On Film (Thinking in Action)

Stephen Mulhall

3.92 · Rating details · 52 ratings · 3 reviews

First published in 2002. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.

Get A Copy

Paperback, 152 pages

Published December 23rd 2001 by Routledge (first published December 14th 2001)

More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about On Film, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about On Film

Lists with This Book

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30

Average rating 3.92 ·

Rating details

· 52 ratings · 3 reviews

More filters

Sort order

Start your review of On Film (Thinking in Action)

Sep 01, 2008 Joshua rated it really liked it

I recently volunteered to write an article on the second edition of Stephen Mulhall's On Film. The first edition was part of Routledge's "Thinking in Action" series--a series of short books by philosophers that are intended for a general, non-specialist audience. In On Film, Mulhall offered a series of subtle explications of the Alien movies. He also used them to reflect on the philosophic significance of films. Mulhall explained in his introduciton that he was troubled by certain approaches in I recently volunteered to write an article on the second edition of Stephen Mulhall's On Film. The first edition was part of Routledge's "Thinking in Action" series--a series of short books by philosophers that are intended for a general, non-specialist audience. In On Film, Mulhall offered a series of subtle explications of the Alien movies. He also used them to reflect on the philosophic significance of films. Mulhall explained in his introduciton that he was troubled by certain approaches in film studies--particularly by the tendency among film theorists to treat films as mere fodder for theory. By contrast, he proposed to show, via his analysis of the Alien films, that films could themselves engage in philosophic reflection. This might not sound particularly radical, but it is, I find, an interesting idea. Mulhall's thought, as I understand it, was that the depiction of sexuality and embodiment in, say, the first Alien film could constitute an actual refutation of, say, Freud.

Mulhall chose to reflect on the Alien movies in particular because they constitute a series of sequals each of which has been directed by a different director (Ridley Scott, James Cameron, David Fincher, and Jean-Pierre Jeunet). This intrigued him partly because it suggested that each director could be understood as engaged in something like philosophic reflection. Each inherited a well-developed narrative world, one that reflected substantive philosophic claims about personhood, identity, sexuality, etc., and each director, in turn, was faced with the question of how they would modify this fiction world, what philosophic positions they would set out to refute, defend, etc. The recently published second edition, which is considerably longer--so long, in fact, that it no longer qualifies for inclusion in the "Thinking in Action Series"--applies this methodology to the Mission Impossible movies, each of which has also been directed by a different director.

Let me say a few words about what I find to be the flaws of Mulhall's book before praising it. Mulhall's notion of "film as philosophy" is, I find, a bit vague and underdeveloped. He makes an explicit effort in Part Two of the second edition to reply to critics and to clarify his view, but I still find him to be a bit evasive on what it means, exactly, for a film to philosophize in "just the way that philosophers do." Also, his analyses of the Mission Impossible films felt a little rushed to me. He gave me a whole new appreciation of MI: I and MI: III. (I thought the first was horrible and skipped seeing the third altogether; Mulhall now has me convinced that they're both pretty deep.) However, I found his his claims about MI: II to be unconvincing. In general, the additions to the book aren't as substantial the incredibly subtle and original analyses of the Alien films that constituted the first edition and that now make up the "Part One" of the second edition.

These quibbles aside, On Film is an excellent book. Mulhall is skeptical of film theory, although he is careful to document his credential with it in his book's footnote. As a result, his analyses of the various films he discusses are very readable. Reading On Film feels like watching a DVD commentary by an extremely thoughtful and articulate film critic. Mulhall's love of the films he discusses, too, is palpable and infectious. I cancelled my Netflix a while ago, but I actually restarted my subscription just so that I could re-watch the films Mulhall discusses in his book. Mulhall's book isn't for everyone. But if you have any interest in science fiction, the Alien films, sequeldom, and the role of celebrity in our appreciation of film, then I highly recommend this book. ...more

flag 3 likes · Like · see review

Dec 28, 2020 Ben Baaske rated it really liked it

If you are interested in overthinking (in a very fun, yet sometimes exhausting manner) popular science fiction film, then look no further. Discussions on franchises and directors, how they progress through directors and projects, respectively. Heavy on the Alien franchise, as well as Mission Impossible, with discussion on other films as well: Blade Runner, Star Trek, Se7en, the Bourne franchise, Minority Report, etc.

flag Like · see review

Sep 17, 2019 G. Connor Salter rated it really liked it

Shelves: about-literature, about-writing, on-film, philosophy

Mulhall uses the Alien film series (the four original films) as the basis for his discussion about filmmaking, with connected essays about later films that the four directors (Ridley Scott, James Cameron, David Fincher, Jean-Pierre Jeunet) made after their work in the franchise. So readers don't just get a look at how the Alien series evolved, but also how the individual films connect to films like Blade Runner, Terminator 2, and Se7en.
This is an interesting book in that shows how film critics ...more

flag Like · see review