In 1937 Ronald H. Coase published a classic paper, "The Nature of the Firm." This classic study is discussed by Oliver E. Williamson and Sidney G. Winter as they address a topic of increasing importance in the field of what is the nature of the firm in economic analysis? The study examines the impact on a firm's organization of the costs associated with producing and selling products.
This book is hard to find outside of $75 for a used paperback version. It's from a conference celebrating the 50th Anniversary of Ronald Coase's 'Nature of The Firm' essay from 1937 where he first outlined what Transaction Costs are. It's a collection of essays from 1987 including the original and follow on reflections from Ronald Coase.
It was extremely important to me as I'm a marketplace entrepreneur. Without going into the details, Transaction Costs are to business what Dark Matter is to Physics, the most ubiquitous and least understood force that moves the universe.
Economists always tout the great benefits of a 'free market' in which buyer and seller remain entirely independent of each other, save for one-off transactions. So why, Ronald Coase inquires in the classic (1937) title essay of this book, do companies and organizations exist at all? Why don't they resort to one-off transactions for a day's labour here, a month's rent over there, and a delivery truck on demand? If free markets are so efficient, why do firms internalize billions of dollars of transactions every day?
Coase claimed that many types of transactions are efficient in a free market, but there are 'transaction costs' that limit the efficiency of others. It's tough to find workers with exactly the right skills to fit a particular firm, for example, and once they are found it takes some time to assess their realizable value. These information and negotiating costs mean that most specialized and skilled human resources are internalized by firms. Other investments with high transaction costs include specialized machinery and technical knowledge.
In this book Williamson extends Coase's theoretical analysis in some practical directions. For example, he explores the mechanisms that govern different forms of transactions. Staff who work for a firm for a very long time become highly knowledgeable about its operations or its internal culture or public positioning, which strengthens their negotiating positions and shifts the balance of governance. Supplier firms can develop machinery that is so finely integrated to the firm's manufacturing processes that it is better to acquire them than lose the relationship.
For me, the relationship between transactional governance and the length of the mutual commitment between buyer and seller is fascinating, because it has very broad implications. The longer a commitment between two parties, the less possible it is to predict all the events that might come up, or to reduce the governance structure to a written contract. In a lot of contexts where the formal (text-based) economic and financial sectors have yet to consolidate because the nation has yet to attain mass literacy, this means that large numbers of transactions fail or are very precarious - for example voluntary savings accounts, insurance, or parliamentary democracy.