This book seeks to elucidate its subject - the governing of democratic state - by making intelligible the party politics of democracies. Downs treats this differently than do other students of politics. His explanations are systematically related to, and deductible from, precisely stated assumptions about the motivations that attend the decisions of voters and parties and the environment in which they act. He is consciously concerned with the economy in explanation, that is, with attempting to account for phenomena in terms of a very limited number of facts and postulates. He is concerned also with the central features of party politics in any democratic state, not with that in the United State or any other single country.
I. BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE MODEL. 1. Introduction. 2. Party Motivation and the Function of Government in Society. 3. The Basic Logic of Voting. 4. The Basic Logic of Government Decision-Making.
II. THE GENERAL EFFECTS OF UNCERTAINTY. 5. The Meaning of Uncertainty. 6. How Uncertainty Affects Government Decision-Making. 7. The Development of Political Ideologies as Means of Getting Votes. 8. The Statics and Dynamics of Party Ideologies 9. Problems of Rationality Under Coalition Governments. 10. Government Vote-Maximizing and Individual marginal Equilibrium.
III. SPECIFIC EFFECTS OF INFORMATION COSTS. 11. The Process of Becoming Informed. 12. How Rational Citizens Reduce Information Costs. 13. The Returns From Information and Their Diminution. 14. The Causes and Effects of Rational Abstention.
IV. DERIVATIVE IMPLICATIONS AND HYPOTHESIS. 15. A Comment on Economic Theories of Government Behavior. 16. Testable Prepositions Derived from the Theory.
This is a book that the large majority of students seeking an advanced degree in politics will encounter at some point or another. Even if you never read the actual text, you will no doubt come across many mentions of "Downsian logic" or something similar. Therefore, regardless of the actual content of the book, it's one that is important to be familiar with just because it is a primary text that is referenced all the time, and considered a foundational text for rational choice theory, probably the most prevalent political science framework in modern scholarship.
On the other hand, Downs wrote this book in the 1950s, and a lot has changed since then. I will say this in favor of it: after I read the first chapter, I thought I was going to find the entire thing to be absurd abstract exercise, but I was wrong about that. It ends up being much more compelling than I thought it would be at first. Downs' premises his book on the idea that actors in a democracy make choices that beneficial to themselves in a rational (predictable) manner, and then elaborates on how these choices might be made when we begin to think about the role of uncertainty in decision-making and how parties might use various strategies to maximize their appeal to voters. The rational choice theory that has emerged since the publication of an Economic Theory of Democracy has been quite successful in a variety of areas in predicting political behavior, a rare victory the notriously soft world of social sciences, though not universally successful and not without critics.
The major area where this book has a blind spot is in what has become known as bio-politics, a field examining some less-than-rational bases of decision-making. The primacy of rational decision-making is facing some serious challenges from this type of research, may usher in a different paradigm for understanding some of the questions Downs' raises.
Mathematical but not scientific. Some interesting models, like Arrow's coalition problem. Ultimately, not enough engagement with the empirical world or biology, but still quite logical and clear compared to meaningless garbage like 17th-19th century "political economy", including Locke, Hobbes, Smith, and Marx.
This is a wonderful book, full of important ideas. First, Downs gives us a list of features that must be fulfilled to get a real democracy. One point there concerns me, which I think makes no democracy in this world a real democracy, but merely a flawed democracy. Second, Downs creates a model in which everyone is rational, and votes rationally, which is a major limitation of this book. I find it rare that people think all the time about the differentials between the incumbent party and the opposition party in terms of utility points. Mostly, people are rarely calculating and aggregating in this manner, which makes the model in this book a Weberian ideal type.
Tiene consideraciones interesantes para tomar en cuenta en los análisis de la democracia partidista, tanto en sistema bipartidista como sistemas multipartidistas y la acción de los políticos y votantes según sus incentivos.
Tengo ciertas dudas sobre las hipótesis que tiene sobre la naturaleza del gobierno, aunque creo que los modelos propuestos no necesiten de estas hipótesis para desarrollarse, también tengo una mejor comprensión sobre la posición de Caplan con respecto a la irracionalidad de los votantes, Downs pensaba que eran aleatorias, Caplan demuestra que son sistemáticas.
read as text for a grad seminar. "the most cited work in political science," or so said Dr. Wielhouwer. a good thing to have read, but not light weekend reading.
doesn't stand alone too well; read this and some other things - like Mayhew's 'Congress: The Electoral Connection' or any other rational choice work.