What do you think?


The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy
This is a major new introduction to, and interpretation and reassessment of, the nature of foreign policy in the light of changing political conditions, international and domestic. It argues that despite the forces of globalization, foreign policy is an essential part of the life of any state and a focal point for both political agency and democratic accountability.
- GenresInternational Relations
376 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2003
About the author
Christopher J. Hill
17 books3 followersChristopher Hill is Sir Patrick Sheehy Professor of and Director of the Centre of International Studies at the University of Cambridge.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews
August 12, 2011
Despite its ontological confusion it is well worth a read
February 10, 2018
Very abstract; reads like a transcript of his lectures rather than a book per se.
May 10, 2015
There are ontological problems as pointed already and there is a bias of constant search for a median, however, this volume is so well synthesized and so rich that it absolutely deserves at least five stars. It is thought provoking, scientific, as much as social science can get, extremely well referenced, and very insightful. I strongly recommend this book not only for in depth understanding of foreign policy analysis, but also for understanding of domestic and international politics.
November 22, 2014
It is so difficult to be understood by unspecialists as sometimes you feel like that you do not understand what he wants to say . But , it can be -still- a good introduction for Foreign Policy Analysis
August 24, 2018
Well-compiled.
Though the title already suggests a bigger focus on “Changing Politics” rather than “Foreign Policy”, the lack of analysis of the latter element questions the inclusion of it in the title.
Though the title already suggests a bigger focus on “Changing Politics” rather than “Foreign Policy”, the lack of analysis of the latter element questions the inclusion of it in the title.
October 17, 2012
I find it so hard to understand.. I think it's the writing style... Ahh frustrated
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews







