What do you think?
Rate this book
215 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1933
Why should the Negro wait for some one from without to urge him to self-assertion when he sees himself robbed by his employer, defrauded by his merchant, and hushed up by goverment agents of injustice? Why wait for a spur to action when he finds his manhood insulted, his woman outraged, and his fellowmen lynched for amusement?Woodson believed that this form of miseducation, the willful withdrawal of facts and the distortion of history, led to a brain-washed acceptance of the inferior role assigned to black people by the oppressor.
The so-called modern education, with all its defects, however, does others so much more good than it does the Negro, because it has been worked out in conformity to the needs of those who have enslaved and oppressed weaker peoples. No systematic effort toward change has been possible, for, the Negro's mind has been brought under the control of his oppressor. The problem of holding the Negro down, therefore, is easily solved. When you control a man's thinking you do not have to worry about his actions. He will find his 'proper place' and will stay in it.Woodson's main criticism – the fact that black children are taught to despise their own race and admire the white race – is definitely a fair point and something that is worthy of discussion up to this day. Even though we have come a long way since the 1930s, it is still prevalent that whiteness is not only dominant but also idealised in the educational setting, whether it manifests itself in the fact that only books by white authors are on the curriculum or the fact that the history and achievements of minorities are glossed over in history lessons. Or the beauty standard (and default-whiteness) set by society, which is affirmed in all forms of media/advertisements/etc.
In the church, the Negro has had sufficient freedom to develop this institution in his own way, but he has failed to do so. His religion is merely a loan from the whites who have enslaved and segregated the Negroes; and the organization, though largely an independant Negro institution, is dominated by the thought of the oppressor of the race. In chameleon-like fashion the Negro has taken up almost everything religious which has come along instead of thinking for himself.He talks at lenght about the corruption and toxicity of the Christian church and how Black churches were being used to indoctrinate blacks into believing in their own inferiority. He was also unapologetic about the fact that black students didn't learn anything useful or relevant at school/university, which resulted in their incapability of finding a suitable job after graduating.
At this moment, then, the Negroes must begin to do the very thing which they have been taught they cannot do. They still have some money, and they have needs to supply. They must begin immediately to pool their earnings and organise industries to participate in supplying social and economic demands.Can't believe I'm saying this but this approach actually reminded me of Jay Z's new song The Story of O.J. in which Jay preaches that blacks finally have to invest in valuable shit (e.g. by capitalizing on real estate opportunities) and give back to their communities.
For example, there may be a Negro grocer in the neighborhood, but the Negro chauffeur for a rich man down town and the washerwoman for an aristocratic family in 'quality row' will be more apt to buy their food and clothing at the larger establishment with which their employers have connections, although they may be insulted there.I can't speak to the fact whether these sentiments are still prevalent today or not, but I think they're worth mentioning and thinking about. It's important to reflect one's behavior and one's internalized stances.
Any people who will vote the same way for three generations without thereby obtaining results ought to be ignored and disfranchised. As a minority element, the Negro should not knock at the door of any particular political party.
It doesn’t matter so much what a thing is called as what a thing is.