What do you think?
Rate this book
321 pages, Hardcover
First published March 1, 2016
“I felt like I was being pulled through a dark, dank wardrobe into some boozy Narnia.”
“We weren't Sherlock Holmes and John Watson. I was ok with that, I thought. We had things they didn't, too. Like electricity, and refrigerators. And Mario Kart.”
“The two of us, we're the best kind of disaster. Apples and oranges. Well, more like apples and machetes.”
DNF at about 50%
*This review contains spoilers*
I am going to lay this book aside for now. Maybe it has to do with me finishing The Winner's Kiss recently, which made me a mess and in no shape for reading anything else. At least partly The Winner's kiss is to blame, but mostly I am disappointed with A study in Charlotte, because it started like such a promising light funny read and then turned - abruptly - into something dark with serious issues, which weren't handled properly in my opinion.
What I liked about this books is that we have a world where MCs are actually descendants of famous James Watson and Sherlock Holmes; it's like a parallel universe and it was fun. We hear the story from Watson's first POV and he is such a hilarious guy! And what I liked even more is that a killer orchestrates his murders according to the original The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes. If you are a fan, you can imagine how much fun it is to follow your favorite stories in this book. But then me met Charlotte Holmes and here my problems slowly started to creep out of the ground and strangle my interest for the story. First of all, Charlotte is absolutely unlikable character. She is too similar to the original Holmes which is not good in this case. I'll explain. Original Holmes is not a pleasant person. He is quiet unlikeable and vile. He does drugs, he is not the most sociable person, he mostly tolerates humanity because it serves his needs, he is a genius and geniuses are mostly introverts. It's understandable. But original Holmes has charm, even with his traits, he is a pleasant character to read about (mostly). Let's look at Charlotte. She does drugs (started at the age of 12), she smokes (the least of her sins) she is rude to people, she is an introvert, she is a genius (tons of tutors and money can make a genius out of an oaf). She plays violin. Overall, she is the exact female version of Holmes. She is only 16-years-old. Do you know how all the qualities above look on a 16-years-old teenager? Right. Like on an angry depressed brat. She doesn't look special from the side, she looks like an average teenager going through the "hard phase" of their maturing. Which makes her highly unlikeable, to me at least, as a character whom I supposedly must admire according to Watson who can't stop admire Charlotte on every page of the book. If you don't have problems with admiring, you are welcome to read this book. For me, the loss of connection with MC is a way to nowhere.
My second and most important claim about this book is rape. Charlotte was raped by a guy who wasn't the most decent human being and raped Charlotte when she was under influence of drugs and couldn't say no or protect herself. Now, I am absolutely appalled by the way this rape part was presented to us. The guys who raped Charlotte was killed and Charlotte and Watson (he beat the guy) were main suspects for a while. It seems like rape was a plot device to make our characters suspects, and rather than that the topic was easily swept away, because, gah, dealing with aftermaths of rape is not that important. Or why tell your parents that you were raped, because they will only pity you and you don't need their sympathy when you are the almighty Holmes. Many people will probably disagree with me, but I mainly try to avoid rape in books, it's a trigger for me, and when I have to deal with such issues in books, I'd prefer them to be handled reasonably, not just because it's convenient for the plot.
I was going to write one paragraph for this review, but my thoughts and feelings got the best of me and wouldn't let me go until I lifted this weight off my chest. Mostly, I think that this book is a kind of book you have try for yourself and decide whether you like it or not. I can say that my decision to DNF it mostly "it's not you it's me" decision. This book is just not for me, which doesn't make it automatically not your book either. On the contrary, many people find the story compelling and don't have the same issues as I did. I won't even rate it on purpose, because I believe my rating won't be honest or objective. I 'll better go and find something really funny to get me over "hard time".
“We’re being toyed with,�� I said. “But why would he want us to know he’s after us?”
“We weren't Sherlock Holmes and John Watson. I was ok with that, I thought. We had things they didn't, too. Like electricity, and refrigerators. And Mario Kart.”
“A voice cut through the blood-roar. “Watson,” Holmes shouted, at what sounded like an enormous distance, “what the fuck do you think you’re doing?”
“She was altogether colorless and severe, and still she managed to be beautiful. Not the way that girls are generally beautiful, but more like the way a knife catches the light, makes you want to take it in your hands.”
“I wanted the two of us to be complicated together, to be difficult and engrossing and blindingly brilliant.”