Hacking the Electorate is the most comprehensive study to date about the consequences of campaigns using microtargeting databases to mobilize voters in elections. Eitan Hersh follows the trail from data to strategy to outcomes. Hersh argues that most of what campaigns know about voters comes from a core set of public records. States vary in the kinds of records they collect from voters – and these variations in data across the country mean that campaigns perceive voters differently in different areas. Consequently, the strategies of campaigns and the coalitions of voters who are mobilized fluctuate across the country because of the different ways campaigns perceive the electorate. Data policies influence campaigns, voters, and increasingly, public officials.
I have mixed feelings about it. One the one hand, it is well-researched and has many interesting findings. On the other hand, it is dense, tedious and repetitive. I really liked the last chapter. Nonetheless, I believe it should have been an article and not a book.
Tough reading but gives some insights in the ways A person's public records are used by political campaigns to target messages. The author is reporting from past election campaign practices using data distilled by two non-profit governmental commercial firms. These companies form profiles of individual voters that are not necessarily accurate. We have no way of knowing what is in our profile. We can not opt out either.
One of the more important takeaways for me was how inadequate consumer data and social networks are at predicting voter behavior or getting people out to vote. I’m also more cynical about micro targeting practices. This is a great book - very compelling narrative.