Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Le Morte d'Arthur: King Arthur The Knights of The Round Table” as Want to Read:
Le Morte d'Arthur: King Arthur  The Knights of The Round Table
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Le Morte d'Arthur: King Arthur The Knights of The Round Table

3.92  ·  Rating details ·  35,189 ratings  ·  970 reviews
Le Morte d'Arthur is an exciting, magical interpretation of the legend of King Arthur

The next elegant edition in the Knickerbocker Classic series, Le Morte d'Arthur is unabridged and complete. Originally published in 1485 by William Caxton, Sir Thomas Malory's Le Morte d'Arthur remains the most exciting and magical interpretation of the legend of King Arthur and the Knight
Hardcover, 640 pages
Published March 15th 2017 by Race Point Publishing (first published 1485)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Le Morte d'Arthur, please sign up.
Popular Answered Questions
Alannah 'to dress' means 'to set in place' or 'to set one's self'. On page 25 of my version it says "[...] and dressed his shield and took a spear [...]" So i…more'to dress' means 'to set in place' or 'to set one's self'. On page 25 of my version it says "[...] and dressed his shield and took a spear [...]" So in that case it is 'to set his shield in place'(less)
Michael The "Oxford World Classics" Edition, Helen Cooper, ed., 1998 is abridged. The text is based on the Winchester Manuscript, so it is a bit more accurate…moreThe "Oxford World Classics" Edition, Helen Cooper, ed., 1998 is abridged. The text is based on the Winchester Manuscript, so it is a bit more accurate than the Caxton edition (1485), but the editor chose to edit the text (in addition to modernising it to mostly Modern English) to remove certain scenes that she felt were not germane to the overall story and to remove lengthy lists of knights or other participants to certain events within the story.

For example, on page 18 [Caxton's chapter 17], within the "How Uther Begot King Arthur" chapter, the notes show the following editorial omission: "a short section is omitted, in which twenty-one knights attack the eleven kings".

All of the omissions are explained in the Notes section at the end of the book, and none of them disrupts the overall story (they're not missed), but I would have preferred to have an unabridged version, with notes that describe how such-and-so section is extraneous to the larger story, but lets me decide whether to read it or skip it, and how much emphasis to place on it based on my reading.

An unabridged edition would have been better. Although, when we read Malory, we are reading his abridgement of his French sources, so I suppose if I really want unabridged, I have to read the real originals. (less)

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.92  · 
Rating details
 ·  35,189 ratings  ·  970 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of Le Morte d'Arthur: King Arthur The Knights of The Round Table
Aug 14, 2014 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: ugh, fantasy
FINALLY finished this last night. No exaggeration: I have been reading this book for six months. Not six continuous months, mind you. I kept the book by my bed and would try to read a little bit every night, but I could never manage to read more than twenty pages in a single sitting, and I would usually be reading another book in the meantime and forget about Le Morte d'Arthur for weeks at a time.

This thing is a hell of a slog, in other words. Sure, there are knightly adventures and duels aplen
Nov 15, 2009 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: classics
I just recently finished reading "Le Morte d'Arthur", and it was an interesting experience. It defies categorization. Not a novel, not an epic poem, not exactly a collection of myths, more than a collection of folk stories, certainly a product of a Christian imagination, but very earthy. Repetitive, but after I got into the rhythm of it, not boring. Once you submit your prejudices to the vision of the author, you become able to enter into this strange world of kings, knights, ladies, wars and to ...more
Apr 05, 2019 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The ultimate piece of Arthurian legend? Perhaps.

It took me a quarter of a century as a passionate lover of mythology and fantasy to read Le Morte d'Arthur, and in the end I only did so because I've started regularly encountering and listening to people who know much more about Arthurian literature than I do. Sadly, the... academic approach lead me to get little enjoyment out of this. I'm sure it's great, but I couldn't enjoy it like I can modern iterations of the mythos like The Winter King and
Roy Lotz
It happened one Pentecost when King Arthur and his knights of the Round Table had all assembled at the castle of Kynke Kenadonne and were waiting, as was customary, for some unusual event to occur before settling down to the feast, that Sir Gawain saw through the window three gentlemen riding toward the castle, accompanied by a dwarf.

I fully expected to dislike this book. The prospect of five hundred pages of jousting knights struck me as endlessly tedious, and I only opened the book out of
Dec 02, 2007 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
At long last hath I enchieved the goodliest quest of 937 pages of Ye Olde English!

937 pages of damosels and knights smiting everych other and breaking their spears all to-brast, and tourneys and "justing" and villainous kings who traitorly slew... oops, there I go again. I'm just! so! happy! I've been reading this book since February (it's now November) and inasmuch as I thought I was prepared because of that one Christmas that Mr. Murray wrote the family Christmas letter in Ye Olde English... r
I'm so glad I finally read Le Morte Darthur. I've loved the King Arthur stories ever since I was little and read what I think was a retelling by Enid Blyton. I actually read this for my Late Medieval Literature class, but I'd have read it someday anyway. The copy I read was an abridgement, which is probably a good thing as parts of it got quite tedious as it was. The introduction to this version is pretty interesting -- and, by the way, my lectures on it were wonderful.

I subscribe to the view th
(I read this book as part of a reading project I have undertaken with some other nerdy friends in which we read The Novel: A Biography and some of the other texts referenced by Schmidt.)

This book reads like some jag-off had some time to kill in prison and was just putting words down on paper to keep himself from being super bored.

Oh, wait.

So no one really knows who Thomas Malory was, apparently, which is a story in and of itself much more interesting than this collection of loosely connected tho
Aug 09, 2019 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: owned-books
This text isn't the original one, but a short version adapted for English learners. In my opinion, the editors of this book have summarized the original text too much and there are still passages of the text that are too slow and repetitive, but there are also passages where the action is very quick and superficial. But the CD narration is very good, so I'm giving 3 stars for this. If it weren't for the CD, I would give it 2 stars. ...more
Claire Olivarez-Day
This is the ONLY version of Le Morte d'Arthur that you should EVER read. Complete with Early Modern English and absolutely NO dumbing down of the material. Great stuff. ...more
Feb 19, 2012 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: collected
cross-posted at booklikes and the mo-centric universe.

my copy of le morte d'arthur is the classic and complete vinaver edit and i highly recommend it. i haven't read it in years but picking it up now, i assure you this copy is well-thumbed and annotated from my first reading in university. in the first fifty pages, i have written in a very small hand above words to explain their meanings, as i did when reading other, older middle english works much more difficult to ken. still, i smile when i s
Of all the patriarchal, Christianity biased interpretations of Arthurian myth, this is the most misogynistic. Yes, I know one must judge a book by it's time period, but if ever a book infuriated me by illustrating the virgin-whore paradigm, this one has. Not only do most of the female characters completely fail to have names, but those that do are either shrewish sluts or purely chaste and looking to die for God. Also, Sir Gawain is ruined. Also, Merlin is the son of the devil. Also, the Lady of ...more
It drags at times but its the legend of King Arthur and his knights.

This audiobook was a whopping 19 hours.

I will likely listen to this again.

I decided to review Le Morte d'Arthur, even though it has been SO long since I read it. I don't remember everything, but I remember how how fascinating it was. It was a hard read; I remember that. I remember why I decided to read it, too. I had been browsing in the library, and I happened to see the book on some obscure shelf and I noticed it was misfiled. I thought to myself, "is that in French?"

Fast forward to the next day at my state Knowledge Bowl competition (please no nerd jokes here, I'm
Dec 20, 2007 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Medieval Lit. Nerds
As a piece of engaging fiction Le Morte D'Arthur is bound to disappoint unless you are unabashedly entertained by similar cycles of knights questing again and again. Structurally Mallory's work is repetitive and contains a questionable moral structure.
But as an origin of British legends and the development of the English Language it is an essential work.
Its been interesting for me to look at one of the most definitive entries into the canon of England's national pride but it becomes strange whe
Nov 30, 2019 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I finally finished it! Long and hard to read especially for long periods of time but it was an interesting read.
Juho Pohjalainen
Nov 24, 2019 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Where it all began!

Well, no. But where they were all first brought together, like medieval Justice Society, taking the shape and form and connection they've been in ever since. Its impact on tales and fiction over the centuries is quite immeasurable.

As a narrative, Once And Future King has it beat. But I think everyone should still read both.
Lauren Stoolfire
King Arthur and Merlin are some of my favorite characters yet somehow I had never read this book. Now I can officially say that it's definitely worth reading. Yes, it is very long, repetitive, meandering, and featuring many character with similar names, but it is still incredibly magical to explore for the first time. Now I feel like digging into more stories featuring the King Arthur, Merlin, and the Knights of the Round Table.

Dec 05, 2007 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
I still have trouble believing I made it all the way through this. I really did have to struggle through it, and I feel bad saying that because this is a classic. It might not be the oldest written form of Arthurian Legend, but it what all others are based on. It's obviously a classic. However, it was written in the 1490s (yes, that's right, I said 1490s). A lot simply wasn't invented yet. For example, the quotation mark, or any punctuation except for a period. Also, there are a lot of archaic w ...more
It's a great edition of the text with excellent secondary materials and essays.

However, I am very disappointed that an edition which advertises itself as being "unabridged" and in "original spelling" in fact silently emends all yoghs and thorns to gh and th. Use of u/v and i/j has also been ‘modernized’. It seems utterly bizarre to go to the lengths of reproducing such trivial features as Lombardic rubrication, when the Middle English alphabet this work was written in has been edited out.
Rick Davis
I read through this book the first time in 11th grade and many times since.
Stephanie Ricker
I read Morte D'Arthur, or most of it anyway, a very long time ago. I remember not being all that enthused and a bit bored at the endless jousting. Really, there are only so many ways to make getting poked by a stick and falling of a horse sound good, guys.

However, reading it now for Medieval Lit, I was surprised to find that I enjoyed it very much. The jousting was still boring (sorry, Malory), but the characterization was fascinating. Arthur is so painfully young at the beginning and really ha
May 07, 2017 marked it as did-not-finish  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: audiobooks
Ugh. Finally done. I ploughed through the first couple "books" of this as an audio book. Calling it quits. Good riddance.

There are so many names and interactions flying by that it's hard to grab hold of anything and stay invested long-term. All the characters, men and women alike, seem like nothing but cheap stereotypes (not even an archetype, for that would be deeper) -- everyone is either an honorable knight, a backstabbing knight, the mysterious magician, the virtuous maiden, or a lusty witch
Czarny Pies
Jan 14, 2019 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Readers with a high pain threshold
Shelves: english-lit
The mind-numbing repetitiveness and unrelenting brutality of "Le Morte D'arthur" make it absolute hell to read. However, it also contains moments of sublime imagination and stands as a remarkable synthesis of the Arthurian legends. "Le Morte D'arthur" has inspired countless better works. My favourites would be Wagner's "Parisfal" and "Tristand und Isolde". Malory's anthology continues to have enormous influence on Europe's poets, composers, painters and novelists. It is arguably well worth the t ...more
Lady Mayfair
Read in parallel with this, from my notes, titbits of the Arthurian legendarium:

1. When Lancelot and Guenever ran off together, it was Sir Gawain who urged the King to do battle against Lancelot.
2. The Pope held both Arthur and Lancelot in his esteem, he therefore sent down two bulls on the battlefield, to have Guenever brought back and to make peace.
3. In the battle of Sir Gawain v Sir Lancelot, Gawain is injured.
4. Mordred self appointed himself King Of England and wanted to marry Guenever, wh
Sean DeLauder
I started reading this book almost 20 years ago, but made the mistake of reading T.H. White's The Once and Future King first. The difference in prose between a book written in the 1950s (White) and a book written in the 15th century (Malory) was so stark as to make this book nigh impenetrable. Needless to say, my memory of the book is having read up through a battle that seemed like a series of people losing their horses and going to get another in order to lose their horse again. The story read ...more
It took me a long time to get through this unabridged, untranslated version of Le Morte Darthur, but it is -- for the most part, anyway -- worth it. The fact that Malory himself gave up on Tristan is a fair indication of that, and of course this is a hyper-masculine text and there are dozens of loving descriptions of battles and jousts, but the story of Arthur is, to my mind, one of the most powerful stories we tell (second only to that of Christ, in my mind). Nothing can bury that, not even a b ...more
I feel a great sense of accomplishment having finished this. The final three books (the Quest for the Sangreal, Launcelot and Guenever, and the Death of Arthur) were actually pretty good, but good God, the first 75% was such a drag!
Mar 22, 2013 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: english-lit
Alas! who can trust this world? - Sir Launcelot du Lake

Malory recounts epic episodes of tournaments, aimless adventures, noble quests, conquests and civil war. Magical prophets and incestuous adulteries plague the royal court but let the world remember Arthur as the once and future king! Despite the sometimes ridiculous episodes of knight-errantry, I did learn to respect the chivalry and the knight's code which governs the events and exposes admirable characteristics among soldiers and economic
Not quite read, but used as a reference along with more modern editions of Malory. The drawings by Aubrey Beardsley are remarkable and the raison d'être for this edition. ...more
May 31, 2020 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: classics
Long, Dense, and not for everyone. However, for anyone with any interest in Arthurian legend, romantic chivalry, or medieval literature this is absolutely essential.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »

Readers also enjoyed

  • Arthurian Romances
  • The History of the Kings of Britain
  • Sir Gawain and the Green Knight
  • Idylls of the King
  • The Quest of the Holy Grail
  • The Canterbury Tales
  • The Mabinogion
  • Piers Plowman
  • Troilus and Criseyde
  • Lancelot: The Knight of the Cart
  • The Dream of the Rood
  • The Lais of Marie de France
  • The Book of Margery Kempe
  • The Song of Roland
  • Le Lai de Lanval
  • Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Pearl, and Sir Orfeo
  • Parzival
  • King Arthur's Death: The Middle English Stanzaic Morte Arthur and Alliterative Morte Arthure
See similar books…
Sir Thomas Malory was a knight in the fifteenth century, who, while imprisoned, compiled the collection of tales we know as Le Morte D'Arthur, translating the legend of King Arthur from original French tales such as the Vulgate Cycle. ...more

Related Articles

This June, as we observe LGBTQ Pride—the annual celebration of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning communities—we...
209 likes · 75 comments
“Yet some men say in many parts of England that King Arthur is not dead, but had by the will of our Lord Jesu into another place; and men say that he shall come again, and he shall win the holy cross.” 32 likes
“In the midst of the lake Arthur was ware of an arm clothed in white samite, that held a fair sword in that hand. ” 20 likes
More quotes…