Girls Who Like Boys Who Like Boys: Women and Gay Male Pornography and Erotica

by Lucy Neville

This book investigates what women enjoy about consuming, and in some cases producing, gay male erotic media–from slashfic, to pornographic texts, to visual pornography–and how this sits within their consumption of erotica and pornography more generally. In addition, it will examine how women’s use of gay male erotic media fits in with their perceptions of gender and sexuality. By drawing on a piece of wide-scale mixed methods research that examines these motivations, an original and important volume is presented that serves to explore and contribute to this under-researched area.

Genres: Nonfiction, Sexuality

232 pages, Hardcover

Published March 19, 2018

Reviews

[Terri Jones · Rating 5 out of 5]

Hey, I finished reading this 23 days before the two-year mark. I always read non-fiction quite slowly, because it's data, not story. I know stories and tropes intuitively after decades of reading them. But non-fiction is always different.

I was given a copy of this book because I was trying to puzzle out what so appealed to me in m/m Romance, and the author took pity on me. (At the time, it was over a hundred bucks, way out of my budget.) I am grateful. I've learned a lot, both about the research into various aspects surrounding the question of the appeal of slash fic to women, and about myself and my own related questions. If you have similar questions, do read this. It's worth your time.

My conclusions? M/m's primary appeal for me is the absence of sexism that a woman character invariably brings. Also, I like boys, the more the merrier. Also-also, the politics of my 'shocking' preferences and pushing the boundaries of what's "acceptable" for women to prefer appeals to me very much. :)

[Geof Sage · Rating 2 out of 5]

Blue 5/53. (For boys and for being erotica, or 'blue texts'. I'm reaching.)

So I have Many Jumbled Thoughts on this book.

Number one, the author of this academic book didn't really engage academically instead of just descriptively until ch. 7. Chapters 7 and 9 were good (from both a topical and academic standpoint) but the rest of the book was either anecdotal evidence or an overreliance on theory. There was very little attempt to engage critically with the purported topic, perhaps because the author admittedly is an academic and a writer of slashy fanfic herself. Oddly, there was a lot of discussion of QaF slash, which is weird because that specific show and its slash community were big HALF MY LIFE AGO. Also, AO3 and ff.net get shoutouts which JUST FELT WEIRD.

She also draws a line between 'acafans' (academics who are fans) and the rest of fandom. Gatekeep-y. I also assume that this book wasn't written with me as a target audience in mind - I do have some credibility though; I work with poetry that is full of REALLY GAY SUBTEXT (and sometimes text, but mostly SUBTEXT) plus I've read slash. Don't even try to tell me Fraser is straight.

Honestly, this book reminded me why I don't like fandoms. They're clubby and the idea that there are OTPs (helpfully explained in an endnote, like the reader of this volume wouldn't know what an OTP or a Mary Sue, etc. was) that Must Not Be Overturned is shit. And I say this as someone who firmly believes that Fraser/RayV is the marriage and (Fraser/)RayK is the sexy hot boytoy on the side. (OK, so I don't remember With Six You Get Eggroll ALL THAT WELL). See also Steve/Bucky & (Steve/)Sam in the MCU. Jed/Leo isn't even subtext-y. Look at those lingering stares.

Also, her defense of fans reads like #NotAllFans. Yes, many many many (I would assume most) fans of slash are reasonable well-adjusted people. But I remember interacting parasocially with several who weren't online. Her survey of female self-admitted slash fans is a good number across countries and sexualities and ages, but she also clearly cherry picks anecdotes when a more thorough examination of the statistical data is necessary to back it up. Her examination is cursory.

Honestly, it was like reading a senior thesis that got a B on stuff my college friends could discuss better instead of doctorate-level material.

On the plus side, mention of Supernatural mpreg & SGA John/Rodney in anecdotes. Because everyone knows John/Rodney should be canon. Just look at them.

I was really excited to read this book, and I was let down so hard.

[Jackie · Rating 4 out of 5]

3.5 See more at:
http://romancenovelsforfeminists.blog...

[Monbon · Rating 3 out of 5]

some very interesting insights and lots of further reading to do, some of it was quite... hmm. unwilling to counter much of what was quoted? but this aca fan stuff is new to me, so.

[Gigi · Rating 3 out of 5]

Sa kung ano-anong fandom na ko napasama pero this year ko lang na-discover ang fan fiction (at ang nakakabilib na AO3 and the people behind it). Ewan ko kung dahil na rin sa pandemic. Ang dami kong nabasa (at may isang nasulat haha). Grabe yung passion (and fun!). Pagsusulat nang walang hinahanap na kapalit -- dahil lang talaga gustong magsulat ng stories tungkol sa celebrities na gusto nila (may mga umaabot pa sa 200K+ words!), pagbabasa hanggang madaling araw (minsan angst pa at slow burn), zines, writing events, pagpapalitan ng fic recs, events na dedicated sa iba't ibang OTPs. All for the love. Dahil nga dito naligaw ako sa lintek na librong ito haha. Marami itong naibigay na background about slash literature at insight kung bakit ito tinatangkilik lalo na ng mga babae at insight din sa epekto nito sa kultura at mindset ng mga tao. I also learned a lot about myself (at marami pala kami), bakit mataas lagi ang ratings ko sa mga stories gaya ng Beijing Comrades at 2gether hahaha. I appreciate the research that the author did (ang daming references!) and the interviews she conducted. I also appreciate that the author is a reader and a writer of slash herself. Yung isang hinahanap ko lang, same as the other reviews, sana sinama niya yung questionnaire na ginamit niya and the responses. Siguro nandun yun sa actual academic document na pinasa niya for her study? Minsan lang din medyo complex na yung mga cultural at psychological ideas na ginagamit kaya nagstruggle akong intindihin. Minsan din medyo repetitive na yung ideas. Anyway, ok pa rin naman this was still a good read for me.

[Lesley · Rating 4 out of 5]

Actually, more like three and a half: I was just getting a bit irked at how little sense there was of what slash fiction is like - apart from that it involves m/m sex, various tropes, plus various rather meta descriptions of certain common thematic issues. Possibly a bit outwith what the author was doing, but it seemed to leave a certain vagueness at the centre.

[Chelsea · Rating 3 out of 5]

Interesting, but way more of a thesis style than I was hoping for. I was looking for more of a popular science writing style.