Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future” as Want to Read:
Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future

3.78  ·  Rating details ·  3,617 ratings  ·  360 reviews
From Paul Mason, the award-winning Channel 4 presenter, Postcapitalism is a guide to our era of seismic economic change, and how we can build a more equal society.

Over the past two centuries or so, capitalism has undergone continual change - economic cycles that lurch from boom to bust - and has always emerged transformed and strengthened. Surveying this turbulent history
Hardcover, 368 pages
Published July 30th 2015 by Allen Lane
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.78  · 
Rating details
 ·  3,617 ratings  ·  360 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future
Aug 29, 2015 rated it it was amazing
I deliberately read ‘Postcapitalism’ quite slowly, as it deserves considerable thought. I find it striking that such a book was written by a journalist, in an engagingly journalistic style, rather than an academic or that ambiguous figure in between, a public intellectual. Although perhaps Paul Mason falls into the latter category? I’m not sure. Anyway, he isn’t an economist, and I think this book demonstrates quite clearly why that enables him to think beyond neoliberalism. As an aside, a few d ...more
//2020 Update:
You'll be much better off with: Another Now: Dispatches from an Alternative Present...
I should have known by the silence on foreign policy in this book (and the British mainstream media presence of Mason) that something was off, as I had not followed Mason previously. Alarms sounded after reading his reflections of Jeremy Corbyn's electoral defeat and what the Bernie Sanders campaign can learn from it, targeting Corbyn's anti-imperialism as a weakness:
Unfortunately, for a large pa
Sep 11, 2015 rated it liked it
By Kate Duguid

Paul Mason is that rare creature: a left-wing optimist. He isn’t mourning the death of labor power or the rise of machines. That’s because the two have converged to kill off capitalism. Well, nearly. The British journalist reckons we are close enough to a new order that he has eschewed the hyphen in the title of his new book, “Postcapitalism.”

Mason is right to question whether our current system can handle the looming prospects of climate change, long-term wage stagnation and sover
Manda Scott
Sep 30, 2015 rated it it was amazing
There are books we want to read, books we think we ought to read, and books we need to read. This one falls in the latter category, along with Naomi Klein's 'This Changes Everything' and George Monbiot's 'Rewilding' - actually, anything by either of these authors.

Paul Mason is a man for our time. He has reported from all the major political events of the past years and can tell us what was happening behind the scenes - from the ECB's annihilation of Greece for having the temerity to vote in an
Jul 17, 2021 rated it liked it
Watching Bezos's wealth represented as a mountain of rice compared to the few grains representing your common-or-garden millionaire or his puerile dick-swinging space race with Branson I struggle to believe there are many who would disagree with the notion that capitalism has gone too far. Those who don't I suspect are those who believe in the less than winning the lottery odds of becoming the next Jeff.
So it was with interest that I picked up Mason's book hoping for some optimistic vision of a
Sarah Mansour
Oct 20, 2016 rated it it was ok
Shelves: politics
Very good effort by the author to recap our modern history and how neoliberalism came into play.
However, I wouldn't call it a Guide to Our Future as he barely ever says HOW we could do it, but merely mentions the obvious.
I gave it 2 stars as its title was very misleading.
I'd start by reading the last chapter first to see the author's point of view, but the first chapters are very interesting economic history.
Sep 22, 2021 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition

3.5 Stars!

“In Gaza, in August 2014, I spent ten days in a community being systematically destroyed by drone strikes, shelling and sniper fire. Fifteen hundred civilians were killed, one third of them children. In February 2015, I saw the US Congress give twenty five standing ovations to the man who ordered the attacks.”

“Banks turned to consumers as a new source of profit, and to a set of high-risk, complex activities that we call investment banking…Consumers became direct participants in the fin
Taru Luojola
Aug 09, 2015 rated it it was amazing
This really was a positive external shock to my thinking, reviving my once lost interest in socioeconomical litterature by building a well-thought-out (and credibly materialitsic) bridge between historical Marxism and ahistorical ”mainstream” economics. True to the spirit of the classical critics of capitalism, the book does not just describe the world as it is and has been, but also outlines a transitional program of action out of current crises looming above humanity. Much to think of for a lo ...more
Yevgeniy Brikman
Aug 29, 2020 rated it really liked it
Reading this book made me keenly aware of one thing: I don't have a nearly good enough understanding of how the economy works. The author presents a lot of interesting arguments about how the economy got to be the way it is, how capitalism is likely to collapse, and a proposal for an alternative, and I realized I lack the tools and mental model to fully understand or debate these topics. The book is reasonably well-written, so I still got something out of it, but I think I'm going to have to do ...more
Feb 01, 2019 rated it liked it
I was really excited about the promise of this book after reading the first 3rd. It seemed to be a big idea book weaving in Marxism, capitalism, and the new information age. In the end, it was not that. The theoretical chapters were followed up with a catalog of how things have changed and then overly simplistic proposals for the future. He also was not right on the money issues--he talks about reckless spending and seems to be pushing for austerity, but then talks about UBI without connecting i ...more
Apr 16, 2016 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
This book was utter drivel. The author has no understanding of Marxism and incredibly premises much of his theory on a notion of "long-term" economic cycles; a fit-the-regression approach that offers no insight to understanding the complex relationships embodied in economies. I'm surprised he didn't commence his cyclical approach with the rise and fall of the Roman Empire. It's fascinating that bogus scholars such as Mr. Mason fit their own analyses to the brief data sets that they cite. Don't w ...more
Randal Samstag
Apr 01, 2017 rated it really liked it
Shelves: economics
Paul Mason’s 2015 book, Postcapitalism A Guide to Our Future, provides a striking visualization of a possible exit from the disasters of our current capitalist world system to something else: a more life-affirming, empathetic, creativity-fostering and fun world of cooperative progress. But before we get there, we need to manage a couple of problems that capitalism has created for us which present, as the title to Mason’s penultimate chapter suggests, a rational case for panic. And mind you, this ...more
Feb 11, 2018 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history, economics
An alright book. One weird thing is despite the title, most of the book is actually about the history of capitalism (and a highly selective one) than about a blueprint for a new economic system. The blueprint part is probably just the last chapter, and even then it's just a series of prescriptions without solid justification. Sure there are parallels between the trends highlighted in the previous chapter and the prescriptions, but it's not very convincing to me. Plus, many of the prescriptions a ...more
Veronica Dale
May 06, 2016 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: non-fiction
“It hooked me at the first page!” “Ripped from the headlines!” “I couldn’t put it down!”

Hey wait a minute. Isn’t this supposed to be a review of an economics book? It is, and for me all those exclamations are true. In spite of the fact that I usually think economics is opaque and boring, I found this book to be positively riveting.

Like a lot of people, I’m worried about what’s going on in today’s world. The Arab Spring never bloomed; Occupy Wall Street petered out; the upcoming US election see
Tobin Kelly
Dec 15, 2017 rated it did not like it
The central problem with this worthless book is that Paul Mason doesn't understand economics. He clusters concepts together with as much coherence as a toddler trying to build the Millenium Falcon from a random pile of Lego; much as you might expect from someone who graduated in music and politics, then climbed the greasy pole into television punditry.

Unsurprisingly, as a TV entertainer, what he does grasp well is how to inflame the muddle-headed. Almost every page of Postcapitalism drips bile
Mick Kelly
Aug 01, 2016 rated it really liked it
A must-read view of economic history and our economic future.

Though I have a lot of points of disagreement with the author, I still think this is an important book that will give any reader the impetus to question many of the assumptions that underlie the politics of the current model of economics - for economics is really just a branch of politics.

My background is in hard science. I did Astronomy for my first degree and Computing for my masters - so I find the 'hand-waving' pretend maths of e
"It is absurd that we are capable of witnessing a 40,000-year-old system of gender oppression begin to dissolve before our eyes and yet still seeing the abolition of a 200-year-old economic system as an unrealistic utopia."

I rather enjoyed Postcapitalism for the potted history of left-wing thought, the use of "bullshit jobs" as a technical term, and the thought that if someone can find the political will we could find ourselves basically living in Star Trek. Viva la revolución.
Vuk Trifkovic
Jun 26, 2016 rated it it was ok
Not bad, but eventually overreaching. Feels a bit rushed. The main problem is that it totally and utterly fails to explain the lynchpin on which his argument rests. You can't just say "Wikipedia" and be done with it... ...more
Julian Worker
Wonderful book - there is so much I don't know...some wonderful ideas but will anyone have the courage to implement them? Probably the countries of Scandinavia. ...more
Jan 16, 2016 rated it really liked it
Shelves: politics, economics
Mason's intriguing book sniffs through the chaos of a world capitalism racked by a succession of crises which have so badly damaged the project of globalisation.

Plenty of others have done this but most have assumed that somewhere just down the line the system will stabilise and something like the thing intended when Reagan and Thatcher put together their plans for a neoliberal world back in the 1980s will re-emerge.

Mason has something else in mind. He sets out the features which mark the distr
May 04, 2021 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Made some good points about the future of capitalism given the external and internal shocks facing our societies and economies. However it is incredibly frustrating to read with unnecessary jargon which was very distracting. For a book that claims to be about the future, it spends more time talking about the past, with the last chapter the only one vaguely discussing next steps. The author glosses over potential and present challenges which I found made his arguments weak and not entirely convin ...more
Jan 12, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: read-in-2017
A very interesting read! And my first non-fiction book of the year. I do think that this was kind of hard to get through at times (especially when it became very history-heavy) but it brought up so many interesting ideas. I know I'll be thinking about this for a while. ...more
Paul Mason presents strong arguments for the coming slow demise of capitalism, and some good suggestions of what will happen next. I'm not sure of his suggested transition plan, but the face that we need a transition to lessen the harms make sense.

The Good: I found his summary of historic economic theory to be coherent and clear - showing connections among authors and books I had not previously seen, but make a lot of sense. The book was worth reading/listening to for that even if you don't agr
Jul 18, 2015 rated it really liked it
I recommend this book, in spite of its one enormous shortcoming. It's called "a guide to our future," and the recommendations or predictions for the future constitute the written equivalent of vague handwaving. Mason seems to want to provide a positive vision of an alternative to the sure destruction we face from neoliberal economic policy, yet he only succeeds in persuading me that we are in really big trouble. His belief in new forms of sharing information is fuzzy, hard to summarize.

I'm also
Rafael Merino
Apr 26, 2018 rated it really liked it
"The lost causes are exactly those which might have saved the world" –Chesterton said. But there is always the possibility that not even the lost causes could have saved us from the horrors of industrial warfare, mass deportations, labor camps, genocide and other centrally orchestrated disasters.

In this book, the author goes into great detail to vindicate this or that piece of Marxist economics, some well known (the Labor Value Theory, Kondratiev's wave), some obscure (the Fragment on Machines,
John Rausch
Oct 06, 2018 rated it really liked it
I really enjoyed reading this and planned to give it 5 stars, but the last chapter fell flat. Mason spends the first 90% of the book providing historical context for the ideas he is advocating...only to quickly sprint through the ideas themselves in the last 20-30 pages. I would have loved more detail and justification of why they would resolve the problems he describes and how they could be implemented. Despite this, I would still absolutely recommend the book, especially to people such as myse ...more
Jul 31, 2022 rated it really liked it
I loved this for its clear and detailed history of economics and marxist thought, but had serious problems with the proposed solution in the final chapter(s). (I can see serious flaws with any economic model that relies on a technology-heavy data capture of everything, Internet of Things everything --- all ripe for exploitation and/or collapse). Still, I highly recommend this book for its historical content and for clearly explaining economic contexts to a lay audience.
Kirk Houghton
Sep 13, 2015 rated it really liked it
Left-wing politics has lost all credibility in economic science since the victory of Free-Market Capitalism post-1989. Turning their attention to environmentalism, human rights, social justice and anti-austerity, socialists of today do not question the basic premise that private property and a market system for the distribution of goods are indispensable to economic growth; the only question is to what extent the state should temper its excesses. But in the last year distinguished economists hav ...more
John Waymont
Sep 09, 2018 rated it liked it
I bought this from Bookmarks after some thugs smashed up the store. As a non-socialist I wanted to read something which wasn't a regurgitation of thinking from the 19th/20th century- in that, this book delivered.

The historical context was very useful, providing a good grounding in the ideas and critiques used later in the book. The central 'project zero' idea was interesting- I can agree with most but dispute the need for such centralisation, the route to implementing it being clearly rooted in
Anna Barbarella
Apr 30, 2018 rated it did not like it
It’s much easier for today’s left to signal their discontent by demanding the impossible or blatantly undesirable (a return to socialisms of the past) than it is for them to grapple with the question of socialism’s role in a capitalist system not quite disastrous enough to actually revolt against.

Paul Mason acknowledges this and attempts to answer that question – with all the profundity of damp sawdust. These are three hundred pages that state the obvious. He simply unifies some of the most vis
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
UK Amazon Kindle ...: Post-Capitalism 1 28 Aug 03, 2016 04:03AM  

Readers also enjoyed

  • Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work
  • Economics: The User's Guide
  • Fully Automated Luxury Communism: A Manifesto
  • The Socialist Manifesto: The Case for Radical Politics in an Era of Extreme Inequality
  • Capital in the Twenty-First Century
  • The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths
  • 23 Things They Don't Tell You about Capitalism
  • Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism
  • Aristotle’s Way: How Ancient Wisdom Can Change Your Life
  • Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?
  • Postcapitalist Desire: The Final Lectures
  • Another Now: Dispatches from an Alternative Present
  • How to Stop Fascism: History, Ideology, Resistance
  • The Future of Capitalism: Facing the New Anxieties
  • World Order
  • Less is More: How Degrowth Will Save the World
  • Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist
  • Socialism: A Very Short Introduction
See similar books…
See top shelves…
Note: Paul^^Mason

Paul Mason is an English journalist and broadcaster. He is economics editor of the BBC's Newsnight television programme and the author of several books.


News & Interviews

Celeste Ng’s new novel, Our Missing Hearts, depicts a disturbing version of the United States, set in the vaguely distant future, rife with...
25 likes · 0 comments
“JP Morgan spelled it out: for neoliberalism to survive, democracy must fade.” 5 likes
“With info-capitalism, a monopoly is not just some clever tactic to maximize profit. It is the only way an industry can run.” 5 likes
More quotes…