Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Army and Vietnam” as Want to Read:
The Army and Vietnam
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Army and Vietnam

3.86  ·  Rating details ·  139 ratings  ·  11 reviews
Many senior army officials still claim that if they had been given enough soldiers and weapons, the United States could have won the war in Vietnam. In this probing analysis of U.S. military policy in Vietnam, career army officer and strategist Andrew F. Krepinevich, Jr., argues that precisely because of this mindset the war was lost before it was fought.

The army assumed
Paperback, 344 pages
Published March 1st 1988 by Johns Hopkins University Press (first published April 1986)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Army and Vietnam, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Army and Vietnam

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.86  · 
Rating details
 ·  139 ratings  ·  11 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of The Army and Vietnam
Mar 16, 2008 rated it it was amazing
Krepinevich has a cult following among professors and students at the Marine Corps Command and Staff College. After reading his work I understand why. It is rare that ones comes across a book that radically changes the way one looks at military history. Thousands of books have been written on Vietnam and the movies "Platoon" and "Apocalypse Now" brought the war to millions of Americans. Until I read this book, I thought I understood the causes and conduct of the war. Krepinevich brilliantly ...more
Levie Galapon
Feb 14, 2014 rated it liked it
Although repetitive in nature, Krepinevich manages to cite a breadth of knowledge that points out why the Army failed in Vietnam. According to Krepinevich, the Army in particular was unprepared due to doctrine called the Army Concept. The US Army Concept revolves around the use of firepower to quickly overcome enemy forces. Furthermore, the value of US lives is important which makes the use of technology and firepower more important. Because of this, the Army in Vietnam utilized tactics and ...more
Dec 26, 2013 rated it did not like it
Just re-read in full for the first time in probably eight years. Now that I'm more familiar with the documentary record concerning Vietnam (and not just the "Vietnam literature" or the COIN-as-military reform oeuvre, which in many cases are the same thing), Krepinevich's tendentious book holds up very poorly indeed. Greg Daddis's new work (detailed review to come!) – along with recent stuff by Birtle, Andrade, Cosmas, Carland, and others – should put the final nail in this one; I don't think ...more
Mar 24, 2018 rated it liked it
Fantastic and deep analysis of the Vietnam war. We underestimated many aspects, most important, the conventional threat. While we effectively countered the communist conventional forces, they drew US troops away from what was most important - the human geography.

An argument for population centric counter-insurgency, this books presents that and many other thoughts. Well worth the read.
Roger Burk
Feb 05, 2014 rated it really liked it
If like me you have some affection for the American army and for its soldiers, this is a depressing read. It relates how the Army went into Vietnam organized, trained, and equipped for major combat in Europe, and tried to apply the same concept to a counterinsurgency. The result was massive search-and-destroy operations that missed an elusive enemy and further alienated the population. There was no recognition that counterinsurgency was a different kind of war requiring different methods. The ...more
Apr 01, 2013 rated it really liked it
This was a fantastic analysis of the Army's failure to successfully prosecute the war in Vietnam. It was easy to stay interested as the narrative moves at a good pace and the events themselves are fascinating. This book outlines the failure of the JCS to appy the correct strategy to the ground war, in spite of lessons available from the French failure in Indochina and their experience in Algieria. While the Johnson administration micromanaged the airwar, they gave Westmoreland carte blanche to ...more
Oct 04, 2014 rated it it was ok
This book is now very dated. As someone deeply familiar with the historical record on the Vietnam War through archival research, I can say that while this book captures one part of the American experience in Vietnam, it fails to be comprehensive. Yes, the points and themes highlighted here were relevant to some units at some times, but the tendency to view Krepinevich's argument as being universally valid has led to an overly simplistic view of the Vietnam War. This has had consequences for ...more
Dec 03, 2009 rated it liked it
interesting perspective on what should have happened for a successful intervention in Vietnam, but I felt the author kept placing the blame on the Army time and time again. yes, I realize that's the point of the book, but how many times can you drive the point home? endless, i guess! still, a very interesting and enlightening story about the experience.
Brett Matzenbacher
Jan 22, 2016 rated it liked it
Population centric COIN is a panacea! At least according to Krepinevich....

Certainly some useful insights and critiques of the US approach in Vietnam, but also somewhat one dimensional
Matt Danner
Jan 22, 2013 rated it it was amazing
Accurate, thorough, and wholly depressing. After reading this, one would presume that the United States could never make such critical and wasteful errors again. Wrong.

Jun 16, 2008 rated it it was amazing
Far and away the best analysis of the Army's strategy in Vietnam and why it failed...
Jonathan Rue
rated it liked it
Jun 13, 2013
rated it really liked it
Mar 27, 2008
Johnny Wimmer
rated it really liked it
Jul 31, 2019
rated it liked it
Apr 26, 2008
rated it really liked it
Sep 03, 2010
rated it it was amazing
May 27, 2016
Fred Helfrich
rated it it was amazing
Aug 21, 2019
Killian Cholbi
rated it liked it
Feb 04, 2017
rated it liked it
Mar 21, 2014
Andrew Ringlee
rated it really liked it
May 08, 2017
rated it it was amazing
May 10, 2012
rated it really liked it
Jan 29, 2011
Drew Cramer
rated it really liked it
Mar 16, 2013
John Fine
rated it it was amazing
Dec 13, 2016
lorenzo harris
rated it really liked it
Oct 15, 2016
Breane Ross
rated it liked it
Jun 03, 2016
rated it liked it
Mar 10, 2012
P J Mc Carty
rated it it was amazing
Apr 27, 2018
rated it it was amazing
Apr 06, 2016
« previous 1 3 4 5 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • History of the Peloponnesian War
  • The Tide at Sunrise: A History of the Russo-Japanese War, 1904-05
  • Starship Troopers
  • Xenocide (Ender's Saga, #3)
  • What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815 - 1848
  • American Crucible: Race and Nation in the Twentieth Century
  • The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
  • God Emperor of Dune (Dune Chronicles, #4)
  • Survivor
  • Choke
  • Pygmy
  • The Hike
  • The Postmortal
  • Children of Dune (Dune Chronicles, #3)
  • Baltimore, or, The Steadfast Tin Soldier and the Vampire
  • Galveston
  • Leviathan
  • So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish (Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, #4)
See similar books…