Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Losing Earth: A Recent History” as Want to Read:
Losing Earth: A Recent History
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Losing Earth: A Recent History

4.09  ·  Rating details ·  2,480 ratings  ·  390 reviews
By 1979, we knew nearly everything we understand today about climate change--including how to stop it. Over the next decade, a handful of scientists, politicians, and strategists, led by two unlikely heroes, risked their careers in a desperate, escalating campaign to convince the world to act before it was too late. Losing Earth is their story, and ours.

The New York Times
Hardcover, 224 pages
Published April 9th 2019 by MCD (first published August 5th 2018)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 4.09  · 
Rating details
 ·  2,480 ratings  ·  390 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of Losing Earth: A Recent History
Sean Barrs
Climate change is not a new phenomenon. We have known for decades that it’s happening. And to put it quite simply, we have not done enough about it.

Considering the scope of what we face, we have done absolutely nothing to prevent it.

As the years have passed, the problem has got progressively worse. We burn more fossil fuels and we cut down more of the rain-forest to accommodate our ever growing and longer living population. We live in the now, engaging in the same circular petty politics that o
"It is not yet widely understood, though it will be, that the politician who claims that climate change is uncertain betrays humanity [sic]. It is not yet widely understood, though it will be, that when a government relaxes regulations on coal-fired plants or erases scientific data from a federal website, it is guilty of more than merely bowing to corporate interests; it commits crimes against humanity."

Losing Earth is a stunning book to read in the middle of 2020. Not stunning as in
Apr 23, 2019 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: nonfiction, read-2019
while I'm familiar with the science obviously and the political situation of the recent past, this was a clear-eyed and thorough investigation of the period between roughly 1979 and 1989 when the science was accepted and policies were being considered and we actually could have kept warming below 1.5C and absolutely nobody did anything, as per usual, I'm screaming endlessly into the void

that was the main body of the book, which was very good, but the reason it's getting five stars is the afterw
May 22, 2020 rated it did not like it
Before I start my review let me say this. This book is very easy to read and does a great job at showing that the whole World has had it's head stuck up its ass regarding global warming and to an extent, we still do. I believe in global warming, environmentalism, and the Republican Party purposefully spouting lies in order to confuse the American People.


I am a librarian and as a librarian I absolutely require authors to include sources, bibliographies, and PROOF to back up what they are
Jun 25, 2020 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2020-reads
The truth is:
Humans are selfish
Humans are stupid
Humans are ignorant
Michael Hicks
Apr 27, 2019 rated it really liked it
In 1979, scientists learned everything we needed to know about Earth's changing climate and the human factors that have led to it. Not much has changed, scientifically, in the intervening years. Our predictive models have gotten better, and, if anything, we've learned that the original estimates offered by scientists regarding warming trends were too generous.

Nathaniel Rich explores the decade of 1979-1989, when global warming first came into the public purview and scientists and some politicia
Apr 13, 2019 rated it it was amazing
I am one behind on my commitment to read 12 science books this year, so I need to catch up.

This is a short book based on a long-form piece from The New York Times Magazine earlier this year, and it captures a brief period of time--20 years or so--when taking on climate change was a possibility. From Carter, through Reagan, and into Bush the First, climate change (then called The Greenhouse Effect) was a widely accepted phenomena in the halls of government and the boardrooms of American corporati
Jan 02, 2020 rated it really liked it
Enlightening but depressing. We knew everything we needed to know in 1988 to make the decision to start taking action to avert the global warming catastrophe, but oil companies banded together to block action and support Republicans who did their bidding to oppose action. So now we will get at least 3 degrees C warming when it might have been held to 1.5C, which, in terms of ultimate effects is a huge difference. I voted for Reagan, in ignorance of his anti-environmentalism. I vowed after 2000 n ...more
Sep 14, 2019 rated it really liked it
3.5 stars-- If you need a historical non-fiction read to reinforce your bitterness against the boomers, this is it :D. A little lacking as a book in terms of the narrative drive, but the history it recounts is incredibly important & will be an important story to remember as our planet faces the challenges ahead
Susan Paxton
Jun 10, 2019 rated it it was amazing
If you take one thing from this short but powerful book (expanded from an issue-length article Rich wrote for The New York Times Magazine), it's this quote:

"More carbon has been released into the atmosphere since November 7, 1989, the final day of the Noordwijk conference, than in the entire history of civilization preceding it."

In the 1980s we had a real chance to stop climate change. Rich tells you how the science came together and how one man - Bush I advisor John Sununu - played the prime ro
Aug 28, 2019 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
simultaneously one of the most enthralling and TOTALLY FRUSTRATING books i have ever read. made me both hopeful and completely and utterly enraged at the world at the same time. the fact that we had all the knowledge to deal with our climate crisis back in the 1980s only to be brought down by fewer naysayers than can be counted on one hand is, in a word, horrifiying. have times changed? hard to say. i just hope that we don't keep going round in circles for another 40 years.

this book should be a
101st book for 2019.

Covering a period roughly between 1979 and 1989, Nathaniel Rich's book chronicles the rise of the political awareness of the dangers of global warming and early attempts to create legislation to fix the problem. What's really stands about from this book is that all the basic facts and arguments about global warming were already present by the mid-1980s.

Definitely worth a read.

Feb 06, 2020 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction
This book is an explicit account of the extent of human selfishness and stupidity. Learning about our history should give us an incentive to avoid the mistakes we have repeatedly made in the past: that of denying the bleak future that all of humanity is clearly facing. We need to stop with our self-delusions, stop worshipping politicians and act now before it’s too late. A decade has already been squandered. Let us not ruin another one.
Apr 23, 2019 rated it really liked it
I need to stop reading Global Warming books because they’re depressing the fuck out of me. But, this is an incredibly important subject and I’d rather be existentially depressed than ignorant.

Anyway, this was a nice political counter to the apolitical Uninhabitable Earth I read recently. While that one focused on the science and the environmental consequences, this focused on the political machinations that will be our undoing. It took us back to the beginning of the climate crisis, when the oz
L.G. Cullens
May 23, 2020 rated it really liked it
With all the propaganda and distractions, do you really know what humanity is up against and how we got to this reckoning of human existence?

This book tells it as well as most any I've read, at least the more recent history.

Not a lively read, but an important one if you value your future.
Dec 15, 2020 rated it it was amazing
A must read for everyone!
Feb 23, 2020 rated it really liked it
Shelves: eco
The most common takeaway from Nathaniel Rich's Losing Earth: A Recent History seems to be that the USA could have addressed climate change in the 1980s. But it didn't. That common takeaway is fine, but today we should highlight this conclusion after reading Losing Earth:
Nearly every conversation we have in 2019 about climate change was being held in 1979. That includes not only the predictions about degrees of warming, sea level rise, and geopolitical strife but also the speculations about geo-
May 23, 2020 rated it really liked it
Shelves: 2020
Not much longer than a feature length New Yorker article, this is a must read both for its recent history of the science and politics of climate change, and because it lays what's at stake right on the line. Today's adults will face difficulties, our children will see real hardship, their children will fight for survival in a devastated world. Our current path into the future will take us to extreme ugliness - need, war, disaster, collapse. Perhaps Greta Thunberg (not mentioned in the book) and ...more
Apr 24, 2019 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: sciences, politics
This book has an amazing quality of presenting what would normally be quite boring(apart from the fact that it's the fate of the planet involved) board meetings in the 80s as these mega cool superman vs batman events. Well written, short and bittersweet. ...more
Austin Hahn
Aug 11, 2019 rated it really liked it
One of the most hopeless and also hopeful books I've read in a long time. The conclusion is worth reading on its own, on the imperative of reframing climate change as a moral issue to stop the end of civilization, not just a political issue to be solved. ...more
Dec 11, 2019 rated it really liked it
Short and impactful. Should be mandatory reading.
Sep 17, 2019 rated it really liked it
Shelves: environment
Summary: An account of the lost opportunity of the 1980's to address climate change and the birth of the polarized dialogue that exists to this day.

Did you know that much of the scientific understanding of the greenhouse effect and global warming traces back to the nineteenth century? That in the 1950's and throughout the Sixties and Seventies, scientists were already warning of global warming and contending that warming connected with higher carbon dioxide levels was already evident? Did you kn
Eric Shapiro
Jan 04, 2020 rated it it was amazing
5/5. I'm blown away by this achievement, even though this book's brevity constrains it from being a "textbook" or all-inclusive account of humanity's relationship to climate change and our (in)action with respect to it. Nathaniel Rich provides an insightful and fascinating account into the origins of climate science and the attempts of several scientists and policy-makers, as early as the 1960s, to create a worldwide treaty, or to get any political leader to give a shit, to curb carbon emissions ...more
May 07, 2021 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
When did humanity learn about global climate change and the seriousness of its ratifications? If you started any part of your answer with sometime in the twenty-first century, you would be incorrect. In this well-researched and enlightening book, Rich presents us with the disquieting revelation that many entities—including political leaders, scientists, and the energy industry, had working knowledge of the climate crisis in the 1970s, and in many cases, further back than that.

At one point in tim
Richard S
Aug 28, 2019 rated it really liked it
Shelves: science
It's amazing to think, as the world is sent barreling along like an out-of-speed locomotive to environmental catastrophe, that there have been moments when the political power existed to actually accomplish something - Bush in 1992, Obama in 2012, presidents with the desire and ability to enact change - but nothing happened. Now Trump actually jokes about it in his Twitter feed every time there's a cold day, an astonishing level of ignorance, and one that gives no chance or hope - even a glimmer ...more
Muneeb Hameed
Aug 30, 2019 rated it really liked it
I'm moved.

"Nearly every conversation that we have in 2019 about climate change was being held in 1979. That includes not only the predictions about degrees of warming, sea level rise, and geopolitical strife but also the speculations about geo-engineering technology, the appeals to help developing nations overcome starvation and disease without relying, as we did, on massive increases in coal consumption, and the cost-benefit analyses that always seem to favor inaction. Forty years ago, the poli
May 08, 2019 rated it it was amazing
The New York Times reported scientists claiming that the earth was warming in 1953 (66 years ago.) In 1979, scientists, industrialists, and politicians knew pretty much what we know now about climate change. Generations have been screwing their descendants over and over. The haves have benefitted from the use of fossil fuel to the detriment of the poor who are dispropotinately harmed by floods and droughts. Mike Pompeo recently said that the Arctic ice melt is good because it makes it easier to ...more
Kenneth Sutherland
Nov 07, 2021 rated it really liked it
brief history of how ‘climate change’ first became recognized and subsequently politicized in america (over 40 years ago) and how it was unsuccessfully championed for, due in part to corporate lobbying and a general political unwillingness to create any binding global legislation

it is pretty black-pilling to think we have had the same basic models for what will happen when certain degree increases in the global temperature will occur and have done essentially nothing to curb carbon emissions ove
Brent Lockridge
Jan 20, 2022 rated it it was amazing
The author recounts a recent history (1950 - present) of the climate crisis before it was a crisis. The handling of this file by the unequivocal superpower of the day was mired in political discourse that stopped action, that if taken at the time, could have changed our present and future ways of living. The author closes the book with a discussion on why humans discount the future in favor of the present and the moral implications of that decision.
Nathanial Rich also writes fiction and it makes his non-fiction very easy to read. This entire book reads like a long-form journalism article in The Atlantic and is a clear history of what happened in USian politics between 1979-1989 in relation to climate change. The book is enraging, depressing, and has a focus on the USA that isn't always helpful.

First fact: There have been no major findings in climate science since 1979.

Rich indicates that, as a society, we can allow ourselves to understand
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming
  • The Water Will Come: Rising Seas, Sinking Cities, and the Remaking of the Civilized World
  • The Apology Impulse: How the Business World Ruined Sorry and Why We Can't Stop Saying It
  • How to Live a Good Life: A Guide to Choosing Your Personal Philosophy
  • What We Know about Climate Change
  • Know Thyself: The Science of Self-Awareness
  • The End of Ice: Bearing Witness and Finding Meaning in the Path of Climate Disruption
  • The Story of More: How We Got to Climate Change and Where to Go from Here
  • Rest Is Resistance: A Manifesto
  • Don't Even Think About It: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Ignore Climate Change
  • The Gun Debate
  • Falter: Has the Human Game Begun to Play Itself Out?
  • The Nutmeg's Curse: Parables for a Planet in Crisis
  • Monstress, Vol. 7: Devourer
  • Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming
  • Under a White Sky: The Nature of the Future
  • Climate Change: What Everyone Needs to Know
  • Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain
See similar books…
See top shelves…
Nathaniel Rich is an American novelist and essayist. He is the author of Losing Earth: A Recent History, which received awards from the Society of Environmental Journalists and the American Institute of Physicists and was a finalist for the PEN/E.O. Wilson Literary Science Writing Award; and the novels King Zeno, Odds Against Tomorrow, and The Mayor's Tongue. He is a writer-at-large at the New Yor ...more

News & Interviews

Need another excuse to treat yourself to a new book this week? We've got you covered with the buzziest new releases of the day. To create our...
11 likes · 1 comments
“The relationship between those who have burned the most fossil fuels and those who will suffer the most from a warming climate is perversely inverted. The inversion is both chronological (younger generations pay for their elders’ emissions) and socioeconomic (the poor suffer what the rich deserve).” 5 likes
“Nearly everything we understand about global warming was understood in 1979.” 4 likes
More quotes…