It’s important to know that this book is not written by the author, but rather is a collection of accounts on the mongols by a variety of historical figures. Hence, it doesn’t stand on its own as a history book on the mongols but rather serves better as a companion book. I read it after reading “Genghis Khan” by Jack Weatherford so I still had all the necessary knowledge to follow the contents.
I just honestly found it such a slog to get through with all the primary sources. Not enough macrohistory with names and dates for me, just a lot of “here’s a story about how taxes were collected in the ilkhanate”
Spuler's book is a dry collection of passages taken from the accounts from Western, Chinese and Muslim sources that were written during the 13th and 14th centuries. Thus, there is a lack of cohesiveness and narrative, which can frustrate the general reader.
Intriguing and illuminating excerpts from contemporary sources, insufficiently annotated. It's interesting how much the "Secret History" outshines much of the rest of this material.