Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.

Start by marking “The Trojan War” as Want to Read:

Other editions

Enlarge cover

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Open Preview

The Trojan War

Barry S. Strauss

3.77 · Rating details · 1,072 ratings · 144 reviews

Did the Trojan War really happen?

Spectacular new archaeological evidence suggests that it did. Recent excavations and newly translated Hittite texts reveal that Troy was a large, wealthy city allied with the Hittite Empire. Located at the strategic entrance to the Dardanelles, the link between the Aegean and Black Sea, it was a tempting target for marauding Greeks, the ...more

Get A Copy

Paperback, 288 pages

Published January 3rd 2008 by Arrow (first published 2006)

More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Trojan War, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Trojan War

Lists with This Book

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30

Average rating 3.77 ·

Rating details

· 1,072 ratings · 144 reviews

More filters

Sort order

Start your review of The Trojan War

Feb 23, 2010 Alex rated it it was ok · review of another edition

Shelves: 2009, reading-through-history, rth-lifetime

Thought this would give me more historical info on the actual Trojan War. Turns out we don't know enough to fill a book, so a lot of this is padded out by a blow-by-blow retelling of the Iliad, which I definitely didn't need. Booooring.

Someone recently asked me for my least favorite nonfiction books of my whole Reading Through History project, and this was one of two books I named. (The other: Hannibal: Enemy Of Rome.)

We had a stoop sale last Sunday and someone tried to buy this book for a ...more

flag 11 likes · Like · see review

Dec 25, 2012 Nikki rated it really liked it

Shelves: greek-roman, non-fiction, history

I remember finding Barry Strauss' book on Spartacus entertaining and readable, which is probably why I asked for this for Christmas. I've always been interested in the Trojan War, and when it came to getting round to actually reading this I was a little hesitant -- I like my stories of cunning Odysseus and beautiful Helen, not the sordid truth. But so, apparently, does Barry Strauss -- and in fact he suggests that the work of Homer is a lot closer to the historical truth than modern scholars ...more

flag 8 likes · Like · see review

May 28, 2018 Joaco rated it liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: cajonera

This was such a nice book to read. Even though it is short, the author shows his depth of knowledge and succeeds at grounding the Trojan War on archaeological evidence- not only from Greece but also comparing the Greek and Trojan armies to other Bronze Age civilizations from the Near East such as Egyptians, Assyrians, Hittites, and Babylonians-.

Anyone interested on what a real Trojan War might have looked like will have a solid starting point with this book.

flag 7 likes · Like · see review

Aug 27, 2019 Mike rated it liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: history, non-fiction, mid-east, military, ancient

A very readable and interesting introduction to the classic tale of war in the ancient world and the heroes of the age. Good preparation for reading The Iliad which I mean to do. Good maps too! 3 Stars

flag 7 likes · Like · see review

Jan 29, 2017 Nancy rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: history, non-fiction, ancient-world

Based on discoveries made in the last decade in archaeology and epigraphy, Strauss recounts, in his very distinctive voice and style, the story of the Trojan War and analyzes its historicity, connecting it to what we know about Bronze Age warfare, the cult of the warrior, and interstate conflicts and alliances. Strauss has a really compelling sense of narrative. One jarring note for me: when he quotes from The Iliad and The Odyssey, he uses poet Alexander Pope's translations, an interesting ...more

flag 7 likes · Like · see review

Jun 02, 2012 Paul Pensom rated it it was ok · review of another edition

This book wasn't what I was expecting at all. I was looking for a detailed examination of the archaeological evidence for Troy and the Trojan War. What I got was a retelling in often purple prose of The Iliad. There were frequent references to near contemporary records, to be sure, but the hard nosed archaeology was scarce indeed, and far too often it took a back seat to the author's rhetorical flights of fancy. Maybe there isn't enough evidence to furnish a book, but considering this volume ...more

flag 5 likes · Like · see review

Feb 14, 2019 Susan O rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: history-ancient, 2019-read, 2019-nonfiction-challenge

A recounting of the Trojan War using Homer, other ancient texts, and what we know of the Bronze Age from archaeology. Well-written and enjoyable.

flag 4 likes · Like · see review

Jan 11, 2013 Jerome rated it really liked it · review of another edition

A great, readable history of the Trojan War. Strauss avoids getting bogged down in the archaeological issues surrounding Schliemanns discovery, and instead dives right into the Iliads narrative (as well as lesser-known works about the war). He treats Homers characters as real people and uses their story to tell the real story of ancient Greece.

Strauss is a pretty good writer, and he does a great job combining the dramatic narrative of the Iliad with what is actually known of this time period, ...more

flag 3 likes · Like · see review

Dec 19, 2007 Reid rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Strauss crafts a great short book, replete with quick prose, great language and interesting scholarship, tying together Egyptian and Hittite records to show that many of the outlandish tales from the Iliad and the Odyssey are not nearly as surprising as we might think. Anyone who has seriously enjoyed the epics would love this book, a contemporary version of the classic The World of Odyseeus by M.I. Finley. I highly recommend this book for novices and serious scholars. The approachable length ...more

flag 3 likes · Like · see review

Aug 15, 2011 max rated it liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: homer

I grow weary of books on the Trojan War. Who was Homer? When did he live? Where did he come from? Did he compose in the Greek alphabet that was apparently adopted sometime around 750 B.C. or was he an oral poet who dictated his poems to a scribe? Were the Iliad and Odyssey composed by the same individual or by different authors? Was the author a man or a woman? If they were in fact oral compositions, how were poems of such extraordinary length recited -- piecemeal or in their entirety?

Is the I grow weary of books on the Trojan War. Who was Homer? When did he live? Where did he come from? Did he compose in the Greek alphabet that was apparently adopted sometime around 750 B.C. or was he an oral poet who dictated his poems to a scribe? Were the Iliad and Odyssey composed by the same individual or by different authors? Was the author a man or a woman? If they were in fact oral compositions, how were poems of such extraordinary length recited -- piecemeal or in their entirety?

Is the city Schliemann discovered the Troy which we read of in Homer's poems? Was the Trojan War actually fought? If so, when was it fought? Why was it fought? Were Achilles, Agamemnon, Nestor, Odysseus and other characters legendary figures with some basis in men who actually lived, or are they purely the creation of a poetic, mythic imagination?

And on and on and on... There are no answers, only intense speculation. And this very absence of firm answers about the composer of these poems we call the Iliad and Odyssey is one of the things that makes Homer and his Trojan War so interesting. Apart from the spellbinding artistry and transcendent power of his poetry, there is a mystery, a vast chasm of the unknown that separates the creation of these wonderful poems from our world. It is a gulf that is unlikely ever to be bridged.

Contemporary scholars who write about Homer are like ants crawling over the chariot tracks of antiquity. And yet these modern day Myrmidons remain undeterred in their quest, carrying back a grain here, a grain there, and occasionally taking up academic arms against one another. And so they publish books discussing Bronze Age archaeological findings, the meanings of Hittite inscriptions, theories of oral composition, military tactics, social and political organization, etc., etc. etc.

The inquiry into the Trojan War is not at all unimportant, of course. And, in fairness to the scholars, we must admit that their researches have been remarkably fruitful, albeit inconclusive. Still, reading their works is like poring over a book of baseball statistics when you could be watching an actual game. In the end, there is Homer, and only Homer. My advice is to read him (in Greek, of course) or re-read him before opening this book. Smell the salt air wafting over the wine dark sea; hear the rattling of Apollo's arrows as he speeds angrily from Mt. Olympus in response to the prayer of his priest, Chryses; watch the smoke rising from the pyres cremating the Greeks who have been killed by Apollo's plague; behold the manifold wonders of Homer's epic world rather than lie entombed in the frigid, gloomy mausoleum of what are called "Homeric studies." ...more

flag 2 likes · Like · see review

Jan 26, 2015 Philipp rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: non-fiction, greek, greece

This feels like it started out as an annotated edition of the Iliad, and then ballooned into its own book, but it's still an entertaining read. The Trojan War goes through the Iliad (and later, a few other sources), treats the sack of Troy as if it was a historic event (including characters - they probably did not have these names, but similar people probably did exist - "Whether Helens face launched a thousand ships or none, queens of the Bronze Age wielded great power and kings made war over ...more

flag 2 likes · Like · see review

Aug 29, 2011 Marcus rated it it was ok · review of another edition

The cover says 'New History', but it should really say 'Homer had it right from the start'. Barry Strauss basically narrates the classic work and throws into the mix referencesto whatever archeological finds that suit his interpretation. A nice read in some respects, but fast and loose play with scant factual evidence makes it as plausible as a Hollywood movie.

flag 2 likes · Like · see review

Apr 01, 2017 Adam Balshan rated it did not like it · review of another edition

Shelves: history, r-greece

1.5 stars [History]

This is a decent book if you're not a historian. Historians will justifiably scoff at Strauss for presuming to put the word "history" in his subtitle. Basically, the author weaves several hundred generalizations (enriched by unending conjecture) into a somewhat systematic, somewhat chronological narrative. He tells what could have happened in the campaign for Troy, based upon Homer and broad historical data from the Hellene and Hittite cultures.

It was difficult for me to read ...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Sep 13, 2018 Hanna (lapetiteboleyn) rated it liked it

Shelves: 2018, i-sing-of-troy-and-of-a-man

A clear and concise primer to the Trojan War as a historical event rather than an epic poem. I enjoyed Strauss's sense of humour and his defense of Homer as a source, but there was also an awful lot of romantic imagining that got in the way of his evidence.

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Sep 24, 2018 [redacted by S.H.I.E.L.D.] rated it it was ok · review of another edition

Shelves: history

There's about 30 pages of actual history in here, but I guess at least it's written well. Pity, I usually love Strauss.

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Feb 24, 2019 DivyaRani rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: 2019

Did really Trojan war happened?
Barry Strauss gave more historical analysis and comparisons about the war.
A lot to know about the war. Nice book.

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Sep 18, 2018 Kenneth rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

The author's understanding of what "really" happened insofar as we can reconstruct the story from Homer and the archaeological discoveries of the last 200 years.

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Mar 23, 2020 Elvis rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Great book! Mr. Strauss does a fantastic job of taking historical facts about warfare and culture of Ancient Greece and Troy and then applying those facts to Homers Iliad. This integration shows us how the Iliad can be read, interpreted, and enjoyed for its accuracy and poetic license. ...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Jul 08, 2019 K. A. MacKinnon rated it it was ok · review of another edition

This is not the book I wanted it to be. Unless you have a burning desire to have the sack of Troy retold by your high school English teacher (you know, the one who had delusions of being a novelist), its probably not the book you wanted it to be, either.

The biggest problem is the book has no idea whether it wants to be fact or fiction, so it tries to be both. It isnt about examining the historical/archaeological evidence to establish whether Homers version of the tale could be true. It takes This is not the book I wanted it to be. Unless you have a burning desire to have the sack of Troy retold by your high school English teacher (you know, the one who had delusions of being a novelist), it’s probably not the book you wanted it to be, either.

The biggest problem is the book has no idea whether it wants to be fact or fiction, so it tries to be both. It isn’t about examining the historical/archaeological evidence to establish whether Homer’s version of the tale could be true. It takes Homer’s version as fact and uses other sources to embroider upon it. But it also seems to think it’s drawing conclusions along the way. Which, what?

When the author is discussing alternate historical sources, he couches his text in mights and maybes, but when he couldn’t possibly know, he states it as fact. “In all the Greek army no one could match Achilles for his looks or physique. He was tall and striking, and his handsome face was crowned with a mane of long, dirty-blonde hair.” Seriously? And maybe he knows that because Achillles is always depicted that way on vases or something, but if so, he’s certainly not citing any sources.

There are, in fact, 189 end notes, where some of his evidence is collected, but THERE ARE NO REFERENCES TO THEM IN THE ACTUAL TEXT. You have to flip back and forth and guess which line the note might be referring to.

The thing that finally drove me out was the accumulation of the author’s biases. The book is a hot mess to start with, but then it says ‘servant’ when it means ‘slave.’ And “later Greek writers made Achilles and Patroclus lovers, and perhaps they were, but Homer doesn’t say so.” (He’ll take the word of ‘later Greek writers’ on other subjects, though.) And beautiful equals dirty-blonde hair. And then this gem: “Each of the islands [sacked by Achilles] supplied a beautiful woman to one of the Greek heroes: in addition to Nestor’s Hecamede, there was Iphis, a Scyrian woman who slept with Patroclus, and Diomede daughter of Phorbas of Lesbos, who slept with Achilles”. Slept with? That’s how you’re choosing to phrase that? When even the popular expression calls it ‘to rape and pillage’?

This kind of weird squeamishness about the hard truths of the era are visible throughout. He even hedges about admitting that women were considered property at the time. Heavens forbid his heroes not be perfect, I guess. But when you consider that he’s taking the license about stating artistic choices as fact, and/or not citing sources/evidence a large part of the time, AND making his sources hard to find when he does cite them, his biases are definitely an issue.

I made it to page 90 of 189 and officially decided that life is too short. DNF ...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Sep 21, 2011 Rick Davis rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: nonfiction, greece-and-rome-history, ane-and-egypt-history, archaeology

Its a bold move to write a sober history of a mostly legendary war like the Trojan War, but Barry Strauss succeeds in doing just that. The Trojan War is made up of two strands of narrative interwoven throughout the book. One strand is a history of the practices of warfare in the Late Bronze Age in both Anatolia and Mycenaean Greece. Strauss pulls from recent archaeological discoveries, ancient records and letters, and ancient poetry and literature in order to reconstruct the politics and
It’s a bold move to write a sober history of a mostly legendary war like the Trojan War, but Barry Strauss succeeds in doing just that. The Trojan War is made up of two strands of narrative interwoven throughout the book. One strand is a history of the practices of warfare in the Late Bronze Age in both Anatolia and Mycenaean Greece. Strauss pulls from recent archaeological discoveries, ancient records and letters, and ancient poetry and literature in order to reconstruct the politics and paraphernalia of war. I especially appreciated this aspect of the book. The other strand of narrative that runs through the book is a retelling of the Trojan War story, primarily that presented by Homer in the Iliad and Odyssey, in light of the real methods of war at the time period. This was also interesting in a “What could it have really been like?” sort of way.

The book is well written, fun, and easily accessible for any reader. It has timelines, maps, a glossary and some great resources in the back. I only have two quibbles with the book as a whole. First of all, he’s interpreting the Iliad primarily from a military history perspective rather than from a literary perspective. Because of this I think he misinterprets many character points in the Iliad; I especially thing he doesn’t “get” the character of Achilles as Homer presents him. The other problem is that because he is intertwining the two threads (the historical information and the imaginative “historical” reconstruction of the Iliad), it would be easy for readers to make the mistake of considering Agamemnon, Menelaus, Helen, Priam, et al as actual historical persons. There was a war at Troy and the city was burnt sometime between 1250 and 1180ish BC, but Strauss is not intending to say that the story of the Iliad is absolutely historically true. The way he writes can give this impression at times, though.

Overall, I would highly recommend this book to any person interested in classical literature or history. From teachers, to students, to the merely curious, The Trojan War is an engaging and lively read.
...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Sep 09, 2017 NanoCyborg rated it liked it · review of another edition

Pretty decent book.
I read this before I read the Illiad (not finished yet, but I already read a primer on the Illiad/other myths so I knew what was going on) and it explained everything nicely.

This book's goal is to basically legitimize the Trojan War into something that really happened using both old and new evidence. It's very interesting because the way the author puts it at the very minimum, it genuinely looks like something did happen.

One of the best thing in this book was the description ...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Aug 06, 2014 B. Rule rated it liked it · review of another edition

This book is touted as a reexamination of the Trojan War through new archaeological and/or historical research. In fact, I'd say only a third of the book, at best, conforms to that description. There are occasional references to new archaeological discoveries, and a fair number of comparisons to other Bronze Age cultures, together with basically baseless extrapolations to what may have been true for the Greeks and Trojans. In fact, a great deal of this book is sort of pipe-puffing "what ifs" ...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Mar 12, 2008 Will Jeffrey rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

I loved this book so much I immediately lent it out to my mother, and I hope it has made the rounds of the family. Ever since I was a kid with my children's Goldenbook version of both of Homer's epics I have been fascinated with the stories. As an adult I have come to appreciate the storys' plot, dialog, reflection of Bronze age life and culture. Yet always I loved the heroes, the adventure,and of course the percentages of fact and fiction to the legend.
For years, I followed the latest ...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Jul 24, 2014 Rindis rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: history, kindle

I was expecting Strauss' The Trojan War: A New History to be a scholarly study of every detail we have about the Trojan world; basically an updated version of In Search of the Trojan War . Instead, it is a more scholarly Age of Bronze Volume 1: A Thousand Ships . The book is structured around the story of the Trojan War, which is then clothed in modern archaeology, and decorated with Homer.

And it works. Taking the view that the Trojan War is based on something that happened, the book gives the ...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Jul 30, 2014 Sean rated it it was ok · review of another edition

Shelves: abandoned-for-now

I've read a few chapters of this and I think I know why I'm not sold on it -- it's written by a Classics professor. While the book purports to include a story bolstered by archaeological evidence, this basically boils down to "Well, Homer describes similar stuff to that which has been discovered in Anatolia, so let's assume that Helen was a real person." There's a logical leap here that I find troubling; rather than being *based* on archaeological evidence, Strauss's book (while entertaining) ...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Sep 23, 2014 Adysseus rated it it was ok · review of another edition

Shelves: ancient-greece, history

Summarised in one word, Speculative. An entertaining read lively and vibrantly written it is however very short on history it alternates between a blow by blow retelling of the Iliad akin to a spark notes summary and imaginative speculation based on very scant evidence that at times borders on historical fiction. Anyone unfamiliar with the Torjan war or who has not read the Iliad might get some value of this as an entertaining and concise summary of both but to anyone already familiar with ...more

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Nov 17, 2013 Owen O'Neill rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

A fascinating book, very well researched. I had the pleasure of discussing this book personally with Prof. Strauss, and my only complaint is that his publisher did not allow him to go into greater depth. His work clearly shows the sophisticated nature of the conflict behind legend. Highly recommended!

flag 1 like · Like · see review

Nov 27, 2018 Nathan Albright rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: challenge-2018

This is actually the second time I have read this book. In fact, although I got this particular volume that I read this time from the library, I own (or at least owned) a copy of this before from my earlier military history reading during the age before I blogged all of my book reviews. Is this work reading twice? It's an enjoyable and easy to read book by a contemporary classicist and military historian who views Homer as a generally reliable source when it comes to Bronze Age warfare when This is actually the second time I have read this book. In fact, although I got this particular volume that I read this time from the library, I own (or at least owned) a copy of this before from my earlier military history reading during the age before I blogged all of my book reviews. Is this work reading twice? It's an enjoyable and easy to read book by a contemporary classicist and military historian who views Homer as a generally reliable source when it comes to Bronze Age warfare when read carefully, so if you have an interest in Bronze Age warfare [1], this work is certainly one that is worth reading at least once. In general, this book is revisionist history done right, one that takes ancient sources seriously and comes at the subject with a large degree of context both in archaeology as well as textual history, and which is appropriately careful in not exaggerating evidence and in presenting consistency between textual and material evidence rather than seeing archaeology merely with a confirmation bias. All in all, this book is a good book to read about the Trojan War for those who combine a love of ancient history with an interest in texts and archaeology.

This book, at a bit more than 200 pages of core material, is not filled with fluff, but rather focuses on a close reading of texts, a sound knowledge of geography and material remains, and a shrewd interest in understanding human behavior. After some initial notes and chronological material, the author begins by introducing the Trojan War. After that there is a discussion of Helen (and her theft of Menelaus' gold bars) as a classic causis belli (1), and the pressure that Agamemnon faced as a wanax to respond to this by mobilizing the strength of Greece against Troy (2). The author examines the struggle the Greeks faced to ensure a beachhead, aided by their naval superiority (3), and looks at the initial failed assault on the walls that they did to try to keep the conflict short (4). The author looks at the dirty war of attacking the logistical basis of Trojan strength (5) and the trouble faced by the army in light of the rivalry between Achilles and Agamemnon (6). There are discussions of the killing fields in the Trojan Plain (7), the night moves that led to the desperate fight at the ships (8), and Hector's fatal charge that prompted Achilles to fight him and kill him (9). After that the author discusses the remainder of the war (10) and its successful conclusion by a ruse (11), after which the author concludes.

There is a great deal of interest in this book, and the author's style and approach are winsome enough that even if one does not think that all of the author's speculations and interpretations are correct that the general picture is at least a plausible and reasonable one. Moreover, the author's general interpretation is one that values shrewdness and cleverness and that denigrates a meat-headed approach that focuses only on straightforward attacks and glory. By giving praise to moderate and savvy figures (Odysseus and Aeneas come off well here, as does Patrocles), and subtly denigrating those who lack such nuance, like Hector and Achilles and Menaleus and Ajax, the author points to some of the ways in which classic literature can help to inform contemporary approaches to war and conflict by cultivating both mind and body and not neglecting a shrewd understanding of issues of psychology or logistics. As someone who values irregular warfare and also pays attention to matters of psychology and logistics, the author's approach is definitely one that plays to my own interests in history, in this or any age.

[1] See, for example:

https://edgeinducedcohesion.blog/2016...

https://edgeinducedcohesion.blog/2018...

https://edgeinducedcohesion.blog/2018...

https://edgeinducedcohesion.blog/2018... ...more

flag Like · see review

Dec 07, 2018 Robert rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: histories-of-war-warfare

When Barry Strauss book on the war and the fall of Troy first appeared, I confess that I read the reviews and almost yawned at the thought of yet one more book on Troy. I first read the stories of Troy, Ulysses, Paris, Achilles, et al, in one of those popular juvenile prose versions way back when. Since then Ive read many other accounts, including Homers in both verse and prose. I watched Michael Woods great television series on the siege of Troy and bought his book. I watched all of the big ...more

flag Like · see review

Apr 19, 2019 Julie rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: history

Overall, an interesting book that was well written. Strauss offers beautiful imagery and prose that one doesnt often find in a historical work. I did have a few issues with the book however. First, the notes werent well cited within the text, leaving me trying to match the citation to possible facts within the chapter. Second, the author suggests that Achilles rage after the death of Patroclus is fueled by the desire for fame rather than loyalty to his friend. In support of this conclusion he ...more

flag Like · see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Recommend It | Stats | Recent Status Updates

Readers also enjoyed

See similar books…

Videos About This Book

Add a comment

Add a comment

Genres

History

173 users

Nonfiction

50 users

History > Ancient History

46 users

Cultural > Greece

22 users

War

12 users

Fantasy > Mythology

11 users

Literature > Ancient

9 users

Military > Military History

9 users

Classics

8 users

War > Military Fiction

6 users

See top shelves…

About Barry S. Strauss

Barry S. Strauss

125 followers

Barry Strauss, professor of history and classics at Cornell University, is a leading expert on ancient military history. He has written or edited several books, including The Battle of Salamis, The Trojan War, The Spartacus War, Masters of Command, The Death of Caesar, and Ten Caesars.

Books by Barry S. Strauss

The Death of Caesar: The Story of History's Most Famous Assassination

The Battle of Salamis: The Naval Encounter that Saved Greece—and Western Civilization

Ten Caesars: Roman Emperors from Augustus to Constantine

Masters of Command: Alexander, Hannibal, Caesar, and the Genius of Leadership

More…

News & Interviews

With clever detectives, missing jewels, murderous women, daring spies, and more, mysteries and thrillers deliver page-turning delight with ever...

Trivia About The Trojan War: A...

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

Quotes from The Trojan War: A...

“Helios the Sun, who sees everything and knows the gods, is beginning his ride in his four-horse chariot, turning the sky a gauzy blue and the sea the color of widows’ tears.” — 0 likes

More quotes…