Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Conflict Is Not Abuse: Overstating Harm, Community Responsibility, and the Duty of Repair” as Want to Read:
Conflict Is Not Abuse: Overstating Harm, Community Responsibility, and the Duty of Repair
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Conflict Is Not Abuse: Overstating Harm, Community Responsibility, and the Duty of Repair

3.95  ·  Rating details ·  999 ratings  ·  206 reviews
From intimate relationships to global politics, Sarah Schulman observes a continuum: that inflated accusations of harm are used to avoid accountability. Illuminating the difference between Conflict and Abuse, Schulman directly addresses our contemporary culture of scapegoating. This deep, brave, and bold work reveals how punishment replaces personal and collective self-cri ...more
Paperback, 299 pages
Published October 4th 2016 by Arsenal Pulp Press
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Conflict Is Not Abuse, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Conflict Is Not Abuse

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.95  · 
Rating details
 ·  999 ratings  ·  206 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of Conflict Is Not Abuse: Overstating Harm, Community Responsibility, and the Duty of Repair
Merritt K.
The response to this book was determined in part before it was even released, and I suspect many potential readers will dismiss it on hearsay about the author, which is both a shame and deeply ironic considering the book's topic. Or, people may encounter the audacious title and believe this is an apologia for violence, which it isn't. In fact, many of the book's claims seem pretty uncontroversial to me, and I expect would to many of these potential readers: the state has become the arbiter of va ...more
Oct 09, 2016 rated it really liked it
Sarah Schulman says this in the introduction, but in order to get anything out of this book I feel I must stress it: This is not a book that is to be treated as "right" or "wrong."

I say this mostly because I'm afraid many will read some of the more disagreeable notions and dismiss the whole project. I, personally, found many ideas within the book "wrong" and others spot-on "right" and a lot more that I would have worded differently to accommodate readers' feminist code of ethics and/or political
Clementine Morrigan
It’s really unfortunate that important critiques of carceral feminism and hiv criminalization are wrapped up in a book that also forwards some very dangerous and inaccurate ideas about interpersonal violence and how it should be handled by community. I do think queer community unfortunately too often takes up a punitive, carceral approach to both conflict and abuse in our communities which is why I wanted to read this book. We need better ways of addressing these things and that’s what I hoped t ...more
Aug 09, 2017 rated it it was ok


Figure shit out in a way that doesn't involve questioning a potential survivor's narrative to their face, thnx

Okay, so the next thing about this book: FuuuUUUUUUUUUUUUUuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck

I originally found this book through the Autostraddle interview and was c
Morgan M. Page
Oct 11, 2016 rated it it was amazing
Sarah Schulman's remarkable Conflict is Not Abuse offers a nuanced look at conflict, group behaviour, and the consequences of overstating harm. Her book - which examines conflict and overstatement of harm on the local, national, and international scale - couldn't be more well-timed in an era of increasingly hostile responses to difference across culture. Whether it is the ceaseless flamewars of the Tumblr generation, the national scapegoating of people living with HIV through HIV criminalization ...more
Apr 07, 2017 rated it it was ok
Shelves: read-in-2017
I wish I had checked the author, considering how much I hated Gentrification of the Mind. The premise of this book is solid: individuals and groups often overreact to perceived or minimal danger and claim abuse and/or accuse others of abuse when the situation is more nuanced and reciprocal than that.

The problem with the way that the argument is presented is that it gives a very broad overview, invoking governmental power and the Israeli/Palestinian conflict while relying on personal examples fro
Feb 21, 2020 rated it liked it
Shelves: 2020
Alternately insightful and irritating.
C.E. G
Feb 15, 2017 rated it liked it
Shelves: fun-nonfiction
I started out being really into this book, feeling personally challenged by it and writing down some quotes like, "Refusing to be self-critical in order to solve conflicts enhances the power of the state." I found it valuable to look at how both Supremacy and Trauma can lead to unhealthy responses to conflict.

However, the more I read, the more I felt like this book was Sarah Schulman intellectualizing her obsession with past rejections. Like, the title of the book includes "the duty of repair"
Wendy Ortiz
Mar 05, 2017 rated it it was amazing
Fully intending to start a book club just for/about this book. I want everyone I know to read it & discuss. ...more
Jan 23, 2017 rated it liked it
Shelves: queer, theory
* some gorgeous writing and really helpful correctives on the politics of victimhood. as someone who has been thru trauma it was so helpful to read about the narrative that when u face trauma ur expected to become a "virgin" who has done nothing wrong. that narrative also hurts people who have faced harm as they feel they can never live up to it.
* this is supposed to be a pragmatic book on how to communicate across difference within activist circles. but it's discussion on trigger warnings, like
Maggie Gordon
Apr 01, 2017 rated it liked it
Shelves: non-fiction
Conflict is Not Abuse is a book I suspect many people will hate. However, it says some important and astute things about how society deals with conflict and abuse. Specifically, Schulman is writing a call to action for people to sort out problems with communication rather than label them as unworkable too quickly. She differentiates situations where one person abuses their power over another from situations where parties are mutually encountering difficulties with one another. She argues that co ...more
May 13, 2017 rated it it was ok
Made me think, don't agree with all of it. "Snowflakes." Liberal college campuses are denying speakers freedom of speech. Oh, don't like what I said? Do you need a safe space? Are you triggered? Are you upset over the election?
While this book is not specifically about any of the above, I definitely thought of some of the ongoing discussions/arguments (depending on how you put it) and the conflicts that arise. Author Schulman takes the reader on why and how things like texting and emails are har
Jan 03, 2017 rated it did not like it
The overall focus of the book is interpersonal relationships which is not what I expected going in. Schulman was right to preface the book by saying it isn't a book to be agreed with or disagreed with because there is a hell of a lot to disagree with, or at least seriously wonder about.
Esther Espeland
There was a lot I didn’t agree with but I value the questions it asked. Didn’t love her terminology, esp in her descriptions of “triggered events” but she brings an interesting perspective to discussions of community accountability and restorative justice. Def spent most of therapy talking abt it lmao
Scott Moore
Oct 07, 2016 rated it it was amazing
I flew through this book, which resonated strongly and speaks to the possibilities of restorative justice on personal, interpersonal, and global levels. It illustrates how a supremacist society that so intensely polices who deserves compassion (and why) can lead to traumatized behavior mirroring (& perpetuating) supremacy behavior - though for different reasons. It lays bare everyone's responsibility to self-reflect and engage in conversation and listen without hiding behind technology or misuse ...more
Oct 27, 2016 marked it as to-read
A brilliant/problematic/frustrating/inspiring look at human interaction in the modern age. This book is so important as technology continues to alter our ways of communicating with one another. Schulman moves us collectively toward compassion and empathy by way of her rigorous thinking and lucid prose.
Jun 12, 2017 rated it liked it
Oof, I don't know how to rate this book.

The highlights of Schulman's Conflict Is Not Abuse are as follows: (1) Chapter 4, which deals with the criminalization of HIV-positive individuals in Canada, because it teases out what seems to be an inevitable dynamic of state control even within something as glorified by progressives as nationalized health care, as well as underscoring a serious point about an insatiable appetite for punitive response that creates a cascading clusterfuck of error and mis
Nov 30, 2016 rated it it was amazing
Surely to be a textbook for activists and engaged citizens for at least the next four years. Erudite and intricate. Wide-ranging, but well-focused. A true achievement that is built upon yet fuller than her previous non-fiction. If we can survive the dark days ahead, it will be because of thinkers and writers and truth tellers and idea explorers like Schulman.
Vincent Silk
Dec 22, 2016 rated it liked it

This book has been received with a lot of controversy. There are people who accused the author of violence/abuse apologism, and there are moments in the writing where I can see why people would say this. But I like the way that Schulman treats her readers as though they are capable of holding complex truths. These moments of confusion are mostly during the "personal anecdote" sections, where it is difficult for any writer to put a political point across without losing some nuance. These sections
May 16, 2017 rated it liked it
I have so much to say about this book. It was frustrating, radical, oversimplified, deeply complicated, powerful, provocative, brilliant, problematic, insightful and self important. I really do believe it should be widely read mostly because I want to talk about it with everyone.

Highlights for me include resisting the idea that people are disposable, emphasis on reparation, the importance of taking DEEP accountability, and the linkage between community shunning and privilege/White supremacy.

Bryn (Plus Others)
Jan 31, 2019 rated it did not like it
Shelves: not-finishing
I am going to do exactly what Schulman says humans being should never do; I am going to decide that Schulman's beliefs about how to treat other human beings are so pernicious and unpleasant that rather than remaining in relationship to her book, I am going to quit reading it and do something else with my time. She may have excellent points about community responsibility, but I will never know, because I am going to withdraw, withhold myself from the book, and in doing so profoundly harm this tex ...more
Mar 13, 2020 rated it liked it
For the political book club we decided March's read would be Sarah Schulman's Conflict Is Not Abuse, a book I had heard recommended before. I had mixed feelings going into it because, while I'd had it recommended to me by a variety of people, many of whom are perfectly lovely, I had also had it recommended by a non-zero number of people whose understanding of conflict not being abuse was transparently "When I do it it's conflict and when you do it it's abuse," so, yeah, that's awkward.

The boo
Nov 16, 2019 rated it liked it
I struggled immensely with this book. I was hooked after the introduction — Schulman presents some incredibly important ideas around the overstating of harm on interpersonal, structural and nation state levels. She presents ideas about abuse, conflict and the overstatement of harm in a way I’ve never read on the page and leaves me thinking deeply about my relationships to others and the world, and where there is a lack thereof. As I considered reading, however, I found Schulman to walk a fine li ...more
Lorenzo Barberis Canonico
ContraPoints referenced this is her last video about cancel culture, so I decided to read it now as opposed to later (it was already on my reading list for the year for some reason). Basically, Schulman argues that people afflicted with PTSD may not engage in disagreements in good faith because they over-react by associating any form of conflict with the abusive situation they have escaped. She gave some really "interesting" examples such as Israel's response to criticism regarding Palestinians ...more
Nov 25, 2017 rated it liked it
Shelves: lit-non-fiction
Oh man, we're going to have so much to talk about at book club.
Mar 11, 2017 rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: Everyone
Shelves: non-fiction
IF YOU READ ONE BOOK THIS YEAR. IF YOU HAVE EVER EXPERIENCED CONFLICT. IF YOU WANT TO RELATE TO YOUR INTIMATES WITH MORE COMPASSION. IF YOU ARE INVOLVED IN SOCIAL JUSTICE. IF YOU CARE ABOUT TRANSFORMATIVE JUSTICE. Sarah Schulman discusses how we problematically deal with conflict, starting with the personal/familial and tracing a through-line all the way to state abuse of the individual (criminalization of those with HIV in Canada) and geo-political conflict (Israel/Palestine).

Her main thesis is
Casey Jo
Feb 18, 2019 rated it did not like it
DNF at page 100. (Under book report rules of "a book is at least 100 pages", I say it counts for the reading challenge.)

I appreciated the opening chapter of this book. Great points, including:
p. 36: "The fact that something could go wrong does not mean we are in danger."
p.45: "People need interactive conversations, even short ones, in order to understand each other." (on why hashing things out through email is so open to disaster)
p.58: From Catherine Hodes, "Abuse is Power Over and Conflict is P
Nov 06, 2017 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: activist
I did not care for this steaming pile of victim-blaming garbage. It's like everything you ever hated about. I would definitely recommend not taking this book's advice to interrogate your peers if they disclose having been abused to play detective about whether they were "really abused." There's a whole lot of WTF throughout, but the section where the author makes excuses for a woman punching her in the head (?!) If someone punched me- first of all I would file a police report (and I might get fl ...more
Cheryl Klein
Mar 24, 2017 rated it liked it
Shelves: nonfiction
I think I agree with the "repair" and "community responsibility" components of this subtitle and less so with the presumption that overstating harm is rampant and, well, harmful. Sometimes people want to stop communicating, and that's frustrating (I've been on the receiving end, so I promise I get it), but I don't quite buy that it's an injustice-with-a-capital-I.

The connections Schulman makes between conflicts at the interpersonal, community and international levels are interesting but poorly
Sean Estelle
Jul 25, 2017 rated it liked it
I am glad I read this as part of a reading group - forced me to read it slowly and consider it carefully. While I appreciate Schulman's thesis, and the time/resources moved to open this conversation, I do think that some of the examples she utilizes undermine her argument (especially when considering this from the vantage point of those who endure more serious forms of Abuse at a daily level). Worth reading, imo, but don't expect to be nodding your head the whole time.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Readers also enjoyed

  • Emergent Strategy: Shaping Change, Changing Worlds
  • Pleasure Activism: The Politics of Feeling Good
  • Time Is the Thing a Body Moves Through
  • Females
  • Care Work: Dreaming Disability Justice
  • The Faggots & Their Friends Between Revolutions
  • In the Dream House
  • The Queer Art of Failure
  • Felon: Poems
  • Octavia's Brood: Science Fiction Stories from Social Justice Movements
  • Radical Dharma: Talking Race, Love, and Liberation
  • The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love
  • Testo Junkie: Sex, Drugs, and Biopolitics in the Pharmacopornographic Era
  • Carceral Capitalism
  • Nobody Passes: Rejecting the Rules of Gender and Conformity
  • The Revolution Starts at Home: Confronting Intimate Violence Within Activist Communities
  • The Wallcreeper
  • The Other Side of Paradise
See similar books…
Sarah Schulman is a longtime AIDS and queer activist, and a cofounder of the MIX Festival and the ACT UP Oral History Project. She is a playwright and the author of seventeen books, including the novels The Mere Future, Shimmer, Rat Bohemia, After Delores, and People in Trouble, as well as nonfiction works such as The Gentrification of the Mind: Witness to a Lost Imagination, My American History: ...more

News & Interviews

When you work at Goodreads, it's pretty tough to keep that Want to Read shelf under control. (And let's be honest, most of us don't even t...
88 likes · 16 comments
“If a person cannot solve a conflict with a friend, how can they possibly contribute to larger efforts for peace? If we refuse to speak to a friend because we project our anxieties onto an email they wrote, how are we going to welcome refugees, immigrants, and the homeless into our communities? The values required for social repair are the same values required for personal repair.” 4 likes
“Confusing being mortal with being threatened can occur in any realm. The fact that something could go wrong does not mean that we are in danger. It means we are alive. Mortality is the sign of life. In the most intimate and personal of arenas, many of us have love and trusted someone who violated that trust. So when someone else comes along who intrigues us, whose interests we share, who we enjoy being with, with whom there could be some mutual enrichment and understanding, that does not mean that we are being violated again. Experiencing anxiety does not mean that anyone is doing anything to us that is unjust.” 3 likes
More quotes…