Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Communist Manifesto” as Want to Read:
The Communist Manifesto
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Read Book* *Different edition

The Communist Manifesto

3.60  ·  Rating details ·  126,154 ratings  ·  6,502 reviews
A rousing call to arms whose influence is still felt today

Originally published on the eve of the 1848 European revolutions, The Communist Manifesto is a condensed and incisive account of the worldview Marx and Engels developed during their hectic intellectual and political collaboration. Formulating the principles of dialectical materialism, they believed that labor create
...more
Paperback, 288 pages
Published June 27th 2002 by Penguin Classics (first published February 21st 1848)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Communist Manifesto, please sign up.
Popular Answered Questions
syenite Not to necro this question but the below user talks about the "Übermensch" on his reviews, so, take from that what you will?…moreNot to necro this question but the below user talks about the "Übermensch" on his reviews, so, take from that what you will?(less)

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.60  · 
Rating details
 ·  126,154 ratings  ·  6,502 reviews


More filters
 | 
Sort order
Start your review of The Communist Manifesto
Jeremy
Nov 03, 2008 rated it it was ok
Recommends it for: People who wonder why Communism fails
Long overdue update (2013): I read this book five years ago and in almost every respect, I have mellowed considerably.

You can read my review below. It's unchanged. You can read the comments below that. Also unchanged.

I never seriously expected anyone to read this review, much less love or hate it so strongly. I am not apologizing for my view of the book or Marx. He put his entire life into this slender and influential book, and I respect that. I understand a bit more about where he was coming fr
...more
Jason
Jan 11, 2008 rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: Anarchists!!
Read this and understand why your imperialist capitalist government spent the better part of a century playing hot potato with ICBMs, invading and incinerating peaceful, peasant countries, and making your mom and dad piss themselves under school desks.

The elite were scared shitless and by no means would they allow their slaves, errr labor force, a fraction of freedom or equality or means to resist. The 60 year propaganda campaign against Communism and the virtual disappearance of strong labor u
...more
Sean Barrs
Communism doesn’t work. Its ideals are perfectly understandable, justifiable even, but the way it seeks to attain them, that’s just terrible. In reality communist policy falls apart or isn’t fully followed.

The driving force is to achieve a classless rather than class based society. Sounds good on paper doesn’t it? But in order to achieve such a thing, the manifesto proposes a revolution that will wipe out private property. This is more than following the march of history. Mankind has seen count
...more
Always Pouting
I finally read this even though someone gave it to me forever ago. I think the ideas are interesting but I think this functions more into explaining communist ideology in that historical period and for explaining the positioning in regards to other groups. I would rather read more about the idea of history as class struggle but expanded upon which seems like it could be an interesting framework or the themes of the inherent instability of capitalism that was being argued for. I don't think I hav ...more
Barry Pierce
What can I say? Marx was right. Almost.
Darwin8u
“Political power, properly so called, is merely the organised power of one class for oppressing another.”
― Karl Marx, The Communist Manifesto

description

Vol 20 of my Penguin Little Black Classics Box Set. To be clear, I'm not giving this 5-stars because I'm a Communist just waiting start a revolution (not that I'm against a good revolution here or there)*. I do come from a religious tradition that experimented in the 1800s with ideas of consecration and communalism. They called it the United Order. Even wit
...more
Mike (the Paladin)
Nov 12, 2009 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: political
Like many people (at least of my generation) I got this out of the library when I was in high school. You can't describe this as "good" or "a good read" etc. I would however recommend reading this with an open and thoughtful mind. I don't see how any thinking person can read this without seeing the logical fallacies.

What is presented in this book is more properly called Marxist Communism or Marxism. But with only a little knowledge of history it is obvious that wherever "classic" Communism or Ma
...more
J.G. Keely
It is an error to assume that the problem with humanity is an inability to recognize our own problems. While it's true that we constantly look outside for answers, this is just because we are unhappy with the answers we have. We know that success requires hard work and knowledge, but we want something easier. We will accept an easier answer even when it isn't true. We are not motivated by what is true or likely, but by frightening or enticing stories.

We are driven away from the necessary and the
...more
Rachel
One word review: disgusting.

There is so much I could say, and there isn't the space to say it in a review... Where do I even begin?

For starters, the book began on a whining note. There were basically two main thrusts: first that free trade was so unfair to the poor proletariat; second, that the communistic movement had only the interests of the proletariat at heart. It was unhindered by nationality or any other interests and existed solely to make the working class successful.

What started out
...more
Jenna
Jul 12, 2020 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
"You are horrified at our intending to do away with private property. But in your existing society, private property is already done away with for nine-tenths of the population."

The Communist Manifesto is a good introduction to Marx's philosophy and ideals and I was frequently blown away by his observations on the wealthy and Capitalism. 

I'm not going to analyze this book or Marxist thought -- there are too many aspects I need to mull over and much I need to learn. I will say though that I agree
...more
Traveller
Jan 13, 2010 rated it it was ok
Shelves: sociology, re-reading
This tract by Marx and Engels is too enormous in implication to review fully in the small little space that GR allows, so what I'll do for now is take extracts from it and comment on them, piece by piece.

Per the Maifesto:"
"Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form this family exists only among the bourgeois
...more
Steve Evans
Apr 01, 2012 rated it it was amazing
No one should feel the need to agree with this short polemic to realise that it is one of the most important books ever written. It should be required reading in schools really, but anyone who hasn't read it should nip out and get a copy straight away, and put her or his nose in it. Most though not all of Marxism is summed up in it, and unless one is really dedicated, very little else is needed for an understanding of "Marxism". I was one of those people and have read a lot of Marx and Engels an ...more
Glenn Russell


Are there any Marxists around today?

I recently did a reread of this book. Does anybody still consider themselves a member of the bourgeois or the proletariat?

Karl Marx published his manifesto in 1847. Nearly 200 years later and it strikes me the long shadow of Marxism remains: a person's underlying everyday reality and range of choices is defined by one question: Are you rich or are you poor?
...more
Fei Fei
The terms Marxism and Communism are so misused nowadays that it is difficult to hold an intellectual conversation with people about this deeply fascinating political and economic theorist. It is partly the fault of the school curriculum, I fear. For whenever schools teach Marx, they inevitably always start with this book, the Communist Manifesto. But this is precisely the worst place to begin understanding Marxist philosophy. The Communist Manifesto is an anomaly in Marx's work. Strictly speakin ...more
Xio
May 07, 2007 rated it liked it
Shelves: manifesto
Its awful fun to grow up marxist in the US. You get to go to meetings where you, as a kid, soon realize there's no point in paying attention so off you go with the other rowdy tots into the ghetto to make trouble with whatever you find to hand.

And you get to read this novella and if you're bored and underchallenged but over bothered you can begin to argue against american capitalist imperialism and the growth of consumerist doctrine using your new found propaganda skills til you bait a teacher i
...more
Riku Sayuj

The history of all hitherto existing society* is the history of class struggles.

* That is, all written history.



+++

We read the same written history and read it as progress, as stories, etc. The real history, on the other hand, is something else. Played out differently. Yeah, that is the catch.

This was a reading of only the bare text (along with the many prefaces!). It was very powerful and I am now reading the Penguin edition with the really long introduction next. Will write more about this imp
...more
Gary
Jul 14, 2020 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I've never been a Communist but I do think we should read this as a warning as to where the evils and dangers of unfettered capitalism (in those days it included child labour and workhouses in Britain) lead. Espeically since I always find myself surrounded by fanatical free market libertarian lunatics who believe free markets are more important thank human life. ...more
Rebecca
I read this on the train to Manchester, appropriate reading when approaching one of the UK’s biggest centers of Victorian industry and the place where Marx and Engels met to discuss ideas in the mid-1840s. Marx was the chief author of this 50-page pamphlet, first published in London in 1848. It had never occurred to me that it was first issued in German, Marx’s native language. Like Darwin’s Origin of Species, another seminal Victorian text, this has so many familiar lines and wonderful metaphor ...more
Ben Loory
Jan 12, 2014 rated it it was amazing
wow, this was just amazing. i expected it to be long and dry and boring but instead it's like a pamphlet, it's a stirring infomercial, and the writing is incredible, like walt whitman or tennyson's "ulysses"-level rhetoric. i mean when you get to the list of the changes they actually want to make, you go OH JEEZ NO I DON'T THINK THAT'S GONNA WORK!!! but you can't help but see how this would've moved people to action (and probably still continues to do so to this day). it's electrifying and mesme ...more
Greg Brozeit
The most boring and most interesting thing I've ever read. The most profound and most ridiculous thing I've ever read. The most frustrating and most coherent thing I've ever read. The most far-seeing and most fantasy-derived thing I've ever read. But I'm really glad I read it, occasionally re-read it, and am influenced by it, good or bad.

In my opinion, much of the Communist Manifesto is a restatement of Luke 6:31. No matter if you think this is important or tripe, if you've actually read it, the
...more
Belhor Crowley
Jul 14, 2013 rated it liked it
Shelves: philosophy
This of course, like many other ideologies, looks good on paper.
Riku Sayuj

An introduction to a historical work (or any work for that matter) should not be a thorough deconstruction, undertaken from an ideologically opposite standpoint. The reader should be given an introduction and in fact (as much as possible) a defense of the work. This introduction sets out to do the opposite.

I don't have a problem with Marx being critiqued but it should have been done in an independent book. This is like making a reader buy something for the value he attributes to the main work a
...more
Olivia-Savannah
Feb 27, 2021 rated it really liked it
I did agree with a lot of things in this manifesto such as capitalism being over the top and getting out of hand. When the economic situations in history were broken down and explained, I was nodding along. I was surprised by how readable the manifesto was. I expected to get lost in the economic and class distinction jargon, but that didn’t happen at all. When it came to the second chapter, I started to disagree with some things. I felt like they started to sound a bit egotistical when discussin ...more
Kevin Shepherd
bour·geoi·sie: /ˌbo͝orZHwäˈzē/ noun the capitalist class who own most of society's wealth and means of production.

pro·le·tar·i·at: /ˌprōləˈterēət/ noun workers or working-class people, regarded collectively.

Although I needed no persuasion to conclude that capitalism is fertile ground for the corruption of the bourgeoisie and the exploitation of the proletariat, Karl did not sell me on revolutionary socialism as the answer to all of our woes.

On the other hand, Marx isn’t the heinous, horned dast
...more
Kevin Kelsey
Dec 22, 2020 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: read-2020
Deeply entrenched in the economics of the mid 19th century and full of straw man arguments. It barely even touches on the social reasons that inevitably lead to wealth inequality and the creation of the Proletariat/Bourgeoisie dynamic. It's much more interested in reform through brute force, which just seems shortsighted with the breadth of historical examples we have to draw on now. All that has done in the past is to create a power vacuum that is immediately filled by a dictator or some other ...more
Rupert Dreyfus
Aug 25, 2015 rated it really liked it
Shelves: politics
Whether you disagree with Marx or not, this is an important book. It was part of a wider debate back when the idea of revolutionary strategy was taken seriously by the intellectuals of the day. I personally favour the principles of anarcho-syndicalism as being the path towards a freer, more democratic and peaceful world. I also think manifestos such as this lead to dogma rather than allowing revolutionary activity to be experimental and spontaneous.

That said Marx is an important figure in the de
...more
~Jo~
Jul 28, 2017 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction
For once, I am unsure on how to rate this, so I am going with a safe and sturdy three stars. I certainly think this is worth a read, although, it won't appeal to every individual, unless you have interests in Political History or theory.

On the whole, it was a short, but fairly interesting piece of work. It gives a grand insight into the middle 1800's political and also the social life. To be honest though, a hell of a lot has changed since this was written, and without an introduction, I would
...more
Gary
Jan 17, 2021 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I've never been a Communist but I do think we should read this as a warning as to where the evils and dangers of unfettered capitalism (in those days it included child labour and workhouses in Britain) lead. Especially since I always find myself surrounded by fanatical free market libertarian lunatics who believe free markets are more important than human life. ...more
Jason
May 11, 2016 rated it really liked it
Reread this recently and basically yup.
Mehrsa
Dec 13, 2018 rated it really liked it
I just re-read this for a project and what really stuck out at me was how sarcastic it was! Ha Marx and Engle were the original ironic hipsters
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Marx: German white male racist inspired Hitler etc? 9 134 Jan 07, 2021 11:38AM  
The Pickwick Nigh...: The Best Author in Existence 1 4 Aug 05, 2020 02:43PM  
The Well-Educated...: The End of The Communist Manifesto 1 21 Sep 12, 2019 03:44PM  
Highlights 1 17 Aug 06, 2017 01:31AM  
Goodreads Librari...: Combine? 2 15 Apr 17, 2017 11:19AM  

Readers also enjoyed

  • The State and Revolution
  • Socialism: Utopian and Scientific
  • The Principles of Communism
  • Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism
  • Das Kapital
  • The Prince
  • Capital, Vol. 1: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production
  • Wage Labour and Capital
  • The Conquest of Bread
  • The Social Contract
  • Critique of the Gotha Program
  • What Is to Be Done?
  • Leviathan
  • Blackshirts and Reds: Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism
  • Reform or Revolution
  • Critique of Pure Reason
  • The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State
  • Wage-Labour and Capital/Value, Price and Profit
See similar books…
See top shelves…
3,839 followers
Karl Marx, Ph.D. (University of Jena, 1841) was a social scientist who was a key contributor to the development of Communist theory.

Marx was born in Trier, a city then in the Kingdom of Prussia's Province of the Lower Rhine. His father, born Jewish, converted to Protestantism shortly before Karl's birth in response to a prohibition newly introduced into the Rhineland by the Prussian Kingdom on Jew
...more

News & Interviews

  Every year in the U.S., we observe National Hispanic Heritage Month, which runs from September 15 through October 15. And this is the perfect...
56 likes · 11 comments
“The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.

Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guildmaster and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, that each time ended, either in the revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes.”
409 likes
“Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.

Workingmen of all countries unite!”
303 likes
More quotes…