Ian Nicholas Stewart is an Emeritus Professor and Digital Media Fellow in the Mathematics Department at Warwick University, with special responsibility for public awareness of mathematics and science. He is best known for his popular science writing on mathematical themes. --from the author's website
Già il titolo la dice lunga, essendo un pun su "Game, set and match": e in effetti un capitolo di questo libro è dedicato a calcolare la probabilità di vincere una partita a tennis, sapendo di avere una probabilità fissa di vincere un singolo punto. Ma in generale il libro è costellato di giochi di parole, che potrebbero rendere più difficile la comprensione della matematica dietro di essi. Però in generale vale la pena di leggerlo, non c'è nulla di troppo complicato e i temi sono vari e piacevoli.
As a self confessed recreational mathematician I understood just enough to be amazed and baffled in equal measure, and piqued by some, but not all of the chapters. Perhaps giving some of the characters accents was a mistake.
I appreciate Stewart's ability to weave multiple steps in his subject with increasing depth as he continues an overarching narrative (even if it is as goofy as a drunk man always winning tennis.). I think this style especially shines in his essay in which he time travels to talk to Fermat about his last Theorem.
Un libro más de matemáticas recreativas. Muchos lugares comunes que aparecen en otros libros. Además, no me parece que el escritor sea especialmente hábil para explicar los temas más complejos. Le llamaban el sucesor de Martin Gardner... ni de lejos.
The math is a good source for examples of how math applies to real-world situations, with each chapter focusing on different problems. My issue with the book is that the author almost always makes up a story in which two or more people are having a disagreement about something and one of the people use math to resolve the disagreement. I don't know if the author does this because he thinks it is interesting or if he is just trying to fill space, but I prefer more straight-forward discussions of the relevant problems and math.
Note that I believe (and follow) the meanings Goodreads gives for what each number of stars means. Therefore, the majority of my ratings are 3 stars ("liked it").