Jump to ratings and reviews

How to Prepare a Research Proposal: Guidelines for Funding and Dissertations in the Social and Behavioral Sciences

The public assumes the researcher spends the day dreaming up and trying out creative ideas. In reality, proposal development is an invisible but critical barrier over which even a good researcher may tumble. This book is intended to lower that barrier. It should increase first-trial recognition of good ideas and ensure that rejections do not result because a proposal poorly represented either the ideas, the investigator, or both.

302 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1988

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

David R. Krathwohl

16 books8 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
26 (23%)
4 stars
33 (29%)
3 stars
42 (37%)
2 stars
8 (7%)
1 star
2 (1%)
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
Profile Image for Karla.
1,668 reviews15 followers
March 13, 2019
Very
Very
VERY valuable resource for doc students

Well organized
Explained thoroughly

Treasure this like the APA manual

Buy a copy- you’ll mark it up
Profile Image for Apostolos.
302 reviews7 followers
January 6, 2017
Finished this - maybe a little later than I expected (the semester ended a month ago :p) but it's done. Overall not a bad book. It's easy to read and it provides a lot of food for thought in terms of what you should have in your dissertation proposal. It's also got some nifty checklists/rubrics at the end of most chapters to check your proposal against once you're done writing your first draft. As the book says - "There is not good writing, only good rewriting".
Profile Image for Joe.
1,644 reviews13 followers
June 14, 2013
Very readable. Helpful now and will be in the future.
Profile Image for Kris.
577 reviews3 followers
February 27, 2013
Helpful, but interspersed with huge tracts of dull, lifeless info.
Profile Image for Robyn.
234 reviews
July 27, 2017
Less useful than I thought it would be. Big idea is the chain linking is the argument. I'll probably review this again if I have PhD students to advise on the future.
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews