Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Ethnicity and Nationalism: Anthropological Perspectives (Anthropology, Culture and Society)” as Want to Read:
Ethnicity and Nationalism: Anthropological Perspectives (Anthropology, Culture and Society)
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Ethnicity and Nationalism: Anthropological Perspectives (Anthropology, Culture and Society)

3.61  ·  Rating details ·  155 Ratings  ·  5 Reviews
Ethnicity and nationalism are pervasive features of the contemporary world, but how far is ethnicity a result of cultural differences, and how much is it in fact dependent on the practical use of, and belief in, such differences? In this book, Thomas Hylland Eriksen demonstrates that far from being an immutable property of groups, ethnicity is a dynamic and shifting aspect
...more
Paperback, Second Edition, 224 pages
Published September 20th 2002 by Pluto Press (first published 1993)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Ethnicity and Nationalism, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Ethnicity and Nationalism

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
Rating details
Sort: Default
|
Filter
Malcolm
Jul 23, 2011 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: sociology
This is an extremely useful, empirically well informed introductory overview that adds significantly to our body of knowledge in the ethnicity and nationalism studies area by weaving together approaches to and understandings of ethnicity, nations and nationalsm, and anthropology.

The surprising thing I find is that so much of ethnicity and nationalism studies (my work area) fails to take account of anthropological understandings and approaches. While Erikson clearly has his view, he is fair to th
...more
Mohamed Nida نيده
Oct 24, 2012 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2013
وجهات نظر في العرقية: منشأها ودورها وصيرورتها.. يمكن القول بأن الحداثة والعولمة عملا على ضرب البشر في خلاط لخلق نوع من التجانس. لكن ما حدث هو أن حدث تقارب نتيجة تطور تكنولوجيا الاتصال، وفي المقابل ظهر الاختلاف وتم التشديد عليه وإبراز هذا التنوع. ويعبر عن هذا بقوله: "إن العولمة تجعل الناس متماثلين أكثر فأكثر، ولكن كلما أصبحنا أكثر تماثلًا، حاولنا أن نكون مختلفين أكثر. ولكن، كلما حاولنا أن نكون مختلفين أكثر، أصبحنا أكثر تماثلًا، من حيث إن الحركات العرقية أينما كانت تبنى على ذات قواعد التفرّد." وتج ...more
Hussam Al Husseini
The book highlights a very important topic which is ethnicity. What interested me the most is how ethnicity is situational. It is like an illusion in our minds that, if left undetected, can control our lives. However, I found the last three chapters useless, as a layperson for sure!
Hanipal Hamilcar
May 03, 2015 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
العرقية هي نتاج اجتماعي وثقافي وأسهم الانثروبولوجيون في انتاجه
حمد
Dec 25, 2013 rated it really liked it
An eye opener book!
Mohammad Abu Shaban
rated it it was ok
Nov 12, 2013
Mirjam
rated it liked it
Jan 03, 2012
Marina Milošević
rated it it was amazing
Jun 27, 2013
Jeffrey G. Reres
rated it it was amazing
May 26, 2017
Julia Bainbridge
rated it really liked it
Mar 13, 2007
محمد سعيد
rated it it was ok
Feb 27, 2013
Sumi
rated it it was amazing
Dec 04, 2016
Hanna
rated it really liked it
May 01, 2008
Johan
rated it really liked it
Dec 17, 2012
Marieke
rated it liked it
Nov 07, 2015
Barbara
rated it really liked it
Aug 30, 2014
Xuyuanyuan
rated it really liked it
Jun 15, 2013
Andrew Murano
rated it really liked it
Apr 10, 2015
Annick Vb
rated it really liked it
Feb 01, 2017
محمّد
rated it liked it
Feb 01, 2013
Shane Wallis
rated it it was amazing
Nov 15, 2013
Mikaela
rated it really liked it
Dec 12, 2014
Tim
rated it really liked it
Mar 08, 2018
Mathijs
rated it really liked it
Aug 17, 2010
Anthi Chris
rated it liked it
Mar 13, 2015
Pavel
rated it really liked it
Aug 05, 2012
KlrKdd
rated it really liked it
Dec 31, 2014
Amanda Lucille
rated it liked it
Sep 19, 2011
Ulla Sperber
rated it really liked it
Nov 11, 2014
Saklain Al Mamun
rated it it was amazing
Nov 09, 2017
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 next »
  • Ethnic groups and boundaries: the social organization of culture difference
  • Anthropology and Modern Life
  • Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age
  • Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays
  • From Honey to Ashes: Introduction to a Science of Mythology
  • The Logic of Practice
  • Stone Age Economics
  • Banal Nationalism
  • Globalization: The Human Consequences
  • The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure
  • Studies in Ethnomethodology
  • How Societies Remember
  • Nations and Nationalism
  • The Reality of the Mass Media
  • Munitions of the Mind: A History of Propaganda from the Ancient World to the Present Day
  • The Conflict of Interpretations
  • The Pasteurization of France
  • On Collective Memory
Thomas Hylland Eriksen (born 6 February 1962) is professor of social anthropology at the University of Oslo. Born in Oslo, he has done field work in Trinidad and Mauritius. His fields of research include identity, nationalism, globalisation and identity politics. Eriksen finished his dr. polit.-degree in 1991, and was made professor in 1995, at the age of 33. In the years 1993-2001 he was editor o ...more
More about Thomas Hylland Eriksen
“The North American situation, while different from the Brazilian one, reflects a similar complexity and ambiguity in the relationship between race and ethnicity. Whereas Brazilians have a great number of terms used to designate people of varying pigmentation, the ‘one-drop principle’ prevalent in the USA entails that people are either black or white, and that ‘a single drop of black blood’ (sic) contaminates an otherwise pale person and makes him or her black. Conversely, ethnic identity in the USA is, as mentioned above, not necessarily correlated with ‘race’. At the same time, African- American identities are associated” 1 likes
“The term ‘race’ has deliberately been placed within inverted commas in order to stress that it is not a scientific term. Whereas it was for some time fashionable to divide humanity into four main races, and racial labels are still used to classify people in some countries (such as the USA), modern genetics tends not to speak of races. There are two principal reasons for this. First, there has always been so much interbreeding between human populations that it would be meaningless to talk of fixed boundaries between races. Second, the distribution of hereditary physical traits does not follow clear boundaries (Cavalli-Sforza et al., 1994). In other” 1 likes
More quotes…