The Future of War: In Its Technical Economic and Political Relations

by Jan Bloch

Excerpt from The Future of War: In Its Technical Economic and Political Relations

Utopians, said M. Bloch; and they call us Utopians, idealists, visionaries, because we believe that the end of war is in sight? But who are the Utopians, I should like to know What is a Utopian, using the term as an epithet of opprobrium? He is a man who lives in a dream of the impossible; but what I know and am pre pared to prove is, that the real Utopians who are living in a veritable realm of phantasy are those people who believe in war. War has been possible, no doubt, but it has at last become impossible, and those who are pre paring for war, and basing all their schemes of life on the expectation of war, are visionaries of the worst kind, for war is no longer possible.

About the Publisher

Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com

This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

Genres: History

474 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 1899

About the author

1836-1902
Also publishes as Ivan Stanislavovich Bloch and Jean de Bloch

Reviews

[Liquidlasagna]

here's a quote for you from social media

The Russian railroad magnate Ivan Bloch wrote a huge set, The Future of War, describing that the time they lived in was a time like no other.

He mentions the defensive power of high fire-rate weapons, like the machine gun but also the bolt-action rifle.

He predicted that logically, the stagnation of the offense would lead to defense, leading to stalemate. A stalemate would lead to a long protracted war in which more and more men were drafted and killed.

A protracted war would mean mobilization of a nation's entire industry and economy and people for the sole purpose of making war. This mobilization would lead to material shortages at home, civil instability and possibly revolution, and large debt and possibly high taxes.

Because the war became so costly, he predicted, neither power would want to make peace for anything less than total victory, which meant a harsh peace inflicted on the loser, which could mean the destruction of social and political order.

He basically predicted World War I to the letter. When H.G. Well's visited the front in 1916, he believed he was viewing "Bloch's War".

In a different vein, but wth the same amount of premonition, the British journalist Norman Angell wrote a book describing how the economies of the European nations had become so intertwined that war would cause much worse damage than any possible benefit.

He also warned, unheeded, that indemnities inflicted on the loser for the war would only further damage any post-war economic system by crippling a key part of the European economy. He was knighted and given a Nobel Peace Prize for his work and his resultant service in rallying pacificist sentiment in the United Kingdom after the war.

Source: Where have all the Soldiers Gone? - James Sheehan