23 books
—
12 voters
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “To Have or to Be? The Nature of the Psyche” as Want to Read:
To Have or to Be? The Nature of the Psyche
by
To Have Or to Be? is one of the seminal books of the second half of the 20th century. Nothing less than a manifesto for a new social and psychological revolution to save our threatened planet, this book is a summary of the penetrating thought of Eric Fromm. His thesis is that two modes of existence struggle for the spirit of humankind: the having mode, which concentrates o
...more
Get A Copy
Paperback, 182 pages
Published
September 6th 2005
by Continuum International Publishing Group
(first published 1976)
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
Reader Q&A
To ask other readers questions about
To Have or to Be? The Nature of the Psyche,
please sign up.
Recent Questions
Community Reviews
Showing 1-30
Start your review of To Have or to Be? The Nature of the Psyche
To have or to be? Well, it’s simple really. To be, of course. To be rich!
Now, jokes aside.
I don’t normally read philosophical books because I share Lara's, from Doctor Zhivago, view on philosophy. She says: "I am not fond of philosophical essays. I think a little philosophy should be added to life and art by way of spice, but to make it one's speciality seems to me as strange as feeding on nothing but pickles"
Philosophy is, to me, a kind of brain game. A little like Sudoku, only with ideas inst ...more
Now, jokes aside.
I don’t normally read philosophical books because I share Lara's, from Doctor Zhivago, view on philosophy. She says: "I am not fond of philosophical essays. I think a little philosophy should be added to life and art by way of spice, but to make it one's speciality seems to me as strange as feeding on nothing but pickles"
Philosophy is, to me, a kind of brain game. A little like Sudoku, only with ideas inst ...more
Absolutely brilliant book. It takes a lot for a book to move me, or present a new idea that totally affects my perceptions of reality. This book got right to core of a deep-seated culturally accepted norm that was so hard to see I didn't even realize it was there. I have been aware of others talking about the alienating nature of Western culture without getting at the heart of why it is alienating. Erich Fromm makes it simple to understand; it is entirely our life-orientation towards having over
...more
To have or to be?
“I have a problem,” or “I am troubled?”
“I have insomnia,” or “I cannot sleep?”
In To Have or To BE?, the psychologist Erich Fromm describes the having and the being modes of existence and argues for the latter. Do we live in the realm of objects, to get them, to manage them, to secure them, to use them? Or do we live in the realm of experiences, to sense our surroundings, to relate to other, to understand ourselves?
Fromm published the book in 1976, but his analysis of society r ...more
“I have a problem,” or “I am troubled?”
“I have insomnia,” or “I cannot sleep?”
In To Have or To BE?, the psychologist Erich Fromm describes the having and the being modes of existence and argues for the latter. Do we live in the realm of objects, to get them, to manage them, to secure them, to use them? Or do we live in the realm of experiences, to sense our surroundings, to relate to other, to understand ourselves?
Fromm published the book in 1976, but his analysis of society r ...more
An amazing read! Fromm completely changes your perspective on life and what it means to truly live... I recommend reading it not only once, but multiple times throughout life...
Classic introduction on an important question: how to live?
I particularly, like the way Fromm tears slowly and gradually our commonsensical beliefs. Be it, the views on love or sanity or living itself. He firstly presents the widely accepted belief of having in the modern society.
Having means the belief that the our relation is with an object. A having person derives meaning in life by possessing and accumulating products, ideologies, other people. This way of living is fairly common. Visibly, ...more
I particularly, like the way Fromm tears slowly and gradually our commonsensical beliefs. Be it, the views on love or sanity or living itself. He firstly presents the widely accepted belief of having in the modern society.
Having means the belief that the our relation is with an object. A having person derives meaning in life by possessing and accumulating products, ideologies, other people. This way of living is fairly common. Visibly, ...more
I consider this book by Erich Fromm to be a masterpiece of thought. I read it in my twenties after returning from a long overseas trip and returning to a large city for work. It just seemed to sum up everything I was thinking about Western society's obsession with materialism and consumerism and the consequential destruction of the environment and the basic values of humanity. It's a short book, but Fromm seems to be able to concisely and eloquently get his point across with incredible impact wi
...more
This book continued my reading into ecology economics. Fromm is a psychoanalyst, genius, German philosopher that promotes radical humanism in response to the dead, capitalistic society that exists in Western countries. The main tenet of the book is the differences between the "having" and "being" modes. The having mode supports greed, envy and an consumption based economy that likens development with growth. He argues that the unlimited growth of economies has failed to produce the greatest good
...more
After finishing To have or to be?, it got among three most important books I’ve read so far. Its main theme is why our current system fails at fulfilling us as human beings. And what we as its agents can do about it to change the frustration.
On the philosophical level, I deeply related to Fromm’s ideas about the causes of our emptiness and existential crises due to placing too much focus on a ‘having’ mode. Be it possessions, work, love, faith, learning. According to Fromm, the mode is too self ...more
On the philosophical level, I deeply related to Fromm’s ideas about the causes of our emptiness and existential crises due to placing too much focus on a ‘having’ mode. Be it possessions, work, love, faith, learning. According to Fromm, the mode is too self ...more
Sep 16, 2008
Valarie
rated it
it was amazing
Recommends it for:
Anyone who wants to break free of the madness!
Shelves:
favorites
I could feel my life change while reading this. My copy, which was used in the first place, is now well underlined, dog-eared and full of post-its for easy reference.
Truly, this is Fromm at his most idealistic and least academic. Fromm identifies two basic modes of human living, one of "having," the other of "being." He characterizes the having mode as developing along with the notion of private property and capitalism, particularly twentieth century capitalism, which is based on maximal consumption. In the having mode of existence, one's relationship to the world is one of possession, possession not only of property and objects, but also of people and ideas
...more
I read this book after having earlier read the same author's Fear of Freedom. I found To Have or to Be a much weaker effort with much less intellectual "meat" to digest. The first part of the book makes some solid and incisive points while not endlessly repeating the tired theme of the debased state of modern society while the second part issues a call for a new technocratic system constituting the "New Society." Fromm explicitly denounces technocracy at several points in the book but his propos
...more
Fromm's major works were written in the second half of his life, with To Have Or To Be? the last work before his death in 1980. To Have Or To Be? is a kind of manifesto for a humane future, Fromm’s credo it could be said.
Fromm, a Marxist, had long railed against capitalism and what he called the marketing orientation, which he saw as shallow, fulfilling only minor human needs, which anyway were in large measure created by advertising. He saw consumers as children, made infantile by corporate gre ...more
Fromm, a Marxist, had long railed against capitalism and what he called the marketing orientation, which he saw as shallow, fulfilling only minor human needs, which anyway were in large measure created by advertising. He saw consumers as children, made infantile by corporate gre ...more
An incredibly well-written, well thought-out book by Erich Fromm wherein he lays out the two fundamental modes of being: having and Being. This idea cuts across a great deal of existential thought and yet somehow synthesizes & clarifies it in a penetrating way. Erich Fromm lays out the basic dichotomy at work, but he does it in a humanistic context: the discussion is not divorced from our current time. On the contrary, the urgency of this book derives from its awareness of the present, our curre
...more
I read this book last summer, and I think it has had an impact on my way of thinking. It will be along time before I'm able to fully appreciate and enact the 'prescription' given here by Fromm.
I was editing an essay today that I wrote a while back. One of the sentences was about how father's spend much more time at work than with their children. The phrase 'spending time' didn't sit well with me, but it was really hard to think of an alternative. It honestly wasn't until I recalled Fromm that I ...more
I was editing an essay today that I wrote a while back. One of the sentences was about how father's spend much more time at work than with their children. The phrase 'spending time' didn't sit well with me, but it was really hard to think of an alternative. It honestly wasn't until I recalled Fromm that I ...more
The ideas in this book (as in other books of Fromm are) are so damn close to me. But as always Fromm is too much of an idealist, he is so clear-cut about what is "good" and what is "bad", what is "right" and what is "wrong". Sometimes I really miss the scientist in his book, but I share many of his values and his worldview.
...more
Erich Fromm explains there are two fundamentally different approaches to life: one that is based on having and one that is based on being. In the having mode of existence, one’s relationship to the world is that of possessing and ownership. As he explains, this is the dominant mode for most modern humans and is intensified through the values of a capitalist culture. For instance, unlimited production and consumption, which are at the core of capitalism, intensify and rely on the having mode. In
...more
Fromm here offers a kind of new ethics and spirituality based on cooperation and opposition to the individualistic values of capitalism. using early christianity, budhism and marxism as the ideological bases on which his proposed new human society rests.
While is interesting in parts, It really doesn't offer something groundbreaking if you are familiar with other marxist writings of the 20th century. Also Fromm sometimes falls into very superficial trappings and some kind of naivete when offering ...more
While is interesting in parts, It really doesn't offer something groundbreaking if you are familiar with other marxist writings of the 20th century. Also Fromm sometimes falls into very superficial trappings and some kind of naivete when offering ...more
It's a great book that will provide anyone living in modern occidental society with a new angle through which they can understand their life. I particularly liked the analysis of socialism and the explanation for its requiring a cultural evolution previous to the economic one. Some of the middle chapters concerning meister Eckhart may be of less interest to some readers. If you are having trouble with them, I invite you to just skip them, since they are not truly connected with the rest of the b
...more
Are you having a good girlfriend, or are you being a good one? To have or to Be?
It's on you. ...more
It's on you. ...more
As every good philosophy book, this one — if not outright changes you — will at least affect your outlook on life.
I absolutely loved this book. I found myself eagerly marking up nearly every page, each filled with thoughtful and relevant passages. Of course, as an education, it causes me to consider if we want students to have an education or to be educated. Fromm obviously explores the teleology much more broadly than this, and it's worth every read and re-read.
...more
Another (much later) book from Erich Fromm that I really liked (see my review of "Escape from Freedom"). In this (short) book, Fromm distinguishes two modes of activity that can characterize any aspect of human life: the "having" mode and the "being" mode. Both of these have their roots in natural instincts of human beings: the desire to possess, and the desire to share and love.
Fromm says that almost any activity can be conducted in either mode, and the character of the activity can be complete ...more
Fromm says that almost any activity can be conducted in either mode, and the character of the activity can be complete ...more
I read this book, because my professor of History of Religion had suggested it and now that I've finished it I'm sure it's impact will stay with me for a long time. This book is a mix of different ways on how to perceive two ways of living - to be, and its antithesis - to have. It's not only a philosophical study, as it searches through economical and social factors as key elements that establish the way of life. My knowledge of philosophy is limited, but feel like the basis of the point of view
...more
First, you identify a problem; then, you solve it. That's the way it's supposed to work, right? This book had a lot to commend it for the initial 2 of 3 sections. I was fully onboard for the explanation of the differences between having and being, and then the analysis between those modes of existence.
Things go completely off the rails in part 3, where Fromm lays out his view on society will need to change to avoid catastrophe. It's filled with overly-specific prescriptions that have 0% chance ...more
Things go completely off the rails in part 3, where Fromm lays out his view on society will need to change to avoid catastrophe. It's filled with overly-specific prescriptions that have 0% chance ...more
If you are unaware of who Erich Fromm was, do a quick Wikipedia search. It's pertinent. This is not an overly-abstract, philosophical read; it's easygoing, not too long, and it's insightful.
I first read this as a recreational read in my teenage years and it made a positive impression. Read this book and you'll be able to answer this question for yourself: What is the Point of Living: To Have or To Be?
I was most impressed with this quote (capitalization is mine): "If you are what you HAVE and you ...more
I first read this as a recreational read in my teenage years and it made a positive impression. Read this book and you'll be able to answer this question for yourself: What is the Point of Living: To Have or To Be?
I was most impressed with this quote (capitalization is mine): "If you are what you HAVE and you ...more
To Have or to Be? 1976, differentiates between having and being, how the modern society has become materialistic and prefers "having" than "being". The question should be what is good for man, rather what is good for the growth of the system. The materialistic nature of people of "having" has been more developed than "being". This is the truth that people of modern world have completely lost their inner selves.
این کتاب دو ترجمه از دو مترجم دارد. و به دلیل تفاوت های آشکار در مفاهیم، این تردید از ...more
این کتاب دو ترجمه از دو مترجم دارد. و به دلیل تفاوت های آشکار در مفاهیم، این تردید از ...more
An interesting read, on Fromm’s view of the concept of possession versus being, describing it from different perspectives. While reading it, it reminded me of Paul McCarney’s “Fool on the hill”, and it’s main character Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, part of the lyrics which go like this:
“Day after day, alone on the hill
The man with the foolish grin is keeping perfectly still
But nobody wants to know him
They can see that he's just a fool
And he never gives an answer
But the fool on the hill
Sees the sun goi ...more
“Day after day, alone on the hill
The man with the foolish grin is keeping perfectly still
But nobody wants to know him
They can see that he's just a fool
And he never gives an answer
But the fool on the hill
Sees the sun goi ...more
Erich Fromm continues a discussion about man's choice of having something or being something. I was reading this book while experiencing a society environment where "having" is praised and desired in many ways, where capital is accessible and it's fruits are sharply visible. So why "to be" if you can have and be happy about it? Simply because if you are not being who does exist then. So one of the great achievements of the book is exposure of a human who attaches to material things that she owns
...more
Another mind-blower of a book - another one that read like a meditation - running the ideas though my mind was like adopting a new world view - THIS is what I want from a book.
It also opened my eyes to serious Talmudic and Biblical study from a POV I only suspected it contained - a great feat seeing as I'm a former Hebrew School drop out. Actually made the ideas of a religion I always associated with authoritarianism and dogma (like most people tend to feel about a religion forced on them) seem ...more
It also opened my eyes to serious Talmudic and Biblical study from a POV I only suspected it contained - a great feat seeing as I'm a former Hebrew School drop out. Actually made the ideas of a religion I always associated with authoritarianism and dogma (like most people tend to feel about a religion forced on them) seem ...more
This book outlines two orientations to the world: "having" and "being." Fromm argues that much of the frustration of modern life stems from too much emphasis on "having," which does not provide as much satisfaction as "being." "Having" is a game we cannot win, there's always more we could have, and thus we become dissatisfied. Instead, he urges us to prioritize "being," focusing on sensory awareness, social activity, and other experiential pursuits that can provide a bounty of happiness, nearly
...more
| topics | posts | views | last activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transaction done with wrong address in Binance | 1 | 5 | Jan 13, 2019 09:28PM |
Readers also enjoyed
Erich Fromm, Ph.D. (Sociology, University of Heidelberg, 1922), was a psychoanalyst and social philosopher who explored the interaction between psychology and society, and held various professorships in psychology in the U.S. and Mexico in the mid-20th century.
Fromm's theory is a rather unique blend of Freud and Marx. Freud, of course, emphasized the unconscious, biological drives, repression, and ...more
Fromm's theory is a rather unique blend of Freud and Marx. Freud, of course, emphasized the unconscious, biological drives, repression, and ...more
News & Interviews
Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “We are not makers of history. We are made by history.” So, this January, as we celebrate Martin Luther King...
14 likes · 5 comments
No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »
“We are a society of notoriously unhappy people: lonely, anxious, depressed, destructive, dependent — people who are glad when we have killed the time we are trying so hard to save.”
—
83 likes
“If I am what I have and if what I have is lost, who then am I?
Nobody but a defeated, deflated, pathetic testimony to a wrong way of living.”
—
76 likes
More quotes…
Nobody but a defeated, deflated, pathetic testimony to a wrong way of living.”
