The Cold War U.S. Army: Building Deterrence for Limited War

Modern War Studies

by Ingo Trauschweizer

The Cold War marked a new era for America's military, one dominated by nuclear weapons and air power that seemed to diminish the need for conventional forces. Ingo Trauschweizer chronicles the U.S. Army's struggles with its identity, structure, and mission in the face of those challenges, showing how it evolved, redefined its mission more than once, and ultimately transformed itself.
Trauschweizer describes how, beginning in the 1950s, the army faced an unprecedented problem: how to maintain a combat-ready fighting force that could operate on both conventional and nuclear battlefields. Faced with shifting threats to national security, budgetary battles, and unstable political developments around the globe, the army also had to keep abreast of new weaponry while navigating changes in its own top brass and the presidency.
Trauschweizer particularly considers the army's organizational and doctrinal response to problems posed by deterrence in Europe, focusing on the evolving role of the Seventh Army in West Germany-the largest and best-prepared field army the U.S. had ever deployed in peacetime. He explores the roles of Generals Matthew Ridgway, Maxwell Taylor, and others, as well as the use role of tactical nuclear weapons, as he traces the army's transformation through the New Look policy, pentomic reorganization, and the adoption of the ROAD concept.
Ultimately, Trauschweizer contends, the army found it impossible to prepare for limited war in the Third World while pursuing its primary mission of deterrence in Europe. His revisionist argument about the army's objectives in the 1960s and early 1970s places the Vietnam War in the context of the wider Cold War, offering new lines of inquiry into both. He also shows how, after the debacle of Vietnam, the army's sense of mission, technological evolution, organizational structure, and operational doctrine matured to produce the AirLand Battle doctrine of 1982, the cornerstone of our defense of Europe until the Cold War finally ended.
The U.S. Army's evolution during the 1950s and its role in Europe throughout the Cold War have remained two of the most neglected subjects in American military history. By covering the interaction of strategy, organization, doctrine, and technology in the army during this era--as well as the relationship between army doctrine and U.S./NATO defense strategy--The Cold War U.S. Army marks a major contribution to our understanding of both subjects.

384 pages, Hardcover

First published June 3, 2008

Reviews

[Jonathan · Rating 5 out of 5]

In spite of shooting wars in Korea and Vietnam, the focus of the US Army during the Cold War was firmly on Germany and deterring a Soviet attack on Western Europe and NATO that could rapidly transform into a full-scale strategic nuclear exchange between the superpowers. The greatest challenge was how to integrate the use of "tactical" nuclear weapons into a fighting method that would have seen the US Army fighting an enemy with a numerical superiority. It was not always evident how to win - or even survive - such a war, and it took the end of the Vietnam War, the adaptation of the all-volunteer force, and an intellectual revolution during the late 1970's through the 1980's to accomplish the necessary changes. This was the basis of the well-trained and effective military machine that won the First Gulf War so quickly. This book isn't a comprehensive or social history of the army, but rather a thorough institutional history that focuses on doctrine, strategy, operational planning, organizational structure, and technology.

Note: the book isn't as exciting or glamorous as the title suggests. If you aren't interested in a tiresome slog through a slow-moving academic work, you might want to wait for the movie to come out.

[Darrell E. · Rating 5 out of 5]

I'm a bit biased having studied under Dr. Trauschweizer, but I found this an excellent look at the evolution of the US Army from Korea into the Gulf War. This book is certainly not written for mass consumption, but rather to fill a void in the literature. However, it does a good job of demonstrating how the army developed and tested concepts and exchanged ideas. As the army faces new threats this book may help leaders when considering how to shape the force and develop doctrine.

[Aaron VanAlstine · Rating 3 out of 5]

A dry academic history. Very interesting if it’s your thing, however.