Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.

Start by marking “Sonic Agency: Sound and Emergent Forms of Resistance” as Want to Read:

Other editions

Enlarge cover

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Open Preview

Sonic Agency: Sound and Emergent Forms of Resistance

Brandon LaBelle

3.69 · Rating details · 13 ratings · 2 reviews

A timely exploration of whether sound and listening can be the basis of political change.

In a world dominated by the visual, could contemporary resistances be auditory? This timely and important book from Goldsmiths Press highlights sound's invisible, disruptive, and affective qualities and asks whether the unseen nature of sound can support a political transformation. In ...more

Get A Copy

Hardcover, 224 pages

Published February 15th 2018 by Goldsmiths Press

More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Sonic Agency, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Sonic Agency

Lists with This Book

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

Showing 1-43

Average rating 3.69 ·

Rating details

· 13 ratings · 2 reviews

More filters

Sort order

Start your review of Sonic Agency: Sound and Emergent Forms of Resistance

Mar 27, 2018 Franck rated it liked it

Brandon LaBelle is a well-known theoretician and practitioner in the field of sound art, noise music and the "Acousmatic". In recent years, he has focused on the relationship of space (as in "Acoustic Territories" and sound / noise (as in "Background Noise"). His most recent book outlines some interesting ideas about the function of sound in public space. How sound could be civilizing, potentially resistant, or even community-building - beyond the privatized "neoliberal" urban spaces that charac ...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Jul 05, 2020 Scott Neigh added it

A book concerned with "positioning sound and its discourses in dialogue with contemporary struggles," that attempts to seek out "ethical and agentive positions or tactics" grounded in "experiences we have of listening and being heard" (1). It does this by drawing on the scholarly area of sound studies and a range of other theoretical resources, as well as various manifestations of sound and listening, to construct four figures – the invisible, the overheard, the itinerant, and the weak – for re- A book concerned with "positioning sound and its discourses in dialogue with contemporary struggles," that attempts to seek out "ethical and agentive positions or tactics" grounded in "experiences we have of listening and being heard" (1). It does this by drawing on the scholarly area of sound studies and a range of other theoretical resources, as well as various manifestations of sound and listening, to construct four figures – the invisible, the overheard, the itinerant, and the weak – for re-thinking the social world and how we act to change it.

Given one of my major pieces of work at the moment, this should have been an inspiring and deeply informative read, but my experience of it was much more ambivalent than that. Though there definitely were fascinating new-to-me ideas in the book, and it did point me towards other sources that may be useful to me, I spent most of my time while reading it reflecting on the complicated relationship between academic work and struggles for collective liberation. As I've said lots of times before, I'm a firm believer that it is possible to read many different kinds of scholarly work in ways that can help inform such struggles, even when the work was not written with that intent in mind – this is rarely the most important thing for people doing intellectual work for and with movements to be doing, but it is at least possible and sometimes quite useful. And, like I said, there were things in here that felt that kind of useful to me. Like in the chapter on "the overheard," the book outlines an interesting vision for the ways in which the highly networked, mediated, and surveilled realities of at least many of us in rich countries create a distinctive social environment where much of both our own experience and formation, as well as our contributions to the experiences and formation of others, are arbitrary, fragmented, unintended encounters. What does that actually mean for who we are, how we know the world, and how we might act to change it? Questions worth asking, I think. And there were plenty of other bits and pieces – far from all, but more than a few – that got at aspects of the social world in new-to-me and interesting ways.

Unfortunately, notwithstanding those bits, lots of this book also felt disconnected and not very useful. And I am not sure quite how to talk about it, because I don't want to feed into the anti-intellectualism in the general culture or the variant that pops up in movements – I don't think it helps to be dismissive of anti-intellectual responses and we should work to understand where they come from, because it is often connected to power and is enflamed by the more ridiculous and elitist elements of scholarly research and writing, but I don't want to contribute to it. At the same time, this is a book that draws explicitly on movements, written by someone who seems to have political commitments that seem like pretty good ones to me, and when I sit and think about how its substance specifically when it comes to things like agency and change might be useful...I don't come up with much. I worry I'm being unfair or ungenerous. No doubt other readers would have a different experience than me. And like I said I think there are bits and pieces in it about how the social world today works that are potentially useful. But much that seems to want to be relevant to struggles for justice and liberation seems to be floating in the air somewhere, disconnected and not easy to pull down to earth.

I've been trying to articulate a bit more clearly what it is about the work that makes me say that. I'm sure if I took more time than I care to, I could come up with something. But my best preliminary guess goes back to feminist sociologist Dorothy Smith's insight from decades ago about the very real, material divide between knowledge that emerges from a grounding in the world of the everyday and most knowledge in the academy that is produced in relation to other institutional discourses and the ruling regimes in which they are embedded.

On a related but narrower and perhaps more petty note, I also found it frustrating that the book would retreat into asking rhetorical questions, often as a device to suggest a certain sort of relationship between its ideas and struggle, without actually having to definitively claim that relationship and therefore have to defend it.

Anyway. Reading this has not fundamentally changed my sense of the kinds of things I think are worth reading, or my sense of the relationship between scholarly work and movemenets. But it perhaps makes clearer something that I already knew: that the relationship between the topic of a given piece of work and its likelihood of containing useful-to-me ideas is a complicated one.

Also reviewed on my blog: https://scottneigh.blogspot.com/2020/... ...more

flag Like · see review

Madeline THall rated it really liked it
May 04, 2020

Andrei rated it liked it
Dec 09, 2019

Mia rated it it was amazing
Jun 05, 2020

Murat Alat rated it liked it
Jul 16, 2020

Afonso Matos rated it liked it
Apr 16, 2020

Alex Vann rated it it was amazing
Jun 18, 2019

SPH rated it liked it
Apr 05, 2020

Jamie Maule rated it liked it
Jan 24, 2019

Bill rated it it was amazing
Mar 30, 2020

Josh rated it it was amazing
Sep 25, 2019

Claire Matthews rated it liked it
Jul 09, 2020

Christopher rated it liked it
May 02, 2019

Alasdair Pettinger marked it as to-read
Jan 16, 2018

Benedek Vasák marked it as to-read
Feb 04, 2018

Matthew Purcell marked it as to-read
Feb 09, 2018

Henry Murray marked it as to-read
Feb 21, 2018

Christine marked it as to-read
Mar 21, 2018

Sean marked it as to-read
Mar 25, 2018

Isak Nyman marked it as to-read
Apr 15, 2018

Andras Nemeth is currently reading it
Apr 25, 2018

Louis Johnson marked it as to-read
May 09, 2018

b marked it as to-read
May 14, 2018

natpod marked it as to-read
Jun 09, 2018

Danielle marked it as to-read
Jun 10, 2018

Ophélie Petit marked it as to-read
Jun 11, 2018

Simon marked it as to-read
Jun 30, 2018

Sam marked it as to-read
Jul 12, 2018

Julia marked it as to-read
Jul 21, 2018

Stefano Steno marked it as to-read
Aug 19, 2018

Msmlska marked it as to-read
Aug 19, 2018

Kpr32 is currently reading it
Sep 02, 2018

Gediminas marked it as to-read
Sep 12, 2018

Oak3000 marked it as to-read
Sep 15, 2018

Laurent Güdel marked it as to-read
Nov 05, 2018

Laçin T. marked it as to-read
Nov 12, 2018

vi macdonald marked it as to-read
Nov 12, 2018

Hrefna Sigurðardóttir marked it as to-read
Nov 13, 2018

Marat Aglalit marked it as to-read
Nov 20, 2018

Lyndsie A marked it as to-read
Nov 21, 2018

Kyle marked it as to-read
Nov 23, 2018

Or ha marked it as to-read
Nov 27, 2018

new topic
Discuss This Book

There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Recommend It | Stats | Recent Status Updates

Readers also enjoyed

See similar books…

Genres

Music

2 users

See top shelves…

About Brandon LaBelle

Brandon LaBelle

6 followers

Brandon LaBelle is Professor in New Media in the Faculty of Fine Art, Music and Design at the University of Bergen. He is the author of Lexicon of the Mouth: Poetics and Politics of Voice and the Oral Imaginary, Diary of an Imaginary Egyptian, Acoustic Territories: Sound Culture and Everyday Life, and Background Noise: Perspectives on Sound Art.