Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “All the Shah's Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror” as Want to Read:
All the Shah's Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

All the Shah's Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror

4.26  ·  Rating details ·  6,740 ratings  ·  737 reviews
An American Coup & the Roots of Middle East Terror
Half a century ago, the United States overthrew a Middle Eastern government for the first time. The victim was Mohammad Mossadegh, the democratically elected prime minister of Iran. Although the coup seemed a success at first, today it serves as a chilling lesson about the dangers of foreign intervention.In this book,
...more
Paperback, 272 pages
Published August 1st 2004 by John Wiley & Sons (Hoboken, NJ) (first published July 11th 2003)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 4.26  · 
Rating details
 ·  6,740 ratings  ·  737 reviews


More filters
 | 
Sort order
Start your review of All the Shah's Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror
Mehrsa
Jul 29, 2008 rated it it was amazing
I just re-read this book in preparation for a book club. This book is the tragic story of a CIA operation that removed one of the only democratically elected leaders in the Middle-East. Mossadegh came into power and angered the British by nationalizing Iranian Oil and the British were determined to oust him from office. After Truman (who opposed a coup) left office and Eisenhower came to office, the Americans also signed on and actually conducted the coup. This story is so tragic (especially if ...more
Ahmad Sharabiani
All the Shah's Men, Stephen Kinzer
All the Shah's Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror is a book written by American journalist Stephen Kinzer. The book discusses the 1953 Iranian coup d'état backed by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in which Mohammed Mossadegh, Iran's prime minister, was overthrown by Islamists supported by American and British agents (chief among them Kermit Roosevelt) and royalists loyal to Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. In 1933 Reza Shah signed a
...more
da AL
Nov 18, 2019 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction
Outstanding -- a must-read for all who want to understand US/Iran relations. Author & audiobook narrator are great.
C.
Eye-opening, sad and infuriating read. Tells how the U.S. destroyed the birth of democracy in the middle east, which began in Iran, and now falsely accuses Iran as a sponsor of Mid-East terrorism, when in truth, it's the Saudis!
Always remember majority of Islamist terrorists are 'Sunni' Muslims, while Iran are Shia Muslims!
Tom LA
Nov 19, 2018 rated it really liked it
Wow, such a great book. I had read Kinzer’s “The brothers” a few years ago, about the Dulles brothers, and found it just as engaging, well-written, and well researched.

Kinzer has a real gift to write history that is deep, accurate and, at the same time, as gripping as a novel.

I’ve often found that many history books that are very engaging lack a certain depth or seriousness. “All the Shah’s men” does not — it’s both a gripping tale, almost a page turner, and a really good history book.

The
...more
Steve Kettmann
May 02, 2010 rated it really liked it
My S.F. Chronicle review from 2003:

Nearly two years after the shock of Sept. 11, 2001, it's fair to start poking through the legacy of U.S. foreign policy and raise troubling questions about the extent to which our own past misdeeds ultimately boomeranged on us. Few readers of "All the Shah's Men," by longtime New York Times foreign correspondent Stephen Kinzer, can come away without grave suspicions that Sept.
11 was in many ways a self-inflicted wound.

What American crime could explain so
...more
Max
Oct 15, 2015 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: world-history
Iran has a long and distinct history. Beginning in the 6th century BC with Cyrus, followed by Xerxes and Darius and on to the present, Iran’s people have had a common identity. The adoption of Shiism in the 7th century AD imparted a common set of values. Since then Arabs, Mongols and Turks ruled Iran. In the 19th century the decadent Qajar rulers exploited Iran to support their opulent lifestyle. In 1925 they were overthrown by a British engineered coup conducted to thwart Russia. The British ...more
Jon Nakapalau
The overthrow of Mohammad Mossadegh is one of the little known events that lead to Mohammad Reza Shah coming to power in Iran. This book looks at the tragic aftermath - and the continuing strife - that was a direct result of this act.
Erik Graff
Aug 05, 2010 rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: Americans
Recommended to Erik by: Einar Graff
Shelves: history
Although over ninety, Dad is unusually active. He is a docent at the Dundee Historical Society and, thanks to the influence of his Danish wife, Lene, takes courses as a non-degree-seeking student at the Roosevelt University campus out in dreary Schaumburg, Illinois. He tends towards history and political science, having said at one time that he enjoys ganging up with the liberal teachers against his mostly right-wing, fellow suburban students. (Dad always was a pinkish Democrat.) This book was ...more
Quo
Apr 13, 2014 rated it it was amazing
Part of what makes All The Shah's Men: An American Coup & the Roots of Middle East Terror so fascinating is Stephen Kinzer's ability to put all of the details into historical context and still formulate his story in a way that causes it to read like a spy novel at times. I initially read this book on the American involvement in Iran when I was awaiting an Iranian visa to visit a country that was officially listed as part of the "Axis of Evil".

While being very curious about the erstwhile
...more
Anuradha
Why should you read All the Shah's Men?
1. Stephen Kinzer is, in my opinion, the greatest journalist of our age.
2. Also, his expertise in the Middle East is almost nonpareil. (Refer to aforementioned point on his journalistic prowess)
3. If you want to learn about why the US really, actually, does not like Iran.
4. If you, like me, think that Iran could've been a world power under Mohammad Mossadegh.
5. If you don't believe the above statement, and need proof.
6. If you want a short, concise history
...more
Ronald Schoedel
Feb 18, 2014 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: audiobooks
An alternate title of this book could be "United States: Strangler of Infant Democracies". It is pretty well known among scholars and international relations experts that anti-American Mideast terrorism has its roots in the US coup that overthrew Iran's first-ever democratically elected prime minister in 1953. This book explains the history of Iran, its governments, its oppression at the hands of colonialists, its exploitation by the British oil industry, and how Britain talked the United States ...more
Jessie
Feb 03, 2009 rated it liked it
I wish more people read books like this. I think it is important for every citizen of the US to understand why people from other countries feel the way they do about us, particulary in the Middle East. I think most Americans are simply unaware of what our government does under the broad and vague umbrella of what is deemed "classified" information. As we are supposed to be a government "of the people" and our government therefore, in effect, represents us and our interests, I think Americans ...more
Manray9
Oct 29, 2013 rated it really liked it
We remain unable to recognize the dangers of unintended consequences. Such dangers should breed caution and a reluctance to engage in foreign adventures. Does each generation have to relearn this?
Maggie
Feb 24, 2013 rated it really liked it
Anyone interested in U.S.-Iran relations or the 1953 Coup d'etat in Iran will find "All the Shah's Men" to be an interesting read. Kinzer's language is quite simple, and I can see how this might frustrate more intellectual readers. However, for a student or young person interested in learning more about the history of the coup, Kinzer's simple language is an asset; his book is probably the easiest way to quickly learn about the coup.

The reader should bear in mind that even sixty years after
...more
Negin
Sep 29, 2015 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: persia-iran
The book is fabulously researched, thought-provoking, and Kinzer really knows his stuff. It also helps that the writing style flows. This is a truly powerful read.
Stephen
On one dismal night in 1953, a conspiracy destroyed both Iranian democracy and American honor. At the dawn of the 1950s, Iran was struggling to free itself from British domination, a precursor to the bloody colonial revolutions that would mark the mid-20th century. Despite being a product of colonial rebellion itself, the United States would betray its own history and one of amiable relations with Iran to assert itself on the world stage. All the Shah's Men is an admirably executed mix of ...more
Juliana Philippa
A must-read for anyone who wants to be able to put current events into perspective (4.5 stars)

All the Shah's Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror was a terrific book - a detailed and well-balanced historical non-fiction that at times reads like a spy thriller and throughout made me unbelievably angry and sad. Stephen Kinzer does a wonderful job of taking you behind the scenes of Mossadegh's overthrow and includes information from all the key players. He provides an
...more
Regina Lindsey
Nov 21, 2013 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: favorites
All the Shah's Men by Stephen Kinzer
5 Stars and a heart

In 1979, Iranian students stormed the American Embassy and held fifty-two Americans hostage for 444 days. Americans were shocked because, in their minds, the U.S. and Iranians still held the mutual affinity shared pre-1953. Prior to 1953, “Americans were regarded with nearly universal admiration and affection.” Iranians saw Americans as allies, supporters of their fragile democracy, and remembered martyrs such as Howard Baskerville, the “
...more
Thomas
Exhaustive account of the 1953 coup that deposed nationalist Iranian Mohammad Mosaddeq, who was anti-British but mildly pro-American, in order to install the oppressive regime more directly controlled by Shah Reza Mohammed Pahlavi, whom this book portrays as about the most gutless dictator ever born. A direct path is drawn between the pro-American attitude of the Iranian people, and Mosaddeq in particular, before the British were expelled for what Mosaddeq called "meddling" in Iranian politics ...more
Jack D. Riner
Feb 03, 2009 rated it liked it
**Spoiler Alert**

This is going to shock a lot of people. Several years ago there was a Republican administration that completely failed to understand a foreign nation and its people. However, they didn't let such a small detail stop them from inducing a regime change favorable to Western big business interests at that moment.

While the need for immediate gratification was fulfilled, the Eisenhower Administration stole Iran’s future away from its people and planted the seeds of Islamic
...more
Michael Kukubird
Dec 26, 2012 rated it it was ok
Although the subject of the book is interesting I have issues with Kinzer's prose. Maybe I took the book too seriously. ATSM reads like a historical novel instead of a factual and objective historical account of events leading up to the 1953 American backed coup.

The language used by Kinzer is highly emotional and subjective. The arguments put forth are too simplistic and almost everything is painted in black and white. The British are all evil to the core while all Iranians are noble and long
...more
Pamela
Dec 28, 2008 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
In 1953, the CIA, aided by the British, engineered a coup to overthrow the secular, democratically elected government of Mohammed Mossadegh in Iran, as Mossadegh had committed the "crime" of nationalizing the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (now British Petroleum). Before then, Americans had been regarded favorably in Iran and much of the Middle East, and veteran journalist Kinzer makes a strong case that this coup led directly to the hatred and distrust of the U.S. in this part of the world, various ...more
Jerome
May 22, 2012 rated it really liked it
Kinzer's work is great for a lot of reasons, and the book manages to perform a few tasks very well. First, it presents the events of Summer/Fall 1953 in Iran many times through the words, written and spoken, of those involved. Second, it provides the context of the 1953 coup by explaining Britain's and America's relationships to Iran over the course of the early 20th century, as well as providing a brief overview of all Iranian history to understand the Iranians' desires in the 20th century. ...more
Neil
Nov 28, 2009 rated it really liked it
I think it's a shame that most Americans remain ignorant of the role our government played in overthrowing Iran's moderate, liberal and secular government in the 1950s, led by Mohammed Mossadegh. This book does its part to fill that gap. However, contrary to many others who reviewed this book on Goodreads, I didn't come away with a conclusion in my mind that the United States perpetrated a manifest injustice on the people of Iran. This was not an indictment of US foreign policy, as some others ...more
J.M. Hushour
Aug 17, 2018 rated it it was amazing
Only a complete jackass would argue that the CIA-engineered overthrow of the popular Iranian prime minister Mossadegh in 1953 had positive benefits for the region, and Iran, especially. Not only did the Dulles brothers and the CIA make sure that the oil kept flowing to the profit of Western interests, but the operation placed the Shah solidly in power, ushering in a new age of repression and violence which culminated in the Iranian revolution in 1979.
None of this is controversial. It hasn't been
...more
Doreen Petersen
Jun 20, 2019 rated it liked it
Shelves: politics
A country the US should never have gotten itself involved in.
Miebara Jato
Jan 22, 2020 rated it really liked it
There's no better time to read All the Shah's Men than now. The relationship between the United States and Iran has gone from bad to worse. The Trump administration has suspended the nuclear agreement and recently assassinated General Qasem Soleimani.

But how did these two countries get to this sourish juncture?

"All the trouble started in1953. In Iran, almost everyone has for decades known that the United States was responsible for putting an end to democratic rule in 1953 and installing what
...more
Christopher
When it comes to understanding the modern Middle East and why it is the way it is, there are a number of dates and events that are key to it, such as the end of World War I and the Sykes-Picot agreement, the beginning of the U.S.-Saudi relationship during World War II, and the creation of modern Israel as a Jewish state. In this wonderful book of history, Mr. Kinzer makes an excellent case for why we should consider the 1953 coup that overthrew the government of Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh ...more
John Kaufmann
Mar 25, 2016 rated it really liked it
Excellent book about the U.S.-sponsored coup overthrowing the democratically elected government of Mohammed Mossadegh in Iran in 1953. It was this coup, of course, which set the stage for the Iranian Revolution in 1979 led by Ayatollah Khomeini and the subsequent conflict between Iran and the Islamic world against the West. How different might the world look today had the British agreed to concession, or had the U.S. not eventually agreed to the plan to overthrow Mossadegh.

The book starts with
...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • The Twilight War: The Secret History of America's Thirty-Year Conflict with Iran
  • Revolutionary Iran: A History of the Islamic Republic
  • From Russia with Blood: The Kremlin's Ruthless Assassination Program and Vladimir Putin's Secret War on the West
  • Bitter Fruit: The Story of the American Coup in Guatemala
  • Empire of the Mind: A History of Iran
  • A History of Modern Iran
  • Black Wave: Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the Forty-Year Rivalry That Unraveled Culture, Religion, and Collective Memory in the Middle East
  • Socialism Sucks: Two Economists Drink Their Way Through the Unfree World
  • Petrostate: Putin, Power, and the New Russia
  • The Fall of the Ottomans: The Great War in the Middle East
  • The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine
  • A Frozen Hell: The Russo-Finnish Winter War of 1939-1940
  • Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq
  • From Beirut to Jerusalem
  • Chain of Command: The Road from 9/11 to Abu Ghraib
  • The Management of Savagery: How America's National Security State Fueled the Rise of Al Qaeda, Isis, and Donald Trump
  • Desperate Deception: British Covert Operations in the United States, 1939-44
  • The Siege of Mecca: The Forgotten Uprising in Islam's Holiest Shrine and the Birth of al-Qaeda
See similar books…
386 followers
Stephen Kinzer is an award-winning foreign correspondent who has covered more than 50 countries on five continents. His articles and books have led the Washington Post to place him "among the best in popular foreign policy storytelling." (source)
“the thirteenth-century mystic Jelaluddin Rumi, reject orthodoxy of any kind: I hold to no religion or creed, am neither Eastern nor Western, Muslim or infidel, Zoroastrian, Christian, Jew or Gentile. I come from neither land nor sea, am not related to those above or below, was not born nearby or far away, do not live either in Paradise or on this Earth, claim descent not from Adam and Eve or the Angels above. I transcend body and soul. My home is beyond place and name. It is with the beloved, in a space beyond space.” 2 likes
“Acheson immediately understood the urgency of this message. He summoned Ambassador Franks and told him that the United States resolutely opposed “the use of force or the threat of the use of force” against Iran, and that Truman himself had “stressed most strongly that no situation should be allowed to develop into an armed conflict between a body of British troops and the Persian forces.” 0 likes
More quotes…