Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.

Start by marking “Burning to Read: English Fundamentalism and Its Reformation Opponents” as Want to Read:

Other editions

Enlarge cover

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Open Preview

Burning to Read: English Fundamentalism and Its Reformation Opponents

James Simpson

4.04 · Rating details · 24 ratings · 7 reviews

The evidence is everywhere: fundamentalist reading can stir passions and provoke violence that changes the world. Amid such present-day conflagrations, this illuminating book reminds us of the sources, and profound consequences, of Christian fundamentalism in the sixteenth century.

James Simpson focuses on a critical moment in early modern England, specifically the cultu

...more

Get A Copy

Hardcover, 368 pages

Published November 23rd 2007 by Belknap Press of Harvard University Press

More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Burning to Read, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Burning to Read

Lists with This Book

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

Showing 1-46

Average rating 4.04 ·

Rating details

· 24 ratings · 7 reviews

More filters

Sort order

Start your review of Burning to Read: English Fundamentalism and Its Reformation Opponents

Feb 23, 2017 Veronica rated it really liked it

Shelves: thomas-more-studies

Very insightful critique of the inconsistencies within 16th century Protestant theology, with a surprisingly sympathetic reading of Thomas More's views on Scripture. The author recognizes that More was not opposed to vernacular Bibles but to particular translations with a tendency to undermine Church teaching, especially on the Sacraments. The author is friendly to More's notion that Scripture must be read within a tradition, and hails this notion as a remedy for violent fundamentalism. His chal ...more

flag 2 likes · Like · see review

Oct 29, 2017 Dan Knauss rated it it was amazing

[[ TLDR: Burning to Read is an academic but very readable collection of essays that were first given as lectures by a major figure in late medieval/early modern English literary studies. In Simpson's retelling, the Henrician Reformation is a story of the rise of fundamentalist discourse rooted in literalist textuality, a misanthropic and paranoid psychology of abjection, a hermeneutic of suspicion, and the basis for despotism and violence. Clearly this Reformation is not the unproblematic scene ...more

flag Like · see review

Jul 01, 2019 Sasha Wolf rated it liked it

Shelves: 002-the-book, 248-christian-experience-practice, 273-doctrinal-controversies-heresy, 942-history-of-england-and-wales

This is an interesting and disturbing account of the mentality of Reformation literalism. Unfortunately it is not an easy read; there is a lot of repetition, the style is uneven, and there is some postmodernist jargon. The Kindle edition unfortunately does not contain the images from the print version.

flag Like · see review

Feb 27, 2009 Karl Steel rated it really liked it

Shelves: nonmedieval_nonfiction

Several months ago, visiting family, someone mentioned that he had just returned from a sermon on Ezekiel 16. We asked, "what did the pastor say?" "Do what God wants or else." If you don't know Ezekiel 16, have a read: it tropes Israel as a foundling that God raises, pimps out, marries, and then casts out for sleeping around. It might not strike you that "do what God wants or else" is the best or even an adequate reading of the strange sexuality of this chapter, but, armed with Simpson's Burning Several months ago, visiting family, someone mentioned that he had just returned from a sermon on Ezekiel 16. We asked, "what did the pastor say?" "Do what God wants or else." If you don't know Ezekiel 16, have a read: it tropes Israel as a foundling that God raises, pimps out, marries, and then casts out for sleeping around. It might not strike you that "do what God wants or else" is the best or even an adequate reading of the strange sexuality of this chapter, but, armed with Simpson's Burning to Read, you can at least have a sense of the faithfulness of such an interpretation to early modern "Evangelical" (Simpson's locution in preference to the anachronistic "Protestant") hermeneutics and soteriology. Likewise you will understand why I recall that Romans 3:23 ("For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God") was the favorite verse of my fundamentalist upbringing.

Simpson's book, admittedly polemic, seeks to uproot claims that the liberal tradition begins with the 'liberation' of reading and interpretation in the early 16th century. His secondary purpose is to recuperate Thomas More and to reveal William Tyndale as champion of intolerance. David Daniell, Tyndale's modern day promoter and (to put it kindly) anglophile, gets kicked down the stairs repeatedly: this is a thrilling bonus. As Simpson argues, evangelical reading practices simultaneously idolized the 'mere' text, jettisoned non-textual contexts (such as traditions, reading communities, historical situation, and different speech situations), atomized the reader, made adherence to scripture impossible, and set up this very impossibility as the foundation of spiritual life (since one's own sense of failure was a sign, *perhaps,* that one belonged to the Elect). Despair, paranoia, and the secret impulses of fundamentalism sprang up in ground fertilized by Tyndale and Luther, points Simpson makes alternately by close reading of treatises and Psalm translations by Henrican courtiers (most of whom were on the verge of execution) and by citing casualty figures for the religious persecutions and religious wars of the 16th and 17th centuries.

Burning to Read never quite clarifies what this despair &c sprang up in place of. This is odd, since Simpson is a medievalist. As a result, the medieval church implicitly comes off much better than it should (and I'll let aside Simpson's explanation for More's persecution of Evangelicals: short version: he blames it on *Evangelical* reading practices!). Given that the book is semi-popular rather than strictly scholarly, I can't expect it to have the citational apparatus of, say, The King's Two Bodies. Nonetheless, I wonder at the absence of any reference to Pelagianism. I also wonder at the absence of any reference to Reginald Pecock's Repressor of Over Much Blaming of the Clergy (1450). In defending the mainstream Church from the Lollards' refusal to hear any argument but those derived from scriptura sola, Pecock "asserts that whoever 'expresseli' bids any 'gouernance' to be carried out...'includingli' bids all those further (unspecified) things to be done which logically flow out of the said 'gouernaunce.' Therefore one cannot rightly insist 'that needis ech gouernaunce of Goddis ... lawe and seruise muste be groundid expresseli in Holi Scripture'" (qtd from Alcuin Blamires, "The Wife of Bath and Lollardy," Medium Aevum 58 (1989), at 228). Pecock's argument helps encompass ecclesiastical traditions, the sacraments, &c, all this seemingly non-scriptural 'dross' that the Evangelicals scorned, within scripture, while rescuing scripture from mere textuality, returning it to the vitalism of communities of faith as a lived experience. Surely this treatise, and the late 14th- and 15th-century English debates to which it belongs, belongs in Simpson's book? Without it, the debates of Tyndale, Luther, and More appear to be sui generis; with it, we would have been much better able to isolate the conditions that enabled Evangelical ascendence and all its nasty aftereffects.

As a side note, the discussion of Josiah (who provides a model for the bloody effects of the 'rediscovery' of scripture) could have been made even more useful had Simpson observed that the struggles described are, so far as I know, actually within "Judaism" between the centralizing Temple Cult and the dispersed Shrine Cultists, rather than--as it's portrayed in Scripture--between Hebrews and purportedly "foreign" deities.

I should in closing emphasize that the last two paragraphs are grousing, ungenerous given how much I enjoyed the book, its argument, and its limpid prose. I simply wish, then, that Simpson, or his publisher, had provided a page labeled "for more on these issues see" followed by a list of relevant books on the relevant late medieval controversies. ...more

flag Like · see review

Jul 15, 2008 Kev rated it really liked it

Recommends it for: Clayton Crockett, Aaron Simmons, Jay McDaniel, Peter Mehl, Toran Isom

Recommended to Kev by: Jeff Kelley

Shelves: christian-theology, philosophy, history

The most imortant thing I learned is that it is very dangerous to misconstrue that what you read is what it says or means.

Pedagogy is crucial to understanding. Learning & competent wisdom depends upon a mentoring teacher to lead one to what one reads being what it says & means.

The bane of unintended consequences is that very opportunity of a new innovation can lead to the genesis of the exact opposite of the good one intended to do -- and it can happen so very much faster than one expects.

Impo ...more

flag Like · see review

Feb 12, 2015 Humphrey rated it really liked it

A very smooth, engaging prose makes this work quite enjoyable. It poses itself as a revisionist history of the reformation, but to a Catholic like myself (who has been hearing accounts of the reformation that go against the tide of protestant triumphalism) it doesn't seem to be doing anything particularly unusual. It is design for popular appeal, but it still manages to have some decent intellectual meat underneath the seasoning. ...more

flag Like · see review

Jun 30, 2012 Jonathan Lyons rated it really liked it

Shelves: foucault-and-friends

A radical reinterpretation of the roots of religious fundamentalism in the Christian tradition.

flag Like · see review

Hanna rated it it was amazing
Jul 28, 2017

Charlie rated it really liked it
May 14, 2019

Cynthia rated it it was amazing
May 20, 2018

Eric Thrond rated it it was amazing
Sep 28, 2019

Jared rated it liked it
Feb 28, 2016

Madeline rated it it was amazing
Oct 12, 2013

Anthony rated it liked it
Jan 16, 2015

Mikey Harding rated it it was amazing
Jan 23, 2021

Jeffrey rated it really liked it
Jun 23, 2008

David Anderson rated it it was ok
Oct 07, 2014

Brian rated it really liked it
Nov 04, 2015

Ellie rated it liked it
Oct 03, 2013

Matt rated it really liked it
Jun 24, 2014

Michael rated it really liked it
Nov 24, 2009

Lucas rated it really liked it
Jun 26, 2018

Sarah Kissel rated it really liked it
Nov 29, 2017

Emma G rated it it was amazing
Aug 30, 2014

Miguel marked it as to-read
Mar 08, 2008

Anton marked it as to-read
Mar 24, 2008

Dottie added it
May 19, 2008

Davis Swissly marked it as to-read
May 19, 2008

Jennifer (JC-S) marked it as to-read
May 20, 2008

Randy marked it as to-read
May 20, 2008

Miladus added it
Jul 01, 2008

David added it
Dec 12, 2008

Karen added it
Jul 15, 2009

Gail added it
Dec 21, 2009

John David marked it as to-read
Oct 15, 2010

Hatfield marked it as to-read
Dec 24, 2010

Dale added it
Jul 28, 2011

Davewent added it
Sep 23, 2011

Marilee Urbanczyk marked it as to-read
Sep 19, 2012

Heather marked it as to-read
Oct 14, 2012

Douglas Minson added it
Dec 20, 2012

Drspk added it
Mar 13, 2013

Sharon marked it as to-read
May 31, 2013

Jordan Peacock marked it as to-read
Sep 30, 2013

Nazeeruddin marked it as to-read
Sep 30, 2013

Dave Greder added it
Nov 01, 2013

new topic
Discuss This Book

There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Recommend It | Stats | Recent Status Updates

Readers also enjoyed

See similar books…

Genres

History

4 users

Religion

2 users

Philosophy

2 users

See top shelves…

About James Simpson

James Simpson

6 followers

William James Simpson (writing as James Simpson), Ph.D., is a lecturer and Chair of the English Department at the University of Cambridge, and a Fellow of Girton College. His primary focus is on medieval literature, as well as Middle English and early modern literature and culture (1150-1600).