“Only very rarely does one of our stories—one of us—change the course of human events. Joshua Sharpe asked the right questions, refusing easy answers.” —Anna Quindlen, Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist and best-selling author
The riveting story of a 1985 double murder, a long-overdue investigation, and the fight to exonerate an innocent man.
In 1985, a white man walked into a South Georgia church and brutally murdered Harold and Thelma Swain, two pillars of the area’s Black community. The killer vanished into the night. For fifteen years, the case remained unsolved. Then authorities zeroed in on Dennis Perry, a carpenter who grew up nearby. Convicted with devastatingly flawed evidence, Perry received a double life sentence.
When award-winning journalist and South Georgia native Joshua Sharpe retraces the case, he discovers a winding path of corruption, devastating missteps, and secrets. Driven by the pursuit of the truth, Sharpe’s investigation takes him through dusty courthouse archives, down winding dirt roads, and into intense interviews. But he keeps knocking on doors—even after they’re slammed in his face. Sharpe uncovers explosive evidence that helps prove Dennis Perry’s innocence. And he confronts a long-ignored suspect: an alleged white supremacist who had bragged about committing the murders.
But the fight for the truth is not easily won. When a key figure in the investigation turns up dead under suspicious circumstances, Sharpe’s sources and editors insist that he could be in danger. And even as evidence mounts of Perry’s innocence, local officials work to keep him in prison—until Sharpe’s reporting forces the state to launch a new investigation—thirty-five years after the Swains’ murders. Driven by Sharpe’s tireless reporting, The Man No One Believed tells the unbelievable story of one of the most confounding cases in Georgia history, the extraordinary fight to free an innocent man, and how state officials worked against the odds to deliver justice for the Swains after all.
Both a riveting true crime story and a searing indictment of American injustice, The Man No One Believed is a gripping work of literary journalism—a moving examination of how we reckon with the sins of our past.
While the story told here is important, I feel that Sharpe didn't really do it justice. The book doesn't really hit its stride until Part 3, when Sharpe describes his own investigation into the murders, and even then he sometimes falls into the trap of making it too much about him instead of his subject.
The first part of the book was difficult to get through. At times it was repetitive, but it also lacked depth and explanations that would have greatly added to the narrative. For example, Sharpe says the Kinesic technique pointed toward Barrentine's guilt and said it sounded like psychic stuff, but never actually explained what it was. He alludes to cases but doesn't give any information about them.
I also feel that the WHY behind it all was never adequately answered or investigated. I realize Sharpe is limited in what he can uncover based on who will talk to him, but it felt like a bit of a letdown.
And for my pet peeve on how everything is an "untold story"...true, I had never heard of this, but 1) I was not alive when the murders took place and 2) I have always lived geographically distant from where this occurred. However, it sounds like this wasn't really an untold story, and it sounds like plenty of people did believe "the man no one believed". I realize this is editors just hyping things up but maybe something more like "Corruption in a Small Town: The Georgia Church Murders" would have been more fitting while staying true to the clickbait-style titles favored these days.
Overall, a short and somewhat interesting look into the murder of Harold and Thelma Swain that fell just a bit shy of my expectations.
Pretty good coverage of the exoneration of one man, sentenced to life without parole for the murder of beloved community members. The book would’ve been MUCH more compelling IF the publisher had included photos. It would’ve been easier to tell apart the stories and the law enforcement officials, as the case has spanned 4 decades and the “players” have come and go with the times. I was annoyed at having to look up photos of the victims, the sheriff, the deputies, the olive chief, etc, as I was reading about their contributions to the case. I’m hoping the “no pictures” thing isn’t becoming a trend with the true crime genre. Time will tell
I have deep respect and empathy for the real people in this story. Their experiences are important and deserve to be heard.
That said, I don’t believe the author did this story justice. The writing felt choppy and disjointed, making it difficult to stay engaged. Despite its short length, the book dragged and felt much longer than it was. In the end, it just didn’t offer much in terms of insight, emotion, or storytelling impact. I truly wish this powerful story had been told in a stronger, more compelling way.
The Man No One Believed: The Untold Story of the Georgia Church Murders – A Masterclass in Investigative Journalism and Moral Reckoning Rating: 5/5
Joshua Sharpe’s The Man No One Believed is a tour de force of literary journalism that transcends true crime tropes to deliver a searing examination of systemic injustice, journalistic tenacity, and the glacial pace of redemption. As someone who devours both crime narratives and critiques of the carceral system, this book left me emotionally gutted yet galvanized—a rare feat for a genre often mired in voyeurism.
Why This Book Is Exceptional Sharpe’s narrative operates on three planes: a forensic dissection of investigative failures (flawed eyewitness testimony, prosecutorial tunnel vision), a taut thriller about his own perilous pursuit of truth, and a poignant meditation on the human cost of wrongful convictions. The prose crackles with urgency, particularly in scenes where Sharpe confronts law enforcement’s obstinacy or interviews Perry’s family, their grief still raw decades later. The structural choice to parallel Perry’s ordeal with the Swains’ unsolved legacy—two tragedies intertwined by negligence—elevates this beyond true crime into moral archaeology.
Emotional Impact & Revelations Reading this book felt like witnessing an exhumation. Sharpe’s depiction of Perry’s mother, who prayed her son’s name into the void for 20 years, brought me to tears. The chilling account of the white supremacist suspect—his bragging left unchecked due to racial bias—ignited fury, while the eventual exoneration (achieved against bureaucratic inertia) offered catharsis. Most haunting were the quiet moments: Perry’s prison sketches of freedom, or Sharpe’s admission of fear when threats materialized. This isn’t just a story about a case; it’s about the weight of bearing witness.
Constructive Criticism While Sharpe’s first-person perspective lends intimacy, occasional detours into his personal connection to South Georgia could have been deepened to explore regional complicity. The epilogue’s focus on Perry’s post-prison life feels abbreviated—a fuller exploration of reparation’s limits would have underscored the book’s critique of “justice delayed.”
Final Verdict A landmark work that belongs alongside Just Mercy and The Executioner’s Song. Sharpe doesn’t just solve a cold case; he indicts the systems that thrive on indifference. This book will haunt you—and it should.
Thank you to Edelweiss and W. W. Norton for the gifted copy. Sharpe’s work is a testament to journalism’s power to bend the arc of history.
Pair with: Ghettoside for another exploration of race and impunity, or The Cadaver King and the Country Dentist for parallels in forensic injustice.
For fans of: Michelle Alexander’s systemic critiques, Robert Kolker’s narrative depth, and Truman Capote’s emotional precision.
There’s a few tragic events in here. It’s short but it still felt like many things could have been taken out and the narrative would have remained the same.
The Man No One Believed tells the harrowing story of the 1985 church murders of Harold and Thelma Swain, the wrongful conviction of Dennis Perry, and the long-overdue investigation into the real suspect. On paper, this is an incredibly compelling story. A brutal double murder in a sacred place, the conviction of an innocent man, and one journalist’s relentless search for the truth.
But while the case itself drew me in, the telling of it lost me. For a book that isn’t very long, it took me quite a while to finish. The main struggle for me was that the writing didn’t provide enough detail to keep the story flowing smoothly. With so many people involved in the case, it became difficult to keep track of who was who, and at times I felt like key context was missing.
I couldn’t help but agree with another reviewer who suggested this story might have worked better as an article. The journalism is solid, and the subject matter is undeniably important, but as a book, it didn’t quite hit the mark for me.
A riveting story about how the justice system is often corrupt, especially dealing with racial divides in the South. I am glad to see that a man who was wrongly convicted was released from prison and that the true murderer was eventually tried and sent to prison.
I feel incredibly sorry for the family and friends that lost their loved ones to murder and for the family and friends of the wrongly convicted man. It had to be a heartbreaking journey, over more than 4 decades, that they all had to go on.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
Meh. Interesting and important subject matter, but told in a boring way. The book was already short, but it felt too long. It was advertised as reading “like a thriller”, but dragged on for me. Found myself feeling like, “Ok, get to the point…” This would have been more enjoyable as an article.
I received a copy to review. All opinions are my own. This was a very well written book that covered every aspect of the crime and subsequent conviction and everything afterwards. I definitely was shocked by this case and how it was handled and it’s so important for writers and journalists to cover things like this to keep the public informed and educated. I also enjoyed the authors ties to the area and how he handled gathering the information for this book.
Joshua Sharpe’s work here should’ve earned him a Pulitzer. It’s a shining example of the power of investigative journalism. It’s clear that his reporting into the murders of the Swains led to not only the exoneration of Dennis Perry, but also to the arrest of a suspect so many investigators had overlooked. This is an incredibly well-written and deeply reported narrative that perhaps only someone like Sharpe, a dogged reporter with South Georgia roots, could have produced. Bravo.
This is a well researched and decently detailed account of a double homicide that had been “solved” until recent evidence determined the real killer was still in the loose. I think what I appreciated the most is that the “what” of the case is very detailed — from the event itself up to the recent updates during the COVID pandemic nearly forty years later. I also appreciated the note that Sharpe would use italics for remembered quotes and quotation marks for those he could explicitly verify in text or on recording. That showed a level of care that other nonfiction doesn’t always demonstrate.
However, my biggest problems are that this wasn’t in the true crime format I’m used to in other media and it never really tackles the “why”. The second is more straightforward — there was a lot of descriptive elements of what happened, but the motivations were only ever discussed briefly or in passing. This is crucial though because it’s how motive is determined, not just for the crime itself but for each of the individuals involved. Regarding format, there was no intrigue (as everything was given away well before any evidence for distrust in the investigation), it felt like there was very little original engagement by Sharpe (that is, until you finally get to the very end and see his notes pages), and there’s no room for engagement by the readers.
This is a well researched and well written account of the Georgia Church Murders. I hadn't heard of this case before reading this book, but it did an excellent job with recounting that night and retelling all of the suspected events and theories that were floating around. I'm also glad that this wasn't only a rehashing of those events, but also included a broader discussion of the racism and hate bound up in this crime. I'm sad that it took so long for Perry to get justice and to have his conviction overturned, but I'm glad it came before it was too late for him to enjoy his life. However, it's awful that there was a bigger push to free Perry than to pour the resources needed into finding the Swain's real killer. The DA's office was so frustrating, and the reluctance to free Perry and prosecute Sparre was infuriating. I'm glad that there's still some hope for the Swain family, and that there were a few people pushing for justice even when everyone else was content to let Perry take the fall and move on.
Thank you to NetGalley for the ARC!
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
The concept of this was so fascinating, especially living in Georgia where the murders happened, but the execution was not really there. There were some parts that really held my interest, but even by the end I was still partially confused by what actually happened that night.
This was my BOTM selection for August and I cannot explain to you just how excited I was to see a NONFICTION BOOK in the options! Like happy birthday to me!!!!!!!
The Man No One Believed by Joshua Sharpe tells the story of a dual homicide at the Rising Daughter Baptist Church in southern Georgia. Thelma and Harold Swain were shot in cold blood in the middle of Bible study one night by a white man who entered their church with what appears to be no other reason than to simply execute a beloved black couple for no other reason than their skin color and popularity.
Sharpe is not the first person in the last 40 years to chronicle the story of what happened that night, but thanks to his persistence in the investigation, the man who was accused of the murders was exonerated and the real criminal was put behind bars. The injustice of the imprisonment of Dennis Perry was infuriating. The way some crooked cops were able to completely derail an innocent man's life is INSANE and I'm aware of the shortcomings of our judicial system, but I'm also aware that when it's used in the PROPER way, it generally works. This is a story of pure misconduct. It was heartening to see Perry receive clemency after serving over a decade in jail for a crime he did not commit, but the way he ended up in that situation is disgraceful to the men who put him there.
I'd recommend this book to anyone interested in true crime (which weirdly seems to be a lot of people?? read a history book!!!! LOL) but be prepared to feel some righteous anger as you go. This is a very quick read, but as another reviewer mentioned, I wish the publisher had included some pictures and other items to really immerse the reader in the event they're learning about!
The Man No One Believed is a fascinating look at the justice system dealing with a double homicide in Georgia in 1985. This was a long overdue story that needed to be told. Joshua Sharpe did that with Harold and Thelma Swain’s story. He highlighted issues of corruption and racial disparities in the Southern United States. It details the case of a wrongfully convicted individual, Dennis Perry, who was ultimately released from prison, while the actual perpetrator was later identified, tried, and incarcerated. Additionally, it moves beyond a mere recounting of the crime, addressing broader themes such as racism and prejudice associated with the case. The narrative acknowledges the profound impact on both the victims’ families and those connected to the wrongfully convicted man, emphasizing the lengthy and difficult process spanning over four decades.
I really enjoyed this book, as I was not aware of this crime. It was a fascinating read, and I would recommend it to all of my true-crime readers.
Thank you to NetGalley, the author, and the publisher, N.N. Norton & Company for the opportunity to read and review an advanced reader's copy of The Man No One Believed.
This is a serviceable account of a double murder that happened in Georgia in 1985. The most likely killer was finally arrested last year and the trial just commenced, but prior to this new development, an innocent man served nearly 20 years for the murder until he was exonerated because of DNA evidence. What a mess of an investigation. The book lacks an absorbing narrative, but it is a worthwhile read.
We all know that the Georgia justice system has failed many times, but it was heartbreaking to read about one incredibly messed up investigation and how that really showcases the depth of injustice.
DNF about 1/2 way through. It was too much like trying to read a newspaper from front to back and didn’t have enough substance to keep interest. I’ll google the story because I do want to know.
Not rating due to the fact this is based on a real crime & real story. However, I feel as though the amount of details was a lot, spanning over 40+ years in only 200 pages. I think this story is extremely important to bring awareness too, but I also felt like the information could have been rearranged better or made into a documentary instead. I pray for peace for this family who lost these loved ones.
Unfortunately, this one was a bit lackluster for me.
I have noticed when reading true crime, or any narrative nonfiction really, that authors cannot seem to find a balance between writing something that is detailed in excess with a ridiculous amount of names, dates, locations, backgrounds to keep track of, or something that only provides the bare bones of the situation, without much depth.
Unfortunately, this was the latter.
I could have likely gone down a Wiki rabbit hole that contained more information then this book did.
I don't feel we got nearly as much information on the investigation, the wrongful conviction, etc. that we could have. I was expecting a strong piece of investigative journalism and I just kind of kind " Okay...here's an overview of what happened." and it was fairly underwhelming, which is not what you want when we are dealing with a wrongful conviction.
Honestly, I think I am spoiled now by true crime podcasts.
This book was interesting, but it read more like a textbook than anything else. The second half of the book was definitely better than the first half!! I just got really bored of this really quick, I was dragging my feet to get through it. Too many names to keep up with.
I couldn’t put this book down! A fascinating read but terrifying and heartbreaking how many lives are destroyed by racism, corruption, greed, and political agendas.
Look, I can read non-fiction sometimes! Though maybe it helped because the story was crazier than you could get away with in real life...
This is a book about a double murder in a church in Georgia, the man falsely imprisoned for decades, and the journalists who helped get him out and get the real murderer arrested. And if you have any scrap of faith in the justice system, you probably won't after you read about the evidence that got Dennis Perry put away for life. It was pretty bad, and I've heard about a lot of bad false convictions. Spoiler alert: the man had a verified alibi and went to prison anyway.
But the good news is that this story ends as well as something like this can: the falsely imprisoned man is free and is awarded millions, and the true culprit is awaiting his trial. And getting to that point is a testament to the good old fashioned detective work some people are willing to do and the power of a well researched podcast. True crime brings out some of the best and worst of humanity. The best often being people who are willing to dedicate thousands of hours of their time to help release a man they've never met and get justice for two people they never can meet. So I finished the book feeling slightly better, I guess.
Sadly, this felt a little flat for me. While I enjoyed learning about this event and Perry’s journey to justice, the book didn’t strengthen until its final part. There were also a lot of repetitive moments which only cemented my initial thoughts about the books length. The thing with highlighting “untold” stories is that too often there isn’t enough information or research to dive deeper into the historical and emotional components needed to craft a strong narrative non fiction.
I could still recommend this read to someone who may be interested or curious, although this could’ve just been a detailed article and delivered the same outcome.
I thought this was a very well written, captivating true crime non-fiction book. I was not familiar with this story before reading the book and I chose this as my Book of the Month. A real eye opener on the type of people who live among law abiding citizens. This proves that sometimes the justice system does not always work fairly and thankfully there are people and organizations that don’t give up no matter how long it takes to uncover the facts. (It might have been enhanced by including photos.)
The work that people do to give justice to those wrongly convicted of any crime is such important work. Organizations like the innocence project have always been something I support and believe in to help these individuals get their lives and freedom back! With that being said, this book just didn’t really hit for me. The first few parts seemed a little confusing in the way the story and investigation were laid out. Keeping names and faces and roles straight wasn’t helped much.
OK GEORGIA INNOCENCE PROJECT I SEE YOU! if anyone ever wants to know what i want to do with my life, and why i want to work in innocence circles, read this book. amazing storytelling by Sharpe as well. technical at some points that may not make total sense to people not in law or criminal justice without a google search, but amazing none the less.