What do you think?
Social Inequality: Forms, Causes, and Consequences
This text explores how social inequality in the United States can be explained, how it affects us, and what can be done about it. The book is based on the assumptions that social inequality is multidimensional and that in order to deal with inequality and its consequences we need to understand the theories behind it. Taking a historical and social structural approach, the author simply but compellingly gives a sense of the pervasiveness of social inequality and how it affects us all. For the fifth *An examination of the pros and cons of globalization has been added to the chapter on globalization. *A powerful, in-depth discussion of socioeconomic status of homosexuals and legal discrimination demonstrates how sex, sexual orientation, and gender lead to discrimination in the legal system. *Added coverage of environmental racism reminds students that economic "resources" are not limited to income, but also to land. *The addition of discussion on Herbert Spencer's theories of social inequality complements the discussions of the poor and welfare reform.
430 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1992
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
May 1, 2023
Required for class. Informative and useful for the class. 11th edition was read, not 8th.
December 30, 2012
From around 7 millions years ago, the African Continent had begaun to recede with its forest, the dryness invaded the continent where it began to have a savannah. The savannah gave chance to the hominids along with the other predators and preys to gather onthe plains. There, human was having an ancestral lineage which began to develop a kind of 'Intellect' by trying to devise sometools for hunting in order to survive.
since gatheres-hunters society, there was already inequaity shaped by the stereotyping according to strength. The stronger the hominid, the more effective of its food gathering and his succed in getting a mate.It would have more offsprings then the weaker would. So The whle society would have followed mostly the the stronger's routine then those of the weaker. Thus, society was following the rule of the stronger and stereotyped by the routine of those strongers.
Nowadays, much the same rule is seen in our societies that the rich are the stronger and the poor are the weaker by the stereotyping routine. The weaker will have to be cast out or to be pushed aside by the stronger just as the primitive society did. The modern days routine of the stronger is represented by having monetary power and affluent materialistic enjoyment when the poor is stereotpyed by havng indegent materialistic scource to live on a meagre live.
However, personal modification play much in intervening the routine. Some exceptions prove thatindividual is an idividual that post natal investment in individual hard working will change the fate.
Social background is playing an important opportunity for proving a gap for those weaker to ascend the social position. While the society is affluent in resource and in need of tertiary eduated people, then those who were weaker will have opportunity to ascend to the higher position by the gate of education. Stereotyping is not totally right but a caertain degree of eroeous ingradient to prove that personal dilligence in improving own future is a must to reach the goal.
Stereotyping is a profound language to research on because the involvment in personality dispositions are to be blamed for. Personality dispositions are stratifivation s of genetic linegae according to behaviour characteristics which is very crucial for the outcome of seuccess. Our behaviour is shaped by the hsitorical accumulation of unlimiting expriences of our ancestral lineage through the time ing lineage of the spatial entity where the genetic fuctional entity plays its tricks. It is a very profound function to be elucidated by Mathematical method but on the contrary of Philosophical method, it can be ascribed to Nature. Nature plays the cycling of a kind of cosmological event which is propagating on the temporal-spatial plain where the History is on the stage of being transcended.
since gatheres-hunters society, there was already inequaity shaped by the stereotyping according to strength. The stronger the hominid, the more effective of its food gathering and his succed in getting a mate.It would have more offsprings then the weaker would. So The whle society would have followed mostly the the stronger's routine then those of the weaker. Thus, society was following the rule of the stronger and stereotyped by the routine of those strongers.
Nowadays, much the same rule is seen in our societies that the rich are the stronger and the poor are the weaker by the stereotyping routine. The weaker will have to be cast out or to be pushed aside by the stronger just as the primitive society did. The modern days routine of the stronger is represented by having monetary power and affluent materialistic enjoyment when the poor is stereotpyed by havng indegent materialistic scource to live on a meagre live.
However, personal modification play much in intervening the routine. Some exceptions prove thatindividual is an idividual that post natal investment in individual hard working will change the fate.
Social background is playing an important opportunity for proving a gap for those weaker to ascend the social position. While the society is affluent in resource and in need of tertiary eduated people, then those who were weaker will have opportunity to ascend to the higher position by the gate of education. Stereotyping is not totally right but a caertain degree of eroeous ingradient to prove that personal dilligence in improving own future is a must to reach the goal.
Stereotyping is a profound language to research on because the involvment in personality dispositions are to be blamed for. Personality dispositions are stratifivation s of genetic linegae according to behaviour characteristics which is very crucial for the outcome of seuccess. Our behaviour is shaped by the hsitorical accumulation of unlimiting expriences of our ancestral lineage through the time ing lineage of the spatial entity where the genetic fuctional entity plays its tricks. It is a very profound function to be elucidated by Mathematical method but on the contrary of Philosophical method, it can be ascribed to Nature. Nature plays the cycling of a kind of cosmological event which is propagating on the temporal-spatial plain where the History is on the stage of being transcended.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews