Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Presidents of War: The Epic Story, from 1807 to Modern Times” as Want to Read:
Presidents of War: The Epic Story, from 1807 to Modern Times
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Presidents of War: The Epic Story, from 1807 to Modern Times

4.24  ·  Rating details ·  1,125 ratings  ·  172 reviews
From a preeminent presidential historian comes a groundbreaking and often surprising narrative of America’s wartime chief executives

It sometimes seems, in retrospect, as if America has been almost continuously at war. Ten years in the research and writing, Presidents of War is a fresh, magisterial, intimate look at a procession of American leaders as they took the nation
Hardcover, 752 pages
Published October 9th 2018 by Crown
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Presidents of War, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Presidents of War

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
4.24  · 
Rating details
 ·  1,125 ratings  ·  172 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Bill Gates
May 20, 2019 rated it really liked it
If I had been just a year or two older, I might have been called to serve in the Vietnam War. I think that’s one reason why I’m so interested in books and movies about the war. I always come back to the same question: If I had fought in the war, would I have showed courage under fire? Like many people who have not served, I have my doubts.

In addition to thinking about those who fought and died in the war, I have also spent a lot of time learning about those who directed the war. My interest in a
Jeffrey Keeten
”At about 4:30 on Friday morning, April 12, 1861, a single mortar shell tore a thin streak through the blue-black sky over Charleston Harbor, then dropped onto Fort Sumter, exploding into a burst of red and orange.”

 photo Fort20Sumter_zps8f8svhrg.jpg

With that one mortar shell, South Carolina touched off a conflict that would claim the lives of approximately 618,222 soldiers. The greatest toll of lives, by far, of any war fought by America. There were two very different perspectives of the prospect of this war. The South was exc
Aaron Million
Apr 22, 2019 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: american-history
Michael Beschloss spent a decade researching and writing this absorbing portrait of American Presidents taking the country into various wars, and his commitment to the project shows in its high quality. This is a very good book, and as usual with Beschloss, combines popular readability with vigorous research and extended, informative footnotes. Beschloss shows how, over time, the war-making power of Congress has been usurped and now basically ignored by Presidents of both political parties. This ...more
Nov 26, 2018 rated it really liked it
“While donning his sack coat, [Captain Charles D.] Sigsbee had found a ten-month-old letter from one of [his wife] Eliza’s friends, which had gone unanswered. On the ship’s tricolor stationary, he started writing Eliza (‘My darling Wife’) to apologize, and heard the [USS] Maine’s Marine bugler, ‘Fifer’ Newton, the popular third baseman for the ship’s baseball team, play 'Taps.' Sigsbee put down his fountain pen to listen. Then, at 9:40, just as he slipped his completed letter (‘Lovingly, C.D.S.’ ...more
Nov 04, 2018 rated it it was amazing
Presidents of War: The Epic Story, from 1807 to Modern Times is a meticulously researched book that author Michael Beschloss has spent the last ten years in preparing it for publication by reviewing correspondence, diaries and declassified documents, which is quite apparent in the historical sweep and scope of the book. This historical narrative begins in 1807 with the assault on the USS Chesapeake and the measures taken by President Thomas Jefferson to avoid war through the Bush administration ...more
Joseph Sciuto
Nov 03, 2018 rated it it was amazing
Michael Beschloss' "Presidents of War" is an extraordinary work, so extraordinary that it should be required reading for anyone seeking the Presidency, Vice Presidency, a Senate seat, a congressional seat or any cabinet positions in the United States Government. 

This amazing piece of historical record brought me to tears on many occasions just thinking about the mothers and fathers who lost their children to wars fought for the benefit to get a President re-elected, out of selfish pride, stupid
Intimate portraits how the 'Presidents of war' fared during the war years, their struggles, both politically and emotionally and how the original vision of the founding fathers has eroded during modern times

At the dawn of the American republic, the framers of the constitution had a dream: that war would be regarded as the last resort of their invented political system. Unlike the European powers at that time, where monarchs and dictators could declare war at will, in the American Republic it wou
Apr 04, 2019 rated it really liked it
Shelves: listened-to
Beschloss has an ambitious goal with this book and he almost makes it: An in depth account of each time a President took us to war (and the one time a President didn't, thanks Jefferson!). I say almost because Beschloss largely focuses on the President at the time the war started, but not always. He gives short shrift to those that come later. I'm specifically thinking of Truman with World War II and Nixon and Ford with the Vietnam war. Now I know Beschloss has a whole other book on FDR and Trum ...more
Oct 04, 2018 rated it it was amazing
I won a free copy of this book from Goodreads First Reads.

An interesting thread to follow through American history, the presidents that served during wartime from the War of 1812 to Vietnam. A few chapters are devoted to each conflict with the background to the war and the man in office at the time along with politics more broadly. It is interesting how one bleeds into the next via the advisers or the young Congressman of one being President the next. But more importantly decisions made during
Krisette Spangler
Aug 11, 2019 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: history
This novel was a page turner for me. It chronicles the wars of the United States from the War of 1812 to the Vietnam War. The author explores the reasons for the wars and often what the President of the United States did to circumvent Congress to enter the war without congressional approval. I loved the author's approach as he offered equal amounts criticism and praise for these early leaders of our nation. I learned so much, and I hope he does a follow up at some point that includes the War on ...more
Feb 02, 2019 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: history, military
Michael Beschloss's Presidents of War addresses the exercise of presidential power in U. S. wars from 1812 to the present, underlining the way that presidents have left their personal morals aside and extended the war powers of the executive branch. It is a deeply researched and very readable report of the American experience with that aspect of international politics we call "War." The book is long—about 600 pages of text—and most readers will be familiar with recent wars, perhaps even as parti ...more
Bruce Katz
May 29, 2019 rated it really liked it
Shelves: american-history
A well written, thorough, and insightful history. I learned a lot of things I hadn’t known, had several misconceptions rectified, saw evidence that many of the things in politics that infuriate me now have been with us for a long, long time.
Mar 26, 2019 rated it it was amazing
The Erosion of Constitutional Checks on Commitment to War

Much has been written about how America’s wars have been conducted. Michael Beschloss has written a book about how America’s wars have started.

When a king was unpopular, the framers of the Constitution observed, he would often contrive a war to gain popular support. Thus, in order to make it difficult for a President to take the nation into conflict unilaterally, Congress was given the power to declare war. Beschloss argues that over time
Ted Hunt
Apr 17, 2019 rated it really liked it
This is a very well researched and well written book that examines the conduct of war of most, but not all, of the nations "war presidents." It looks at Madison, Polk, Lincoln, McKinley, Wilson, FDR, and Lyndon Johnson, analyzing how each of these men brought the nation into war and how they interpreted and used their status as "commander in chief" to attempt to bring each conflict to a successful conclusion. As one would imagine, given the length of the book (586 pages) and its relatively narro ...more
Donald Owens II
Mar 13, 2019 rated it really liked it
A thoughtful and sobering chronicle of the gradual increase of presidential power to unilaterally wage war and ignore the constitutional limits on authority.
Dave Schoettinger
Nov 03, 2018 rated it liked it
The author considers this book as being the history of American presidents using war to secure more power and independence of action at the expense of Congressional oversight; and it is that. However, as something of a history geek, I thought the best part of the book was the inclusion of some of the obscure details of the periods covered, such as the route James K. Polk took from Nashville to Washington for his inauguration, or the surprise connection between the Gulf of Tonkin attack and rock ...more
Stan  Prager
Jan 30, 2019 rated it liked it
Review of: Presidents of War, by Michael Beschloss
by Stan Prager (1-30-19)

The Founders sought a separation of powers in war-making, as in so much else of consequence to the new Republic, so the Constitution mandated that only Congress may declare war, while assigning to the President of the United States authority as commander in chief of the armed forces. A history of European monarchs engaging in war by fiat informed this caution in limiting the ability of the executive branch to act without
Porter Broyles
I listened to about 25% of this book before I quit. It's not necessarily a bad book, but:

1. The coverage of the events is a little light, I'm familiar with many of the stories told.

2. The book felt like it was a subtle advocacy piece.

The bias in the book made it hard for me to accept.
Clay Davis
Jan 09, 2019 rated it really liked it
Liked the earlier wars that were researched than the later ones. The book needs a better cover.
Daniel Saab
Apr 03, 2019 rated it it was amazing
I think this is an important read for anyone looking for an anchored perspective on our history with war and insight on the decisions made (in both good and bad faith). It's fascinating to put all the pieces together; I feel like a got a focused realignment of information I learned and probably let get muddy throughout my life.
Dec 01, 2018 rated it it was amazing
Beginning with Thomas Jefferson and the Chesapeake Incident of 1807, Beschloss takes his readers through a series of fascinating chapters on the War of 1812, the Mexican War, the Civil War, the Spanish-American War, both World Wars, Korea and Vietnam.

The Persian Gulf War and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are relegated to a brief Epilogue, still too recent for fully considered historical judgement. Each war is vividly described from the point of view of the Presidents, their supporters and op
Feb 05, 2019 rated it it was amazing
I wish all historians could write history as entertaining and enlightening as Beschloss. His transition from president to president while holding on to details and demonstrating how one tied to the other was fascinating.

I highly recommend.
Nov 25, 2018 rated it really liked it
This book is an in-depth discussion of how the American Presidents dealt with their power during the execution of the war they were involved in. These are: James Madison & the War of 1812; James Polk & the Mexican-American War; Abraham Lincoln & the Civil War; William McKinley & the Spanish American War; Woodrow Wilson & the First World War; Franklin Roosevelt & the Second World War; Harry Truman & the Korean War & Lyndon Johnson & the Vietnam War. It the end ...more
Nov 19, 2018 rated it liked it
Beschloss introduces us to the evolution of presidential power in wartime with novelistic flair. Long on narrative, but somewhat terse in analytical terms, "Presidents of War" offers a balanced perspective. He highlights strengths and weaknesses of several major wartime presidencies, including Jefferson's, Madison's, Polk's, Lincoln's, McKinley's, Wilson's, FDR's and Johnson's. Readers familiar with the histories of those president's wars may find the storytelling a bit repetitive, but each chap ...more
Bill Zarges
Nov 17, 2018 rated it really liked it
Very good review of how Congress was relieved of its constitutional prerogative to declare war......
Oct 20, 2018 rated it it was amazing
I won this in a Goodreads Giveaway. So thanks to Goodreads and Crown Publishing.

This is a fantastic piece of work exploring the thread running through American history of Presidents and their expanding war time powers. This book spotlights the presidents who fought unnecessary wars, the presidents who lied or manipulated actions to enter wars, and how these presidents chose to involve Congress before and during war time. The constitution grants Congress the power to declare war, but the author s
Summary: An account of eight American presidents who led the nation into war, how they coped with its stresses, and the consequences of their actions with regard to presidential power.

As recent tensions (I write in July 2019) with North Korea and Iran underscore, the potential and power of a U.S. president to lead the nation into war is great, and brings solemn consequences in terms of loss of life, ongoing entanglements, or the ultimate cataclysm of nuclear conflict. Michael Beschloss, in this
Dec 12, 2018 rated it it was amazing
This historical read, that took more than a decade to bring to publication due to extensive research covers the actions, reactions, quirks, shortcomings and personalities of the sitting, and incoming presidents who launched America into the wars of the nation. This book opens with Madison, and his quest for a land grab that hurled a young nation into the war of 1812, and closes with the current conflicts in Afghanistan. A recommended read for history buffs.
Jan 20, 2019 rated it really liked it
An interesting history of our country and of war. No point in bothering Congress about such petty details like declaring war.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • Franklin D. Roosevelt: A Political Life
  • Heirs of the Founders: The Epic Rivalry of Henry Clay, John Calhoun and Daniel Webster, the Second Generation of American Giants
  • A Nation Among Nations: America's Place in World History
  • Mr. Trump's Wild Ride: The Thrills, Chills, Screams, and Occasional Blackouts of an Extraordinary Presidency
  • The Shadow of Blooming Grove: Warren G. Harding in His Times
  • American Dialogue: The Founders and Us
  • Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism, 1860-1925
  • America: A Concise History, Volume 2: Since 1865
  • The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, President
  • Richard Nixon: The Life
  • Playing with Fire: The 1968 Election and the Transformation of American Politics
  • Consequential President
  • Hoover: An Extraordinary Life in Extraordinary Times
  • Ethan Allen: His Life and Times
  • The Field of Blood: Violence in Congress and the Road to Civil War
  • War on the Waters: The Union and Confederate Navies, 1861-1865
  • The Myth of the Lost Cause: Why the South Fought the Civil War and Why the North Won
  • An Artist in Treason: The Extraordinary Double Life of General James Wilkinson
See similar books…
Michael Beschloss is the author of nine books on presidential history, including, most recently, the New York Times bestsellers Presidential Courage and The Conquerors, as well as two volumes on Lyndon Johnson’s White House tapes. He was also editor of the number-one global bestseller Jacqueline Kennedy: Historic Conversations on Life with John F. Kennedy. He is the NBC News Presidential Historian ...more
“not all readers become leaders, but all leaders must be readers” 3 likes
“As Allied forces moved into Hitler’s Fortress Europe, Roosevelt and his circle were confronted with new evidence of the Holocaust. In early 1942, he had been given information that Adolf Hitler was quietly fulfilling his threat to “annihilate the Jewish race.” Rabbi Stephen Wise asked the President that December 1942 to inform the world about “the most overwhelming disaster of Jewish history” and “try to stop it.” Although he was willing to warn the world about the impending catastrophe and insisted that there be war crimes commissions when the conflict was over, Roosevelt told Wise that punishment for such crimes would probably have to await the end of the fighting, so his own solution was to “win the war.” The problem with this approach was that by the time of an Allied victory, much of world Jewry might have been annihilated. By June 1944, the Germans had removed more than half of Hungary’s 750,000 Jews, and some Jewish leaders were asking the Allies to bomb railways from Hungary to the Auschwitz death camp in Poland. In response, Churchill told his Foreign Secretary, Anthony Eden, that the murder of the Jews was “probably the greatest and most horrible crime ever committed in the whole history of the world,” and ordered him to get “everything” he could out of the British Air Force. But the Prime Minister was told that American bombers were better positioned to do the job. At the Pentagon, Stimson consulted John McCloy, who later insisted, for decades, that he had “never talked” with Roosevelt about the option of bombing the railroad lines or death camps. But in 1986, McCloy changed his story during a taped conversation with Henry Morgenthau’s son, Henry III, who was researching a family history. The ninety-one-year-old McCloy insisted that he had indeed raised the idea with the President, and that Roosevelt became “irate” and “made it very clear” that bombing Auschwitz “wouldn’t have done any good.” By McCloy’s new account, Roosevelt “took it out of my hands” and warned that “if it’s successful, it’ll be more provocative” and “we’ll be accused of participating in this horrible business,” as well as “bombing innocent people.” McCloy went on, “I didn’t want to bomb Auschwitz,” adding that “it seemed to be a bunch of fanatic Jews who seemed to think that if you didn’t bomb, it was an indication of lack of venom against Hitler.” If McCloy’s memory was reliable, then, just as with the Japanese internment, Roosevelt had used the discreet younger man to discuss a decision for which he knew he might be criticized by history, and which might conceivably have become an issue in the 1944 campaign. This approach to the possible bombing of the camps would allow the President to explain, if it became necessary, that the issue had been resolved at a lower level by the military. In retrospect, the President should have considered the bombing proposal more seriously. Approving it might have required him to slightly revise his insistence that the Allies’ sole aim should be winning the war, as he did on at least a few other occasions. But such a decision might have saved lives and shown future generations that, like Churchill, he understood the importance of the Holocaust as a crime unparalleled in world history.*” 2 likes
More quotes…