Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought” as Want to Read:
Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought

4.06  ·  Rating details ·  1,132 ratings  ·  54 reviews
What are human beings like? How is knowledge possible? What is truth? Where do moral values come from? Questions like these have stood at the center of Western philosophy for centuries. In addressing them, philosophers have made certain fundamental assumptions-that we can know our own minds by introspection, that most of our thinking about the world is literal, and that re ...more
Paperback, 640 pages
Published October 8th 1999 by Basic Books (first published December 20th 1998)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Philosophy in the Flesh, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Philosophy in the Flesh

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
4.06  · 
Rating details
 ·  1,132 ratings  ·  54 reviews


Filter
 | 
Sort order
Elena
Aug 16, 2013 rated it it was amazing
“The understanding, like the eye, whilst it makes us see and perceive all other things, takes no notice of itself: and it requires art and pains to set it at a distance and make it its own object....” - Locke

“The aspects of things that are most important for us are hidden because of their simplicity and familiarity. (One is unable to notice something because it is always before one’s eyes.) The real foundations of his inquiry do not strike a man at all.” - Wittgenstein

The hardest thing to see is
...more
Loring Wirbel
May 12, 2018 rated it it was amazing
In the late 1980s, I read Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things by Berkeley cognitive linguist George Lakoff, and he almost made me forget my Noam Chomsky psycholinguistics obsession, with the book's intriguing study of categorization and language. Throughout the 1990s, I studied neural networks in vertical perception domains such as vision processing. So how did I manage to miss the fact that Lakoff and his University of Oregon cohort Mark Johnson published a massive work in 1999 that made the case ...more
Matt
Aug 13, 2010 rated it it was ok
How to make philosophical tripe.

1) Take a page and a half of Wittgenstein,
2) Mix with tedious philosophical platitudes
3) Add yeast and bake until it rises to over 500 pages.

Maybe I'm being unfair-there are some interesting insights, but I'm irritated to the extent that they claim to contribute anything new to the discussion.
Kylie
Nov 21, 2007 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: psychology
Being a student of the Western Philosophical canon and positively fascinated by Psychology, this book - which puts a spotlight on the canon consisting of what we've learned through the study of the human mind - is fascinating, illuminating and - in my opinion - required reading. The questions that make Philosophy so necessary and so fascinating are deeply and significantly impacted by facts about how our brains function.
Milele
Feb 21, 2009 rated it really liked it

Philosophy in the Flesh is the cooperative effort of a cognitive psychologist and a philosopher. It begins by introducing modern cognitive psychology, and explaining how it is much more experiment-based than the previous generation of psychological explanation. This is followed by an overview, with examples, of many of the metaphors that dominate our lives: viewing time as a stream, viewing goals as places to go to, and so on.

The second half of the book, roughly, discusses various Western philo
...more
Christian
May 15, 2013 rated it liked it
Shelves: philosophy
It's funny that, given the authors' explication of metaphors in all the world's philosophies, they should blatantly ignore the metaphorical assumptions which they make themselves. Specifically, they denounce all the metaphysicians for assuming that "there is a category of all things that exist", while they make much the same assumption when they defend the aims of neuroscience against the critiques of post-structuralism - that there is only a single container (the findings of science) which enca ...more
Stewart
Jan 10, 2010 rated it really liked it
This book is welcomed counterweight to much of Western philosophy and the idea of a split between mind and body. "Reason is not disembodied, as the tradition has largely held, but arises from the nature of our brains, bodies, and bodily experience," the authors write early in the book. The book points out that our explanations of the world, particularly philosophy but even science, are mostly metaphorical.
My biggest problem with the book is not a dearth of good ideas but its numbingly dull pro
...more
Marijn Meijles
Oct 27, 2017 rated it it was amazing
It took me a while to finish this book. It was worth every minute though.

The central tenet of this book is that the mechanisms by which we understand and reason about the world are shaped by our bodies. This implies that there is no "a priori philosophy" whatsoever.

The authors explain in detail how our bodies influence our ways of thinking. A large part of this is devoted to an exploration of our use of metaphors in our reasoning. The fascinating part for me is that it sounds extremely logical,
...more
Eric Shaffer
Aug 31, 2008 rated it it was amazing
George Lakoff is my favorite philosopher, and here, he impresses me most of all with his critique of the Western philosophers, from Greek to contemporary, most of whom have annoyed me with their relentless mysticism and/or abstractions about existence when daily there is already enough to do and more than enough to worry about. I love the basic notion that metaphor is the basis to our understanding of the world. From the time I can remember, that seemed plain, but Lakoff is the only one who says ...more
Dave Peticolas
Nov 01, 2014 rated it it was amazing
Amazing. The stuff happening in cognitive science these days blows my mind.
Neel
Nov 22, 2017 rated it really liked it
This was one of 2 books I read for a Topics in Thought and Cognition class. Lakoff and Johnson weave some of the findings of modern cognitive science into a coherent philosophy with profound implications for the way we understand ourselves, reality, and our relationship to it. The theory is fascinating and its impact immense, so the authors can hardly be criticised for explaining both meticulously, but the book can get a bit repetitive, especially if you already have a background in the field(s) ...more
Joshua Stein
Jul 30, 2012 rated it it was ok
Shelves: mind, philosophy
So, I realize that most of the reviews of Lakoff's book are positive [normally I don't look at other goodreads reviews before writing my own, because it helps to be in the dark] but I think that's reasonable, given what the book is. The book is an account to give an alternative account of what philosophy should be (Lakoff's "empirically responsible" programme) given a set of facts of the matter in cognitive science. Lakoff attempts to show that the historical tradition of western philosophy, fro ...more
Nicholas
Mar 08, 2013 rated it really liked it
Shelves: philosophy
This hefty volume employs the empirical findings of second generation cognitive science to challenge the Western philosophical belief in a rational disembodied mind. The primary method of critical examination utilizes the theories of "unconscious embodied conceptual metaphor" and its origins in sensorimotor experience, to explain how philosophers (old and new) have arrived at their conclusions using a metaphoric logic they mistakenly thought was literal.
As you'd expect in a book written by car
...more
Melissa
Jul 31, 2008 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: philosophy
I read this book on a plane trip half on the way there half on my way back. I cannot say if I took a lot from it then, but I know I read it again and took something completely different from it. It is a challenging philosophy that I had a grasp of at a young age and I am not sure how it is argued otherwise, but in some general way I could say that it states that mind and body are one not separate and what you have wrong w/ one you have in the other because it is all interconnected...point being ...more
Jennifer
May 25, 2012 rated it really liked it
Shelves: for-thesis
Philosophy in the Flesh is a glowingly easy book to read. This philosophical theory of the embodied mind provides a nice theoretical framework to look at literature, culture, and science. The heft of the book is kind of intimidating but once you get into it, there's a lot of rich and detailed metaphorical fun to be had. Biggest problem: George Lakoff self-cites himself a bit too much.
Ariana
Feb 07, 2011 marked it as to-read
I expexted this to read as a text book but I was optimistic that it would be introductory level. It seems to have been written for experts in the field and so was difficult to follow in parts and failed to maintain my interest. I'm still interested in the premise of the book and may still go back and finish it.
Mentat
Apr 15, 2012 rated it really liked it
a very important book that was a mind opener for many traditional semanticists who still clung to truth-conditional semantics. Introduces cognitive semantics that deals primarily with categorization and prototypes.
Ann
May 11, 2011 rated it it was amazing
I full-heartedly agree with the review excerpt on the cover, "A ground-breaking work that radically changes the tenets of traditional western philosophy." For anyone interested in the mind, metaphorical thought, philosophy, language, psychiatry/psychoanalysis, etc.
Mark Hollingsworth
May 14, 2009 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: philosophy
This is one of the ten most influential books in my life (and thought). I used something I learned from it in my sermon yesterday. Much of this book served to clarify and integrate what I had already been thinking about language and thinking, some of it was new and wondrous.
John
[used in paper & thesis]

Hugely provocative, possibly wrong in many areas, illuminating and inspirational in so many other ways. Best read together with the original book by Lakoff & Johnson 'Metaphor We Live By' and the newer work by Mark Johnson, like 'Morality for Humans: Ethical Understanding from the Perspective of Cognitive Science'.
دحمان
Dec 30, 2018 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
على كل إنسان قراءته
Power Boothe
Aug 23, 2017 rated it it was amazing
2001
Wouter Van
Feb 11, 2018 rated it it was amazing
Great book on nature of language, philosophy and cognitive science. Challenges several fundamental assumptions of how we view the world and ourselves.
Richard
Finally got around to reading this book and for the most part it seems reasonable. Anyone committed to a naturalist worldview would find little that was especially revolutionary. That said, however, the author's have sharp critiques of Chomsky and philosophers of the analytic tradition that I haven't the familiarity required to judge as fair or not.

The authors claim that Chomsky's linguistic model (Universal Grammar) is untenable knowing what we now know about the human brain. They also suggest
...more
Kristofer Carlson
Jan 22, 2017 rated it it was amazing
Until I read this book, I was unaware just how dualistic the western mind is. The western concept of mind is similar to that of the western concept of soul. Both are disembodied and transcendent. However, the modern field of cognitive science says otherwise. We are embodied minds; our capacity for rational thought arises from neurobiology. In fact, rational thought takes place well below the level of conscious thought. Our unconscious mind is not repressed in the Freudian sense, but is inherent ...more
Phil Virgo
Jul 29, 2014 rated it really liked it
I have not finished this interesting book. It says that our thought processes are based in biology, and our most abstract and deep thoughts are built on metaphors about our bodies. There is no reason to think we have any deep understanding of reality, even in the mathematical precision of physical sciences, because we are unable to think beyond the evolutionarily limited perspectives available to a creature who has only metaphors of its own body - a historical accident and not up to finding deep ...more
Vladimir
Oct 29, 2013 rated it it was ok
The book contains several interesting ideas worth exploring (spatial metaphors and time, for example) but literally everything else can be derived from more sophisticated thinkers such as Dewey, James, Maturana, Varela or Kelly. Also, Lakoff's arrogance is occasionally nothing short of stunning. Most notably in the very beginning of the book where he imagines to have proven wrong the 2500 years of philosophic tradition by employing a highly reductionist take on Aristotle, Descartes, and analytic ...more
Kris
Dec 21, 2007 rated it really liked it
This book is an amazingly in depth look at what it means to be human. Current neuroscience is forcing philosophers to move away from the Cartesian concept that the mind is seperate from the body, and instead allowing us to look at what it means to be a fully embodied person. The beginning of this book looks at language, and the consistent use of metaphor that humans use to convey meaning. I am very much looking forward to reading about how the creation of the "self" is influenced by language and ...more
Dave Burns
Mar 01, 2015 rated it really liked it
Shelves: library, blewmymind
Just briefly, the authors use finding from neuroscience to challenge some of the important findings of western philosophy. Basically, they look at how language is processed in the brain and compare that to how philosophy thinks about concepts. I should reread it and make a more serious review.
I gave it only four stars because it seemed like it needed some editing, not very readable. Maybe I should give them more points for ambition. Not the slam dunk I would like to have read, but worth the trou
...more
Renae
Mar 28, 2013 rated it it was amazing
One of the most transformative books I have ever read. Though a bit dry at times, it demonstrates that most of our thought is unconscious or minimally conscious, that we think in metaphors for which we have been conditioned from an early age and that we are far less in control of our choices than we think we are. This book is essential for those wishing to follow Socrates advice to know oneself.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Philosophy in the flesh 1 24 Feb 02, 2008 05:56AM  
  • The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and The Mind's Hidden Complexities
  • The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience
  • The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding
  • Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again
  • The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding
  • Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind
  • The Primacy of Perception: And Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics
  • The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain
  • Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind/Brain
  • The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science
  • Out of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness
  • Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology
  • Matter and Consciousness: A Contemporary Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind
  • Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology
  • Conversations on Consciousness: What the Best Minds Think about the Brain, Free Will, and What It Means to Be Human
  • The Literary Mind: The Origins of Thought and Language
  • Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf
  • Reflections on the Dawn of Consciousness: Julian Jaynes's Bicameral Mind Theory Revisited
432 followers
George Lakoff is Richard and Rhoda Goldman Distinguished Professor of Cognitive Science and Linguistics at UC Berkeley and is one of the founders of the field of cognitive science.

He is author of The New York Times bestseller Don't Think of an Elephant!, as well as Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think, Whose Freedom?, and many other books and articles on cognitive science and ling
...more
“The mind is inherently embodied.
Thought is mostly unconscious.
Abstract concepts are largely metaphorical.”
14 likes
“Cognitive science has something of enormous importance to contribute to human freedom: the ability to learn what our unconscious conceptual systems are like and how our cognitive unconscious functions. If we do not realize that most of our thought is unconscious and that we think metaphorically, we will indeed be slaves to the cognitive unconscious. Paradoxically, the assumption that we have a radically autonomous rationality as traditionally conceived actually limits our rational autonomy. It condemns us to cognitive slavery - to an unaware and uncritical dependence on our unconscious metaphors. To maximize what conceptual freedom we can have, we must be able to see through and move beyond philosophies that deny the existence of an embodied cognitive unconscious that governs most of our mental lives.” 6 likes
More quotes…