Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “McCain's Promise: Aboard the Straight Talk Express with John McCain and a Whole Bunch of Actual Reporters, Thinking About Hope” as Want to Read:
McCain's Promise: Aboard the Straight Talk Express with John McCain and a Whole Bunch of Actual Reporters, Thinking About Hope
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

McCain's Promise: Aboard the Straight Talk Express with John McCain and a Whole Bunch of Actual Reporters, Thinking About Hope

4.25  ·  Rating details ·  953 Ratings  ·  88 Reviews
Is John McCain "For Real?"

That's the question David Foster Wallace set out to explore when he first climbed aboard Senator McCain's campaign caravan in February 2000. It was a moment when Mccain was increasingly perceived as a harbinger of change, the anticandidate whose goal was "to inspire young Americans to devote themselves to causes greater than their own self-interes
Paperback, 144 pages
Published June 1st 2008 by Back Bay Books (first published September 1st 2000)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about McCain's Promise, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about McCain's Promise

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Rating details
Sort: Default
May 30, 2008 rated it really liked it
Shelves: nonfictions, dfw
im not really sure why this is being published now, when it was written for the ghost of election past, but im not going to complain because i love the dfw, and now i can rate it. greg will never catch me!!!
Aug 15, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Questo saggio breve dimostra come il Realismo Isterico di David F Wallace sia, più che una tecnica, una chiave di lettura della realtà.
Wallace racconta la campagna per le primarie di John McCain, candidato repubblicano outsider, "anti politico" e "anti mediatico". Questa roba è incredibilmente attuale per l'Italia dei 5 stelle, ed è inevitabilmente una serie di acrobazie realisticamente isteriche sul paradosso dell'antipolitico che vuol candidarsi a Presidente degli USA e che usa i media per di
Nov 26, 2015 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: favorites, nonfiction

It’s Thanksgiving, 2015, and we’re in the throes of the craziest presidential campaign ever, because of one Donald J. Trump, so I decided to re-read Wallace’s essay about presidential campaigns, the 2000’s Republican’s campaign for its nominee. The contest was between George W. Bush and Senator John S. McCain. I wish I could gather all my family and friends around the fire this Thanksgiving and we could talk about politics and the campaign, after everyone reads this essay. Wallace takes us insid
Jul 31, 2016 rated it really liked it
"Salesman or leader or neither or both, the final paradox – the really tiny central one, way down deep inside all the other campaign puzzles' spinning boxes and squares that layer McCain – is that whether he's truly 'for real' now depends less on what is in his heart than on what might be in yours."
Although McCain has by now (2016) largely receded into history's shadows, the campaign trail of 2000 as recounted by DFW is still relevant. This is because DFW, as is his wont, asks the perennial qu
May 07, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: nonfiction
DFW is breathtakingly genius, as you can see in this supposedly non-political long essay on McCain2000 Campaign. A must-read, especially in the exhaustion/excitement of the election days.
Tom Stamper
Oct 31, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This is best described as David Foster Wallace's experience traveling with John McCain in the winter of 2000 as he tried to wrest the Republican nomination from George W. Bush. 16 years old and this story is already a period piece. It's easy to forget that McCain was treated like Prince Valiant by the media in 2000. He wouldn't get the same treatment in 2008 when the media had a new Prince. But the real story is less about McCain and how Wallace sees the political process.

Wallace comes to a con
Jan 12, 2018 rated it it was amazing
Very interesting narrative, I think 2018 could learn a lot from 2000 McCain.

I also think DFW would have hated covering 2016. Hell, probably even 2008 and 2012.
Jul 29, 2017 rated it really liked it
With the same brilliancy of his essays Consider The Lobster and Big Red Son, DFW provides another thorough lookout inside the Mcain2000. DFW is aware of the dullness of politics and the Indifference people have for it, yet he strays away from repetitiveness and pretentiousness of political writing and brings us an honest and new look to it.
John Wiswell
Aug 26, 2013 rated it it was amazing
In 2000, John McCain was beloved to both major parties in the U.S. and couldn't get the nomination from either. It was possible that if he ran against both candidates that he'd win, but of course that didn't happen. David Foster Wallace was embedded with McCain's campaign, doomed to lose out to George W. Bush, and shrewdly observed how McCain made messages out of himself, how the staff tried to manipulate those messages, and how the country refused to see the candidate as a complex human being. ...more
Joey Nelson
Jan 01, 2018 rated it it was amazing
So fun reading David Foster Wallace’s take on (semi) modern American politics.

“It’s hard to get good answers to why most Young Voters are so uninterested in politics. This is probably because it’s next to impossible to get someone to think hard about why he’s not interested in something. The boredom itself preempts inquiry; the fact of the feeling’s enough. Surely one reason, though, is that politics is not cool. Or say rather that cool, interesting, alive people do not seem to be the ones who a
Lisa Claire
Apr 27, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
An as-it-happened commentary penned by my favourite GenX writer of the 2000 Republican Presidential nomination race: where going negative worked against expectations, where the anti-candidate lost to the establishment favourite, and "alt-media" meant The Rolling Stone, not obscure puppet blogs masquerading as legitimate news sites (pardon my cynicism).

It's hard to imagine John McCain as an Anti-Candidate (and even harder as the greater of two evils as he's sometimes sceptically cast by Wallace)
Mar 27, 2016 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
In the end, the Shrub won. McCain, the anticandidate of the 2000's could not stand a chance in a Republican Establishment bent on regaining the power, returning to the "good old days". We know how and when by watching TV, or reading the news. And we take the news as it is. Sent by the Rolling Stones mag. on McCain's campaign trail, David Foster Wallace chose a different approach in understanding the party politics, the Babel-like going and coming of political strategies. On top if it, he present ...more
E. C. Koch
Feb 20, 2016 rated it it was amazing
Apart from J. Weisberg's intro. you're not getting anything here that you didn't get in the version printed in CtL; so it should be said right off the bat that you probably shouldn't buy this unless you just really need to read what Weisberg says about what Wallace says about McCain's now sixteen-year-old campaign or to complete a shrine or something. That said, this is a(nother) really great essay by DFW that hits on his major themes of sincerity and belief in a toxically aloof pomo culture tha ...more
Martin Kurniadi
Sep 02, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: political, essay
In here, David Foster Wallace was trying to tell that John McCain, the candidate of United States President in year 2000, as objective as he could.

He was chosen to represent the Rolling Stones, as a non-political writer, to see and write about this man. There is a lot I don't know about presidency in the United States, especially back then, but I know after reading this that politics itself is a battleground. It is mischievous, selfish, and filled with boobie-trapped stage everyone needs to be c
Kristin Schuck
Mar 02, 2015 rated it really liked it
I read this because I've been trying to get my nerve up to read Infinite Jest. I've actually even checked IJ out from the library once or twice, but been too intimidated to crack it open. So I looked up David Foster Wallace's books at the library and checked out the best reviewed DFW book available. Just so happened to be only 144 pages (I think IJ has over 1,000 pages.)

This book was a piece that started as a far-shorter Rolling Stone article published during John McCain's failed 2000 run at th
Sep 23, 2015 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction
It's less about McCain the candidate (or even McCain the man), then it is about how the press that covers a campaign becomes part of it. It is also interesting in light of everything we've been talking about. Consider this description of political candidates:

", interesting, alive people do not seem to be the ones who are drawn to the political process. Think back to the sort of kids in high school or college who were into running for student office: dweeby, overgroomed, obsequious to auth
Dan Douglas
Great reporting from John McCain's 2000 campaign. Reading it in light of today's political moment is all the more interesting. Wallace shows what a dog-and-pony show political campaigning is, and how difficult it can be for an honest candidate to make headway in a system that is designed for effectiveness rather than transparency and honesty.

The writing and point-of-view is amazing. The only downside of this essay is that it abruptly stops where it should keep going--to the eventual loss and un
Sep 22, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
more about the media coverage surrounding presidential campaigns than it is about McCain 2000 -- which is great.
also the source of this much-quoted & endlessly relevant paragraph:
If you are bored and disgusted by politics and don’t bother to vote, you are in effect voting for the entrenched Establishments of the two major parties, who rest assured are not dumb and are keenly aware that it is in their interests to keep you disgusted and bored and cynical and to give you every possible psycho
Ken Heard
Jan 15, 2014 rated it liked it
Rolling Stone puts a reporter on the bus of what first is a marginal candidate for president who becomes the front runner and tells him to write what he sees. Sound familiar? The magazine did the same in 1971 when Hunter S. Thompson covered the George McGovern campaign, and Thompson did a far better, more insightful job.

That's not to say David Foster Wallace failed. He did okay with his observations of life on the road, with behind the looks at John McCain and other reporters, with the "Twelve M
Evan Kirby
It's good and all, but it never feels particularly revelatory about the ins and outs of covering a campaign and what campaign life is, what is basically the intent of the whole thing in the first place. All the John McCain insights about his personality don't really seem that interesting or new, but I think that's primarily due to the fact that I'm reading this 16 years after it was written and McCain's other presidential campaigns since then have informed this portrait of him that I already kne ...more
Sep 06, 2008 rated it it was amazing
Fantastic book-length meditation on McCain2000, originally a much shorter Rolling Stone piece. Part think-piece, part investigative journalism, it's just Wallace doing his humanist/pomo thing. Nonetheless, an interesting/necessary perspective on McCain as an extraordinarily intelligent and honorable man (a great reading on the meaning of McCain's time in the Hanoi Hilton) saying, ultimately, some very scary shit. Also, a lot of good stuff on the mechanics of contemporary campaigns, much of which ...more
Love DFW, this is a slighter longer politically oriented "This is water". Same humor, less of a central message, but still thought provoking.

It's centered on DFW's unconventional and fish-out-of-water political coverage of one week on the 2000 John McCain presidential campaign trail.

I like non-fiction political books a little too much. Especially the gossipy ones. This was a cool perspective on a cool event.
Kyle Butcher
Nov 11, 2017 rated it really liked it
Maybe I'm reading too far into it's implications with our current POTUS's anti-candidate -president status, but I could help but feel this book might've been an unknowing predictor of our political predicament.

Not really a book except for it was bound & I bought it on Amazon; not really like other DFW I've read except it both highlights the (almost) necessary response of PM cynicism while producing hope.
Sep 26, 2017 rated it liked it
I read this hoping for something along the lines of Hunter Thompson's writings on the '72 campaign trail. This didn't quite measure up due to Wallace seeming to have very little interest in politics (a chapter is titled 'Who Cares' and another, 'Who Even Cares, Who Cares'). That made for some interesting observations on political media and fine writing on McCain's torture in Vietnam (stabbed in the nuts!!!!), but left out the soul.
Sep 27, 2017 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
מסה אחת מעולה על קמפיין הבחירות של ג'ון מקיין והשאר פחות. אולי כי לחלק הראשון יש אווירה ועומק של כתבת מוסף, עם ניסיון לסטות מהפוליטי כדי לדבר על החוויה של מסע בדרכים ועל הדמויות שמקיפות את האובייקט הפוליטי ששמו ג'ון מקיין. זאת, בעוד החלקים האחרים כמו נכתבו מנקודת מבטו של סטודנט באוניברסיטה, עם הרבה אינטלקט ומעט מאוד רגש, שלא לדבר על ההומור שפוסטר וואלאס מצטיין בו
Satyabrata Mishra
In this brilliant essay on John McCain, David F. Wallace shows the making and breaking of McCain's presidential candidacy; the rise of an anti candidate to his fall amongst populist explosion. Full of Wallace's trademark dry wit, this prose is apt for a quick afternoon read for all political science fans.
Jeff Cunningham
Feb 13, 2016 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Brilliant political insights

Wallace cuts through every personality and every move that takes place on the campaign. He proves himself the most adept political observer while at the same time confesses he was never a journalist, just pretending (brilliantly) to be one.
Mar 09, 2016 rated it really liked it
Nick Fulchino
Aug 10, 2016 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Fantastic essay.
May 23, 2016 rated it really liked it
It's a magazine article in long form.
Entertaining and insightful, a nice little dish from DFW's kitchen.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Up, Simba republished? 3 44 Dec 12, 2008 06:38AM  
  • Understanding David Foster Wallace
  • No One Left to Lie to: The Values of the Worst Family
  • Consider David Foster Wallace
  • Elegant Complexity: A Study of David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest
  • McSweeney's #14
  • The Shape of Things to Come: Prophecy and the American Voice
  • David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest: A Reader's Guide
  • Water to the Angels: William Mulholland, His Monumental Aqueduct, and the Rise of Los Angeles
  • The Legacy of David Foster Wallace
  • Radical Priorities
  • The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin
  • Conversations with Edward Said
  • Renegade: The Making of a President
  • The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader
  • Although of Course You End Up Becoming Yourself: A Road Trip with David Foster Wallace
  • Style Deficit Disorder: Harajuku Street Fashion - Tokyo
  • The Bush Tragedy
  • Unhitched: The Trial of Christopher Hitchens
David Foster Wallace worked surprising turns on nearly everything: novels, journalism, vacation. His life was an information hunt, collecting hows and whys. "I received 500,000 discrete bits of information today," he once said, "of which maybe 25 are important. My job is to make some sense of it." He wanted to write "stuff about what it feels like to live. Instead of being a relief from what it fe ...more
“If you are bored and disgusted by politics and don't bother to vote, you are in effect voting for the entrenched Establishments of the two major parties, who please rest assured are not dumb, and who are keenly aware that it is in their interests to keep you disgusted and bored and cynical and to give you every possible reason to stay at home doing one-hitters and watching MTV on primary day. By all means stay home if you want, but don't bullshit yourself that you're not voting. In reality, there is no such thing as not voting: you either vote by voting, or you vote by staying home and tacitly doubling the value of some Diehard's vote.” 1129 likes
“In fact, the likeliest reason why so many of us care so little about politics is that modern politicians makes us sad, hurt us deep down in ways that are hard even to name, much less talk about.” 12 likes
More quotes…