Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “A Queer History of the United States for Young People” as Want to Read:
A Queer History of the United States for Young People
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

A Queer History of the United States for Young People

3.51  ·  Rating details ·  198 ratings  ·  60 reviews
Queer history didn’t start with Stonewall. This book explores how LGBTQ people have always been a part of our national identity, contributing to the country and culture for over 400 years.

It is crucial for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer youth to know their history. But this history is not easy to find since it’s rarely taught in schools or commemorated in o
Paperback, 336 pages
Published June 11th 2019 by Beacon Press (first published June 4th 2019)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

Popular Answered Questions
kippen (uponthepages) I'm assuming it's because this book claims that asexuality is a temporary phase and doesn't really exist! you can't write a LGBT+ history book and be …moreI'm assuming it's because this book claims that asexuality is a temporary phase and doesn't really exist! you can't write a LGBT+ history book and be acephobic (less)

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.51  · 
Rating details
 ·  198 ratings  ·  60 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of A Queer History of the United States for Young People
Apr 29, 2019 added it
Shelves: arc-galley, 2019
Updated to add that these issues are still in the finished copy.

Keeping in mind that I read this as a physical arc and not as a finished edition, I had many issues with this title. It's fairly good for what it is, but there are some really big red flags on this text. I don't know if it's from the original author, the adapter, or for some other reason, but:

p. 3: transgender is in a list of words for "women and men who are attracted to members of their own sex"

p. 10: "now that we have explored all
Jun 16, 2019 rated it did not like it
Shelves: not-for-me
Haven’t read it, but saw a screenshot of the page saying asexuality is a temporary phase. 😳😳😳 So, it’s an untrustworthy book. Which is too bad because a great book on this topic is needed.
Jun 11, 2019 rated it really liked it
I received an ARC copy of this book from Edelweiss

actual rating: 3.5

I do have some issues with some of the language used in this book, but overall it is filled with a lot of good information. I did like how it talks about how the language we use to describe different orientations is always changing and tried to put things into their historical contexts, but still there were some things the author said in the modern day sections where I did not necessarily agree with the wording of it in some way
Tristan Frodelius
Jun 16, 2019 rated it did not like it
The exclusion of asexuality as a full, substantive identity and historically present part of the queer community belies a lack of research and/or general knowledge of queer history. It is placed in scare quotes and the author claims that asexuality is "recent" (it is not). The author paints a picture that asexuality is a phase and not a true identity, saying that it is "similar to" other identities, ostensibly because the author does not believe it is one. Asexuality has existed through human hi ...more
Cassidy Raab
Jun 16, 2019 rated it did not like it
I didn’t read this book but apparently it has acephobia in it so the author can EAT SHIT
Aug 20, 2019 rated it did not like it
Shelves: queer, dnf
This book is such a ball of YIKES I'm DNFing it 50 pages in, with a quick skip to the backmatter as well. I know some other reviews have mentioned some of these concerns from the ARC but just to reiterate/add to them from the finished copy: the author incorrectly and inconsistently defines asexuality (ignoring aromanticism and any other nuances along the ace/aro spectrums) and bisexuality (ignoring biromaniticism). The author talks more than once about the gender binary being an outdated and Eur ...more
julia 🏳️‍🌈
Uff. I had such high hopes for this book, but it left me disappointed.

Starting off with something positive: some aspects of the book are quite interesting. I knew some of things already, but lots of facts were new to me. A story that I particularly liked was the one about "Publick Universal Friend" - a preacher living in the late 18th century and refusing to identify as either male or female as well as not using she/her or he/him pronouns. I also liked that the book explained things in such a s
A compact glimpse at some LGBTQ+ movers and shakers in America's past. While informative, I did find this book to be a bit lacking (such as claims of "x changed the way Americans viewed y," with just a statement like this being the only "proof" given). Another thing that got on my nerves was some blatant misinformation or exaggerated info. Such as the claim that POC military personnel were ONLY in support units.... Here's a quote from the Texas Historical Commission website regarding African Ame ...more
Jun 17, 2019 marked it as nope
Yikes, this book is a big nope. ...more
Jun 17, 2019 rated it did not like it
Asexuality is not a "temporary feeling", you ignorant charlatan. ...more
Nicole Crucial
Aug 07, 2020 rated it liked it
I learned a lot about actual lgbtq figures and history, but as others have pointed out, the author's definitions of many identities are outdated or just plain wrong/problematic. (See: calling asexuality a "phase", bisexuality as attraction to "both" genders in some places and "various" genders in the index, some weird language/pronouns around trans people but specifically Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera, ignoring pansexuality except to equate it with being "sexually fluid"...)

The book could
Though LGBTQ people have made extraordinary gains in recent years, identifying as such a person can be incredibly difficult for young people. Young LGBTQ people can face discrimination and abuse from their family, friends, and community. Fortunately, Mr. Bronski and Mr. Chevat have written this excellent book about the history of LGBTQ people in America that will be encouraging and enlightening to both young and old readers alike.

While most of this book is made up of short biographical sketches
Jan 03, 2020 rated it liked it
I don't know if I'd put this on any "best of" lists, but it's an integral addition to any collection. It's not particularly well written because it's really just a series of short story biographical sketches of people who do not fit neatly into boxes or that contemporary society questions as possibly questioning using historical context from primary source documents like their letter writing. The organization is merely chronological.

It also doesn't feel comprehensive and I wonder what the diffe
Dec 01, 2019 rated it really liked it
Very interesting!
Feb 04, 2020 rated it liked it
Shelves: ya
Such an accessible history! I love the James Baldwin quote that framed it: "The great force of history comes from the fact that we carry it within us, are unconsciously controlled by it in many ways, and history is literally present in all that we do. It could scarcely be otherwise, since it is to history that we owe our frames of reference, our identities, and our aspirations" (270). Bronski introduced me to lots of new characters, like gender revolutionary Public Universal Friend and new heroe ...more
Roslyn K
Sep 03, 2019 rated it did not like it
This book literally put me in a reading slump and at this point I can't finish it. Just the thought of going back to it exhausts me. Nothing in the first 50 pages really stuck out to me as good and so much of it was a problem. Obviously, the biggest and most unsurmountable problem for me was the lack of and dismissal of asexuality and aromanticism. As an aroace woman, seeing asexuality and aromanticism included in a general queer history is obviously gonna be incredibly important to me and the f ...more
*Deep inhale* Petition to rename this A Problematic Book that We're Still Going to Give to Young People Anyway. Because that’s what this is. Problematic.

Don’t take me the wrong way. The subject matter is great, it’s the execution that’s gone a bit wrong. This book does not deserve a coherent review, so we're going off on tangents.

First off, the book itself talks down to the reader. The whole time I felt as if I was being scorned or treated as a child. I get that this is an adaptation, but the wh
Feb 03, 2020 rated it really liked it
Shelves: lgbt, non-fiction
Actual: 3.5

I def agree w people’s frustrations in this book in that sometimes it came across condescending (the bit about “wow people used to READ newspapers?? Not use instagram?? Crazy, right, teens who don’t know anything!” Was so annoying lol), the definition of asexual in the back really isnt that great, but I also think it’s unfair to dismiss this book as a whole and say that there is nothing worthwhile about it because that’s really not true.

This book is really good in that it gives a lot
Casey Peel
Aug 01, 2019 rated it really liked it
I read this book to see if it would be a good one for my 13-year-old niece. I think she's a bit too young for this right now but I can see it being good for her next year (with her parents' consent).

I want to preface the review by saying that the definition of asexual in the glossary is not just bad but actively damaging. I'm at a loss for why it was even included as I could find no mention of asexual/aces in the entire book (which, itself, is a huge miss). If you give this book to a young perso
Nov 24, 2019 rated it did not like it
Shelves: no-thanks
LMAO I think Goodreads removed my review for this book?? Well fuck that.

This book deserves a one-star rating because it fails in its basic premise: to present QUEER HISTORY. You can't erase asexuality/aromanticism and present an accurate/complete view of queer history. You can't deny or be ignorant of the history of asexuality and claim to have the adequate knowledge base necessary to write a book on queer history. I don't trust this author, I don't trust this book. More reviews about the proble
Jul 26, 2019 marked it as dnf-d
I was going to read this, but slowly going down the reviews as this is a 2.94 book I was cautious. Which lead me to a link of the author being acephobic. YIKES NO. GET OUT. LEAVE MY LIFE. BYEEEE!

P.S. Here's the twitter Thread
Jul 27, 2020 rated it really liked it
A great insight to some historically important people who were LGBTQ+ and historically important people because they were LGBTQ+ and how both groups shaped our society.
A great addition to my classroom nonfiction shelf.
Noah Elliott
Aug 18, 2020 rated it it was ok
So, my feelings are pretty mixed.

I'm going ahead and admitting that I didn't read the glossary, but I found the quote about what he said on asexuality. (Although, I did notice that he never mentioned asexuality in the actual book). As an asexual individual, that's a big yikes from me. Another identity he described wrong is pansexuality, which he only mentioned in passing twice. From what I remember, he described pansexuality both the same as bisexuality in the introduction and the same as sexua
Suzanne Ondrus
Jul 15, 2020 rated it really liked it
I learned a different side of American history from this book! This book would be great to suplement a women's studies or gender studies course. I especially appreciated the cultural explanations- i.e. that same sex friendship a hundred years ago or more we today cannot look at with our modern lens; this aspect was even taught by showing snippets of letters with affectionate greetings. Bronski presents how sharing beds was common a hundred year ago and how socialization was segregated by gender. ...more
Jul 22, 2019 rated it liked it
I'm quite disappointed with this one. It might be something I return to later, but I feel as though there's a lot of reaching going on here, in addition to some misrepresentation through diction.
First, the early history is mostly spent on people's friendships. While I do believe some of these people were actually gay, I'm going to guess that some of this was due to a different take on masculinity. That, and Bronski didn't even assume they were gay. Some people presented were presented as good,
Molly Walker
I had mixed feelings about this. On one hand, I loved learning about notable queer people and their impact on US history. In many ways, the contributions of those in the LGBT+ community (especially those who are also POC) have been erased from our history-both in the past and the history that is being made now. I appreciated that this book presented these stories in an accessible, compelling way.

However, some parts of this book were frustrating. Like other reviewers have mentioned, the dismissi
Feb 16, 2019 rated it really liked it
My inclination when I started the book was four stars and although I've debated somewhat, I'm choosing to stick with that - primarily because there were people and events discussed in this book that I didn't know about and I appreciated that thoroughness. I appreciated as well that the book did not only focus on gay, lesbian, or trans individuals specifically, but also dealt with individuals and events that simply pushed outside of the traditional norm of heterosexual relationships or marriage - ...more
Apr 06, 2020 rated it really liked it
This book sort of hovers between a history of queer people and a history of people who also are queer. By which I mean sometimes, especially later in the book, the history of the queer communities and queer rights are presented, but the rest of the time it is about specific people in history who happen to also be gay. Or who are possibly gay. There are frequent - frankly repetitive - reminders that not everyone talked about in the book is confirmed to be queer, especially in sections further bac ...more
TammyJo Eckhart
Oct 30, 2019 rated it it was amazing
I was a bit concerned when I got this book to review because I've seen so many article and books about LGBTQ+ folks in history that were utterly unhistorical with assumptions made about relationships and evidence looked at in an ahistorical fashion. Author Michael Bronshi not only gives the evidence but the historical context for that understanding that evidence.

Bronshi also embraces a fuller meaning for the word "queer" and includes anyone who falls outside the heteronormative models. These is
Aug 07, 2019 rated it really liked it
Shelves: queer-lit, loft-ya
This book does in depth on the history of queer people starting with the indigenous people and specific tribal beliefs on the matter. This book covers many stories of queer people throughout the history of the united states and the author does their best to use terminology fitting to them based on what they referred themselves to or what we know about that time period. The biggest issue with this book is that it lacks information and stories of people who identify as asexual, and it does mention ...more
« previous 1 next »

Readers also enjoyed

  • An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States for Young People
  • Amazons, Abolitionists, and Activists: A Graphic History of Women's Fight for Their Rights
  • An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States (ReVisioning American History, #3)
  • The Moon Within
  • One Person, No Vote: How All Voters Are Not Treated Equally
  • We Are Not Yet Equal: Understanding Our Racial Divide
  • The Seep
  • Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything American History Textbooks Get Wrong
  • Such a Fun Age
  • Homie
  • This Book Is Anti-Racist: 20 Lessons on How to Wake Up, Take Action, and Do the Work
  • A Young People's History of the United States: Columbus to the War on Terror
  • Birthday
  • The Sound of Stars
  • Our Bloody Pearl (These Treacherous Tides #1)
  • Becoming RBG: Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Journey to Justice
  • This Book is Gay
  • Finna (Finna #1)
See similar books…
Michael Bronski has written extensively on LGBT issues for four decades. He has published widely in the LGBT and mainstream press and his work appears in numerous anthologies. He is a Senior Lecturer in Women’s and Gender Studies and Jewish Studies at Dartmouth College.

News & Interviews

Some interesting news for book nerds: According to recent industry research, book sales spiked dramatically in 2020–otherwise a rather...
25 likes · 11 comments
“A closely connected idea is historian George Chauncey’s argument that gay and lesbian communities found their earliest manifestations in poor and working-class cultures, because wealthier classes could maintain a greater degree of personal privacy. For LGBT people, the luxury of privacy was antithetical to forming communities, which are, by their nature, public in bringing similar people together.” 0 likes
More quotes…