new take ... 2 1/2 stars
Well, I've changed my mind about this book. It's just too hard to find stuff in it, for me anyway. Maybe it's got a layout, index, TOC etc that is specifically designed to appeal to the sensibilities of much younger people than I. Maybe it's like Wired - it took me months of occasionally trying to read that before I finally was able to see a lot of things - the page numbers, the date on the cover, what the TOC was trying to tell me, what was important stuff on pages and what was just nifty-cool-rad-hitechy design shit.
Anyway, I was trying to find the element (tag pair) - you know, the thingies you use to get bold text, italics, and so on) - that would allow me to make footnotes like s.penkevich can do (he actually told me in a comment stream, but I forget what comment stream).
Could not for the life of me find it, eventually got frustrated and Googled what I wanted and found it in about two seconds.
The book may be okay for younger people, and especially if you already know something about the subject. But not for a real dummy, especially for an old one.
old take ... 4 stars
Seems like a prety good reference book. If only one could use all these nifty things in a GoodReads review, it would be pretty cool.