Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triumph” as Want to Read:
The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triumph
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triumph

4.12  ·  Rating details ·  435 ratings  ·  33 reviews
In this volume, Albert Hirschman reconstructs the intellectual climate of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries to illuminate the intricate ideological transformation that occurred, wherein the pursuit of material interests --so long condemned as the deadly sin of avarice --was assigned the role of containing the unruly and destructive passions of man. Hirschman here of ...more
Paperback, 20th Anniversary Edition, 184 pages
Published January 26th 1997 by Princeton University Press (first published 1977)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Passions and the Interests, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Passions and the Interests

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 4.12  · 
Rating details
 ·  435 ratings  ·  33 reviews


More filters
 | 
Sort order
unperspicacious
Hirschman is a beast. I was hoping to find a few nuggets on the philosophies surrounding capitalism's original sin, but came away with so much more; and in such a short little book at that. No wonder this is a classic in political economy...
Rachel
Sep 20, 2012 rated it it was amazing
On this, my second trip through the history of economic thought with Albert Hirschman, I remain no less impressed that the first time around. The Passions and the Interests is Hirschman's examination of 17th and 18th century European thought, particularly as it related to the anticipated political, social, and economic effects of people acting in accordance with their material interests. On balance, and for a variety of reasons, the thinkers Hirschman discusses here--Montesquieu, James Steuart, ...more
Ralph Orr
Very good summary of the intellectual currents that lead from the early Christian view that the pursuit of money is less than virtuous, to the view that pursuit of self-interest in the form of commerce is beneficial to human freedom by its necessary restraint on the power of the state. Of course, this idealistic view has since proven flawed. However, it remains helpful in understanding the context in which Adam Smith and others wrote in favor of what would become capitalism, and for today of som ...more
Franz
Dec 31, 2017 rated it it was amazing
This short book was included in the bibliographies of many books I've read, so I thought it was time to read it. Hirschman argues that capitalism developed as a means by the rising merchant class of the late middle ages to check the nearly tyrannical powers of the local aristocracy. Money making was a frowned upon activity, with avarice being sinful. Commerce, however, appealed to the rational interests of merchants and traders, and as their wealth and influence grew they counteracted the unruly ...more
Said Abuzeineh
Nov 23, 2015 rated it really liked it
لا يوقف على ما لهذا البحث من خطر وأهمية إلا بأن ينتظم عند قارئه في سلسة من الأفكار أولها ابن خلدون حين وصف انسان البداوة وانسان الحضارة، وذكر في مقمته كيف يتحول وكيف تدور بتحوله هذا عجلة التاريخ،

وغاية هذا البحث الذي هو معتمد الخائضين في أثر الرأسمالية على الإنسان والتاريخ، انه يوقف على ما خفي في كتب الفلاسفة المؤسسين امثال مونتسيكيو وهوبز، وجون ستيوارت ميل، وآدم سميث من نزوع نحو تغيير انسان ابن خلدون وتحويله عن غرائزه وعواطفه، ليصبح انسانا مدفوعا بمنفعته لا أكثر ، فيكسرون بهذا عجلة التاريخ ودور
...more
Jayesh
Sep 30, 2019 rated it really liked it
Shelves: non-fiction
History of arguments for Capitalism.


In one of the most attractive and influential of these critiques, the stress is on the repressive and alienating feature of capitalism, on the way it inhibits the development of the “full human personality.” From the vantage point of the present essay, this accusation seems a bit unfair, for capitalism was precisely expected and supposed to repress certain human drives and proclivities and to fashion a less multifaceted, less unpredictable, and more/>
...more
Jacob Vorstrup Goldman
I Enjoyed Hirschman's analysis, which, however, is quite narrow in its scope and is elucidated very early. This essentially means that the rest of the book is him reiterating the more or less same argument through the eyes of Montesquieu, Steuart, Smith etc.: that commerce and the aspiration for wealth can subdue negative 'passions', a broad term mostly embodied by the already wealthy. Capitalism thus sprung out of a dire necessity to deal with a war-mongering aristocracy and their inferior gove ...more
Muhtadi Faiaz
Dec 03, 2017 rated it really liked it
If anyone wants to read a well-written book which summarizes the developments in economic philosophy before 20th century through a coherent narrative, this is the book for you! It was fascinating to see how economics evolved from seeing 'passions and interests' as the worst side of human beings, which should always be kept in check; to using the passion of greed and self-interest as a force which triumphs other 'harmful' passions and thus helps people to live 'good' lives. The model, most econom ...more
Roger B
Mar 24, 2018 rated it really liked it
Shelves: history, classics
a bit of a stodgy read but lots of important ideas on the backdrop of the emergence of capitalism and the pitting of avarice vs power in an attempt to find a way to assuage human nature. we forget the old arguments and ideas at our peril.
Jeff
Aug 06, 2017 rated it really liked it
it's not the easiest book to read, in that the language is overly complex and pretentious imo, but the content is super interesting, especially the parts about the evolution of language around commerce before and after smith/hume.
Sara Rocutto
Una lettura a tratti faticosa (per questo per me lunga, per quanto si tratti di un libricino), che però illumina proprio nel finale.
Lee
Dec 21, 2018 rated it really liked it
A great meditation on the evolution of the philosophical ideas that gave birth to capitalism.
Rhys Lindmark
Jul 21, 2019 rated it it was amazing
Impressive book on the history of arguments for capitalism.
Radwa
Feb 17, 2017 rated it really liked it
Shelves: study
An interesting, yet challenging, read ....

"Both critics and defenders of capitalism would improve upon their arguments through knowledge of the episode in intellectual history that has been recounted here. This is probably all one can ask of history, and of history of ideas in particular: not to resolve issues, but to raise the level of the debate." (Hirschman, 1977)
Nick Geiser
Oct 30, 2015 rated it it was amazing
Hirschman was in some sense a student of irony. The Passions and the Interests, for instance, is a study of how "capitalism was supposed to accomplish exactly what was soon to be denounced as its worst feature." One of of his other great books, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty, is about how a seemingly taut and competitive economic system is filled with slack and sloth. Hirschman offers a revisionist intellectual history of capitalism in which, rather than revolution of bourgeois norms against aristocra ...more
Ferda Nihat Koksoy
Jan 30, 2013 rated it really liked it
Shelves: philosophy
TUTKULAR VE ÇIKARLAR
-ZİHİNSEL YOKSULLUK, hoşlanılmayan ve özgür irade ile seçilmemiş olan İŞ karşılığında YARATICILIĞINDAN VAZGEÇMEK demektir; bu durum, kapitalizmde en sık yaşanan gerçekliktir.

-DÜŞÜNCE TARİHİ'nden beklenen, sorunları çözüme ulaştırması değil, tüm unsurlarla TARTIŞMA YARATMAK'tır.

-ANAYASA üzerinde kalan kutsal, güçlü, zarif, soylu, zeki, akıllı ve kadiri mutlak görülen tüm düzenlemeler, sadece 5 FRANK EDER (Balzac).

-"YENİLER", sanıldığından çok dah
...more
Johann_tor
Sep 06, 2013 rated it it was ok
Shelves: history-of-ideas
This book is a brisk perusal of intellectual history from Machiavelli to late 18th century. The author wishes to highlight an intellectual process whereby the question of the earlier period, how to manage passionate people now that religion doesn't seem to work, gave rise to the idea that one can subsume the motives of men to one overarching idea of "interest". This in turn allowed the analysis of political economy based on private gain that accompanied the rise of capitalism in late 18th centur ...more
Yognik1789
Dec 24, 2014 rated it liked it
He takes time to come to the point. Only after exhausting all genealogies and histories from all possible political philosophers and French intellectuals does he make a little statement of his own. Says that's assertion supported by evidence. I feel, yeah bro great job!!
This is what he means "accept some benign human proclivities at the expense of some malignant ones".

That's one reason why I hate political theorists sometime. One, their language and selection of words is very fancy and they go
...more
A.L.
Jul 21, 2013 rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: anyone
It is rare to pick up a book for academic research and find it a pleasure to read, but this was certainly the case with Hirschman's delightful prose. A concise history of the idea of capitalism, Hirschman provides a compelling counter-argument to Weber's Protestant Ethic. Capitalist activities came into favor among the intellectual elite "not because the money-making activities were approved in themselves, but because they were thought to have a most beneficial side effect: they kept the men who ...more
Vicky P
Nov 13, 2016 rated it really liked it
Shelves: nonfiction
This book was required reading for a class. It was difficult at some points to make sense of the language the author uses, but overall was a fascinating read and gave me a lot to think about. And I think, based upon his contemporary notes section, that this was his goal. He was not necessarily trying to convince me, his reader, of any one thing, but rather to open my eyes to the train of past arguments and to make me see that it is important to educate myself in past rhetoric before attempting m ...more
Matt
Aug 24, 2011 rated it really liked it
This is an immensely fascinating book. Hirschman develops a compelling narrative centered on the historical development of the intellectual impulses that gave rise to Capitalism. One particularly interesting thread is the notion that avarice was once seen as (i) a rather innocuous passion, and (ii) a passion that can control, limit, and even diminish other, more harmful passions (e.g., lust, violence). So although discourse concerning the merits of Capitalism has changed form in recent decades, ...more
John Gillis
May 01, 2014 rated it it was amazing
I got into Hirschman recently,and I'm in a long-term read of a book about his fascinating life (Worldly Philosopher, 2013, lauded by Malcolm Gladwell), but I'm also reading a couple of his books along the way, including "Crossing Boundaries" (a delicious hors d'oeuvre of a book), and this one, which is short at 135 pages, but literally rewrites the historical underpinnings of the development of capitalism. Not for everybody, for sure, and there's a large "so what?" factor, but if you would appre ...more
Brian
Feb 06, 2008 rated it liked it
What was "lust for wealth" in Machiavelli's day has become "rational self-interest" since Adam Smith. This book traces the history of ideas that turned a "passion" (a danger to the body politic) into an "interest" (a beneficial principle of social organization). I was having trouble really caring about what Enlightenment thinkers (many of them a bit obscure) said about capitalism, but then this book got a lot more interesting in the second half of the last chapter, where Hirschman both gives the ...more
Paul Bard
Aug 11, 2014 rated it liked it
Hirshmann believes that economic history can raise the tone of debate about capitalism above simplistic cliche.

To that end, he says that Tawney's and Marx's theories about the rise of capitalism are to black-and-white, and he tacitly and modestly replaces a nuanced historical study of the actual rise of capitalism.

I should think the key idea of this nuanced essay comes from the Cardinal de Retz, who says that "interest governs the world." Sure, says Hirshmann, "interest governs the
...more
Humphrey
Nov 21, 2011 rated it it was amazing
Actually read this last spring, but recently looked into it again for a paper on passions and freedom in The Tempest. This text is fantastic. It reads incredibly quick and compellingly for the amount of information and insight it contains. I would recomend it to anyone looking to understand the theoretical basis for capitalistic society. A really impressive text.
Jim
Dec 26, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
a book that changed the way I looked at capitalism, the enlightenment, pragmatism and also, loath to admit, made me realize the minds of that era were smarter in a more applied way than I ever gave them credit for (mind you, in my defense, I was eighteen (!) when I read this)
David Grönlund
Apr 02, 2015 rated it liked it
He certainly takes his time to come to the conclusion that history is important when discussing economics. Not very accessible for the layman. But that was probably never the point either. We do however need more advocates of history examination. Insane amounts of wisdom can come from that.
Craig Bolton
The Passions and the Interests by Albert O. Hirschman (1997)
Alex
Sep 09, 2011 rated it it was amazing
Honestly one of the best "history of ideas" books I've read....smart, compelling and substantive. Quentin Skinner should feel humbled.
katie
Feb 22, 2012 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: favorites
Really interesting and different history of capitalism.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • Liberalism and Democracy
  • John Maynard Keynes: 1883-1946: Economist, Philosopher, Statesman
  • The New Science of Politics: An Introduction
  • Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State, 1688-1783
  • Creative Destruction: How Globalization Is Changing the World's Cultures
  • The Strange Non-Death of Neo-Liberalism
  • The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government
  • The Culture of the New Capitalism
  • Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason
  • Capitalism and the Jews
  • Traces of the Trinity: Signs of God in Creation and Human Experience
  • The New Industrial State
  • The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time
  • Global Shadows: Africa in the Neoliberal World Order
  • Golden Fetters: The Gold Standard and the Great Depression, 1919-1939
  • Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity
  • ReORIENT: Global Economy in the Asian Age
  • The Haves and the Have-Nots: A Brief and Idiosyncratic History of Global Inequality
See similar books…
“Going further than Hobbes, who relied on the general convergence of interests between the Many and the One who rules, some of the Physiocrats invented institutional arrangements specifically designed to make the despot truly “legal.” On the one hand, they elaborated a system of judicial control that would see to it that the laws issued by the sovereign and his council are not contrary to the “natural order” that is to be reflected in the fundamental constitution of the state.43 But an even more important safeguard was the idea that the sovereign should be given a real stake in the prosperity of his commonwealth. This was the purpose of the institution of co-property that Le Mercier de la Rivière proposed in his Ordre naturel et essentiel des sociétés politiques (1767).44 According to his plan, the sovereign would be co-owner, in a set and unchangeable proportion, of all the productive resources and of the produit net: as a result, any conflict of interests between him and the country at large would be inconceivable, and the Hobbesian identity of interests would be transparent even to the most obtuse and wicked despot.” 1 likes
More quotes…