Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.

Start by marking “On Fire: The Case for the Green New Deal” as Want to Read:

Other editions

Enlarge cover

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Open Preview

On Fire: The Case for the Green New Deal

Naomi Klein

4.26 · Rating details · 1,811 ratings · 291 reviews

#1 international and New York Times bestselling author Naomi Klein, author of The Shock Doctrine and This Changes Everything, makes the case for a Green New Dealexplaining how bold climate action can be a blueprint for a just and thriving society.

For more than twenty years, Naomi Klein has been the foremost chronicler of the economic war waged on both people and planetand #1 international and New York Times bestselling author Naomi Klein, author of The Shock Doctrine and This Changes Everything, makes the case for a Green New Deal—explaining how bold climate action can be a blueprint for a just and thriving society.

For more than twenty years, Naomi Klein has been the foremost chronicler of the economic war waged on both people and planet—and an unapologetic champion of a sweeping environmental agenda with justice at its center. In lucid, elegant dispatches from the frontlines of contemporary natural disaster, she pens surging, indispensable essays for a wide public: prescient advisories and dire warnings of what future awaits us if we refuse to act, as well as hopeful glimpses of a far better future. On Fire: The (Burning) Case for a Green New Deal gathers for the first time more than a decade of her impassioned writing, and pairs it with new material on the staggeringly high stakes of our immediate political and economic choices.

These long-form essays show Klein at her most prophetic and philosophical, investigating the climate crisis not only as a profound political challenge but as a spiritual and imaginative one, as well. Delving into topics ranging from the clash between ecological time and our culture of “perpetual now,” to the soaring history of humans changing and evolving rapidly in the face of grave threats, to rising white supremacy and fortressed borders as a form of “climate barbarism,” this is a rousing call to action for a planet on the brink.

With reports spanning from the ghostly Great Barrier Reef, to the annual smoke-choked skies of the Pacific Northwest, to post-hurricane Puerto Rico, to a Vatican attempting an unprecedented “ecological conversion,” Klein makes the case that we will rise to the existential challenge of climate change only if we are willing to transform the systems that produced this crisis.

An expansive, far-ranging exploration that sees the battle for a greener world as indistinguishable from the fight for our lives, On Fire captures the burning urgency of the climate crisis, as well as the fiery energy of a rising political movement demanding a catalytic Green New Deal. ...more

Get A Copy

Audiobook, 288 pages

Published September 17th 2019 by Simon Schuster Audio

More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about On Fire, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about On Fire

Lists with This Book

Inconspicuous Consumption by Tatiana Schlossberg

Imagining the Future of Climate Change by Shelley Streeby

FUTURE EARTH BOOKS

12 books — 1 voter

The Sixth Extinction by Elizabeth Kolbert

The Uninhabitable Earth by David Wallace-Wells

Best Popular Climate Books on Goodreads

102 books — 3 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30

Average rating 4.26 ·

Rating details

· 1,811 ratings · 291 reviews

More filters

Sort order

Start your review of On Fire: The Case for the Green New Deal

Sep 30, 2019 Sci-(Fi) Nerd Mario rated it it was amazing

Shelves: 5-social-criticism, klein-naomi

We can create heaven or hell on earth, change the system or drive it against the wall, go towards a real utopia or a dystopia. With the climate as a cruel tyrant, wiping many of us from the planet.

Klein presents a collection of essays and concrete ideas towards an ecosocial change. As living examples, the Scandinavian states with their Nordic model can be seen as proof of functioning of a fairer society. Because critics like to say that humans arent philanthropic and altruistic and wont work We can create heaven or hell on earth, change the system or drive it against the wall, go towards a real utopia or a dystopia. With the climate as a cruel tyrant, wiping many of us from the planet.

Klein presents a collection of essays and concrete ideas towards an ecosocial change. As living examples, the Scandinavian states with their Nordic model can be seen as proof of functioning of a fairer society. Because critics like to say that humans aren´t philanthropic and altruistic and won´t work together and that there is only one working, economic system. Interestingly Sweden, Norway, Finnland, Iceland and Denmark are highest rated in the Human Development Index. The Swiss and The Netherlands, are, to a certain extent, similar too.

It seems as if the state is highly regulated and the humans live in prosperity, security and peace, they are friendly to each other.
And if the state is unregulated and the full carnivore potential for cruelty is unleashed, they shoot and extort each other. I mean, just look at the prisons and the educational system of the US and those countries. Mass incarceration with people becoming real criminals in prison or real resocialization and amnesty. Stupid frontal education with a lot of dropouts or an education based on the child-friendly standards of Montessori and Waldorf. And so on.
But what do I know, I am no economist.

In astronomy, one can take a look in the future. On planets that went different ways of runaway greenhouse effects. Venus, Mars, etc. Certainly, the whole progresses are still not nearly understood, but the facts are on the table. And even the melting of all ice on the planet won´t be such a big deal in contrast to possible catastrophes. Superstorms, the size of continents, that won´t ever stop, milling the surface and making life impossible in many regions. Probably a skip to global cooling, so that Snowball earth is there again and all freezes to death. We don´t understand the sun, so if it´s activity level suddenly drops, that could get nasty. A supervolcano that strengthens the effects. Combine astronomy with geology and meteorology and one gets many possible outcomes. Not in decades or centuries, but in millenniums, much can happen, started by our today's actions. And we see proofs of it everywhere in the night's sky.

A completely subjective standpoint: Got me, I am biased. I believe in wisdom and education that lead to a technological singularity. Or, in shorter terms, I am a friendly technocrat. Technology will certainly save us and enable space colonization, the solving of many problems, yada yada yada. The critical factor is time and I don´t believe that we will have sufficient possibilities to manipulate weather and climate in adequate quantities if we mess up everything with such a speed. Just imagine the number of machines needed to change global weather systems. If we don´t stop right enough in front of the abyss, the green planet probably won´t change its colour, cause global greening is just one of the possibilities.

But it will have lost its unique habitability and up to 99 percent of all species on it. Just extremophiles, cockroaches and us in underground bunkers, dealing with the problem of avoiding or at least minimizing incest because so few of us survived or were privileged enough to enter the underground facilities. Could also be that even that isn´t the worst problem, but avoiding epidemics and turning towards cannibalism to survive.

A wiki walk can be as refreshing to the mind as a walk through nature in this overrated real-life outside books.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_D...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planeta... ...more

flag 104 likes · Like · see review

Oct 04, 2019 Michael rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: favorites, 2019

Propulsive and inspirational, On Fire: The Burning Case for a Green New Deal lays out a lucid roadmap for building a carbon-free, just society. Across several succinct speeches, think pieces, and long-form articles, Klein makes clear how a swift transition to clean energy has the potential to create a fair economy, right historical injustice, and repair the worn fabric of civil society. The standout intro and epilogue highlight how youth-led organizations like the Sunrise Movement, progressive ...more

flag 48 likes · Like · see review

Sep 23, 2019 Rebecca McNutt rated it it was ok · review of another edition

Shelves: environmental, political, non-fiction

I'll be fair and admit up front that I'm biased. I'm very fiscally conservative and libertarian to some extent, I do not care about climate change at all, and I'm unabashedly a capitalist in terms of which ideology I conform to. It was a given for me that I would disagree with a lot of this book, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that I hated it. Klein is a bit more rational about climate change and not so much of a zealot. She also isn't preachy or holier-than-thou in her writing in the same I'll be fair and admit up front that I'm biased. I'm very fiscally conservative and libertarian to some extent, I do not care about climate change at all, and I'm unabashedly a capitalist in terms of which ideology I conform to. It was a given for me that I would disagree with a lot of this book, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that I hated it. Klein is a bit more rational about climate change and not so much of a zealot. She also isn't preachy or holier-than-thou in her writing in the same manner which Al Gore and Greta Thunberg are. She does make some valid points about military consumption, indigenous rights and economy imbalances. However, I think this book is equally as flawed on just as many levels if not more.

There is a sort of sad irony that somebody who is not a person of colour and who is privileged enough to have a high-paying career, pushing an agenda for what people who fall into these categories should want. I should just break the news now (and as a twenty-one-year-old liberal arts student this is almost sacrilegious, but to hell with it) - These implements are not a magic spell for equality. I grew up very poor, I have very little personal income even now, and no, a Green New Deal is not going to fix that. I grew up in a country which has universal healthcare, a country which has been rated statistically to offer some of the best quality of life in the world, a country with interest-free student loans available to disabled students, with charging stations for electric vehicles - and yes, my parents still abstained from eating for days on end sometimes so that my sister and I could, we still had to live in a former drug den building because it was affordable even though both my parents were working, and there were families much worse off living all around us. No socialist implement is going to fix that, and will not balance out inequality, because racism, immigration and environmentalism are not purely monetary issues, nor are they necessarily intertwined, and this book doesn't really make a good case for why they would be beyond anecdotes and broad correlation which doesn't mean anything solid at this point. There are many sweeping generalizations within On Fire as well when it comes to speaking of demographics of people, and it almost comes across as patronizing. There's a certain sense throughout the book that the author feels that we all owe everybody else something, which realistically, we don't and cannot be held to in any stable or fair sense of the concept.

I do like that On Fire isn't as fearmongering as many other non-fiction books in the emerging "climate change" subgenre of political literature. A certain amount of it is expected, but Klein doesn't just complain incessantly that we aren't doing enough, which I appreciated. I do however think that this book, like many other recent titles, is just beating a dead horse and speaks from higher ground. It is very easy to advocate for a major economic upheaval when you live in stability personally and don't have to worry about how it might affect you for things to be overthrown in such a manner. I also think that the very concept of a "Green New Deal" in and of itself will always be more or less a fantasy, at least in the United States. It sounds like a paradise on paper (as many political schemes often do). Klein understands it from the perspective of somebody on the outside looking in, and again I think she does do a decent job at times to argue her case, but She doesn't understand the bigger picture, nor are her connections of climate change to all the world's socio-economic woes very sound. Blaming climate change and colonialism for all of these things is convenient, and there are indeed points at which it's true (you cannot separate racial inequality from imperialism and colonialism in any sense; they are intertwined on many levels), but to bring climate change into so many socio-economic issues at once? That's just reaching way too hard. It made the book come off as very flaky at times - but hey, what do I know? ...more

flag 46 likes · Like · see review

Jan 04, 2020 Lyn Elliott rated it liked it

Shelves: environment, apocalypse-now

Naomi Kleins book of essays roils with indignation at the consequences of stretching the limits of the environment, as in deep sea oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, and of ignoring the actuality, let alone the implications, of climate change.

If youre not familiar with these issues, this is a lively place to acquaint yourself. If you are, its useful to be reminded of the need for all of us to play as active a role as we can to influence governments and corporations to change their decision Naomi Klein’s book of essays roils with indignation at the consequences of stretching the limits of the environment, as in deep sea oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, and of ignoring the actuality, let alone the implications, of climate change.

If you’re not familiar with these issues, this is a lively place to acquaint yourself. If you are, it’s useful to be reminded of the need for all of us to play as active a role as we can to influence governments and corporations to change their decision making models. And, of course, to do our own tiny bits to think global, act local.

As GR friend Jan-Maat pointed out, the title is horrifyingly accurate as Australia burns in this apocalyptic summer, still with a long way to go. The consequences of these fires are unimaginable. Estimates several days ago were that 4 million hectares (nearly 10 million acres) of forest and farmland had been burned in the state of New South Wales alone. New areas have since gone up in flames, nearly half of the pristine environment of Kangaroo Island is burned. Over 500 million native animals are estimated to have died, and that doesn’t include insects.
With the continued lowering of rainfall, the plant species that have burned can’t necessarily be replaced. What should we plant instead? Goodness knows.

And then there are the thousands of people who have lost their homes and their animals. Communities razed to the ground, holiday makers rescued by the navy from coastal areas where the skies are red and black from fire.
Our capital, Canberra, has the worst air quality amongst world cities at the moment as it is enveloped with smoke from fires on three sides, 60 km and more away,

We live in a beautiful part of the Adelaide Hills that so far has escaped, but we know that we are living in a precarious space.

Our incompetent and slippery government still denies climate change, recently negotiated the carry over of carbon credits so it wouldn’t have to do anything to reduce emissions, let alone impede the extraction and burning of coal.
And we have nothing approaching a water policy.
As inland towns run out of water and rivers run dry, we have huge irrigation franchises for foreign-owned companies to grow cotton in the desert (Cubbie Station is the worst).
A Chinese company has been given approval to mine underground water in Queensland:
https://www.theguardian.com/environme...

A Norwegian oil company is planning to drill for deep sea oil, not in its own waters, but in the remarkable marine environment of the Great Australian Bight.

I could go on, but you get the picture. My own head of indignation is running very high! ...more

flag 16 likes · Like · see review

Sep 17, 2019 Quirkyreader rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

First off, I got this book from the publisher sponsored by LitHub.com.

I have read other books by Klein that were though provoking and moving. I expected no less from this book.

This book is a collection of essays that Klein has written over the years about the Earth heating up and what individuals and groups are doing to turn down the thermostat. It also focuses on groups that dont want to hear about it and want to keep on as business as usual.

I will admit I came to this book with a bit of a ...more

flag 14 likes · Like · see review

Dec 15, 2019 Candie rated it it was amazing

I really enjoy Naomi Klein's books and I would not say that this one is any different. It is a very interesting book on some very important topics of today; such as climate change and it's disastrous effects, systemic racism, capitalism, economic inequality within countries and between countries and the dismal outlook on our future if immediate and drastic changes are not made.

I genuinely think that this is a book for everybody and that at the very least, even if you do not agree with all of ...more

flag 15 likes · Like · see review

Feb 16, 2020 Kevin rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: 1-how-the-world-works, econ-environment

Beyond No! protests: building a future.

The Good:
--Accessibility: unlike academic social science hieroglyphs, I take the time to read Kleins works to experience how she engages with the wider public.
--This book is a collection of her articles/lectures on one of the great ideas in the age of runaway capitalist climate destruction. Highlights:

1) Beyond denial: the greater threats of hopelessness and climate barbarism.
--US fossil fuel companies have been planning for climate change for over 40 ...more

flag 11 likes · Like · see review

Sep 24, 2019 Malcolm rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: activism

One of the many things that has intrigued me about the long run emergence of the climate emergency we now live in has been the shifting language we use to describe it. Leave aside the outright deniers, although in recent years many of them have shifted from denial of global warming to denial of it human causes; the rest of us have gone from talking of a build-up of greenhouse gasses (this is after the hydrofluorocarbon focus of the 1970s, and the hole in the ozone layer) to global warming to One of the many things that has intrigued me about the long run emergence of the climate emergency we now live in has been the shifting language we use to describe it. Leave aside the outright deniers, although in recent years many of them have shifted from denial of global warming to denial of it human causes; the rest of us have gone from talking of a build-up of greenhouse gasses (this is after the hydrofluorocarbon focus of the 1970s, and the hole in the ozone layer) to global warming to climate change. We’ve shifted from a technical description (complete with potent, comprehensible, metaphor) to (scary) literal description to (less scary) vaguely generic label, almost as if we’ve sought to downplay the extent of the crisis. Yet the message I seem to have taken from this ever shifting language is one of deferral, that we’ve called it something less scary and although the collective efforts of a global environmental movement have brought about less change than necessary the issue seems to have been left in the we’ll get to it soon basket.

Reading this collection of Naomi Klein’s essays from over the last decade reminds me how dangerous that deferral has been but also how language and practice have changed in important ways and that we’ve come a lot further than it might seem, amid the incremental tweaks and failures of state policy. Of the 18 essays, 15 are previously published – some presented here in a largely unchanged form with notes or an epilogue to adjust and update key points – while some of the more recent pieces, from the last two years, have been reworked and in some aspects extended or deepened. There is a long scene-setting introduction, and a shorter final essay making the case for a Green New Deal.

The overall sense is clear; we are in a state of climate emergency. If the advice from scientists is right (and increasingly it looks as if they might have been conservative, at least in respect of melting ice caps and high mountain areas) then we’re edging towards the last decade where meaningful action is possible. We know that tipping points can be abrupt, that we might incrementally move towards a moment of change, and when that moment arrives change is rapid, intense and profound – that’s why it is called a tipping point, but that’s also what makes the Green New Deal inspiring: the state of emergency Klein outlines can only be addressed by comprehensive, coordinated action tailored to local/national/regional policy, social, economic and cultural situations. It is a compelling case. She looks at wild fires and rising sea temperatures, at the Deepwater Horizon disaster and Hurricane Maria’s devastation of Puerto Rico made worse by the economic evisceration of the territory; she explores emerging social movements and unexpected institutional changes to remind us that amid the crisis there is not only a long-standing network of activists an organisations, but that there are also unexpected allies and the dangers of hanging on to the gradualism that has infected policy responses in the last 25 or more years. Throughout it all, there is powerful case for a global response based in the principles of justice, and a reminder that around 250 years of economic development and practice has been based on the extraction of value – of land and labour – from colonised and otherwise occupied parts of the world, many of which are bearing the brunt of climate change….. there I go, euphemising again – global warming!

It is, however, a collection of essays so while there is an overarching argument in support of the Green New Deal the book lacks the coherence of This Changes Everything , as it should – such is the nature of the essay; so this could be considered an appendix to the earlier book, even as it overlaps both in time and issues traversed. As an appendix, it raises the stakes, from the analysis of extractivism to the need for comprehensive action; in that it is a vital extension and intensification of the earlier book, but also stands independently – such is the virtue of the essay form.

There is a lot of hoo-ha about the Green New Deal – those who see it as a plot and those who see it as the solution to all. Both are wrong: it is however, it seems to me, on the basis of Klein’s demystification of much of it here and other readings, a valuable frame to work within – and as I hear the deniers (who we now call sceptics, which gives then undeserved credibility) deny, I am reminded of that cartoon that used to do the rounds suggesting that even if the science is wrong, we’ve finished up making the world a better place – but then I’ve been convinced since the late 1970s that the science is right, so I would say that….

On Fire is engaging, accessible and a compelling foray into the basic question of our times and timely reminder of the state we’re in. What’s more, despite the sense of crisis, it’s an inspiring read. ...more

flag 9 likes · Like · see review

Sep 14, 2019 Randall Wallace rated it liked it · review of another edition

As both parties happily drift to the right, we should not be surprised that the number of Americans who believe climate change is real has plummeted from 71% in 2007 to 51% in 2009, and 44% in 2011. If the trend continues, the Simpsons character Cletus will become the fount of all wisdom while Americans report to work in Snuggies. Republicans are opposed to recognizing the climate crisis simply because they know its solution would mean wealth distribution, resource sharing and reparations. As As both parties happily drift to the right, we should not be surprised that the number of Americans who believe climate change is real has plummeted from 71% in 2007 to 51% in 2009, and 44% in 2011. If the trend continues, the Simpson’s character Cletus will become the fount of all wisdom while Americans report to work in Snuggies. Republicans are opposed to recognizing the climate crisis simply because they know its solution would mean wealth distribution, resource sharing and reparations. As Naomi says, “climate change detonates the ideological scaffolding on which contemporary conservatism rests.” It’s hard to keep vilifying collective action when it’s the only workable solution.

As Greta Thunberg said, “We have to stop competing with each other. We need to start cooperating and sharing the remaining resources of this planet in a fair way.” One of the advantages of autism, Greta Thunberg says, is that you are less apt to repeat the social behaviors of your peers which helps to forge a unique path. This allows you to focus with great intensity, removes the need for deception and lying, while seeing things more in black and white. As a result, Greta’s public comments are often, “short, unadorned and scathing”. Naomi shows how FDR’s New Deal showed us how the Green New Deal could easily help the people, infrastructure, economy, common spaces, air and water. The IPCC report shows that every half degree of warming involves the death of hundreds of millions of people. The Union of Concerned Scientists has shown us that, “the U.S. Military is the largest institutional consumer of oil in the world.” The current immigration logic is to treat immigrants with such “callousness and cruelty” that no one would want to enter the country unless they looked like Melania. The Great Depression only caused a 10% reduction in CO2 for a few years. A recent discovery is that the genocide of indigenous Americans factored into the Little Ice Age of the 1500 to 1600’s which was caused by so much land being removed from production (which led to more sequestering of carbon). The great Auks were killed off to keep the pillows and mattresses in Europe stuffed.

In the United States, we are taught to hate “the other” – we hate migrants (comically forgetting most of us are technically migrants – Jared Diamond said the American people move, on average, once every five years), we hate Muslims (because they gave us the concept of bathing and washing), hate Blacks (because for centuries we’ve owed them reparations) and hate women (to better pretend we rank higher or we’re the Lord of the trailer). In the end Naomi sees the solution is Kimberle Crenshaw’s Intersectionality, where all paths converge with low-carbon policies. Changing our lifestyle and maybe our neighborhood must go hand in hand with demanding structural changes in insure a future. And mass uprisings of the people are the way to create the necessary “friction” to slow the capitalist machine. What we need is “an intersectional approach to social and political change.” For Naomi, Socialism has made many mistakes with the environment which is why the answer is Eco-Socialism. ...more

flag 8 likes · Like · see review

Sep 29, 2019 Erik rated it liked it

If you haven't read much else by Klein, this is a good intro to her take on the climate movement. But since I had just read her earlier book on the movement, "This Changes Everything," I found the new book less interesting. "On Fire" reprints two chapters from the earlier book, perhaps with some minor changes, though if so, not immediately apparent ones. Other essays are speeches given in various countries including Britain and Australia with less appeal outside of those particular nations.

What If you haven't read much else by Klein, this is a good intro to her take on the climate movement. But since I had just read her earlier book on the movement, "This Changes Everything," I found the new book less interesting. "On Fire" reprints two chapters from the earlier book, perhaps with some minor changes, though if so, not immediately apparent ones. Other essays are speeches given in various countries including Britain and Australia with less appeal outside of those particular nations.

What I did like was her take on the Green New Deal at the very end. She makes a good case for why a serious effort to fight climate change is needed and why it needs to include everyone in society, from the government on down. However, I'm still not convinced that we require "democratic" socialism to fight climate change and that conservatives need to be excluded from solutions. No major policy changes will be long lasting if the left just shoves them down the throat of everyone else. It's too easy for the opposing party to reverse them in the future.

Finally, it's helpful that she refers back to the history of FDR's original New Deal. But she doesn't seem to see much role for national feeling or patriotism, which was a huge selling point of Roosevelt's approach. Instead, Klein seems to imagine a series of GNDs that happen in various countries but are driven by cosmopolitan elites and the "woke" masses, much like an international socialist revolution. This is idealistic but I'm not sure how realistic it is, given that successful movements in the past combined an international outlook with one that was also national.

I'd love to see Klein find a place in the climate movement for people who love their country as much as they care about the world and also for people who are inspired by the past accomplishments and philosophies of our own Western countries as much as they are by the traditions of the indigenous peoples that Klein so admires.

But this book is worth reading alone for Klein's skillful critique of the doomerism of Nathaniel Rich's book "Losing Earth." Rich wrongly asserts that the late 1980s were the best time to fight climate change, ignoring the ascendance of extreme capitalism and a culture of greed-is-good driven by globalization and deregulation whose beau ideal was Ayn Rand. Rich claims that "we" (meaning you and me, not Exxon and the US govt) missed this once-in-a-lifetime chance to save the climate in 1988-89 because we were too selfish or shortsighted to make major changes in our consumer lives. He's wrong and Klein places the blame where it belongs, with oil companies and the governments they control, and offers hope that ordinary people can and will mobilize for an economy that's both clean and fair. ...more

flag 7 likes · Like · see review

Sep 13, 2019 David Jordan rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

It's exciting to have the opportunity to read a book that feels so important. Our rapidly advancing climate crisis has advanced beyond the worrisome stage and we are faced with the possibility of catastrophic disaster if we continue on the destructive path that has brought us to this place. Naomi Klein shares her considerable expertise and formidable knowledge concerning climate change, environmental disaster, and the intersectionality of economic inequality, systemic racism, the dangerous ...more

flag 7 likes · Like · see review

Sep 02, 2019 Carolina Ibanez rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Even if you dont agree with her view or solutions, its a must read for this time. ...more

flag 7 likes · Like · see review

Sep 28, 2019 Peter (Pete) Mcloughlin rated it it was amazing

Shelves: nukes-and-the-end-the-world, politics, philosophy, nature, psychology, general-science, general-history, economics, biology, complexity

Naomi Klein makes an appeal that the climate crisis is making the old quip about the choice between Socialism or Barbarism pressing reality. To save ourselves in her view we have to make serious structural changes to not only our energy infrastructure but to Capitalism itself. Whether what you see on the other end looks socialist or social-democracy on the one hand or fascism on the other depends on our politics in the coming years and our willingness to challenge entrenched power. Neoliberal ...more

flag 7 likes · Like · see review

Oct 06, 2019 Mirek Jasinski rated it it was amazing

A must-read on a very difficult subject - climate change!

flag 6 likes · Like · see review

Sep 25, 2019 Lara rated it liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: non-fiction

This book is both a huge success and a massive failure; it depends on who you were before you opened the book. It won't change your mind. The arguments in here are not going to convince anyone who doesn't want to believe. In fact, I would venture to say very little of this book can serve as an argument. Instead, this book should be seen as a way to galvanize those already invested in this idea.

The actual book is a collection of writings: some essays, some articles, some random musings near as I ...more

flag 5 likes · Like · see review

Feb 11, 2019 Bettie marked it as wish-list

Recommends it for: everyone

@AllenLaneBooks will publish @NaomiAKlein's On Fire: The (Burning) Case for a Green New Deal: http://bit.ly/2SIp1TR

flag 5 likes · Like · see review

Sep 26, 2019 Steffi rated it really liked it

Shelves: 2019

Naomi Kleins latest book On Fire. The Burning Case for a Green New Deal (2019) is a very timely collection of essays written between 2009 to 2019 - in many ways a lost decade but one of a profound shift between the 2009 UN climate summit where Bolivian climate negotiator Angelica Navarro Llanos called for a Marshall Plan for the Earth to AOC and the squad introducing the Green New Deal to Congress in 2019 and the UK Labour Party adopting the GND at their 2019 party conference earlier this week.
Naomi Klein’s latest book ‘On Fire. The Burning Case for a Green New Deal’ (2019) is a very timely collection of essays written between 2009 to 2019 - in many ways a lost decade but one of a profound shift between the 2009 UN climate summit where Bolivian climate negotiator Angelica Navarro Llanos called for a ‘Marshall Plan for the Earth’ to AOC and ‘the squad’ introducing the Green New Deal to Congress in 2019 and the UK Labour Party adopting the GND at their 2019 party conference earlier this week.

It’s also the decade since the global financial crisis which in many ways ended liberal democracy as we knew it. Obama was symptomatic for the West’s initial response to both financial and climate crises - his advisors included both former Wallstreet and BP Executives - more of the same market based, neoliberal ‘solutions’ zero structural change. It was a total capitulation of politics before the markets and corporate interests, the triumph of technocracy which here and there emboldened the far right. The centre left’s capitulation in this lost decade also brought about social movements addressing various dimensions of exploitation and discrimination, Occupy Wallstreet, Blacklives Matter, Fight for 15, Standing Rock, #metoo, medicare4all - many find an expression in the political movement which came out of the 2016 Bernie campaign and finally brought together these siloed struggles in the Green New Deal on which both Bernie and Warren will run in 2020.

At the same time, the 2018 special IPCC report on keeping warming below 1.5C made clear that business as usual is not an option and triggered the global Fridays for Future movement and brought the the Green New Deal into the political mainstream.

The essays capture some of these developments that took place in the last decade and which led us to the current cross-roads: A world ruled by Trump and Johnson or Bernie and Corbyn - both worlds are currently within reach, equally scary and exciting.

We’ve lost a decade to the moderates who changed nothing and convinced the electorate that democracy is rigged against them, ironically culminating in the elites in the form of Boris Johnson leading a campaign of ‘the people versus parliament’. Should Congress impeach Trump, the same will happen in the US.

The next decade will be a defining period and I hope that when I buy Naomi Klein’s book in 2030 (which I will) which looks back at the ‘20s, it will be a story of collective action of change rather than empty rethoric. ...more

flag 4 likes · Like · see review

Jan 29, 2020 Ryan rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: eco

I liked Naomi Klein's On Fire: The Burning Case for a Green New Deal, a book which collects Klein's essays on climate change from the 2010s, and here are some reasons to read it.

First, it can be read as a sort of representative history of how climate activists thought and reacted during this past decade. I often feel a need for a history of green thought but have not yet stumbled upon one.

Second, these essays show that by the end of the decade a group was organizing around the thought of Klein, I liked Naomi Klein's On Fire: The Burning Case for a Green New Deal, a book which collects Klein's essays on climate change from the 2010s, and here are some reasons to read it.

First, it can be read as a sort of representative history of how climate activists thought and reacted during this past decade. I often feel a need for a history of green thought but have not yet stumbled upon one.

Second, these essays show that by the end of the decade a group was organizing around the thought of Klein, McKibben, Monbiot, Hansen, Raworth, Ocasio-Cortez, and Thunberg. I mention this group not as a comprehensive list, nor to dismiss the shoulders of their predecessors, so much as because these folks are synthesizing and referencing each other's works (maybe not Hansen). What is this group thinking? I wonder if Klein might see within the group intersectionality. Because intersectionality encourages people to see how effects compound and speak to one another, the climate crisis becomes tied up in economic systems, class conflict, structures of racism and sexism, the imbalance between the North and the South--and more. Raworth represents many of these ideas in her doughnut and Ocasio-Cortez also envisions the Green New Deal as a way to mitigate these conflicts.

Third, I like that Klein's analysis, because it is proud and uncompromising, shows the diversity of greens. This group is not well divided into prophets and wizards, as one might take from Mann. Nor is it romantics and eco-modernists, as Brand and Pinker suggest. There are all sorts of people under this tent, a phrase I take from David Roberts.

Fourth, I do admire how proud and uncompromising Klein's analysis is. It's not uncommon to see conservatives argue that the Green New Deal is a sort of "trojan horse" for left policies. Klein does not stutter but rather argues that these intersectional policies are indeed the best way to build a healthy and prosperous society in response to the climate crisis. She further argues that the climate crisis reveals how bankrupt, useless, and ultimately harmful neoliberalism's individualistic policies can be. She refuses to accept that humans are failing to respond to climate change and instead argues that capitalism is failing to respond to it. So often, greens try to compromise, soft sell their aspirations, or they worry over how to most enticingly convince deniers to accept climate science. I admit that I sometimes find this obsequiousness exhausting, though of course I do it all the time, and I was so happy to see someone with the courage to just forge ahead.

Fifth, I particularly liked the section of the introduction that analyzes what Klein calls "climate barbarism." Basically, I interpret this idea as the haves bunkering down behind their walls and their hoarded wealth, which they will use to adapt to rising seas, changing weather patterns, and heat waves--damn the have-nots. In this moment, one might do well to think of all those "climate change might be bad, but maybe not for us" arguments that get thrown around.

Sixth, there are many useful concepts in the book. Klein often refers to the dominant ecological mindset of the West as "extractivist." This model is built on some infinite concepts--an infinite frontier and an endless "away" into which we can sweep our pollution. The climate crisis is disorienting because it is increasingly difficult to believe in limitless resources and the endless away.

Finally, while Klein's earlier work, This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate, may seem better to me, it's also much longer. There are articles here that are powerful but also short, which makes them an effective entry into Klein's reasoning. Most of them can easily be found online, but I particularly recommend "Capitalism vs. the Climate," "Geoengineering: Testing the Waters," "Stop Trying to Save the World All By Yourself," "Let Them Drown," and "Capitalism Killed Our Climate Momentum, Not 'Human Nature.'" Agree or disagree, these essays are thoughtful, clear, and worth considering.

If I had to criticize The Burning Case for a Green New Deal, I'd note that there is no bibliography, though that's typical of collected works, and I found the most recent stuff the least powerful--though I wonder if I'll appreciate it more in a couple years. Ultimately, Klein is a thoughtful and talented writer. ...more

flag 3 likes · Like · see review

Oct 29, 2019 Sotiris Karaiskos rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: politics, modern-issues

There are many books that refer to the ugly way in which the world works and causes many problems for much of humanity, but Naomi Klein's books always stand out for one reason: they are not simply whining but suggest some solutions. In this she goes on to argue in favor of the idea that imposing of specific drastic solutions to climate change can bring about major changes in the way the world economy operates, thereby creating a fairer world. Drawing inspiration from the drastic political There are many books that refer to the ugly way in which the world works and causes many problems for much of humanity, but Naomi Klein's books always stand out for one reason: they are not simply whining but suggest some solutions. In this she goes on to argue in favor of the idea that imposing of specific drastic solutions to climate change can bring about major changes in the way the world economy operates, thereby creating a fairer world. Drawing inspiration from the drastic political changes Franklin Roosevelt has brought to bear to face of the great financial crisis, she proposes a corresponding New Deal where huge investments in renewables and the social state will create millions of new jobs, especially for the vulnerable groups of the population, and in parallel with the salvation of the planet, the salvation of mankind from very big social problems will come also.

The author, in a simple and comprehensible way, then arguing on the basis of the facts available, then invoking the emotion, warns of the great danger that threatens humanity, sounding the alarm and warning that the time we have to act is ending without, however, never leaving room for despair, making a call to arms for all of us to react and force governments around the world to do something at once, putting aside their hesitations, stopping to succumb to the pressures of the economically powerful who profit from the ongoing catastrophe of the planet. A necessary read nowadays as the wave of mobilization against climate change is growing.

Υπάρχουν πολλά βιβλία που αναφέρονται στον άσχημο τρόπο που λειτουργεί ο κόσμος και δημιουργεί πολλά προβλήματα σε μεγάλο μέρος της ανθρωπότητας, τα βιβλία της Ναόμι Κλάιν, όμως, πάντα ξεχωρίζουν για έναν λόγο: δεν περιλαμβάνουν απλά γκρίνια αλλά προτείνουν κάποιες λύσεις. Σε αυτό συνεχίζει την επιχειρηματολογία της υπέρ της ιδέας ότι η επιβολή συγκεκριμένων δραστικών λύσεων για την αντιμετώπιση της κλιματικής αλλαγής μπορεί να φέρει μεγάλες αλλαγές στον τρόπο που λειτουργεί η παγκόσμια οικονομία, δημιουργώντας έτσι έναν πιο δίκαιο κόσμο. Αντλώντας έμπνευση από τις δραστικές πολιτικές αλλαγές που έφερε ο Φράνκλιν Ρούσβελτ στην προσπάθειά του να αντιμετωπίσει τη μεγάλη οικονομική κρίση, προτείνει ένα αντίστοιχο New Deal όπου πολύ μεγάλες επενδύσεις στο χώρο των ανανεώσιμων πηγών ενέργειας και στο κοινωνικό κράτος θα δημιουργήσουν εκατομμύρια νέες θέσεις εργασίας, ειδικά για ευάλωτες ομάδες πληθυσμού, με αποτέλεσμα παράλληλα με τη σωτηρία του πλανήτη να έρθει και η σωτηρία της ανθρωπότητας από πολύ μεγάλα κοινωνικά προβλήματα.

Η συγγραφέας με απλό και κατανοητό τρόπο, πότε επιχειρηματολογώντας με βάση τα διαθέσιμα στοιχεία, πότε κάνοντας επίκληση στο συναίσθημα, προειδοποιεί για το μεγάλο κίνδυνο που απειλεί την ανθρωπότητα, κρούοντας τον κώδωνα του κινδύνου και προειδοποιώντας ότι ο χρόνος που έχουμε για να δράσουμε τελειώνει, όμως, ποτέ να αφήνει χώρο για την απελπισία, κάνοντας ένα κάλεσμα στα όπλα προς όλους μας για να αντιδράσουμε και να αναγκάσουμε τις κυβερνήσεις όλου του κόσμου να κάνουν κάτι άμεσα αφήνοντας στην άκρη τους δισταγμούς, σταματώντας να υποκύπτουν στις πιέσεις των οικονομικά ισχυρών που έχουν κέρδος από τη συνεχιζόμενη καταστροφή του πλανήτη. Ένα απαραίτητο ανάγνωσμα στις μέρες μας που το κύμα της κινητοποίησης ενάντια στην κλιματική αλλαγή γίνεται ολοένα και μεγαλύτερο. ...more

flag 3 likes · Like · see review

Nov 04, 2019 David rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

We have 11 years. That's according to Naomi Klein (although she humbly adds she is merely one of many voices in her field who have been drawing similar conclusions).

Nevertheless, we only have 11 years. That's not anything resembling idle speculation. Its not just talk; it's a rather exact measurement. And it's not negotiable. We have 11 years to get the Green New Deal in motion.

Or we're fucked. And... should The Thing in the WH get re-elected... well, in Naomi's words: "Game over."

She knows We have 11 years. That's according to Naomi Klein (although she humbly adds she is merely one of many voices in her field who have been drawing similar conclusions).

Nevertheless, we only have 11 years. That's not anything resembling idle speculation. Its not just talk; it's a rather exact measurement. And it's not negotiable. We have 11 years to get the Green New Deal in motion.

Or we're fucked. And... should The Thing in the WH get re-elected... well, in Naomi's words: "Game over."

She knows this stuff inside and out. I knew - not nearly enough - about it, so I read this brilliant, accessible, concise and compassionate book. Naomi knows her shit. Let me let her express it a little in her own words:

"Climate change is a collective problem demanding collective action on a scale that humanity has never actually accomplished. Yet it entered mainstream consciousness in the midst of an ideological war being waged on the very idea of the collective sphere."

Right. In other words... some 'force' does not want us all to come together for this purpose. That 'force' is the elite - the wealthy and the corporate - who are quite happy seeing all of the 'minions' scrambling around without a unified deal. Naomi explains later in more detail:

"Climate change acts as an accelerant to many of our social ills (inequality, wars, racism, sexual violence), but it can also be an accelerant for the opposite, for the forces working for economic and social justice and against militarism. Indeed, the climate crisis, by presenting our species with an existential threat and putting us on a firm and unyielding science-based deadline, might just be the catalyst we need to knit together a great many powerful movements bound together by a belief in the inherent worth and value of all people and united by a rejection of the sacrifice zone mentality, whether it applies to peoples or to places."

And for what result?

"In tacking the climate crisis, we can create hundreds of millions of good jobs around the world, invest in the most systematically excluded communities and nations, guarantee health and child care, and much more. The result of these transformations would be economies built both to protect and to regenerate the planet's life support systems and to respect and sustain the people who depend on them."

~the kind of result one would expect from a plan taking its inspiration from FDR's New Deal of 1933-36. Klein believes that, if it worked then - and it did - it can work again... if it's put in motion soon. ~which is why that *must* happen. Solidarity in this must be our priority. If we are to survive.

Remember when you thought 'The Twilight Zone' was just a tv show, and things like that couldn't really happen? Think again.

Surprisingly, Klein remains rather relentlessly upbeat in her writing. My guess re: that is that she chooses to believe in the best in people... that, when necessary, people will overcome the odds to achieve greatness in stability.

I don't want to just hope that's the case. I want to see that day begin. Don't you? ...more

flag 3 likes · Like · see review

Feb 01, 2020 Kelly rated it it was amazing

This book is comprised of a lengthy forward and essays/speeches Naomi Klein had given throughout the 2010s, often in response to climate disasters. She's added her 2019 reflections at the end of each essay to contextualize any changes to events in that location, policy, or her own thinking.

Initially, I was a bit taken aback because I thought the book was all original work... but then I found the book structure was brilliant. It's vital to keep a clear history of environmental justice movements ...more

flag 3 likes · Like · see review

Sep 21, 2019 Alja rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

The book equipped me with a broader perspective on climate change that also includes social justice. While it was depressing to read the author's almost-decade old essays and to know that no significant action has been taken since then, the book ends on a more optimistic note with a call to action which does not include buying more green products but instead supporting decisive and sweeping changes that offer a better future both for our planet and its people. ...more

flag 3 likes · Like · see review

Sep 08, 2019 Jayne Gerdeman Homsher rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

I just finished this incredible thought provoking book about climate change and making our life into smart green approaches. We all need to read this book and think about what is occurring around us and our planet. It is time to make change for real and start at your own home, encourage your family and friends and take time to get involved in your local community to discuss green energy, green way of life and the elimination of problems that are contributing to ruining our world of what makes ...more

flag 3 likes · Like · see review

Feb 11, 2020 Scott Trinkle rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: 2020

Climate change is terrifying and paralyzing, the most natural response is to give up. The climate justice movement / the Green New Deal / Klein's work here are totally essential for presenting an alternate picture where confronting climate change is more than just an attempt to stave off disaster, but a unique opportunity for building a better, more just world.

So: this is fantastic, and you should read it. Klein's writing is powerful and moving, as well as detailed and harrowing. Didn't realize ...more

flag 3 likes · Like · see review

Oct 21, 2019 mo rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: non-fiction, favorites, library-loaned, essays, politics, read-2019

This book joins the ranks of Klein's previous ones as a non-fiction work that is both accessible and urgently needed.

The book does not seek to convince climate change deniers that they are wrong, as that would be a waste of one of our most precious yet scarce resources in the fight to keep Earth from becoming incompatible with life: time. Rather, it implores those who already care or are on the fence that collective action - a truly broad-based movement incorporating an array of solutions to ...more

flag 3 likes · Like · see review

Sep 22, 2019 Leif rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Naomi Klein will help you remember that climate change and environmental catastrophe are connected to the rapacious destruction of standards of human life and dignity, along with the massive redistribution of wealth from the poor to the wealthy.

On Fire collects Klein's essays from the last ten years or so, from her initial writings on the BP oil devastation across the disappearing shores of Louisiana (and beyond) to her more recent project with the Leap Manifesto and championship of the Green ...more

flag 3 likes · Like · see review

Sep 22, 2019 Brian Mikołajczyk rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: politics, rb_media, sociology, economics, climate-change

Naomi Klein argues that intersectionally-sound policies are necessary in order to fight climate change. While more CO2 is released into the atmosphere, the nations that are going to suffer first are developing nations who weren't part of the problem. Klein also argues that our current capitalistic model is not going to solve the problem of climate change. Radical reform is needed.
An excellent read!

flag 3 likes · Like · see review

Nov 07, 2019 Murilo rated it liked it · review of another edition

On Fire is very worthy for its critiques to environmental dangers, oil industry cynicism, globalization, financialization of the market, neoliberalism, capitalism and almost everything else. But man... the solutions are just disastrous. I understand and agree for the most part with all those critiques, but the solution is NOT revolution.

Conservatism, as originally described by Burke at the context of the French Revolution, teaches us that if we must preserve institutions and other things that On Fire is very worthy for its critiques to environmental dangers, oil industry cynicism, globalization, financialization of the market, neoliberalism, capitalism and almost everything else. But man... the solutions are just disastrous. I understand and agree for the most part with all those critiques, but the solution is NOT revolution.

Conservatism, as originally described by Burke at the context of the French Revolution, teaches us that if we must preserve institutions and other things that have worked so far and carefully change it. Do you know why we need to be careful? Because all the revolutions that envisaged a communist outcome ended up leading to hundreds of thousands (if not tens of millions) killed plus several social problems (like inequality, famine, poor living conditions, prohibition of migration, censorship...). I’m talking about China, Soviet Union, Cuba, North Korea, Cambodia, North Vietnam, Albania... the list is long.

I know Naomi reprimands those regimes and does not want that. But she criticizes capitalism and urges for an urgent and sudden upending of this economic regime that is just too risky. Capitalism has all those problems I’ve agreed to, but the solution is reform, not revolution. So a socialist-oriented reform may ultimately lead to the same thing those cited regimes created (generalized misery, poverty and deaths). If not, look at how countries that recklessly created welfare states without capitalist economic reasoning: Brazil during Lula and Dilma’s governments created our worst crisis ever (even worse than 1929 in terms of GDP slumping), Chavez and Maduro’s Venezuela created one of the worst humanitarian crisis of the present. I agree that free market classic liberalism is awful as well, we can look at Chile’s capitalization pension reform results and United States’ inequality and wage stagnation. But, finally, look at countries/regions like Hong Kong, Singapore, New Zealand, Switzerland, Australia, Taiwan and Canada. They all are among the most free economies of the world, and at the same time they have a strong and present State that acts in favor of its population (although they all have issues that could be addressed as well).

What I’m trying to say is that an abrupt eco-socialism (as Naomi defends) will undermine most of the wealth creation, growth and prosperity that have failed in socialism and super neoliberal economies likewise, but that are prospering in free economies with a strong State. So, instead of pretending they have all the answers and try something revolutionary, why not go that moderate path with such a good outlook?

Naomi DARES to mention that several other non-capitalist (and non-socialist) societies of the past had very friendly relations to the mother nature. HOWEVER, she forgets to mention that before capitalism and the modern State arrived, people lived in constant war, poverty, inequality, slavery, tribalism, imperialism, tons of diseases, low life expectancy, high infant mortality rate, lack of hygiene, lack of sanitation, lack of medicine, lack of technology, lack of life-improving tools and goods. Do you know what brought an end to that most rapidly in the history? Capitalism: incentives, productivity, competition, and wealth growth.

If you want to know how State and government can work efficiently and productively while addressing several social issues? Read Bill Clinton’s Back to Work . If you want to not only reform, but transform capitalism but keeping growth, efficiency and productivity while having a socialist approach in terms of inequality? Read the excellent book by Roberto Mangabeira Unger called The Knowledge Economy .

Now that I have discussed the social problems of capitalism, I must say that it has to be a discussion APART from environment issues.

Even Naomi says that most socialist States failed to cooperate with the environment (look at China’s rate of pollution today, and Soviet Union’s destruction of the Aral Sea, which was one of the greatest nature destructions of all times).

So, if we forget about that revolutionary socialist crap of the Green New Deal and communism as well, we can discuss it through a capitalistic point of view (which she says it’s too moderate and will lead to a drastic outcome). She may be right, and we need to speed it up urgently, but solving the environment issues today while bringing us to a likely caveman era, which is what happens when we disrupt a system so suddenly and forcefully? That’s insane! Let’s do it quick, but through gradual reforms. At least a handful of countries in Europe have set goals to eliminating fossil fuel transportation, exactly today (November 7th 2019) New Zealand has set a goal to reduce carbon emissions to ZERO by 2050, plastic ban movement has been awoken and is gaining force throughout the world, CFCs have been banned, sustainable energy is having hundreds % of growth in countries like China and India, renewable sources industries are being financed and growing more and more arounds the globe, trading market for carbon emissions have been created, several meetings and accords (most notably Montreal Protocol, Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement)...

So, I mean, things are progressing and we can prod our communities and leaders to quicken the quantity and quality of change. And, more importantly, we can set ourselves to change as individuals (which she believes is useless with a horrible collectivist argument) and do our part first before we demand from others.

Edits: South Korea plans on having 3 cities fully hydrogen-powered by 2022. Damn capitalism! ...more

flag 2 likes · Like · see review

Sep 25, 2019 Huck Brock rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Necessary and urgent.

This is a book of essays. They are all good, but it is well worth it even if you just read the introduction and first essay

flag 3 likes · Like · see review

Oct 03, 2019 Sean Carlin rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

NOTE: This review originally appeared on my blog.

Since I trained under former vice president Al Gore to serve in his Climate Reality Leadership Corps just over a year ago -- a period in which no fewer than eighty-five federal environmental regulations have been rolled back, greenhouse-gas emissions have spiked (after leveling off in years prior), polar-ice melt is outpacing predictive modeling, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has strenuously warned us we have a mere decade to ...more

flag 3 likes · Like · see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

topics	posts	views	last activity
Play Book Tag: On Fire - Naomi Klein 3/5	2	12	Feb 16, 2020 12:29PM
Goodreads Librari...: Wrong number of pages for Allen Lane Hardcover	2	14	Oct 29, 2019 01:05AM
Goodreads Librari...: Combine Editions - "On Fire" by Naomi Klein	2	10	Oct 02, 2019 01:31AM

Readers also enjoyed

See similar books…

Genres

Nonfiction

134 users

Politics

86 users

Environment

65 users

Science

49 users

Environment > Climate Change

32 users

See top shelves…

About Naomi Klein

Naomi Klein

3,709 followers

Naomi Klein is an award-winning journalist, syndicated columnist, documentary filmmaker and author of the international bestsellers No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism and This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. She is a senior correspondent for The Intercept and her writing appears widely in such publications as The New York

...more

Books by Naomi Klein

The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism

This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate

No Is Not Enough: Resisting Trump’s Shock Politics and Winning the World We Need

Fences and Windows: Dispatches from the Front Lines of the Globalization Debate

More…

News & Interviews

7 Great Books Hitting Shelves This Week

Need another excuse to treat yourself to new book this week? We've got you covered with the buzziest new releases of the day. To create our lis...

Trivia About On Fire: The Case...

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

Quotes from On Fire: The Case...

“There is simply no way to square a belief system that vilifies collective action and venerates total market freedom with a problem that demands collective action on an unprecedented scale and a dramatic reining in of the market forces that created and are deepening the crisis.” — 1 likes

“During normal, nonemergency times, the capacity of the human mind to rationalize, to compartmentalize, and to be distracted easily is an important coping mechanism. (...) When it comes to rising to the reality of climate breakdown, however, these traits are proving to be our collective undoing. They are reassuring us when we should not be reassured. They are distracting us when we should not be distracted. And they are easing our consciences when our consciences should not be eased.” — 0 likes

More quotes…

See a Problem?

Preview — On Fire by Naomi Klein

On Fire: The Case for the Green New Deal

Get A Copy

Friend Reviews

Reader Q&A

Lists with This Book

Community Reviews

new topic
Discuss This Book

Readers also enjoyed

Genres

About Naomi Klein

Books by Naomi Klein

News & Interviews

Trivia About On Fire: The Case...

Quotes from On Fire: The Case...

See a Problem?

Preview — On Fire by Naomi Klein

On Fire: The Case for the Green New Deal

Get A Copy

Friend Reviews

Reader Q&A

Lists with This Book

Community Reviews

new topicDiscuss This Book

Readers also enjoyed

Genres

About Naomi Klein

Books by Naomi Klein

News & Interviews

Trivia About On Fire: The Case...

Quotes from On Fire: The Case...

new topic
Discuss This Book