Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right” as Want to Read:
Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right

4.11  ·  Rating details ·  12,168 ratings  ·  1,963 reviews





One of "6 Books to Understand Trump's Win" according to the New York Times the day after the election

The National Book Award Finalist and New York Times bestseller that became a guide and balm for a country
Kindle Edition, 370 pages
Published February 20th 2018 by The New Press (first published September 6th 2016)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 4.11  · 
Rating details
 ·  12,168 ratings  ·  1,963 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right
Bruce Katz
Nov 20, 2016 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: current-events
In many ways, this book reveals more about the nature of our national divide than "Hillbilly Elegy" does. The author spent a good bit of time with people on the far right -- self-identifying Tea Party members from coastal Louisiana. She came to know them, got them to speak candidly about their values and how they see their lives and their country. What evolves over the course of "Strangers" is a complicated portrait of people who have tried to "play by the rules" and live "good Christian lives," ...more
Mar 12, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right by Arlie Russell Horchschild is a 2016 New Press publication.

Recently, there has been a rash of books published that highlight the ‘angry white American’ movement, that attempts to explain the cultural and class divisions our country is experiencing, which are designed to give us insight into the mindset of those who voted for the republican candidate.

I feel like this book, written by someone about as far removed from this
Jun 09, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Trish by: Bruce Katz
The concept of this book is exactly what I had been thinking about for the past two years. I am so grateful for Hochschild for structuring a study to investigate the political divide in the United States as evinced by Louisiana, a deeply conservative red state facing environmental degradation and widespread poverty. Hochschild focused on a single issue upon which voting age people might be expected to converge in attitude--environmental pollution--and ended up asking a question which illuminated ...more
May 26, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Tatiana by: Trumpcast
The thing is, no matter how well Trump voters' psyche and worldview are explained to me (and this book does a fantastic job of presenting the Right's "deep story"), I can never truly comprehend them, especially the lack of generosity in their version of morality, aversion to objective facts and constant voting against their best interests. There are flaws in their logic that are driving me insane.

In addition, this is quite a damning portrait of state of Louisiana. The republican voters of this
Aug 18, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I listened to the audio of Strangers In Their Own Land. Arlie Russell Hochschild is a self described liberal Democrat sociology professor at Berkeley. She set out to climb what she describes as the "empathy wall" for the purpose of understanding what has motivated the Republican base in the US in recent years. She does so by conducting extensive interviews in a number of smaller communities in Louisiana -- a state with high levels of pollution and poverty that has consistently voted Republican. ...more
Susanne Bradley
It’s been a little under two weeks since Donald Trump won the presidential election. Since then, I’ve been hearing a lot of gloating from conservatives and self-flagellation from liberals to the effect of: this happened because out-of-touch urban elites ignored the pain of the white working class, while denigrating their values as racist and backwards.

I must confess that I’ve been morally conflicted as to how to respond. On the one hand: yes, many have been left behind by globalization, and many
David M
Recently it's occurred to me that perhaps I'm not doing enough to defeat Trump...

I may be complacent. It's still hard to take the idea of him as president seriously. Whatever the outcome of this election, however, it's clear that he's captured a huge percentage of the electorate - millions and millions of my compatriots. What accounts for this baffling phenomenon? a populist movement built around a multi-millionaire who brags about cheating his workers and personally benefiting from economic
Feb 26, 2019 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I liked this quite a lot. This is a ‘walk in mile in my shoes’ book, in many ways. That is, the author wants to know why people in ‘red’ states in the US – where, unlike the rest of the world, ‘red’ means deeply conservative (yeah, I know, yet another of those US oddities) – seem so consistently to vote against their own best interests. In some ways it is cross between The Righteous Mind and Lakoff’s Don’t Think of an Elephant. Oh, and also perhaps Owen Jones’s Chavs: The Demonization of the ...more
Jessica Jeffers
Oct 06, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: nonfiction
I liked Hillbilly Elegy but this is the book we should all be reading if we want to understand the extreme polarization in this country from the point of view of the white working class. I think Arlie could have gone even deeper than she did, because she mostly wanted to focus on environmental issues and only barely brushes up against many of the moral issues and other ideas that are important, but the fact that these ideas would be novel to anyone confuses me and frustrates me, because these ...more
The Pfaeffle Journal (Diane)
Nov 06, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2016
Gosh, reading this got me no further in understanding the conservative point of view than reading Hillbilly Elegy: A Memoir of a Family and Culture in Crisis or What’s the Matter with Kansas?
The most interesting part of the book is where Hochschild explains the “deep story” how the general consensus of the Tea Party she interviewed, over a five-year period, feels that “other people” are cutting to the front of the line to the American Dream. Affirmative action, immigrants, refugees, an
Hochschild is a University of California Berkeley sociologist. She states she was attempting to understand the Great Paradox: the fact that people in the poorest states who most need federal programs consistently vote for candidates who oppose those programs. The author traveled to Louisiana one of the poorest states and the one hardest hit by environmental pollution.

The people see their homes fall into sink holes caused by toxic waste, see deformities in wildlife and cancer in people including
Nov 10, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
“You are patiently standing in a long line leading up a hill, as in a pilgrimage. You are situated in the middle of this line, along with others who are also white, older, Christian, and predominantly male, some with college degrees, some not.

“Just over the brow of the hill is the American Dream, the goal of everyone waiting in line. Many in the back of the line are people of color --- poor, young and old, mainly without college degrees. It’s scary to look back; there are so many behind you,
Clif Hostetler
Apr 22, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: current-events
I was attracted to this book because it promised to answer the question, "Why do the people who would seem to benefit most from "liberal" government intervention abhor the very idea?" I have puzzled with this question ever since I read Thomas Frank's What's the Matter with Kansas.

Arlie Russell Hochschild is a sociologist and who better to explain the behavior of large groups of people. Thus I thought perhaps she would be able to explain what a political writer like Frank couldn't comprehend.
Sep 27, 2016 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
I learned a lot about pollution in Louisiana from this book, but I'm not sure I learned anything new about the "deep story" of the tea-party right. It could be that I have read enough about this phenomena, both past (it swept Europe between the two Great Wars) and present, that I already had a fairly good grasp of what is driving both the right and the left. This book did reinforce the concept that people hold on to their beliefs regardless of facts. In the end, I was left where I was when I ...more
Reading Arlie Russell Hochschild’s Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right is definitely a walk on the weird side. I wasn’t surprised by her revelations that the Right doesn’t believe in regulations or hates the federal government. I already knew all that. What is amazing is how the Right (in this book, Tea Party Republicans) came to those conclusions. The amount of energy involved in having these beliefs and continuing to champion them in the face of overwhelming ...more
Aug 14, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I was avoiding reading this one because it seemed so hyped up by everyone about "how to understand Trump's people" and I admit that maybe I just didn't want to understand them. But this book was wonderful. So well written and so insightful. I don't resonate with the Tea Party in any respect and in fact, I think I am the embodiment of who they believe is the problem with the system (an immigrant from a Muslim country who has succeeded here), but I gained a lot of empathy and indeed, ...more
Strangers in Their Own Land is a detailed look at the cultural divide in the US. The scope of this divide is deep (and wide), and Hochschild, a Berkeley sociologist, chooses to focus on a specific sector: the environment, corporate pollution, and regulatory practices. It's an interesting shift as so much rhetoric on the divide focuses on religion, race, and even healthcare. Those are mentioned here, but only as supporting the theme of environmental factors. She chooses to focus her studies on ...more
Christine Ward
This is a must-read for anyone who is struggling to understand how Trump was elected president.

I will admit that I had to take a break from this book after Election Night. I was too raw; too brokenhearted; too angry; too sickened to read more about people who not only voted against their own interests (so it seems to me), but who voted against who I am as a person - multiethnic, female, feminist, agnostic, Californian, liberal, progressive - and everything I stand for.

But in the days that
Sarah Jaffe
The best book yet for those who want to understand the rise of the Tea Party and Trump. Arlie Russell Hochschild's work on emotional labor is the hottest thing on the social justice internet, but she's using her decades of experience and turning her lens on the Right and the emotional work that undergirds all of our political thoughts.
Mikey B.
I read this book to broaden my understanding of the Donald Trump victory in 2016. In some ways it accomplished this. I also learnt of the extensive pollution in the area of Louisiana under scrutiny in this book. Many of the people living there, rather than wanting more government control on the industries responsible for dumping chemicals into their environment, want less of it. Some even feel the industries should be self-regulating. And also think, fatalistically, that this is the cost for ...more
Chance Lee
Dec 12, 2016 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: anyone who uses blanket terms for another group of people
Shelves: true-story
Allegiance to a political party "now beats race as the source of divisive prejudice" according to the first chapter of this book, in which a sociologist lives with Tea Party supporters and reports on them. Hochschild seeks to understand why this is. What lies behind what she labels "the Great Paradox"? On the surface, they are allied with a certain party that goes against their own best interests. They're anti-taxes, federal support, and "entitlements," yet they depend on them to live. They want ...more
Mar 15, 2017 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
As a left-winger who has spent most of my life in the kinds of places this book depicts, I was curious to see if the author, who is pretty much the caricature of the liberal elitist my conservative friends and neighbors imagine, could figure out what's going on in rural America. Unfortunately, I couldn't stomach the book long enough to figure out her thesis.

Books that ostensibly describe political phenomena are not credible if they can't get basic facts right. If the author can't be trusted
Oct 02, 2016 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
If anyone wants to spend hours over drinks discussing this book with me, I'd love to. Clearly, I'm doing a lot of self-medicating with my book choices right now. As if some kind of better clinical understanding as to why someone would vote for Trump would make me feel any better about it... It won't of course, but at least it made me feel like I'm trying to understand my fellow citizens and, like Hochschild, fighting to stay empathetic to people whose concept of the world makes no sense to me. ...more
Dana Stabenow
Apr 23, 2018 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A liberal Berkeley sociologist, alarmed by the yawning fissure in American society between left and right, spends five years in Louisiana talking to Tea Partiers to try to understand their viewpoint. The result is a thoughtful, insightful look at what is, let’s face it, a prime mover of political events today, and not just in the USA, either.

That prime mover is, essentially, a reaction against first the 20th and now the 21st century. White male power and status is on the decline and everyone
I wanted to give her 4 stars for the effort, but I can't because the scope here is excellent but just too small. Louisiana and her survey points and conclusions are correct and with just a few exceptions spot on. But that is also not completely or even partially a parallel to other parts of the country, especially the Middle West and upper central of the USA. They (latter group) have been preached to endlessly and put at the end of the line for fully the last 20 years. And they also have immense ...more
Nov 28, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: america-wtf
I read this book the week before the presidential election. I was a lot more able to follow the author on her quest for Empathy then. Yes, let's listen patiently as "nice" people repeat counter-factual nonsense and prejudice. Let's defer endlessly to their feelings of grievance and irrational, misplaced rage.
Now, post-election, as the President-Elect queues up a team of anti-regulation, climate-change-denying, corporate profiteers to seize our country, I think these "nice" white Louisiana Tea
Florence Millo
Oct 03, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I finished Strangers In Their Own Land and never, ever have I been so glad to finish a book. It has been like a millstone around my neck the entire time I was reading it. It irritated, upset, annoyed me so much that I could only read 5-6 pages at a time before I would have to put it down for a while. Why, you ask. First of all, I must state that I am and have always been from childhood, an environmentalist. This book as the result of the author's attempt to understand and develop empathy for ...more
Charles J
May 24, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Arlie Hochschild has gone the extra mile, and then some, to understand conservatives. I would say that she exemplifies the (pseudo-) Indian saying, “Never criticize a man until you’ve walked a mile in his moccasins,” except that is not politically correct, so I will not say it. Nonetheless, Hochschild has spent a lot of time and effort genuinely trying to understand a group of Louisiana conservatives, and the result is a very interesting book. Sure, it’s not perfect, in part because Hochschild, ...more
May 29, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Arlie Russell Hochschild applied the techniques of research in sociology (“exploratory”, “hypothesis generating”, “participant observation”) to explore the paradox of people who support politicians who vote against their interests. She selected Louisiana for its high rate of poverty and environmental damage and its strong Tea Party support.

She focuses on 6 people two of whom have virtually lost their homes (i.e. they still have the deeds) to chemical waste. She finds all the interviewees warm,
This book has a race problem.

I'm not calling Hochschild a racist—I would hesitate to call anyone who participated in the Freedom Summer a racist, as doing what she said (in a throwaway parenthetical, no less) is arguably the ultimate act of allyship.

But reading the book, I had a creeping sense that I wasn't included among the target audience for Hochscild's book, despite being a young liberal who has lived his whole life in what most would probably see as the coastal bubble. This creeping sense
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
What did you think? 6 47 Dec 17, 2017 06:02AM  
Pantsuit Politics...: Feb - Stranger's in their Own Land by Arlie Russell Hochschild 48 172 Nov 16, 2017 05:28AM  
Neighborly Allian...: Strangers In Their Own Land 1 4 Mar 14, 2017 09:41AM  

Readers also enjoyed

  • Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City
  • How Democracies Die: What History Reveals About Our Future
  • White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America
  • Dying of Whiteness: How the Politics of Racial Resentment Is Killing America's Heartland
  • Why We're Polarized
  • White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism
  • The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker
  • Hillbilly Elegy: A Memoir of a Family and Culture in Crisis
  • Amity and Prosperity: One Family and the Fracturing of America
  • The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America
  • Janesville: An American Story
  • Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right
  • White Rage: The Unspoken Truth of Our Racial Divide
  • White Working Class: Overcoming Class Cluelessness in America
  • The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness
  • Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World
  • Responsible Parties: Saving Democracy from Itself
  • Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics
See similar books…
Arlie Russell Hochschild is the author of The Outsourced Self, The Time Bind, Global Woman, The Second Shift, and The Managed Heart. She is a professor of sociology at the University of California, Berkeley. Her articles have appeared in Harper's, Mother Jones, and Psychology Today, among others. She lives in San Francisco.
“Across the country, red states are poorer and have more teen mothers, more divorce, worse health, more obesity, more trauma-related deaths, more low-birth-weight babies, and lower school enrollment. On average, people in red states die five years earlier than people in blue states. Indeed, the gap in life expectancy between Louisiana (75.7) and Connecticut (80.8) is the same as that between the United States and Nicaragua. Red states suffer more in another highly important but little-known way, one that speaks to the very biological self-interest in health and life: industrial pollution.” 13 likes
“In 1960, when a survey asked American adults whether it would “disturb” them if their child married a member of the other political party, no more than 5 percent of either party answered “yes.” But in 2010, 33 percent of Democrats and 40 percent of Republicans answered “yes.” In fact, partyism, as some call it, now beats race as the source of divisive prejudice.” 10 likes
More quotes…