Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray” as Want to Read:
Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray

4.03  ·  Rating details ·  1,152 ratings  ·  238 reviews
A contrarian argues that modern physicists' obsession with beauty has given us wonderful math but bad science.

Whether pondering black holes or predicting discoveries at CERN, physicists believe the best theories are beautiful, natural, and elegant, and this standard separates popular theories from disposable ones. This is why, Sabine Hossenfelder argues, we have not seen
Hardcover, Basic Books, 291 pages
Published June 12th 2018 by Hachette
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Lost in Math, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Lost in Math

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 4.03  · 
Rating details
 ·  1,152 ratings  ·  238 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray
Feb 11, 2018 rated it really liked it
Recommends it for: Anyone who wants to know how science really works
Sabine Hossenfelder is a theoretical physicist, and she's pretty mad about the way her subject has gone over the last thirty years. She's written this book to tell you why she's mad, and what she's done to try and find out what went wrong. She's talked with a bunch of people, some of them major stars of the physics world. She's asked them questions and she reports their answers. Somehow, even though a fair amount of it is near-incomprehensible physics-speak, she makes it cool and funny. She's ...more
Manuel Antão
Jun 23, 2018 rated it really liked it
Shelves: 2018
If you're into stuff like this, you can read the full review.

Implausifiability in Physics: “Lost in Math - How Beauty Leads Physics Astray” by Sabine Hossenfelder

“The time it takes to test a new fundamental law of nature can be longer than a scientist’s career. This forces theorists to draw upon criteria other than empirical adequacy to decide which research avenues to pursue. Aesthetic appeal is one of them. In our search for new ideas, beauty plays many roles. It’s a guide, a reward, a
Peter Tillman
I have no way to judge Dr. Hossenfelder’s qualifications as a theoretical physicist, but I can say up front, she’s one hell of a writer.

I have a bunch of notes, but you know what? If you just want a straight review, go to Steven Woit’s, linked below. My first impressions: theoretical physicists are supposed to come up with stuff that can be tested by experiment. If you can’t test the idea, or if it flunks the test, you move on (see Feynman). Physicists have been working away for *30 years* to
Jan 10, 2019 rated it really liked it
A quick summary of the book’s contents: Many physicists these days are inclined to believe that beautiful, elegant theories are the only ones truly worth pursuing. Hossenfelder argues that this is the main reason why there hasn’t been a major breakthrough in the foundations of physics for over 40 years. She asserts that this often debilitating aesthetic criteria has become a rigidly adhered-to dogma, and that physicists are in fact beating themselves soundly with their own outworn yardstick. She ...more
Aug 13, 2019 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Hossenfelder is a theoretical physicist. This is her first book written for the lay audience. The author is a research fellow at the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies in Germany. The book is about the abuse of mathematics while pretending to do science. The book is a series of interviews with well-known physicists. She builds a case of how science fails to self-correct itself and set about proving a theory. Hossenfelder does some critical thinking that she outlines in the book. I ...more
G.R. Reader
Jun 17, 2018 rated it it was amazing
I figured that if Luboš Motl hated the book this much, it had to be worth reading. It's usually a sound principle, and it didn't let me down this time either.
David Wineberg
May 08, 2018 rated it it was amazing
The universe is unacceptable to physicists

Well back into history, Man has tried to force nature into symmetry. Some of our greatest scientists spent their lives trying to force the solar system and then the universe into spheres, cubes, cones and cylinders. Or to find superpartners for every particle so they fit the (newish) theory of supersymmetry. That it has never worked has deterred no one, it seems.

Sabine Hossenfelder is a theoretical physicist whose very job it is to create new theories
Brian Clegg
Jun 12, 2018 rated it it was amazing
One of my favourite illustrations from a science title was in Fred Hoyle's book on his quasi-steady state theory. It shows a large flock of geese all following each other, which he likened to the state of theoretical physics. In the very readable Lost in Math, physicist Sabine Hossenfelder exposes the way that in certain areas of physics, this is all too realistic a picture. (Hossenfelder gives Hoyle's cosmological theory short shrift, incidentally, though, to be fair, it wasn't given anywhere ...more
Oct 05, 2019 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: science, netgalley
I never heard of Sabine Hossenfelder until I came across this book, but now I even follow her Facebook account. She’s one hell of a writer and her dry humor and down to earth principles made this book a joy to read.

In terms of scientific facts, the book doesn’t bring anything new in the field; there hadn’t been a major discovery in physics for quite some time but the approach on today theories is unique.

The book consists mostly in a series of interviews with today’s major physicists, but her
Nick Black
Jul 04, 2018 rated it it was ok
Recommended to Nick by: Manny
reads like a Mary Roach book about particle physics -- altogether too many "human interest physics" elements, including descriptions of one interviewee's cats ("Astrokate", apparently a ...twitter authority). Woit already handled a lot of this in 2007 with [title: Not Even Wrong]. Hossenfelder makes no useful suggestions, instead just dumping on people when she's not flying to Hawaii. I couldn't disagree with her central thesis -- leaning hard on "beautiful math" is no substitute for testability ...more
Jun 27, 2018 rated it it was amazing
It is reassuring to know that there are quite a few people out there not happy with how physics is going these days.

Reading, for example, Krauss’ half-assed pompous non-explanation for why there is something instead of nothing, or reading Tegmark’s incoherent ramblings about his mathematical universe as he pats himself on the back for being oh such a crazy maverick, or basically watching the entire string community pat their collective backs so hard they will break each other’s shoulder blades
80th book for 2019.

Hossenfelder's central thesis—that physicists are are now obsessed by beauty (i.e., elegant mathematics), to the detriment of truth (i.e., hard data)—is certainly interesting.

The book contains a series of interviews with leading theoretical physicists, where she discusses the role of elegance/beauty/simplicity in theory assessment, but while these discussions are in themselves fascinating—Steve Weinberg's is hilarious—they are often colored by what seems to be a superior,
Feb 13, 2019 rated it liked it
Shelves: physics
I honestly don't know how to rate this book. Some arguments were extremely worthwhile and needed a voice. In regard to those arguments, Hossenfelder's voice was razor sharp, clear, unafraid, questioning, critical, and informative. Other times though, it really felt as if she overshot -- a lot, which muddied the waters for her better arguments. Prior to this book, I watched talks given by Hossenfelder in which she picked apart my heroes. She criticized them for being guided by beauty. Watching ...more
Jose Moa
Feb 03, 2019 rated it it was amazing
Before all Iwould like guve it six stars.

Since the 60s years in the past century ,when the Higgs machanism was proposed and so completed the standard model and the recent Discovery of the Higgs boson in the LHC giving to the standard model the final confirmation,,there has not been any breakthouht in theoretical physics,this is giving way to a great worry and stress in the theoreticl physicists comunity,more as they are in what they name the nightmare scenario,is to say,no new particle,no
May 02, 2019 rated it really liked it
Shelves: 2019-reads
A good read after Adam Becker's What is Real, and for anyone who might have watched that giddy, over-earnest documentary, Particle Fever about the LHC and CERN and wondered what happened after the Higgs was found .... well: they are still waiting, and as the physics world waits, sitting in their ideological camps (supersymmetry, string theory, etc.), some physicists are entrenching themselves in the theories to which they have devoted their careers, even when there is no evidence. While others ...more
Jun 05, 2018 rated it really liked it
Shelves: 2018-reviews

Lost in Math by Sabine Hossenfelder is an important investigation into the current biases shared across the theoretical physics discipline. It asks hard questions about the current orthodoxy. Highly recommended.


Basic Books provided an advanced electronic copy in exchange for an honest review. Review cross-posted at my website: PrimmLife


One thought experiment that I love is the Theseus Paradox, which asks the question that if a ship is repaired and all of its old parts
Bob Schnapps
The author is someone who rates their own books on Goodreads...
Apr 18, 2019 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: non-fiction, 2019
Lost in Math is a great and well written summary about the way physics is represented in the modern days. The writer Sabine Hossenfelder is a theoretical physicist whose job is to create new theories and leave the mathematical stuff to the mathematicians. In her book Hossenfelder talks about what has gone wrong with her subject in the last thirty years or so.

Now, especially in particle physics, the whole concept kind of circles around made up theories that are only supported by mathematicians.
May 04, 2018 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: science
Note: I received an ARC of this book from NetGalley.

This was a great book, and one I hope that many people (particularly within physics) choose to read. It's not the most uplifting book, but that's the point. I'm a student within physics, and I'm happy that someone is at least shedding some light on the less appealing aspects of physics at this time. It's great to be hopeful, but if everyone is sharing the same mass delusion about supersymmetry and beauty when there is no experimental evidence
Kam Yung Soh
Oct 24, 2017 marked it as to-read
Shelves: science, physics
Sabine Hossenfelder says the book description was not written by her. For a better idea of what the book is about, see her blog post on it.
Ben Babcock
Is truth beauty and beauty, truth? It can be hard to tell.

In Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray, Sabine Hossenfelder argues that these two concepts are not equivalent. As the subtitle implies, Hossenfelder feels that theoretical physicists are too obsessed with creating “beautiful” theories, in the sense that the mathematics that underpins the theories (because these days, theories are basically math, even though, as Hossenfelder stresses, physics isn’t math) must be beautiful and use
Rod Van Meter
Jul 06, 2018 rated it really liked it
A fascinating philosophical take on how philosophical physics has become. Physicists are hooked on various definitions of simplicity, involving fewer mathematical terms and especially fewer "magic constants" or "voodoo constants" (as we would call them computer systems).
The author is having deep existential doubts about how physics will peel back the next layer of reality. Many modern theories not only are not currently being tested, but *cannot* be tested, some because they would involve, oh,
Dec 09, 2018 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: science
Wow, great book!

My personality tends to distrust the air of broad, settled certainty when I encounter it; too many times it means the person I'm talking with has made a career or lifestyle out of rejecting competing evidences. If they know the deficiencies in their beliefs, they rarely acknowledge them as such. Examples:

- When I hit the vendor floor space at a computer security conference, no vendor will tell me the shortcomings in their systems; I have to ask competing vendors to find out those
Dec 30, 2019 rated it it was amazing
This was one of the funniest, snarkiest, most straight-forward books about what the future of physics is - and isn't - that I've ever read. The chapter headings had me in tears with laughter and I constantly kept reading snippets out loud to my less physics-drama inclined partner, which would then require an intense explanation of the history of the field (no pun intended), which then, of course, would cause the whole thing to cease to be funny, and left him with a "cool story bro" look on his ...more
Alan Johnson
This is a book about critical thinking. The author focuses on certain areas of theoretical physics, which is her specialty. However, she also extends the analysis to other fields, most notably to contemporary academic economics, which she clams is in even worse shape from a rational perspective than her own field (pp. 224-26).

The last chapter catalogs (pp. 230-31) some of the fallacies Hossenfelder elaborates throughout her book: confirmation bias, motivated cognition, the sunk cost fallacy,
Abhishek Kona
Jan 24, 2019 rated it it was ok
I could not finish this book. The overall points in the book make sense to me. Physicists are looking for elegant theories to prove the real world instead of working backwards from the data. This is a problem as it causes us to design expensive experiments in non empirical way. The community has started to rely on elegance as a guiding principle.

But I am convinced there is not about 200 pages worth of stuff to be written about the topic. This book could have a 1000 word article. The author is
Jul 16, 2018 rated it really liked it
A look at high-energy particle physics* in its present nightmare (of deep inconsistency and vastly expensive new data). Her thesis is that the problem is sociological and aesthetic: in the absence of new data sources, we form cliques and regroup around incompatible, unempirical beauty intuitions.
it leads me to conjecture that the laws of nature are beautiful because physicists constantly tell each other those laws are beautiful.
experimentalists working with a detector developed to catch
Galen Weitkamp
May 09, 2019 rated it really liked it
Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray by Sabine Hossenfelder.
Review by Galen Weitkamp.

The first thing that struck me when I opened this wonderfully perplexing book is the table of contents.

Chapter 1: The Hidden Rules of Physics
In which I realize I don’t understand physics anymore. I talk to friends and colleagues, see I’m not the only one confused, and set out to bring reason back to Earth.

Chapter 2: What a Wonderful World
In which I read a lot of books about dead people and find that
Aug 13, 2018 rated it it was amazing
Like Sabine writes and tries to address, physics has worked itself into a state where all our experiments result in null result after another, and our cutting edge theories are mere speculations of science fiction. The way she approaches this problem, trying to figure out how we got here, what we can do to fix it, and whether what we’re doing is justified in the first place, is wonderful. This is an excellent popular work on the cusp of physics and philosophy, but it comes with a little ...more
Richard Thompson
Apr 29, 2019 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: physics
This is one of the best physics books that I have read in a while. It is in the heart of my Goldilocks range, not too hard and not too easy. And I really liked the author's point of view. She talks about the lack of progress in basic physics in the last 30 to 40 years, and she does her bit of string theory bashing, but she does so in an even handed way and acknowledges that string theory and multiverses may even be right and that we may find meaningful ways to test them with experiments, even if ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • Something Deeply Hidden: Quantum Worlds and the Emergence of Spacetime
  • What Is Real?: The Unfinished Quest for the Meaning of Quantum Physics
  • Einstein's Unfinished Revolution: The Search for What Lies Beyond the Quantum
  • Understanding Complexity
  • Quantum Space: Loop Quantum Gravity and the Search for the Structure of Space, Time, and the Universe
  • Through Two Doors at Once: The Elegant Experiment That Captures the Enigma of Our Quantum Reality
  • Losing the Nobel Prize: A Story of Cosmology, Ambition, and the Perils of Science's Highest Honor
  • Infinite Powers: How Calculus Reveals the Secrets of the Universe
  • The Age of Living Machines: How Biology Will Build the Next Technology Revolution
  • The Theory of Everything: The Quest to Explain All Reality
  • Liquid Rules: The Delightful and Dangerous Substances That Flow Through Our Lives
  • Beyond Weird
  • When Einstein Walked with Gödel: Excursions to the Edge of Thought
  • The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect
  • L'ordine del tempo
  • The Second Kind of Impossible: The Extraordinary Quest for a New Form of Matter
  • Your Brain Is a Time Machine: The Neuroscience and Physics of Time
  • The Man Who Knew The Way to the Moon
See similar books…
Sabine Hossenfelder is an author and theoretical physicist who researches quantum gravity. She is a Research Fellow at the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies where she leads the Analog Systems for Gravity Duals group.

Hossenfelder completed her undergraduate degree in 1997 at Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität in Frankfurt am Main. She remained there for a Masters degree under the supervision
“The sense of beauty of a physical theory must be something hardwired in our brain and not a social construct. It is something that touches some internal chord. When you stumble on a beautiful theory you have the same emotional reaction that you feel in front of a piece of art.” 2 likes
“There are other reasons we use math in physics. Besides keeping us honest, math is also the most economical and unambiguous terminology that we know of. Language is malleable; it depends on context and interpretation. But math doesn’t care about culture or history. If a thousand people read a book, they read a thousand different books. But if a thousand people read an equation, they read the same equation.” 2 likes
More quotes…