Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Tyranny of Words” as Want to Read:
The Tyranny of Words
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Tyranny of Words

4.31  ·  Rating details ·  220 ratings  ·  23 reviews
A popular approach to semantics in which the author discussess how to clarify the meaning of words and achieve more exact communication. Index
Paperback, 420 pages
Published April 15th 1959 by Mariner Books (first published 1938)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 4.31  · 
Rating details
 ·  220 ratings  ·  23 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of The Tyranny of Words
Jul 29, 2011 rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: Everyone
Recommended to Jason by: Peter Joseph
Shelves: tzm-reading-list
Highly Recommend! This is my introduction to the concept of Semantics. To date it's the most informative book I've come across on language and spoken communication. As a writer and speaker this book sets a foundation for communicating new information to another person or group. How to take in information and understand nonsense from utility. It clears the smoke of spellbinders and mystics, philosophers and economists where words hang in the abstract, with different meanings & interpretations to ...more
Jan 13, 2015 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
This is a hard book to review because it requires contextualization. Here goes:

Stuart Chase was an economist who got interested in words when semantics was developing as a branch of linguistics. This book is his synthesis of his reading in this area over a 3-year period in the mid-1930's. It is clearly not written by a linguist and it has some terrible logical errors (including a bunch of syllogisms that would bring a logician to tears). However, the area it tackles is terribly hard: how do we c
Leon M
Jan 23, 2010 rated it liked it
Shelves: ps-ppe-priority
Stuart Chase's "Tyranny of Words" is one of the easier introductions to the applied philosophy of language. The book makes four major points that I'd like to mention here:

1) It introduces the reader to Korzybski's idea of general-semantics as first discussed in his "Science and Sanity". Korzybski major realization was that words always need to refer to something in existence: the map is not the territory. From this theoretical approach to the philosophy of language, Korzybski develops practical
Sep 29, 2008 rated it really liked it
Recommended to Van by: Hayakawa
Shelves: nonfiction
The Tyranny of Words

The book was first published in 1938 (my copy was published in London at that time, strangely enough) and I don't know how to edit the Goodreads text that says it was published much later. Also good quality paperbacks (with better covers) and hardbacks are still available on Amazon.

The author, ironically, is a little more wordy for my taste than I would like but not nearly enough to “bounce” me from the book. The ideas are practical and useful. This is an “early” work as it w
Sheng Peng
Oct 30, 2020 rated it really liked it
The key idea is pretty interesting, i.e., outside of physical sciences, nobody knows what they are talking about and it's all time wasted. Especially in economics and politics. ...more
Josh Smith
Jun 10, 2013 rated it it was amazing
Amazing book on the prospects of the clarification of language. I enjoyed the special focus on economic and political matters. As the book was written between the two world wars, you would think it might read like a dated book, but it actually was quite refreshing. One can see echoes from the past in today's economic and political problems, which Chase masterfully shows stem partly from problems with communication and using dogmatic absolutes. Every person considering himself or herself on the " ...more
Jul 15, 2011 rated it really liked it
I am currently on chapter 6, this book is a bit difficult to read since some of the words are not on my daily vocab; so I have to take the time I come across each new word to me and write it down the look up the definition. To my understanding so far the author's take on semantics is of words being used excessively on intangible things. I have been taking notes as I progress through the chapters and have a list of a few other experts in the field of Semantics and neurology to follow up on once c ...more
Sep 13, 2009 added it
This book introduced me to Alfred Korzybski's General Semantics (GS). One of the most important precepts of GS is that any abstract word without a clear referent in the physical world is deemed essentially meaningless. Guided by this and other principles of the discipline, Stuart Chase gives and critiques examples of misleading or meaningless language in economics, politics, literary theory, science and law. I found this book to be an easy-to-understand (and well-written) investigation of the li ...more
Roger Smitter
Sep 13, 2020 rated it it was amazing
The academe discipline that we now call communication has its roots in called
“ rhetoric,” what philosophers a few thousand years ago. With this book in 1938, Chase began a major change in the academic discipline. Now it’s called “communication” and deals with means of communicating that the Greeks (or Chase) could imagine.

But it’s good to learn about the people who developed an academic field that many students are seeking.

The book begins with a series of questions, including “Does communicati
Shashi Khanka
Feb 23, 2018 rated it really liked it
This was not an easy read as I expected it to be. I thought it would be a lot about psychology but its about Reality, about the real world that we live in. The words that we use and the world that we have created in our minds of words and loads of them has little to do with reality. A lot of things that we talk about are in abstraction and much of it has no referents in the real world. The author mocks the intellectuals that can talk endlessly on Law, Liberty, Equality, Capitalism and the like. ...more
Richard Snow
Aug 30, 2020 rated it really liked it
Mr. Chase was an economist and a reformer during the New Deal era with FDR. This book was published in 1938 as 'fascism' of different varieties was rising in Italy and Germany when the United States had not entered the conflict. Chase draws on prominent figures of the era to analyze the use of language in communication, and proposes that if we were to agree on the meaning of the words we use we could improve communications and eliminate conflict in the public sphere.

I particularly enjoyed readin
Doug DesCombaz
Fun to read on an unintended level as an artifact or time-capsule for the context of being written 8 decades ago (1938) prior to US involvement in WWII US. It took me a bit to realize the author wasn't just making a reference to Hitler (or whatever my first clues were) as a historic figure. The author provides many examples of arguments over economic systems (and other things) that haven't changed in all of these decades. He shared a funny experiment of asking a number of different people their ...more
Sawyer Donk
Dec 11, 2019 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Loved it, and I’m sure I will remember this as being a intellectually formative title. I’ve never given the subject of semantics much though but Stuart Chase argues stylishly and effectively the importance of its study. I’m already diving into the books in the bibliography.

After around page 250 or so, Chase stops talking about theory and applies it to practical problems. Being an economist, the following chapters involve right and left wing economics, American law, and politics of his time.
I fou
Apr 08, 2021 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition

one of the classics

Chase - The Tyranny of Words
Hayakawa - Language in Action
Wilson - Language and the Pursuit of Truth
Tyler Chism
Dec 14, 2019 rated it liked it
Find the first couple of three star reviews for this book and they do a great job of summing up my thoughts.
Pangaea Marianas
Sep 23, 2010 rated it it was ok
Recommends it for: No one.
Recommended to Pangaea by: Wikipedia article on General Semantics
This was my first exposure to Mr. Chase, it was recommended me by various sources as I delve into General Semantics. I find it likely that it will be my last Chase. This book did not chalk my cue stick. There were a few tidbits which were worthy of jotting, but the entirety of extracted material was not in sufficient proportion to its 350+ pages to warrant a positive review. In my opinion, Mr. Chase's mind is not a necessary partner in the quest for 21st century enlightenment and I do not plan t ...more
May 25, 2015 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
For somebody who is trying to expose the tyranny of words, the author uses too many words. On a serious note - the book makes sense. Our language is severely lacking, and most of the time talk but don't communicate. I wish we had one universal language and its okay to use abstract words but they should not be mixed with reality.

Most of the text so far seems dedicated to illustrations of the points he's trying to make, but these illustrations are redundant and long-winded (and not necessarily based in reality). I just read a set of pages that could have gotten their message across with 1/8th of the word-count. The word-to-content ratio in this book is too skewed for me to deal with and I give up. ...more
Jimmy Ele
Apr 24, 2014 rated it really liked it
The last 100 pages of this book were really hard to get through. It all of a sudden became very boring to me especially when it came to economic and judicial word abstractions. I enjoyed the first 300 pages immensely, and that is why I rated it 4 stars.
Dec 08, 2009 rated it it was amazing
EVERYONE SHOULD READ THIS! No questions ask, just go buy it now. You'll probably need to get if offline; I think it's out of print.

It will teach you invaluable lessons about the words we use to communicate and how they should be used.
Wesley Johnson
Apr 04, 2015 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: physically-own
A great introduction to the basic logic behind semantics, this book also gives an interesting perspective to the United States just before WWII.
Mokokoma Mokhonoana
Aug 11, 2013 rated it really liked it
The book introduces Semantics to the reader. A discipline that decontaminate a thinker's mind, and, leaves one Intellectually Humble. ...more
Almuhalab Saléh
rated it it was amazing
Aug 24, 2017
Greg Thomas
rated it really liked it
Mar 07, 2013
Evaldas Einikis
rated it it was amazing
Mar 28, 2015
Peter Ševčík
rated it really liked it
Feb 19, 2015
Paul Ng
rated it liked it
Jul 25, 2019
Peter Skinnes
rated it liked it
Jun 17, 2015
Jeremy Peterson
rated it it was amazing
Jul 28, 2016
Claudia Negrea
rated it it was amazing
Feb 04, 2013
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Goodreads Librari...: combine two entries 3 14 Jun 20, 2015 08:58AM  

Readers also enjoyed

  • Rage
  • Language in Thought and Action
  • Disloyal: The True Story of the Former Personal Attorney to President Donald J. Trump
  • Axiom's End (Noumena, #1)
  • The Topeka School
  • Last Book You'LL Ever Read and Other Lessons from the Future
  • The Inner Game of Tennis: The Classic Guide to the Mental Side of Peak Performance
  • A Very Stable Genius: Donald J. Trump's Testing of America
  • Agent Running in the Field
  • The Passion Paradox: A Guide to Going All In, Finding Success, and Discovering the Benefits of an Unbalanced Life
  • Classic Short Stories (The Short Story Collection)
  • Night Boat to Tangier
  • Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World
  • The End of Education: Redefining the Value of School
  • 2084: Artificial Intelligence, the Future of Humanity, and the God Question
  • Zen in the Art of Writing
  • Jayber Crow
  • Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788
See similar books…
Stuart Chase was an American economist and engineer trained at MIT. His writings covered topics as diverse as general semantics and physical economy. His hybrid background of engineering and economics places him in the same philosophical camp as R. Buckminster Fuller. Chase's thought was shaped by Henry George, Thorstein Veblen and Fabian socialism. Chase spent his early political career supportin ...more

News & Interviews

We all want to spend more time lost in the pages of great books. That's the idea behind our annual 2021 Goodreads Reading Challenge! It's...
99 likes · 16 comments
“That words are not things. (Identification of words with things, however, is widespread, and leads to untold misunderstanding and confusion.) That words mean nothing in themselves; they are as much symbols as x or y. That meaning in words arises from context of situation. That abstract words and terms are especially liable to spurious identification. The higher the abstraction, the greater the danger. That things have meaning to us only as they have been experienced before. “Thingumbob again.” That no two events are exactly similar. That finding relations and orders between things gives more dependable meanings than trying to deal in absolute substances and properties. Few absolute properties have been authenticated in the world outside. That mathematics is a useful language to improve knowledge and communication. That the human brain is a remarkable instrument and probably a satisfactory agent for clear communication. That to improve communication new words are not needed, but a better use of the words we have. (Structural improvements in ordinary language, however, should be made.) That the scientific method and especially the operational approach are applicable to the study and improvement of communication. (No other approach has presented credentials meriting consideration.) That the formulation of concepts upon which sane men can agree, on a given date, is a prime goal of communication. (This method is already widespread in the physical sciences and is badly needed in social affairs.) That academic philosophy and formal logic have hampered rather than advanced knowledge, and should be abandoned. That simile, metaphor, poetry, are legitimate and useful methods of communication, provided speaker and hearer are conscious that they are being employed. That the test of valid meaning is: first, survival of the individual and the species; second, enjoyment of living during the period of survival.” 2 likes
“A word is not a crystal, transparent and unchanged; it is the skin of a living thought and may vary greatly in color and content according to the circumstances and the time in which it is used.” 2 likes
More quotes…