It is a pretty good book. Intuitive story-telling and problems with solutions are its strong parts. However, I think it could be further improved. The weak part is a lot of "long distance" links in the proofs. E.g. take 6.1.2. proposition in the Galois theory section. It states some properties of fixed fields. The proof is as short as a few lines. However, in the proof there are references to propositions 3.4.7, 3.5.8., 3.5.9, 3.1.9 - all from different parts of section 3, not on the same page. Many of these references could be supplemented by a short few-words description of what they refer to right in the proof so that a knowledgeable reader would not have to go and open section 3 at all. These "long distance" references without any description slow down reading.
(I was reading a pdf version of the text from the screen)