Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “World War One: A Short History” as Want to Read:
World War One: A Short History
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

World War One: A Short History

3.39  ·  Rating details ·  481 Ratings  ·  81 Reviews
In World War One: A Short History, Norman Stone provides a terse, opinionated and wry short history of the First World War.

In 1914 a new kind of war, and a new kind of world, came about. Fourteen million combatants died, a further twenty million were wounded, four empires were destroyed and even the victors' empires were fatally damaged. The First World War marked a revolu
Paperback, 225 pages
Published March 27th 2008 by Penguin (first published 2007)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
May 09, 2014 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
“A oeste nada de novo” assombrou-me a tal ponto que senti a necessidade de procurar respostas para a loucura ali descrita, mas apenas encontrei mais assombro com esta História Concisa da Primeira Guerra Mundial.
Apesar da incompreensão que me avassala, tenho que continuar a procurar estas respostas parcelares que apenas contribuem para o aumento do meu pasmo.

Para já, chega de guerra. Chega de realidade.
Sep 07, 2009 rated it it was ok
Shelves: read-history
This book raises some important questions, i.e., (a) what were they smoking when they published it?, and (2) where can I get some?

Although reading is my favorite activity, the process which leads to publication is a mystery to me. Why did Basic Books publish this book? Who did they think was going to read it? Call me crazy if you want, but I thought that the overwhelming majority of sales might to university undergraduates taking a survey course of twentieth-century history, with a minority of a
Jul 02, 2014 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: bulgur sniffers
Shelves: european-history

Short and unsatisfying.

I picked this off the library shelf to read in accompaniment with a World War I novel I'm reading as a group read. This book was not on my radar; I don't think I've heard of the author; but the books on WWI that actually are on my to-read list are fairly massive, and I wanted something that I would finish at about the same time as the novel. My knowledge of WWI at this point is pretty much The Guns of August.

Is everyone else excited for the WWI centennial???
Jan 15, 2013 rated it it was ok
Liam Boyd
Indie Reads II, Assignment 3

I am not a fan of World War One, A Short History, by Norman Stone. My feeling about this book is that it was like reading a dictionary; always correct, but dry fact after dry fact, etcetera! There is not enough personal information about any of the key politicians, generals or soldiers to make them interesting. Kaiser Wilhelm, Churchill and others were very interesting men who have had much written about them, but in this book, they are just names. For exam
Oct 05, 2016 rated it did not like it
Shelves: european-history
This is a skimpy account of World War I, narrowly-focused on the military dimensions of that conflict. For some reason, I expected this book to include brief but essential discussions of the social history and diplomacy of the war; I should have been tipped off by the illustration on the front cover, which shows a gas-masked soldier on horseback. In this case, it's definitely a matter of "what you see is what you get".

It turns out that what you "get" is a flood of information about WWI combat, w
Jan 10, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: mp2
World War One : A Short History by Norman Stone was a book I definately would reccomend to someone that wants to learn some backround information on World War I. In this book Norman Stone elaborates and presents the collapses of the four empires: Hapsburg, German,Tsarist, and The Ottoman Empire collapsed. He also challenges the current understandings of treaties that were created after the war by expanding and introducing them as failures. He also introduces the conflicts and European countries ...more
Neale Rigg
Jul 20, 2009 rated it liked it
Didn't see the ending coming at all LOL
A very good short narrative of the main currents of the First World War, though I hesitate to say that it's a good "introduction." Stone is a master of the material and crafts an effective 190-page version of the war, one that covers all the major campaigns and battles and plenty of the war's political, social, and economic effects. It's an accomplishment, and I don't hesitate to recommend it.

An historian writing a narrative this short must be choosy about what he covers, and Stone does extraord
Jan 28, 2012 rated it liked it
After reading Guns of August, which only covered the first month of the war, I wanted more. I read about this book and thought it would give a good overview of the war, and I liked the year-by-year analysis. However, the author's too-frequent use of parentheticals chopped the story up, and often the little asides did not add much or assumed the reader knew more. Also, his too-frequent use of pronouns made me backtrack through paragraphs to figure out who Stone was talking about. As an example, o ...more
Jul 06, 2009 rated it did not like it
Well frankly this book was a waste of time. The author seems so intent on amusing us with his epigrams that the war comes off as a jolly laugh. Also, some of them border on anti-Catholic. This may be the fault of the author's writing. At one point I thought English was his second language but on researching his background, I found out he was born and raised in Scotland. His overuse of the coma is criminal. So is his fondness for parenthesis. Not for the novice. Only someone who is well read in W ...more
Andrew Fear
Jan 20, 2013 rated it it was amazing
I wish I could write like this. Stone manages to extract the key themes of the war without becoming bogged down in a somme of detail. This isn't for tactical military historians, but is full of insights and theories about strategy. Inevitably some bits and pieces aren't there - the East African War for example, but then as side shows they are rightly ignored. Stone adds just enough personalia and dry wit to keep the whole thing entertaining as well as informative and thought-provoking. A grand b ...more
Jul 23, 2017 rated it liked it
I was looking more for a political history, and this was more military.
Brendan McCauley
Jan 10, 2017 rated it it was ok
Not particularly enlightening. Find another book on the topic.
Richard Kearney
Feb 08, 2014 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Norman Stone's "World War One: A Short History" is a well-written narrative focused on the military history of the conflict that decisively and traumatically influenced events around the globe right up to the present day, although it does not neglect the war's political and diplomatic dimensions. Stone, a distinguished historian of the twentieth century who has published extensively on both world wars and Turkish history, offers a fairly comprehensive perspective on the participants and events o ...more
A couple of weeks ago whilst watching some programme about the first world war I realised that I don't actually know much about it. So I thought I'd remedy the situation. I will probably read a more in-depth book at some point in the future but I thought it would be useful to read a quick summary first - so I picked up this book at my local library.

Once you've discounted photographs, blank pages, maps, the index etc. the page count is more like 120 pages. So it's called a 'Short History' and th
Amjad Badenjki
In 1914, a massive war that lasted for four years that has included the countries of the United States, Ottoman Empire, Belgium, Germany, Russia, Japan, Italy, France, Greece, and many more, all took place in this terror. This war was known as World War I. The main reason, why World War I started was because of an assassination of a man called Archduke Franz Ferdinand reason being that people didn't like that Hungary and Austria had to be stuck to each other. Another reason is because everyone t ...more
Ryan J
Jan 15, 2013 rated it really liked it
In this book there is a very strong and detailed description of World War 1. The author gives information on specific battles and what is happening in Europe through the years of 1914-1918. The book opens in early 1914 and shows Germany's true intentions of gaining land in Eurpoe, and their plan the take out the Russian Army before the Russians became to powerful. Germany had been waiting for the right moment to declare war on Russia. Then, Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated by a Serbian ...more
Mike Knox
May 24, 2010 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction, history
Chapter 1 (Outbreak) weaves together the various factors that made Europe a place where war was waiting to happen. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was ‘the inevitable accident’. Years later the murderer said that if he had not done it, “the Germans would have found another excuse” (23). "The generation that emerged into maturity around 1890 has much to answer for…the greatest mistake of the twentieth century was made when Germany built a navy designed to attack [Great Britain:]” (1 ...more
Jim Coughenour
If you want to get a solid understanding of World War One in an afternoon, this book would be hard to beat. Stone moves expertly across the years and geography of a conflict that still seems impossible to grasp in its stupidity and staggering cost – and not only in terms of lives and fortune: this war more or less accomplished the suicide of European civilization. (For an exalted examination of that idea, see George Steiner's In Bluebeard's Castle.)

Stone is masterful at summing up the current sc
Jacob O
Jan 16, 2013 rated it it was ok
I think that World War One: A Short History by Norman Stone was an average book. It got the main points across, but I lost interest quickly. The author explains important events of the war in such a way that I had to read pages over and over again until I could understand what he was talking about. Battles are explained poorly as well. No interesting facts or detailed descriptions of the battles are given, just a simple explanation of what the plan was and who won. Also, none of the important pe ...more
Apr 21, 2013 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Lauren by: Irene Goldman
Boring. A slog. If I wanted a dry recitation of "troops move this way and conquer X, troops move that way and are defeated at Y," I could have just sat down for a game of Risk, and it would have been shorter too. Maybe that's a little harsh. What it comes down to is that I'm just not interested in military actions. I'm usually more interested in the diplomatic and social context that leads to them. And while this book did have some of that, especially in the final couple chapters, it just wasn't ...more
Christopher Litsinger
Jan 22, 2010 rated it liked it
Shelves: read-in-2010
I read this book after seeing it on a list of "the best books of the last decade that you didn't read" and figuring I didn't know that much about World War One and it was probably time to change that.
The book's greatest strength is also it's greatest weakness- it is, as it says a short history. At 200 pages in print, it read to me at times like lists of places and names that I wasn't so familiar with.
All the same, if you are looking for a quick overview of the war, this is a fine place to start.
Dec 27, 2015 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Well worth the read because of the grand sweep and scope it gives you, in a manageable number of pages.

The problem with WW I, as opposed to WW II, is that it was very much a static war, and not much of a war of movement. So, keeping track of what happened when is more difficult--you don't have the moving lines on a map to remind you of the sequence of events.

There were, after all, multiple battles over even the same territory (e.g., First Ypres, Second Ypres, Third Ypres/Paaschendale).

This is p
Good but it really is short - less than 200 pages - one substantial chapter per year roughly. It does look at all the fronts too so there is a tremendous amount compressed into this slim volume and if you want anything more than an overview it needs to be followed up with more detailed works - of which there is a good list of recommendations. It is inevitably given its size an opinionated read and leans to the lions led by donkeys cliche of the the great war but it is sprinkled with odd facts to ...more
Peter Ellwood
Dec 27, 2013 rated it liked it
Great fun to read: Stone is opinionated and at times brutal, and he sure has opinions on the conduct of war. But it's quite striking how little this admittedly short book actually tells you: for example the gas attacks and the 1915 battle of Ypres - one of the major events of the entire war - is dealt with in a couple of sentences.

I might come back to this book again some day, once I have read a more detailed and conventional account of the war. I imagine the Stone book might well form an inter
Jul 20, 2013 rated it it was ok
Not a bad book. It doesn't sell itself as being big on details and information, like most historical books about wars - but it does deliver on what it calls itself. Namely, "A Short History (of WWI)." It covers a lot of territory very concisely and quite swiftly. Some of the details included are things not found elsewhere, whereas some points are straight facts that can be found in other books. As a supplementary piece, it does the trick. It does inspire one to want to read more on the insanitie ...more
Jul 30, 2012 rated it it was ok
Shelves: in-english, history
I bought the book in a museum on WW1 in Slovenia, hoping it would help me understand the history of the war.
In fact, the text confused me, I could not remember the names and could not figure out where did the events take place. Of course, I could have taken out the atlas or searched on Internet, but the purpose was to read about history, not to prepare an exam...
I suppose the subject does not interest me sufficiently to sustain my attention.
I finally got bored and dropped it half way through.
Jul 27, 2014 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Well, this wasn't the best history book I've ever read, but it was okay. It was like the information you would get about an historical period from a history professor over a beer, mostly off the top of his head. It was a survey, with lots of stuff missing from some chapters (one for each year of the war), and too much detail on troop movements and battles and generals you were supposed to already know (which I didn't). So it was a little frustrating, but also gave me a broader understanding of h ...more
Feb 17, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Norman Stone's "World War One: A Short History" is a very entertaining read. As advertised, this is not a comprehensive look at the war, but it does offer an enlightening summary of the conflict's major events. That doesn't mean there aren't interesting details in this book; far from it -- Stone offers many small nuggets of interest that help flesh out the more well-known events. Using a lively tone and clever wit, Stone delivers a memorable history of the Great War that reads quickly yet memora ...more
May 01, 2008 rated it it was ok
Shelves: war
I was disappointed by this whistle-stop tour of the First World War. Although well-written and easy to read, it is opinionated and sarcastic, qualities I don't feel belong in a book which calls itself a 'History'. The Germans come off particularly badly: one is left with the impression that they are a nation of blockheads. The author's statement that towards the end of the war faster monoplanes were replacing the old biplanes struck me as completely wrong - the most successful fighters of 1918 w ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Marne, 1914: The Opening of World War I and the Battle That Changed the World
  • Reporting the Revolutionary War: Before It Was History, It Was News
  • Disobeying Hitler: German Resistance After Operation Valkyrie
  • Pearl Harbor: FDR Leads the Nation Into War
  • Stalingrad: The City that Defeated the Third Reich
  • Somme
  • No Man's Land: 1918, the Last Year of the Great War
  • The Complete Memoirs of George Sherston
  • July Crisis: The World's Descent into War, Summer 1914
  • The First Day on the Somme
  • July 1914: Countdown to War
  • Forgotten Voices of the Great War
  • The Greatest War Stories Never Told: 100 Tales from Military History to Astonish, Bewilder, and Stupefy
  • Tommy: The British Soldier on the Western Front 1914-1918
  • Conversations with Major Dick Winters: Life Lessons from the Commander of the Band of Brothers
  • Day Of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor
  • Upstairs & Downstairs: The Illustrated Guide to the Real Life of Masters and Their Servants from the Victorian Era to the Second World War
  • The Missing of the Somme
Norman Stone is a British historian, who is currently a Professor in the Department of International Relations at Bilkent University, Ankara. He is a former Professor at the University of Oxford, Lecturer at the University of Cambridge, and adviser to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.
More about Norman Stone...

Share This Book

“On 28 June 1914 the heir to the throne, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, was assassinated in Sarajevo, capital of Bosnia, a heartland of the South Slavs. Philosophers refer to ‘the inevitable accident’, and this was a very accidental one. Some young Serb terrorists had planned to murder him as he paid a state visit. They had bungled the job, throwing a bomb that missed, and one of them had repaired to a café in a side street to sort himself out. The Archduke drove to the headquarters of the governor-general, Potiorek (where he was met by little girls performing folklore), and berated him (the two men were old enemies, as the Archduke had prevented the neurasthenic Potiorek from succeeding an elderly admirer as Chief of the General Staff). The Archduke went off in a rage, to visit in hospital an officer wounded by the earlier bomb. His automobile moved off again, a Count Harrach standing on the running board. Its driver turned left after crossing a bridge over Sarajevo’s river. It was the wrong street, and the driver was told to stop and reverse. In reverse gear such automobiles sometimes stalled, and this one did so - Count Harrach on the wrong side, away from the café where one of the assassination team was calming his nerves. Now, slowly, his target drove up and stopped. The murderer, Gavrilo Princip, fired. He was seventeen, a romantic schooled in nationalism and terrorism, and part of a team that stretches from the Russian Nihilists of the middle of the nineteenth century, exemplified especially in Dostoyevsky’s prophetic The Possessed and Joseph Conrad’s Under Western Eyes. Austria did not execute adolescents and Princip was young enough to survive. He was imprisoned and died in April 1918. Before he died, a prison psychiatrist asked him if he had any regrets that his deed had caused a world war and the death of millions. He answered: if I had not done it, the Germans would have found another excuse.” 0 likes
More quotes…