1,134 books
—
4,683 voters

Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.

Start by marking “The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy” as Want to Read:

# The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy

by
,

In his monumental 1687 work

*Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica*, known familiarly as the*Principia*, Isaac Newton laid out in mathematical terms the principles of time, force, and motion that have guided the development of modern physical science. Even after more than three centuries and the revolutions of Einsteinian relativity and quantum mechanics, Newtonian phy ...morePaperback, 991 pages

Published
October 20th 1999
by University of California Press
(first published July 1687)

## Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.

## Reader Q&A

## Community Reviews

Showing 1-30

There are a lot of mathematical proofs scattered throughout the volumes, which were mostly less interesting to me than parts I could read as simply l ...more

I finally learned why Newton is a genius. Why the planets stay in orbit. Why reason finally and forever took the place of authority. I learned when science was once and for all declared the way to "know". I learned why calculus is necessary and why Newton invented it. I learned why math is the language of the universe. I learned why geometry is so important.

I am in awe of Newton. Everything and everyone who followed him was influenced by him. Not just in the scien ...more

Interestingly, one of the few other things I could understand, beyond his Preface, was the General Scholium at the end. After describing the h ...more

Aug 05, 2013
Conrad
rated it
it was amazing
·
review of another edition

Shelves:
mathematics,
science-physics

First, A Clarification: The publication I have is the hardcover revision by Florian Cajori of Andrew Motte's 1729 English translation, copyrighted in 1934 by the Regents of the University of California, and published by UC Berkeley and UCLA Press.

I should also note that, although I have read Newton's Principia several times over several years and for various reasons, I doubt I have ever completed the whole book. To do so would be advisable only under limited circumstances.

For whatever reason, Ne ...more

I should also note that, although I have read Newton's Principia several times over several years and for various reasons, I doubt I have ever completed the whole book. To do so would be advisable only under limited circumstances.

For whatever reason, Ne ...more

*This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.*

Dec 17, 2013
Chris Duval
rated it
it was amazing
·
review of another edition

Shelves:
science-engineering-technology

The original book is one of the foundational books for modernity, expounding both mechanics and the calculus while explaining astronomy. (The little digression at the end into theology can be ignored.)

One can imagine an e-edition of this book where, as one reads the description of the ratio of this or that, the relevant lines on the diagram were highlighted. Even better, when areas are described by line segments belonging to the same line, the e-edition could add a side diagram with links to the ...more

One can imagine an e-edition of this book where, as one reads the description of the ratio of this or that, the relevant lines on the diagram were highlighted. Even better, when areas are described by line segments belonging to the same line, the e-edition could add a side diagram with links to the ...more

Jan 19, 2014
Dipesh
rated it
it was amazing
·
review of another edition

Recommends it for:
Newton's followers

Recommended to Dipesh by:
Sir Issac Newton

- an ingenious and energetic builder who's astonishingly brilliant at composing gorgeous monuments of the most intensely clever design. Sometimes these appear as great books like the Principia itself. Sometimes they appear in experiments. But we would be wrong to look for a single key which unlocks the whole mystery of Isaac Newton.

The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy (1729) ... An English translation by Andrew Motte, based on the 1726 3rd edition of Philosophiae Naturalis Principia ...more

The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy (1729) ... An English translation by Andrew Motte, based on the 1726 3rd edition of Philosophiae Naturalis Principia ...more

I'll stick to learning my physics from more modern sources. I love reading original sources, and for the things I could grasp this book was very intrigu ...more

总评：

当初想到读这本经典的缘起是什么呢？

是因为我读广义相对论的时候，意识到爱因斯坦所破的是很多传统观念的冗余，于是我尝试去读类似于《费恩曼物理学讲义》，然而却没有感觉，并且意识到——这种冗余已经很沉重，需要追根溯源，同时我还思考为什么物理学没有进行公理化，很多地方是漫漶不清的。于是开始阅读《自然哲学的数学原理》，追根溯源进行研究，并且我坚持认为运动学的本质应该是变分法，因此计划读完之后去读朗道的力学。同时发现，牛顿当初已经进行了公理化尝试，然而并没有归结到本质性问题（数学工具的不足）。在阅读到一半时，为了追求更本源，去读了亚里士多德的《物理学》，大失所望，才明白牛顿的正经祖宗并不是亚里士多德，而是阿基米德。

牛顿的写书意识逻辑是非常优美清晰的，比伽利略的作品要好很多了。然而其很多观点是建立在伽利略的观点基础上（如惯性的观念等），是伽利略观点的体系化、规范化。虽然都伽利略的书会少趣味，但还是看一看伽利略的力学观点《关于两门新科学的谈话》吧，动力学概念的源头，还是要寻找到伽利略头上 ...more

Newton writes this book in the style of Euclidean geometry: starting with a ...more

topics | posts | views | last activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|

online maths tutors | 1 | 1 | Apr 26, 2017 11:39AM | |

Principia editors contributions? | 1 | 8 | Dec 25, 2012 08:45PM |

Sir Isaac Newton, FRS , was an English physicist, mathematician, astronomer, natural philosopher, and alchemist. His

*Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica*, published in 1687, is considered to be the most influential book in the history of science. In this work, Newton described universal gravitation and the three laws of motion, laying the groundwork for classical mechanics, which dominated ...more
3 trivia questions

More quizzes & trivia...
“This most beautiful system of the sun, planets and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being.”
—
131 likes

“Blind metaphysical necessity, which is certainly the same always and every where, could produce no variety of things. All that diversity of natural things which we find suited to different times and places could arise from nothing but the ideas and will of a Being, necessarily existing.”
—
30 likes

More quotes…