Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Reading the Old Testament” as Want to Read:
Reading the Old Testament
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Reading the Old Testament

3.59  ·  Rating details ·  54 Ratings  ·  8 Reviews
A new edition of a survey of biblical criticism in which the author clarifies the kinds of questions about the meaning of texts that led scholars to develop the now traditional 'historical-critical' approaches. Also covers the latest developments in biblical study, including deconstruction and postmodernism. First published in 1984.
Paperback, 256 pages
Published October 1st 1984 by Westminster John Knox Press (first published February 1st 1984)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Reading the Old Testament, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Reading the Old Testament

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
Rating details
Sort: Default
Feb 20, 2018 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This is an excellent resource for understanding the differences between the methods of biblical criticism. A must-read for any Old Testament student.
Feb 16, 2009 rated it really liked it
If cognitive dissonance didn't formerly describe your state of mind, anyone who is at all interested in struggling through the perspectives and epistemological bases of literary methods of biblical study will find their mind not only being stretched, but given a thorough shakeup by Barton. The book is incredibly enlightening by showing the circularity of various arguments, the assumptions and contexts around which they are based, and their relation to one another, but also incredibly stupefying ...more
Zachariah Kenney
Jan 22, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This was a good book delving into the theories behind various interpretative methods. I discuss it in greater detail on my blog:
Greg Baughman
Mar 06, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This book is a useful and beneficial read, but for a relatively specialized audience. I would not recommend this book to anyone who does not have a solid background in hermeneutics. I certainly would not recommend it for a lay reader. It will make little sense without some background in Biblical interpretation. Taken straight and without a context, it will prove ponderous at best, and damaging to one's faith at worst. Without a background in some of the issues and history, it can feel as if read ...more
Robert Murphy
Mar 11, 2013 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: library
Worse than a rabid liberal who loves his methodology like an idol because it's new, or a conservative who loves his because it's old, is the moderate who never lands anywhere out loud. Barton decries every method of Biblical interpretation and ultimately lands nowhere with his support. But the man *reads* the Bible and things texts mean things, he just never shows his cards. For a book about how to read the Bible, you need a Ph.D in psychology to understand how to read Barton.
Oct 15, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
If you want an unbiased (ok, less biased) introduction to the classic Old Testament critical methods (source, form, redaction, canonical, etc.), John Barton is your man. He is less focused on the history of how they came about than he is on helping you know how they can be helpful in studying the Bible today. He explains how evangelicals fit into this arena, without being negative. Typical British scholar in that!
Sep 23, 2014 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Terrific book for conservative evangelicals wanting to understand the method behind the madness of critical biblical studies. Barton overplays somethings when he characterizes source and form criticism as primarily a literary undertaking, but he does effectively make the point that source criticism does not necessarily equal the Graf-Wellhausen hypothesis.
Tsun Lu
It is Barton who shows me what is the historical consciousness of modernity. Very informative and very inspiring. I admire his capacity of critical thinking in evaluating the different methodologies. He could have been equally critical of his own view.
rated it really liked it
Jul 20, 2011
Matthew McIntosh
rated it really liked it
Jan 13, 2013
rated it liked it
Feb 03, 2015
Donovan Westbrooks
rated it really liked it
Mar 03, 2018
Amanda Springstead
rated it liked it
Jan 07, 2013
Tom Rouse
rated it it was amazing
Sep 20, 2016
rated it did not like it
Feb 25, 2009
rated it really liked it
Jul 09, 2017
rated it it was ok
Dec 25, 2014
Lucille Chavez
rated it really liked it
May 10, 2017
Trey Benfield
rated it really liked it
Feb 19, 2015
rated it really liked it
Dec 02, 2017
Thomas Mcgraw
rated it really liked it
Oct 23, 2015
Ian Spencer
rated it really liked it
Jan 20, 2018
Daniel Lee
rated it it was amazing
Nov 05, 2014
Dominick Degilio
rated it really liked it
May 05, 2016
rated it liked it
Dec 16, 2015
Richard Fitzgerald
rated it liked it
Jun 16, 2014
Stacey Douglas
rated it liked it
Jul 09, 2012
rated it really liked it
Sep 05, 2012
Mark McFaddyn
rated it liked it
Aug 17, 2014
rated it really liked it
Jul 31, 2014
« previous 1 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
For the Canadian poet, see John Barton.
More about John Barton