Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.

Start by marking “Godless: The Church of Liberalism” as Want to Read:

Other editions

Enlarge cover

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Open Preview

Godless: The Church of Liberalism

Ann Coulter

3.32 · Rating details · 2,927 ratings · 361 reviews

"If a martian landed in America and set out to determine the nation's official state religion, he would have to conclude it is liberalism, while Christianity and Judaism are prohibited by law.
Many Americans are outraged by liberal hostility to traditional religion. But as Ann Coulter reveals in this, her most explosive book yet, to focus solely on the Left's attacks on ou "If a martian landed in America and set out to determine the nation's official state religion, he would have to conclude it is liberalism, while Christianity and Judaism are prohibited by law.
Many Americans are outraged by liberal hostility to traditional religion. But as Ann Coulter reveals in this, her most explosive book yet, to focus solely on the Left's attacks on our Judeo-Christian tradition is to miss a larger point: liberalism "is" a religion--a godless one.
And it is now entrenched as the state religion of this county.
Though liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, it bears all the attributes of a religion. In "Godless," Coulter throws open the doors of the Church of Liberalism, showing us its sacraments (abortion), its holy writ ("Roe v. Wade"), its martyrs (from Soviet spy Alger Hiss to cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal), its clergy (public school teachers), its churches (government schools, where prayer is prohibited but condoms are free), its doctrine of infallibility (as manifest in the "absolute moral authority" of spokesmen from Cindy Sheehan to Max Cleland), and its cosmology (in which mankind is an inconsequential accident).
Then, of course, there's the liberal creation myth: Charles Darwin's theory of evolution.
For liberals, evolution is the touchstone that separates the enlightened from the benighted. But Coulter neatly reverses the pretense that liberals are rationalists guided by the ideals of free inquiry and the scientific method. She exposes the essential truth about Darwinian evolution that liberals refuse to confront: "it is bogus science."
Writing with a keen appreciation for genuine science, Coulter reveals that the so-called gaps in the theory of evolution are all there is--Darwinism is nothing but a gap. After 150 years of dedicated searching into the fossil record, evolution's proponents have failed utterly to substantiate its claims. And a long line of supposed evidence, from the infamous Piltdown Man to the "evolving" peppered moths of England, has been exposed as hoaxes. Still, liberals treat those who question evolution as religious heretics and prohibit students from hearing about real science when it contradicts Darwinism. And these are the people who say they want to keep faith out of the classroom?
Liberals' absolute devotion to Darwinism, Coulter shows, has nothing to do with evolution's scientific validity and everything to do with its refusal to admit the possibility of God as a guiding force. They will brook no challenges to the official religion.
Fearlessly confronting the high priests of the Church of Liberalism and ringing with Coulter's razor-sharp wit, "Godless" is the most important and riveting book yet from one of today's most lively and impassioned conservative voices. "Liberals love to boast that they are not 'religious, ' which is what one would expect to hear from the state-sanctioned religion. Of course liberalism is a religion. It has its own cosmology, its own miracles, its own beliefs in the supernatural, its own churches, its own high priests, its own saints, its own total worldview, and its own explanation of the existence of the universe. In other words, liberalism contains all the attributes of what is generally known as 'religion.'" --From Godless ...more

Get A Copy

Hardcover, 310 pages

Published 2006 by Crown Forum

More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Godless, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

Confessions of a Guidette by Nicole "Snooki" Polizzi

Birth Control Is Sinful in the Christian Marriages and Also R... by Eliyzabeth Yanne Strong-And...

Dealbreakers: If You Like This Book, We Won't Get Along

1,765 books — 5,387 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30

Average rating 3.32 ·

Rating details

· 2,927 ratings · 361 reviews

More filters

Sort order

Start your review of Godless: The Church of Liberalism

Jul 11, 2010 Stephen rated it did not like it

Shelves: 2006-2010, non-fiction, shame-on-you, ebooks, polly-sighs-and-pubic-policy

When it comes to politics…I despise BOTH political parties. I’m an equal opportunity hater, and I think the whole lot are terminally infected with greedy, contemptible, hypocritical scumbagginess.

About the only thing I detest more than the politicians themselves, are the self-appointed, idiotic, partisan flamethrowers who have nothing...NOTHING...to contribute to the discussion of real issues facing the country. It's all just vitriol, sound-byte platitudes and ceaseless aggression.

They co ...more

flag 203 likes · Like · see review

Jul 13, 2007 Kate rated it did not like it

This is quite possibly the most disgusting work ever written or published.

Republicans should be ashamed to even have someone like Ann Coulter in their party. The book makes nothing but personal attacks to demean the Democratic Party and make Liberalism look like devil worship. If being liberal is that bad and wanting freedom from religion is so terrible, maybe Ann is the one who doesn’t belong in America: the nation built on Religious freedom and choice.

flag 152 likes · Like · see review

Oct 17, 2009 Manny rated it did not like it

Shelves: trash, author-less-talented-than-goebbels

I once spent about half an hour at a Palo Alto bookstore leafing through this. Friends often tease me about my willingness to read anything, but it literally made me feel ill. I'm trying to recall other things I've come across that have had a similar effect. The only one I can come up with right now is Wikipedia's description of the notorious viral video 2 Girls 1 Cup. I would guess that I'm less likely to watch that than I am to finish Godless, but it's close.

It's very sad to consider that the ...more

flag 109 likes · Like · see review

Jun 06, 2014 Nandakishore Mridula rated it did not like it · review of another edition

Shelves: hate-mongerers

It should be titled "Brainless" - more apt in the case of Ann Coulter.

Whew! I didn’t think I would survive the ordeal of reading this book.

Ann Coulter is a prominent right-wing media personality in America. However, it is not her conservative views which get her attention: it is the outright hatred she has for the “other”, and the purposefully rude way in which she expresses her opinion, that does it. Liberals hate her, and she revels in it.

I read this book to see whether Ann is as black as sh ...more

flag 99 likes · Like · see review

Jun 27, 2007 Michele rated it did not like it

Ann Coulter is the Devil

flag 88 likes · Like · see review

Mar 26, 2008 Wifey rated it did not like it

Recommends it for: People who liked The Da Vinci Code

Shelves: people-are-monsters

This book is about as accurate as The Da Vinci Code, and it would be really offensive if it wasn't so hilarious. Mostly because it's funny when you glimpse the inner workings of the severely mentally handicapped. I heard some strange things when I taught special ed., but nothing comes close to the fantasy world Ann Coulter thinks she lives in. But what do I know, I'm a woman. ...more

flag 63 likes · Like · see review

Nov 21, 2007 David Simonetti rated it it was amazing

If you like unbridled opinion with a nasty and sarcastic twist this is the book to read. After hearing all the denounciations of the book, I had to read it and I thoroughly enjoyed, particularly the attack on the New Jersey widows. But not only that, Ann clearly makes a strong argument that liberals have created their own religion, which is why they are so hostile towards other form of organized religion. If there is anything that bothers the Left more than anything is when the masses turn to or ...more

flag 43 likes · Like · see review

Feb 01, 2008 Ashleigh rated it liked it

My very first Ann Coulter book...I find her outrageously hilarious. If I had more guts I'd be as outspoken as she is. Her books, including this one, are generally self-absorbed and depreciative of anyone not a conservative, but therein lies the humor. Liberals take themselves way too seriously...Coulter takes advantage of their sensitive feelings and uses their public outrage to fuel her own popularity and book sales. Smart woman. ...more

flag 36 likes · Like · see review

Jul 04, 2008 Robert Beveridge rated it did not like it

Shelves: 2008-goal-list, cuy-co-pub-lib, defenestrated

Ann Coulter, Godless: The Church of Liberalism (Crown, 2006)

I would like to be able to review Ann Coulter's newest tome, Godless: The Church of Liberalism, fairly. However, I find myself unable to do so because Coulter's entire premise is a ludicrous, but increasingly common, fallacy: the equation of conservatism with orthodox religion (specifically, in this case, Christianity, though I've often heard Joe Lieberman, an orthodox Jew, described as conservative as well). I'm not sure how this odd d
Ann Coulter, Godless: The Church of Liberalism (Crown, 2006)

I would like to be able to review Ann Coulter's newest tome, Godless: The Church of Liberalism, fairly. However, I find myself unable to do so because Coulter's entire premise is a ludicrous, but increasingly common, fallacy: the equation of conservatism with orthodox religion (specifically, in this case, Christianity, though I've often heard Joe Lieberman, an orthodox Jew, described as conservative as well). I'm not sure how this odd distortion of reality came about, but let me set the record straight here: anyone whose opinions on any given topic come from a solely religious viewpoint is not a conservative. They are, without doubt, a wholly different stripe of liberal than, say, the Warren Court that Coulter so despises, but trust me-- conservatives don't want them either. Where do you think the term “neocon” came from? That's right-- us. The conservatives.

To use an example that's obviously near and dear to Ann's heart, given how much she brings it up, let's talk abortion. Ann's premise is that liberals (because, obviously, all liberals feel the same on every subject; liberals are a monolith like one might find in a Kubrick film) support a government-guaranteed right to abortion on demand, while conservatives of Coulter's stripe (see above about monolithism) support a government mandate that abortion be illegal. Any true conservative knows that neither of those options is the correct answer (despite how we may feel personally; I am virulently pro-choice, myself)-- the only conservative option is “abortion falls under the ninth and tenth amendments.” In other words, let the states decide. It's all right there in black and white, for anyone who cares to read the constitution.

Not that “constitutional law expert” Ann Coulter isn't above bending the laws a little. While she talks up the first amendment on a number of occasions here, it's pretty obvious that she'd like to see the first amendment (and a couple of others, notably the fifth, which she attacks over and over again while spewing invective against Miranda) go the way of the great auk. A pretty funny position for a “conservative”, someone for whom the Constitution holds the same mystic power as the Bible does for the “liberals in wolves' clothing”, as I've taken to calling the neocons in the past few years.

While I'd actually planned to make Coulter's unsurprising lack of actual conservative views the real substantive body of my non-review, as I was actually reading the book, I found my qualms about the sand upon which her arguments were founded taking a back seat to the woman's writing style (which, and this is surprising, Joe Maguire goes out of his way to praise numerous times in Brainless: The Lies and Lunacy of Ann Coulter). Simply put, Coulter is one of the shrieking harridans she's constantly attacking. Her writing style is based on unfunny, borderline-offensive “jokes” and ad hominem attacks rather than anything at all of substance. This isn't political writing, it's ranting, much of it unsubstantiated. That's all well and good when it's billed as ranting. I rant quite often myself, though I do at least attempt to back it up with facts sometimes, and I always clearly label ranting as ranting, and don't expect people to take it seriously. After all, it is ranting. Coulter, on the other hand, does seem to expect to be taken seriously. But whatever her views on the subject, it's obvious given her sales figures-- Godless debuted at number one on the New York Times bestseller list (a liberal rag she hates, by the by)-- that people do take her seriously. Which says a great deal more about the average Ann Coulter reader's lack of ability to think critically than it does about Ann Coulter, I guess. But then, Coulter subscribes to a belief system that considers it a sin to think critically, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised at that, either.

I wondered, when I was putting myself through the torture of attempting to read Ben Shapiro's worthless Porn Generation, where he'd gotten his writing style. Well, now I know, and I can safely avoid ever having to read trip like this again. Unless, that is, another drooling sycophant like Shapiro decides to ape Ann Coulter's barely-competent writing. (zero)

...more

flag 32 likes · Like · see review

Feb 16, 2008 Justin added it

Shelves: literary-abortions

Same old same old from our favorite horse faced ultra conservative Ann Coulter. When she's not shrieking the usual conservative rhetoric (liberal want to kill babies, outlaw Christianity, force mass gay marriages etc...) she's accusing liberal of betraying the nation, colluding with Communists and plotting the downfall of the USA. I'm not sure what's worse, that people actually like this garbage or having to look at that grotesquery on the cover. ...more

flag 30 likes · Like · see review

Jul 24, 2007 David Cox rated it really liked it

Recommends it for: hillary clinton

Coulter's brash, irreverent style would make her a cultural icon if she were on the left. But even liberals ready to bust a gasket over her views will not be able to hold back a laugh now and then. ...more

flag 28 likes · Like · see review

Sep 29, 2013 Richard Derus rated it did not like it

Shelves: scumbag

Like her view of gawd isn't the problem with the world today. ...more

flag 26 likes · Like · see review

Nov 15, 2008 Kelly rated it really liked it

Recommends it for: Republicans, conservatives, or open-minded individuals ONLY

Recommended to Kelly by: A friend

This one is pretty simple: If you are conservative, Republican, or extremely open-minded, you MIGHT like it...If you're Democrat or a liberal, you're going to hate it...but for God's sake, I hate reading reviews were someone didn't even READ the entire book. I read it from cover to cover.

Ann Coulter has a really snarky sense of humor that can come off as condescending and annoying, sometimes. The reason why some conservatives tolerate her is because when she's funny, she's hysterical, but when s This one is pretty simple: If you are conservative, Republican, or extremely open-minded, you MIGHT like it...If you're Democrat or a liberal, you're going to hate it...but for God's sake, I hate reading reviews were someone didn't even READ the entire book. I read it from cover to cover.

Ann Coulter has a really snarky sense of humor that can come off as condescending and annoying, sometimes. The reason why some conservatives tolerate her is because when she's funny, she's hysterical, but when she's off, she's unbearable to listen to. Here, she's funny...But more than that, she's got good things to say.

The most controversial part of this book was where she called a small group of about four 9/11 widows "harpies". I BOUGHT this book because of that controversy and because, on this subject, I happened to agree with Coulter, even though I don't agree with her on some of her other points. She was not bashing all widows - just the ones who wanted to sue our government for millions when they already received large life insurance settlements and who also received government-funded compensation from a fund created for 9/11 families of victims. These women also had husband's with high-paying jobs and were already living the charmed life.

To ask WHY this enraged me, you must look at where I'm coming from. My husband is a Marine. He puts himself in harm's way for our country and is a two-time Iraq war veteran. If something should happen to him, his family gets $450,000. I think that's an enormous amount of money and I sure as hell would not complain about it. The husbands of these women just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. They weren't on the front lines of our nation's defense. I'm appalled that these women bit the hand that fed them and had no problem with Coulter calling them out on it.

The rest of the book had some witty humor and interesting ideals and it was a good read, even if I don't agree with many of Coulter's views. I'm not quite as fervently religious so in a few parts, I found myself VERY strongly disagreeing with Coulter, but if I were to rate the book honestly, I would rate it a four stars and strongly encourage liberals and Democrats not to touch it with a ten foot pole. It's not worth getting your blood pressure up over. For conservatives and Republicans, though, I think it's a good read with several laugh-out-loud moments of political incorrectness. ...more

flag 27 likes · Like · see review

Dec 21, 2007 Books Ring Mah Bell rated it did not like it

Shelves: poop

complete and utter poo. the reason she's so damn stupid is that she's obviously undernourished. Get that woman a cheeseburger- STAT! ...more

flag 26 likes · Like · see review

Mar 27, 2007 Terry Check rated it did not like it

Recommends it for: anyone who wishes to know the other side

Shelves: politics

It was very...interesting. As a democrat and a liberal, I wanted to find out what fuels the other side. As content goes, it was very poor, as she made blanket statements and backed up her work with only a few examples which could be easily refuted. Her arguements were devoid of logic, not due to content but due to the way she argued. A high school debater could have made her book look like a fool.

flag 22 likes · Like · see review

Mar 23, 2008 Lisa rated it really liked it

Coulter carefully and systematically lays out her idea that liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, but liberalism bears all the attributes of a religion. Coulter reveals the Church of Liberalism, showing its sacraments (abortion), its holy writ (Roe v. Wade), its martyrs (from Soviet spy Alger Hiss to cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal), its clergy (public school teachers), its churches (government schools, where prayer is prohibited but condoms are free), its doctrine of infal ...more

flag 19 likes · Like · see review

Mar 12, 2008 Sandra James rated it it was amazing

Shelves: conservativism

What can I say. I love Ann Coulter. If you can take the tongue-in-cheek sarcasm as just that--sarcasm, Ann's arguements are worth the effort. Great read. I couldn't put it down until I had finished it. ...more

flag 18 likes · Like · see review

Jul 18, 2008 Brandt rated it did not like it

Recommends it for: Chilly campers near a waning campfire, Russians low on toilet paper

Not much merit here. Mostly hate mongering. The beligerence is about the level of something you'd expect from someone who'd recently bad touched a "Communist" dachshund. ...more

flag 16 likes · Like · see review

Sep 30, 2009 Mike (the Paladin) rated it really liked it

Shelves: political

I noted that this book is one "they" listed as one of the worst. Sorry...can't agree. Yes it skewers a lot of sacred cows, yes Ann throws bombs...but she usually makes sense. And, she's funny doing it. Everyone has a right to their opinion political and otherwise, don't let it color your opinion as to quality. For what it is this is a well written book. Even if a lot of people would like to burn it.

My advice? Don't decide against reading a book due to someone else's opinion...take a chance, deci ...more

flag 14 likes · Like · see review

Apr 08, 2008 Anthony rated it it was amazing

Recommends it for: Anyone who REALLY wants to know what the whole conservative v. liberal debate is all about

Shelves: politics-political-thought, favorites

Ok, so I love Ann Coulter, I’ve said it. Abrasive and politically incorrect in the extreme, she calls it like she sees it and, if you can get past her confrontational style to her message, she is usually right on the money. (no pun intended…) This is the best of her myriad books and plainly elucidates the core values (or lack thereof) in the ongoing conservative v. liberal philosophical debate. You really ought to read this book, even if you think you can’t stand the author. You may discover tha ...more

flag 14 likes · Like · see review

Jul 27, 2008 Noelle rated it really liked it

Although some of the things she says are a little caustic, I thought it was informative. The democrats are very against teaching Christianity in schools, but they have replaced it with their own religion and set of values. Instead of teaching creationism, they demand teaching evolution (which many atheistic scientist agree is not supported by scientific evidence.) There were a lot of other things that were worth reading.

flag 14 likes · Like · see review

Jan 02, 2008 Bob Pratt rated it did not like it

Recommends it for: people I hate

Shelves: total-crap

I got this book for free, otherwise I would never had read it. It is the most B.S. book I have ever seen. Little evidence, wild accusations, and spitefull attacks on anyone who doesn't share her viewpoints. Needless to say I left my copy by my toilet, in case I run out of T.P.. ...more

flag 12 likes · Like · see review

Sep 22, 2008 Regina Doman rated it it was amazing

Really enjoyed it, but I am a fan. I knew all the basics of the material Coulter covers (what conservative religious person isn't familiar with the usual attacks?) but I *still* learned something new and still found myself riveted. Preaching to the choir, maybe, but enjoyable! ...more

flag 12 likes · Like · see review

May 26, 2009 Todd rated it did not like it

Shelves: science-fiction, american-politics

"I'm a Christian first, and a mean-spirited, bigoted conservative second, and don't you ever forget it. You know who else was kind of "divisive" in terms of challenging the status quo and the powers-that-be of his day? Jesus Christ."
— Ann Coulter (If Democrats had Any Brains, They'd be Republicans)

Even though I never agree with Ann Coulter I used to at least think she was intelligent. She passed the bar exam right? But, after reading Godless: the Church of Liberalism I take that back. This is ...more

flag 9 likes · Like · see review

Apr 16, 2008 Travis rated it did not like it

Shelves: that-crazy-woman

Liberalism is a religion, and a whacked out one at that, but conservatism is a rational school of thought?
name calling is humor and/ or political commentary?

and what's up with Ann's hate for the 9-11 widows? How very Christian of her and compassionate conservative of her.

I'm really baffled what the appeal of this woman is.

...more

flag 9 likes · Like · see review

Mar 14, 2008 Andrew rated it did not like it · review of another edition

Shelves: politics

Complete garbage. A book packed with name calling and absurd generalizations. Even from a conservative perspective this book is best passed over.

flag 9 likes · Like · see review

Jun 17, 2008 E. Paul Whetten rated it it was ok

Shelves: politics-current-events

Ann’s pen is sharp and some of the insults in this book are clever and humorous, but the ugly tone in this book is just plain exhausting. I’m sure there are good arguments for conservatism vs. liberalism in here somewhere, but they are buried so deeply in name calling and vitriol that they are hard to find.

flag 8 likes · Like · see review

Oct 17, 2009 Marvin rated it did not like it

Recommends it for: absolutely no one

Shelves: non-fiction

Giving another one star review to Ann Coulter''s Godless is probably just another example of sadistic sodomistic necrophilia (that's beating a dead horse) yet anything to lower the general review rating to a more realistic level (like...maybe...one) should be appreciated.

Bottom line. Coulter reveals herself in this book to be petty, vicious, totally devoid of any real ability to understand anything of a scientific nature, and totally unwilling to have an open mind about anything outside her own Giving another one star review to Ann Coulter''s Godless is probably just another example of sadistic sodomistic necrophilia (that's beating a dead horse) yet anything to lower the general review rating to a more realistic level (like...maybe...one) should be appreciated.

Bottom line. Coulter reveals herself in this book to be petty, vicious, totally devoid of any real ability to understand anything of a scientific nature, and totally unwilling to have an open mind about anything outside her own very narrow outlook. Coulter's attempts to call Liberalism a religion does nothing but expose the fact that she has no idea but a religious ideology is. Certainly, if anyone has turn her political viewpoint into a religion it is Ann Coulter. I have always been at a loss to understand why she is so popular because most of the conservatives I know can't stand her either. There must be a lot of stupid conservatives out there that I haven't met.

Now I want to get on my 58 year old soapbox for a minute. American political commentary wasn't always this awful. When I grew up in the 60s and 70s, there were a lot of stupid AND smart commentators on the air, both liberal and conservative. There were even some moderate commentators. Isn't that an extinct breed now? Yet that changed after the loss of the Fairness Doctrine. (edit: For those who are unfamiliar with this concept, The Fairness Doctrine was an FCC regulation that required American broadcasters to present both sides of an issue. It was removed in the early eighties not coincidentally ringing in the beginning of shows like Rush Limbaugh who had no incentive or ability to present a fair sided debate) Broadcasters went for the lowest denominator. They would put on commentators who massaged their audience's ego and not actually examine all sides of a topic. We have turned into a nation of close minded narcissists who don't even know how to intelligently put forth an argument for their belief. That certainly describes Coulter who thinks people do not take her seriously because "I'm beautiful". News flash. People do not take you seriously because you do not present anything to take seriously. I think the popularity of the Coulters and Limbaughs are directly attributable to the end of the Fairness Doctrine and the creation of pseudo news station that pretend to be "Fair and Balanced". And before someone shouts "What about the liberals"..yes, I put MSNBC in this category of pseudo news station, yet not CNN and NPR which remains in my opion, to be fairly objective. I consider myself smart enough to notice and examine any subjectivity in a news report, which will always be there somehow. This is what we have lost in our dialogue; our own ability to seek all sides and then make an informed decision. Until that is returned, the Coulters of the world will continue to usher in a new age of stupidity. ...more

flag 7 likes · Like · see review

Dec 18, 2007 Lisa rated it did not like it

I couldn't finish this book. This woman is an embarrassment to what she claims to believe in. I have no idea where she comes up with all the crap she writes about. Don't read this book! I wish I could give it less than 1 star. ...more

flag 7 likes · Like · see review

Jul 26, 2008 Dionne rated it really liked it

Shelves: political

I love anything written by Ann Coulter!

flag 6 likes · Like · see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

topics	posts	views	last activity
Goodreads Librari...: Please merge and update details	3	14	Mar 10, 2016 02:37PM
Christian Theolog...: Ann Coulter and her defense of Christianity	15	39	Sep 02, 2014 10:02PM

Readers also enjoyed

See similar books…

Genres

Politics

143 users

Nonfiction

82 users

Humor

14 users

Audiobook

7 users

Religion

6 users

Politics > Political Science

6 users

Cultural

5 users

History

3 users

Biology > Evolution

2 users

Womens

2 users

See top shelves…

About Ann Coulter

Ann Coulter

414 followers

Ann Coulter is the author of seven New York Times bestsellers — Guilty: Liberal Victims and Their Assault on America (January 2009);If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans (October, 2007); Godless: The Church of Liberalism (June 2006); How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must)(October, 2004); Treason: Liberal Treachery From the Cold War to the War on Terrorism (June 2003); Slander: Liberal Ann Coulter is the author of seven New York Times bestsellers — Guilty: Liberal Victims and Their Assault on America (January 2009);If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans (October, 2007); Godless: The Church of Liberalism (June 2006); How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must)(October, 2004); Treason: Liberal Treachery From the Cold War to the War on Terrorism (June 2003); Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right (June 2002); and High Crimes and Misdemeanors:The Case Against Bill Clinton (August 1998).

Coulter is the legal correspondent for Human Events and writes a popular syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate.

She is a frequent guest on many TV shows, including The Today Show, Good Morning America, The Early Show, The Tonight Show with Jay Leno, Hannity, The O'Reilly Factor, The Glen Beck Show, HBO's Real Time with Bill Maher, and has been profiled in numerous publications, including TV Guide, the Guardian (UK), the New York Observer, National Journal, Harper's Bazaar, and Elle magazine. She was the April 25, 2005 cover story of Time magazine.

In 2001, Coulter was named one of the top 100 Public Intellectuals by federal judge Richard Posner.

A Connecticut native, Coulter graduated with honors from Cornell University School of Arts & Sciences, and received her J.D. from University of Michigan Law School, where she was an editor of The Michigan Law Review.

Coulter clerked for the Honorable Pasco Bowman II of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and was an attorney in the Department of Justice Honors Program for outstanding law school graduates.

After practicing law in private practice in New York City, Coulter worked for the Senate Judiciary Committee, where she handled crime and immigration issues for Senator Spencer Abraham of Michigan. From there, she became a litigator with the Center For Individual Rights in Washington, DC, a public interest law firm dedicated to the defense of individual rights with particular emphasis on freedom of speech, civil rights, and the free exercise of religion. ...more

Books by Ann Coulter

How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must): The World According to Ann Coulter

Demonic: How the Liberal Mob is Endangering America

Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism

Guilty: Liberal "Victims" and Their Assault on America

Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right

More…

News & Interviews

Peek Ahead at the Biggest Mysteries and Thrillers for the Rest of the Year

Craving a wily whodunit or suspenseful story right now? You're in luck, because we have all the clues to lead you to some seriously spectacular...

Trivia About Godless: The Chur...

3 trivia questions

More quizzes & trivia...

Quotes from Godless: The Chur...

“No matter what argument you make against evolution, the response is Well, you know, it's possible to believe in evolution and believe in God. Yes, and it's possible to believe in Spiderman and believe in God, but that doesn't prove Spiderman is true.” — 44 likes

“The New York Times and the rest of the mainstream media will only refer to partial birth abortion as 'what its opponents refer to as partial birth abortions.' What do its supporters call it? Casual Fridays? Bean-with-bacon potato chip dip? Uh . . . Steve?” — 9 likes

More quotes…

See a Problem?

Preview — Godless by Ann Coulter

Godless: The Church of Liberalism

Get A Copy

Friend Reviews

Reader Q&A

Lists with This Book

Community Reviews

new topic
Discuss This Book

Readers also enjoyed

Genres

About Ann Coulter

Books by Ann Coulter

News & Interviews

Trivia About Godless: The Chur...

Quotes from Godless: The Chur...

See a Problem?

Preview — Godless by Ann Coulter

Godless: The Church of Liberalism

Get A Copy

Friend Reviews

Reader Q&A

Lists with This Book

Community Reviews

new topicDiscuss This Book

Readers also enjoyed

Genres

About Ann Coulter

Books by Ann Coulter

News & Interviews

Trivia About Godless: The Chur...

Quotes from Godless: The Chur...

new topic
Discuss This Book