Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Mothers of Massive Resistance: White Women and the Politics of White Supremacy” as Want to Read:
Mothers of Massive Resistance: White Women and the Politics of White Supremacy
by
Why does white supremacist politics in America remain so powerful? Elizabeth Gillespie McRae argues that the answer lies with white women.
Examining racial segregation from 1920s to the 1970s, Mothers of Massive Resistance examines the grassroots workers who upheld the system of racial segregation and Jim Crow. For decades in rural communities, in university towns, and in N
...moreGet A Copy
Hardcover, 1st, 352 pages
Published
February 1st 2018
by Oxford University Press
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
Reader Q&A
To ask other readers questions about
Mothers of Massive Resistance,
please sign up.
Be the first to ask a question about Mothers of Massive Resistance
Community Reviews
Showing 1-30

Start your review of Mothers of Massive Resistance: White Women and the Politics of White Supremacy

This is a really important perspective that is a nice counterweight to books like "The Good and the Mad" and "She stands at the Door" that talk about angry woman as the face of progress. Angry women (especially mothers) were also the face of white supremacy. women are complicated. This book covers the women that upheld the white patriarchy in the south for many years.
There are some problems with it though. It's a powerful group of stories, but it rarely shifts outward for context or even more d ...more
There are some problems with it though. It's a powerful group of stories, but it rarely shifts outward for context or even more d ...more

Redneck Haiku Review
Gathering
In early morning mist
Mama searches Circle K for
Moon Pies and Red Man
Gathering
In early morning mist
Mama searches Circle K for
Moon Pies and Red Man

When we speak of women being erased from history, it's usually a long list of women's accomplishments that have been ignored or stolen by men (fuck you, Watson and Crick). But women's history is as complicated and messy as any other history, and we cannot ignore the ways in which women have brought harm to others.
McRae tells the story of women in favor of white supremacy from the late 1800s into the 1970s. She focuses on ways women organized to push a whites-only agenda, how they altered textbo ...more
McRae tells the story of women in favor of white supremacy from the late 1800s into the 1970s. She focuses on ways women organized to push a whites-only agenda, how they altered textbo ...more

Chances are, when you think about prejudice and hate, you picture men--hooded klansmen or angry lynch mobs. But women were also involved in the politics of segregation and racism. This book is an exhaustive study of how women in America's South and North interfered to keep segregation the rule of the day...especially in schools. It offers insight into how attitudes of hatred continue to fester to this day.
...more

Mothers of Massive Resistance is an academic examination of the role of activist women have played in fighting for segregation both in law (de jure) and in practice (de facto.) Elizabeth Gillespie McRae examines not only how segregationist laws and Jim Crow relied on women’s participation in enforcement, but how women organized and led the massive resistance to desegregation and the maintenance of white supremacy.
Because so much of Jim Crow fell into the milieu of women, women were integral to c ...more
Because so much of Jim Crow fell into the milieu of women, women were integral to c ...more

It is a difficult thing to take a very close look at yourself and at people like you and accept that those people have done terrible things and you have benefited from those things while others have suffered. There's a tendency to say "But I'M not like that," or "But WOMEN aren't like that" and, well, actually often they are and even if you're (I'm) not, you (I) still need to acknowledge that people of color might have damn good reason to be suspicious of your (my) motives. I really appreciated
...more

McRae offers this dense and detailed academic scholarship on the historical role of white women in upholding white supremacy over the last century as a lesson for those of us dedicated to dismantling systems of oppression. I read (err, skimmed) this work as a white woman who knows that it is my responsibility in dismantling white supremacy to get my own people. By examining women's participation as agents and propagators of white supremacy in all sociopolitical spheres (private and public), McRa
...more

First-class monograph delving into the deep history of women's involvement with (centrality to) the defense of white supremacy over the middle decades of the 20th century. McRae makes a convincing case that it's a mistake to default to images of redneck racists when imagining the dynamics of white supremacist culture and politics. I was particularly interested in her discussion of how Southern women in the post-Brown vs. Board of Education years developed a race-free discourse of property rights
...more

Dr. Elizabeth Gillespie McRae's work is a comprehensive, well-researched treatise on the role white women played in the politics of Southern segregation from the 1920's-1970's. McRae focuses on four women who influenced multitudes of others through their writing and political activism:
North Carolina journalist, Nell Battle Lewis
Mississippi newspaper editor Mary Dawson Caine
South Carolina political activist Cornelia Dabney Tucker
Mississippi columnist Florence Sillers Ogden.
Since I am unable to s ...more

That was a read and a half.
It felt like a text book. I'd probably give it more of 3 stars, but for the amount of work and being readable, I'll give it 4.
I was expecting something a bit more digestible. It can be very dense, especially as the points it's getting across are simple (white women omen upholding white supremacy patriarchy because it's how they define themselves, how the US was fighting the Nazis, despite both taking a page out of the eugenics book, using 'freedom' or 'busing' as an ex ...more
It felt like a text book. I'd probably give it more of 3 stars, but for the amount of work and being readable, I'll give it 4.
I was expecting something a bit more digestible. It can be very dense, especially as the points it's getting across are simple (white women omen upholding white supremacy patriarchy because it's how they define themselves, how the US was fighting the Nazis, despite both taking a page out of the eugenics book, using 'freedom' or 'busing' as an ex ...more

This excellent book is academic research and, especially in its early chapters, can be slow going. But it's well worth persevering to learn the detailed history of how white women in the U.S. have upheld white supremacy over the last century, especially by asserting control over public education and by adopting the rhetoric of the New Right to make their segregationist views ostensibly race-neutral and therefore more palatable to white moderates. I was particularly grateful to understand the con
...more

Dec 10, 2018
Rambling Reader
added it
Now I understand how Trump garnered more than half of white American women's vote.
...more

Important and compelling history of white supremacy in the twentieth century. In the intro, the author points out that there are many histories of white women in civil rights movement work during this same period, but white women’s significant contributions to perpetuating white supremacy are obscured. This book does that work, naming and documenting white women’s work to maintain segregation in neighborhoods and schools, tracing the political contribution of four different women. The focus on c
...more

This is an interesting book. It is ostensibly about women’s role in upholding segregationist policies. It does an admirable job in that, presenting detailed and well documented case studies. What it does best, perhaps unintentionally, is open up the possibility that our current deep seated schisms, our two Americas, are a result of scholars and cultural analysts not recognizing the impact of continued national ambivalence over racial integration.
Women have always influenced American politics an ...more
Women have always influenced American politics an ...more

I rated this a 3 because I think the topic -the role of white (primarily southern but not entirely) women - is critically important to understanding today's politics, so I'd rate it a 5 for significance but a 1 for readability because I found it to be a real slog that I had to force myself to keep returning to. It reads much too much like a dissertation, and though it covers very important ground and provides often striking evidence, the denseness of the prose made it difficult for me to remembe
...more

Excellent book to understand the deep, long-running, and pervasive role that white women have played in advancing and perpetuating white supremacy. A deeply researched book that grew out of dissertation research that the author did for a PhD in history at the University of Georgia. I was particularly taken in (with outrage) at the story of Millie Rutherford, the director of the Lucy Cobb Institute in Athens GA and a long-running champion of women's education, who single-handedly authored dozens
...more

Because this is a dense, and highly academic read, I am only giving it three stars. I wish the book was written in a style that would make it easier for the general public to read so it could have a greater impact. I feel Ms. McRae wrote for her academic peers. Give us more story, please.
The book examined the 'gardening' white women did to maintain white supremacy during the 20th century up until 1970. Because it was so good at helping the reader see through the euphemisms white women used to re ...more
The book examined the 'gardening' white women did to maintain white supremacy during the 20th century up until 1970. Because it was so good at helping the reader see through the euphemisms white women used to re ...more

This book examines the role that four influential women had in fighting to uphold Jim Crow, school segregation and the politics of white supremacy. Whether it was in the schools through the manipulation of textbooks, spreading erroneous and dangerous propaganda about the perils of race mixing or starting grassroots movements that affected the national and international scope of politics and policies, these women, in some fashion or other, had a hand on the pulse of race relations from the 1920s
...more

Elizabeth Gillespie McRae's book takes a few familiar moments in 20th century American history - the maintenance of Jim Crow in the 1920s, Southern "massive resistance" to the 1954 Brown decision, opposition to busing in Boston in the 1970s, and identifies them as part of a long string of female-led, white supremacist-driven opposition to meaningful integration.
It's a book that I struggled to get through - much of it feels meandering, moving from one incident to another without meaningful conne ...more
It's a book that I struggled to get through - much of it feels meandering, moving from one incident to another without meaningful conne ...more

This seemed like a highly topical book to read, especially in light of recent elections and conversations and media about the role of women in politics, elections, organizing, etc. Whereas much of the talk in 2018 has been about women in general and as specific groups organizing for the left/liberal/etc. this book looks at the role of women in upholding white supremacy.
The concept was fascinating to see the roles these women occupied and how they used them to uphold Jim Crow. From deciding the r ...more
The concept was fascinating to see the roles these women occupied and how they used them to uphold Jim Crow. From deciding the r ...more
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »
News & Interviews
Need another excuse to treat yourself to a new book this week? We've got you covered with the buzziest new releases of the day.
To create our...
27 likes · 4 comments
No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »