12 books
—
6 voters
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Super Thinking: The Big Book of Mental Models” as Want to Read:
Super Thinking: The Big Book of Mental Models
by
A Wall Street Journal Bestseller!
"You can't really know anything if you just remember isolated facts. If the facts don't hang together on a latticework of theory, you don't have them in a usable form. You've got to have models in your head."
- Charlie Munger, investor, vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway
The world's greatest problem-solvers, forecasters, and decision-makers ...more
"You can't really know anything if you just remember isolated facts. If the facts don't hang together on a latticework of theory, you don't have them in a usable form. You've got to have models in your head."
- Charlie Munger, investor, vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway
The world's greatest problem-solvers, forecasters, and decision-makers ...more
Get A Copy
Hardcover, 354 pages
Published
June 18th 2019
by Portfolio
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
Reader Q&A
To ask other readers questions about
Super Thinking,
please sign up.
Popular Answered Questions
Adrian Salajan
yes, you get exposed to some models that can be really useful in life
Community Reviews
Showing 1-30

Start your review of Super Thinking: The Big Book of Mental Models

I love mental models but this book can't even install 1 of them to the readers mind. It is a list of 100s of mental models explained in a few sentences.
This should not have been a book but a list of mental models instead, maybe a webpage or something. I'm not sure what was Gabriel thinking turning this into a book but each mental model deserves its own course, practices, posts & examples. Each mental model can be turned in to small books. But cramming 100s of them into a single book like this i ...more
This should not have been a book but a list of mental models instead, maybe a webpage or something. I'm not sure what was Gabriel thinking turning this into a book but each mental model deserves its own course, practices, posts & examples. Each mental model can be turned in to small books. But cramming 100s of them into a single book like this i ...more

When I saw a tweet from Annie Duke saying the world would improve immediately if everyone read this book, I had to check it out. https://twitter.com/annieduke/status/... I wasn’t disappointed. This book is simple, easy to follow and gives mental models that greatly help your decision making. It has a heavy Charlie Munger influence and feel throughout the book which was an added bonus. The authors quote him often and use him and Warren Buffett in several examples. I also appreciated that it was w
...more

As I read this book, I would get up and go see myself in front of a mirror and say "You know nothing John Snow" lol. This is one of those books that will change your life, uproot it, twist it, it will literally chew you and spit out. It combines the traditional and machine wisdom/learnings that is well written with examples to understand.
You will think about your friends, family, co-workers, all the events in the past, all the living and non-living. You would remember how some of these mental mo ...more
You will think about your friends, family, co-workers, all the events in the past, all the living and non-living. You would remember how some of these mental mo ...more

Before starting it, I had misgivings about whether Lauren McCann and Gabriel Weinberg’s Super Thinking would be worthwhile for me to read. This was mainly because I have already studied a lot of mental models from various fields of research, and also because it seemed a bit too self-helpy for my taste. But my best friend bought me a copy, so I took it up in order to discuss with him.
To its credit, Super Thinking is probably the most comprehensive and up-to-date collection of mental models––”recu ...more
To its credit, Super Thinking is probably the most comprehensive and up-to-date collection of mental models––”recu ...more

Sep 15, 2019
Sebastian Gebski
added it
No star rating - I think it would rely too much on individual context.
ST is a book about everything and nothing.
"Mental models" are framed (named) concepts than encapsulated knowledge and observation to simplify reasoning and problem solving. But the problem is ... they are everywhere, it's hard to classify them, they have very different origins and they are products of very different disciplines or just streams of thought.
That's why this book basically feels like an aggregation of other books s ...more
ST is a book about everything and nothing.
"Mental models" are framed (named) concepts than encapsulated knowledge and observation to simplify reasoning and problem solving. But the problem is ... they are everywhere, it's hard to classify them, they have very different origins and they are products of very different disciplines or just streams of thought.
That's why this book basically feels like an aggregation of other books s ...more

I picked this up for two reasons,
1. I've read Gabriel's first book - Traction, and found it immensely helpful.
2. I'm a big fan of mental models. Have read Robert Cialdini, Dan Kahnemann, Dan Ariely, Malcolm Gladwell, Richard Thaler & a bunch of others, including being a regular at Farnam Street. (though haven't been able to consistently use more than a handful of them)
So, picking a book being portrayed as a single treasure trove, from a validated author, seemed like a no-brainer. But, I'd have t ...more
1. I've read Gabriel's first book - Traction, and found it immensely helpful.
2. I'm a big fan of mental models. Have read Robert Cialdini, Dan Kahnemann, Dan Ariely, Malcolm Gladwell, Richard Thaler & a bunch of others, including being a regular at Farnam Street. (though haven't been able to consistently use more than a handful of them)
So, picking a book being portrayed as a single treasure trove, from a validated author, seemed like a no-brainer. But, I'd have t ...more

I have found my new favorite book, and wrote 278 Anki cards to memorize all these mental models shared in the book.
This is not a book to read casually, you probably wouldn't remember much of it. This is a book to read slowly, study and remember.
Thank you Gabriel Weinberg and Laurent McCann for taking the time to write this book. It will help me for many years to come.
I wish I had it 15 years ago, but life is a never-ending self-improvement experience. Looking forward to changing from cargo-cult ...more
This is not a book to read casually, you probably wouldn't remember much of it. This is a book to read slowly, study and remember.
Thank you Gabriel Weinberg and Laurent McCann for taking the time to write this book. It will help me for many years to come.
I wish I had it 15 years ago, but life is a never-ending self-improvement experience. Looking forward to changing from cargo-cult ...more

A good collection of mental models extracted from various disciplines, which if applied properly, can help broaden one’s perspective. Very similar to Charlie Munger’s emphasis on breadth of knowledge and when magic happens when a confluence of factors across a broad spectrum manifest themselves in a lollapalooza effect.
A few mental models that stood out:
1. Argue from first principles - go back to basics and figure out what are we really trying to solve
2. Be aware that your views are being frame ...more
A few mental models that stood out:
1. Argue from first principles - go back to basics and figure out what are we really trying to solve
2. Be aware that your views are being frame ...more

This book is about mental models, which are frameworks of thinking and representations about how things work. Mental models aim to simplify the thinking process and help in decision making and problem solving.
This is a well researched book where the authors integrate an exhaustive compilation of mental models from a wide variety of domains and provide a toolkit for higher-level thinking applicable to various personal and professional contexts. The models are presented in thematic chapters tha ...more
This is a well researched book where the authors integrate an exhaustive compilation of mental models from a wide variety of domains and provide a toolkit for higher-level thinking applicable to various personal and professional contexts. The models are presented in thematic chapters tha ...more

Had high hopes for this book, as I need some more mental models in my life. I devour a ton of information, and can often have trouble recalling or applying it. This book was more common sensical best practices for leading efficient careers, relationships or organizations. A few things I knew before, but most stuff was putting a label on things that are common sense, theories from first year courses in social sciences or business. Took me a while to get through, and we'll see if any of it sticks
...more

Back in the late 1980s, I stumbled across a book entitled Cultural Literacy: What every American needs to know. I wasn’t sure whether this was more brilliant or bonkers: how could you ever hope to capture everything a person should know about their world into a single book? But on the other hand, how handy is that?
To be fair, Super Thinking doesn’t attempt to cover every aspect of life, only mental models, but it feels similarly ambitious and dizzying. It contains more than 300 models – an aver ...more
To be fair, Super Thinking doesn’t attempt to cover every aspect of life, only mental models, but it feels similarly ambitious and dizzying. It contains more than 300 models – an aver ...more

The most practical book on mental models I've found to date.. and I've read a lot of them.
...more

May 26, 2020
Alex
marked it as did-not-finish
The title (“Superthinking”) is more accurate than the subtitle (“The Big Book of Mental Models”). The book was about tools for thinking more generally than mental models. What I was looking for with mental models are metaphors that can be applied cross-discipline for understanding a situation or system, it had a little bit of that but mostly covered cognitive biases as well as some statistical reasoning. I think there are better books that provide more focus on the latter two so I was mostly loo
...more

I agree with people who said that it's not really a book on mental models. It could have took a name of Thoughts on things. Because actually makes some reflections on various aspects and define problems and how to think about them. I was expecting more a book that related to Poor Charlie Almanac, with a set of mental model which can help to relate with the world. The author has attempted to explain too much in very few pages, who actually leads to have very little added info on on many different
...more

Packed with short descriptions of all the mental models the founder of Duck Duck Go feels are essential to know. He mentioned in a podcast interview that this grew out of notes he had written for employees.
I’m not sure how to rate this, as it feels a bit like rating an encyclopedia. Yes, it certainly packs a lot of mental models, but is also pretty exhausting to read, and has to be digested in small bits, as you are introduced to a new idea on every page. Then again, that’s the opposite of the u ...more
I’m not sure how to rate this, as it feels a bit like rating an encyclopedia. Yes, it certainly packs a lot of mental models, but is also pretty exhausting to read, and has to be digested in small bits, as you are introduced to a new idea on every page. Then again, that’s the opposite of the u ...more

This is a fabulous book by Gabriel Weinberg and Lauren McCann which explains over a hundred mental models. Mental models help us to think better about the world and help make better decisions. But including a hundred models in a book is not an easy task. So the book is a bit short on explanations and how to use these models in daily life. However, not all models are useful for a person so I'm free to choose the ones which I find more useful to me and keep adding to my repertoire slowly.
...more

This book is poor. It is ultimately the mishmash of startup hype and doesn't teach you new things. But it does teach some things wrong.
At the start I was getting hopeful that oh, good, a pretty useful list of all sorts of ways to think about all sorts of problems. So that list is useful a bit. But the explanations...
When it got to systems thinking and laid out approximately two sentences about how "you should think about the system as a whole" without a word about its parts, the relationships ...more
At the start I was getting hopeful that oh, good, a pretty useful list of all sorts of ways to think about all sorts of problems. So that list is useful a bit. But the explanations...
When it got to systems thinking and laid out approximately two sentences about how "you should think about the system as a whole" without a word about its parts, the relationships ...more

A lot of objections I see people having with this book is that it brushes over a lot of mental models without going into the details of it.
But I don't think that was what this book was written for. This book is an introduction to over 200 mental models (I know this, cause I've made note of each one of it) and it serves as one good guide to base your decisions on.
Good stuff. Although it does get heavy at times. ...more
But I don't think that was what this book was written for. This book is an introduction to over 200 mental models (I know this, cause I've made note of each one of it) and it serves as one good guide to base your decisions on.
Good stuff. Although it does get heavy at times. ...more

It's got some pretty good "mental models" that I didn't know of, and the descriptions are easy to follow. However, I was a bit disappointed that a big part of the book was spent on "mental models" that are pretty much only relevant for people working in, or leading, businesses. I was hoping for "mental models" that would be more generally useful. That being said, there were a lot of interesting "mental models" in the first half of the book that I'll definitely remember.
...more

Damn you, self-help books. Why do I always think the next one will be worth my time?
When I heard Gabriel Weinberg speaking on The Knowledge Project podcast, I was quite excited. The guy was obviously smart and our mindsets seemed to resonate on the same frequency. Apart from the dickish title, Super Thinking promised to be an interesting book. Unfortunately it did not manage to deliver what it promised. Even though it is not a complete failure, it still felt like a complete waste of time.
The cen ...more
When I heard Gabriel Weinberg speaking on The Knowledge Project podcast, I was quite excited. The guy was obviously smart and our mindsets seemed to resonate on the same frequency. Apart from the dickish title, Super Thinking promised to be an interesting book. Unfortunately it did not manage to deliver what it promised. Even though it is not a complete failure, it still felt like a complete waste of time.
The cen ...more
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »
Since 2008, I've been the CEO & Founder of DuckDuckGo, the Internet privacy company that empowers you to seamlessly take control of your personal information online, without any tradeoffs. Our private search engine is #4 in the U.S., Germany, Australia and dozens of other countries, answering over 9 billion queries in 2018.
I also co-authored Super Thinking: The Big Book of Mental Models (Penguin P ...more
I also co-authored Super Thinking: The Big Book of Mental Models (Penguin P ...more
News & Interviews
Kerine Wint is a software engineering graduate with more love for books than for computers. As an avid reader, writer, and fan of all things...
37 likes · 12 comments
No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »
“Avoid succumbing to the gambler’s fallacy or the base rate fallacy. Anecdotal evidence and correlations you see in data are good hypothesis generators, but correlation does not imply causation—you still need to rely on well-designed experiments to draw strong conclusions. Look for tried-and-true experimental designs, such as randomized controlled experiments or A/B testing, that show statistical significance. The normal distribution is particularly useful in experimental analysis due to the central limit theorem. Recall that in a normal distribution, about 68 percent of values fall within one standard deviation, and 95 percent within two. Any isolated experiment can result in a false positive or a false negative and can also be biased by myriad factors, most commonly selection bias, response bias, and survivorship bias. Replication increases confidence in results, so start by looking for a systematic review and/or meta-analysis when researching an area.”
—
2 likes
“Campbell’s law) in his 1979 study, “Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change.” He explains the concept a bit more precisely: “The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor.”
—
1 likes
More quotes…