What do you think?
Rate this book
177 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2017
Bloodlust didn't receive quite the buzz despite its supposed "relevance" to the status quo in the Philippines, and it's not hard to see why.
The book, which is a yet-another-compilation-of-poems aimed to protest the alleged victims of Martial Law and Extrajudicial Killings failed in every way, in the same way its predecessors flew short.
In part, this is because people are awakening to the fact that all these “protest” books were merely EXPLOITATIONS by authors, known or not, to cash in from decades-old issues and causes that are overdue.
People might be asking what have these books done aside from fattening the pockets of its authors and publishers, amping the names of amateur writers? It’s the same cycle over and over. And these books never gave justice to the victims of abuses or whatsoever these protest books are trying to fight for.
In the age of social networking, literactivism apparently no longer works in printed press. Hence, there are more respect given to spoken poetry and online literature, which are generally free, than towards these fat-cow books trying to cash in from contemporary issues, clipping the names of famed authors along it to add more value.
Yet, upon the first pages opening Bloodlust, you’d instantly regret your wasted money in ever buying this poetry book.
The tone is also appalling as it tries to rehash the Martial Law and forcefully makes it relevant today.
Each poem is but a mix of word salads that is more about vocab-flaunting instead of giving an empowering message to the heart of sympathetic people.
A victim of Martial Law might ask, “is this book truly about us?”
Martial Law remains a good business up to present. And so is EJK. This is the only reason “artists” find it hard to move on from these antiquated topics.
There is no justice given to this book, as there was no justice given to the victims of Martial Law and EJK after all the authors and artists who have been exploiting them.