The Snowden Files: The Inside Story of the World's Most Wanted Man

by Luke Harding

Edward Snowden, a young computer genius working for America's National Security Agency, blew the whistle on the way this frighteningly powerful organisation uses new technology to spy on the entire planet. The consequences have shaken the leaders of nations worldwide. This is the inside story of Snowden's deeds and the journalists who faced down pressure from the US and UK governments to break a remarkable scoop.

From the day he left his glamorous girlfriend in Hawaii, carrying a hard drive full of secrets, to the weeks of secret-spilling in Hong Kong and his battle for asylum, Snowden's story reads like a globe-trotting thriller.

Genres: Nonfiction, Politics, Biography, History, Technology, Espionage, Journalism

333 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 2014

About the author

Luke Daniel Harding is a British journalist working as a foreign correspondent for The Guardian. He was the correspondent of The Guardian in Russia from 2007 until, returning from a stay in the UK on February 5, 2011, he was refused re-entry to Russia and deported back the same day. The Guardian said his expulsion was linked with his critical articles on Russia, while Russia's foreign ministry said that an extended certificate of foreign correspondence was not obtained in time. After the reversal of the decision on February 9 and the granting of a short-term visa, Harding chose not to seek a further visa extension.

Reviews

[Sawsan · Rating 4 out of 5]

A real story written by the guardian reporter Luke Harding about the American Edward Snowden the former employee at the National Security Agency who copied and leaked highly classified documents and information at 2013, exposing the surveillance programs of the United States government.
the book displays his life, work and the Hong Kong period where he shocked the world by exposing the secret facts, till his residence in Moscow
even if nothing changes, he is still a brave man did what he thought the right thing to do

[Diane in Australia · Rating 4 out of 5]

I've always said that if the average person, in any country, knew just one-tenth of what goes on behind closed doors in their government (and big business), they'd be horrified. Snowden's files prove me correct. Sadly, I doubt if exposure changes things much ... except to make the offenders seek out new ways to keep doing their deeds.

4 Stars = Outstanding. It definitely held my interest.

[Νόρα · Rating 5 out of 5]

Η προσωπική ιστορία του αμερικανού πρώην στελέχους της κοινότητας των μυστικών υπηρεσιών,που αποκάλυψε το αδιανόητο εύρος των παράνομων και αναίτιων παρακολουθήσεων που κάνουν οι μυστικές υπηρεσίες των ΗΠΑ και του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου σε εκατομμύρια, χωρίς καμία άδεια και αιτιολογία.

Την υπόθεση Σνόουντεν την είχα παρακολουθήσει εκτενώς όταν ξέσπασε, λίγο από την τηλεόραση(πιο πολύ από περιέργεια για να δω τι μπαρούφες θα λέγανε τα ελληνικά κανάλια), αλλά κυρίως ήμουν κολλημένη στο ίντερνετ καθημερινά και διάβαζα ειδήσεις.
Όταν θα είχε καταλαγιάσει ο θόρυβος ήθελα να διαβάσω και το βιβλίο που ευτυχώς μεταφράστηκε και στα ελληνικά.

Άκρως διαφωτιστικό σχετικά με την υπόθεση Σνόουντεν. Διαβάζοντας το συνειδητοποίησα πόσο διαστρεβλώνει τα γεγονότα η τηλεόραση.Βέβαια δεν ��ερίμενα τίποτε άλλο από το μέσο της παραπληροφόρησης.
Έχει πολύ ενδιαφέρον να διαβάσεις για την ζωή του,πως διαμορφώθηκε η σκέψη του μέσα από τις εμπειρίες του,αλλά και τους λόγους που τον οδήγησαν σε αυτή τη πράξη.

Και τι έμαθα από αυτό το βιβλίο ; πολλά και σημαντικά.
Αρχικά τη δύναμη και την επιρροή που μπορεί να έχει η τεχνολογία στην δημοκρατία της καθημερινότητας στην σύγχρονη κοινωνία(O Όργουελ επιβεβαιώνεται και να σκεφτείς ότι κάποτε τον λέγανε τρελό)

Έμαθα τι είναι η NSΑ και ότι διαθέτει καταπληκτικές ικανότητες για τον πρωτοφανή όγκο δεδομένων επικοινωνιών που μπορεί να συλλέξει σε όλο τον κόσμο.
Με την βοήθεια της η κυβέρνηση των ΗΠΑ έχει βάλει κοριούς στα προσωπικά κινητά τηλέφωνα της Άνγκελα Μέρκελ, Ενρίκε Πένια Νιέτο(ο πρόεδρος του Μεξικού), Ντίλμα Βάνα Ρούσεφ(οικονομολόγος,πολιτικός, πρόεδρος της Βραζιλίας) και σε δεκάδες άλλους ηγέτες του κόσμου.Τουλάχιστον δεν κάνει διακρίσεις,παρακολουθεί του πάντες.

Μετά τις αποκαλύψεις που έκανε ο Σνόουντεν, ότι οι εταιρείες (Yahoo, Microsoft, Google,κλπ) προσφέρθηκαν από την πρώτη στιγμή να συνεργαστούν με τις μυστικές υπηρεσίες Αγγλίας και Αμερικής αλλά επειδή φοβήθηκαν το κράξιμο που θα έτρωγαν από τους πελάτες τους μόλις υπήρχε κάποια διαρροή, ζήτησαν από τις κυβερνήσεις να τους "υποχρεώσουν" με νόμο να παραδίδουν τα δεδομένα από τους σέρβερ τους ώστε να μπορούν να επικαλεστούν αυτή την δικαστική εντολή (την οποία φυσικά έδωσε ο ανώτατος δικαστής των ΗΠΑ) μόλις θα γινόταν οποιαδήποτε διαρροή ότι έχουν τους σέρβερ τους ανοιχτούς σε NSA και GCHQ(η βρετανική ΝSA).

Η NSA δεν ήταν μόνη της σε αυτή την εξόρυξη δεδομένων,η GCHQ της Βρετανίας και οι ομόλογοι τους σε υπηρεσίες στον Καναδά, την Αυστραλία και τη Νέα Ζηλανδία ήταν όλοι μαζί στην επιχείρηση σε μια συμφωνία, γνωστή ως "Πέντε μάτια."

Όπως γράφει ο Harding, στην προσπάθειά της να κάνει τους Αμερικανούς πιο ασφαλής,η NSA έχει κάνει την αμερικάνικες επικοινωνίες λιγότερο ασφαλής και έχει υπονομεύσει την ασφάλεια του συνόλου του Διαδικτύου εισάγοντας μια" πίσω πόρτα "στο λογισμικό κρυπτογράφησης που χρησιμοποιείται για την προστασία των προσωπικών και εταιρικών δεδομένων,όπως αρχεία υγείας και οικονομικών συναλλαγών.

Ένα από τα πιο αποκαλυπτικά θέματα ήταν ότι ο γενικός διευθυντής της Εθνικής Υπηρεσίας Ασφαλείας, Keith Alexander ισχυρίστηκε ότι τα αμφιλεγόμενα προγράμματα μαζικής συλλογής δεδομένων στο εσωτερικό της χώρας είχε είχαν αποτρέψει τον εντυπωσιακό αριθμό των 54 τρομοκρατικών συνομωσιών,αφήνοντας να εννοηθεί ότι όλες αυτές εξυφαίνονταν στην Αμερική.

Όπως σημειώνει ο Harding,ο αναπληρωτής της Εθνικής Υπηρεσίας Ασφαλείας Chris Inglis στη συνέχεια παραδέχθηκε ότι μόλις μια ντουζίνα από αυτά τα χτυπήματα είχαν σχέση με τις ΗΠΑ. Ήταν επίσης ασαφής ως προς το αν αυτές οι συνομωσίες ήταν πραγματικές .Μερικές από τις αναφορές που έδωσε είχαν να κάνουν με οικονομικές δοσοληψίες.

Έτσι λοιπόν αυτοί που παραμόρφωσαν την αλήθεια που σίγουρα ήξεραν τι έκαναν,μείνανε ατιμώρητοι, ενώ το πρόσωπο που έφερε στο φως παρανομίες και αντισυνταγματικές δραστηριότητες,κατηγορείται ο προδότης.Πώς μπορεί αυτό να έχει νόημα σε μια δημοκρατία;
Σαφώς,οι εξελίξεις αυτές δεν είναι απλά απομονωμένα γεγονότα σε μια ιστορία γραφειοκρατίας που υπερβαίνει τις αρμοδιότητές της.Aυτό που ο Edward Snowden έφερε στο φως είναι ότι οι κυβερνήσεις των δύο κορυφαίων δημοκρατιών του κόσμου ενήργησαν σαν δικτατορίες.

Αντί να οδηγηθεί στη λήψη αυστηρών μέτρων,να σφίξει τα λουριά οργανισμούς που είπαν ψέματα και να συγκαλύψει πιο εξωφρενικά στραβοπατήματα τους,έσπευσαν να τους υπερασπιστούν.
Ανώτεροι αξιωματούχοι της βρετανικής κυβέρνησης κατηγόρησαν την εφημερίδα Guardian για προδοσία, σε τέτοιο βαθμό που ανάγκασε το προσωπικό της να καταστρέψει τους υπολογιστές με τα αρχεία του Snowden.Ταυτόχρονα, η κυβέρνηση των ΗΠΑ χρησιμοποιεί όλα τα διαθέσιμα μέσα για να εντοπίσει τον Σνόουντεν και να τον δικάσει.

Το πιο λυπηρό όμως είναι ότι δεν τον αποκαλεί μόνο η κυβέρνηση προδότη αλλά και ο απλός κόσμος.Η λαϊκή κατακραυγή δεν είναι και τόσο μεγάλη στις ΗΠΑ. Οι Αμερικανοί επιδεικνύουν μάλλον απάθεια,θεωρούν ότι είναι εντάξει να παρακολουθεί η κυβέρνηση τα μέιλ ή τα τηλεφωνήματά τους.Τελικά για τις καταγγελίες για την πλήρη παρακολούθηση ΤΩΝ ΠΑΝΤΩΝ ακόμα και του ίδιου του Ομπάμα από οποιονδήποτε υψηλόβαθμο πράκτορα της CIA σταμάτησαν να ασχολούνται τα κανάλια,αλλά για το πώς θα συλληφθεί αυτός που μας το γνωστοποίησε μας τα πρήζουν κάθε μέρα, για να μας πουν ότι όποιος τολμάει και αποκαλύπτει την αλήθεια και την παραβίαση της νομιμότητας θα κυνηγιέται μέχρι τέλους.

Το πρόβλημα με τους Αμερικανούς είναι ότι, ας τους παρακολουθούνε και πότε πάνε στην τουαλέτα ακόμα,έχουνε πραγματικά καταπιεί το τυράκι και τις μπαρούφες και την προπαγάνδα των γερακιών και του Fox,αλλά έτσι και προσπαθήσει κάποιος να περιορίσει τα όπλα και να δώσει δημόσια και -σχεδόν- δωρεάν υγεία για παράδειγμα, θα αρχίζουν να φωνάζουν για πραξικόπημα και για κομμουνισμό.

Κλασσικές ΗΠΑ

Ο κόσμος χρειάζεται ανθρώπους σαν τον Σνόουντεν.
Ένα άτομο λογικό με επιχειρήματα που κάνει επιλογές με βάση τη συνείδηση του και πάνω από όλα διαθέτει θάρρος.
Παραθέτω και κάτι ωραίο που έχει πει:
«Δεν θέλω να ζω σε μια κοινωνία που κάνει τέτοια πράγματα.Δεν θέλω να ζω σε έναν κόσμο όπου οτιδήποτε λέω, οτιδήποτε κάνω, σε οποιονδήποτε μιλάω, κάθε έκφραση δημιουργικότητας ή έρωτα ή φιλίας καταγράφεται...». Έντουαρντ Σνόουντεν
Ο άνθρωπος αυτός είναι ήρωας για μένα.
Προτρέπω τους πάντες να το διαβάσουν.Άλλωστε η ασφάλεια δεδομένων / υποκλοπή δεδομένων και συνομιλιών θα έπρεπε να μας απασχολεί όλους.

Αξίζει να δείτε και το ντοκιμαντέρ Citizenfour, που δείχνει το χρονικό των συναντήσεων του Έντουαρντ Σνόουντεν με τον δημοσιογράφο, Γκλεν Γκρίνγουολντ.Η ταινία αποτυπώνει τις γεμάτες ένταση ημέρες που πέρασε ο Σνόουντεν στο Χονγκ Κονγκ και τις εκμυστηρεύσεις του,στους δημοσιογράφους της Washington Post και της Guardian,πριν αυτοί προβούν στις γνωστές αποκαλύψεις για τις παρακολουθήσεις που προκάλεσαν το παγκόσμιο ενδιαφέρον.

[Mal Warwick · Rating 5 out of 5]

When the news broke late in May 2013 about a junior contract employee of the National Security Agency (NSA) who had fled to Hong Kong with a collection of top secret documents about US intelligence practices in his possession, I didn’t pay a great deal of attention. Nor did I think much of it when the first stories surfaced in the Guardian and the Washington Post that were based on the purloined documents. The headlines merely seemed to confirm what we in the public had learned from previous disclosures about widespread surveillance of US citizens by the NSA.

Then subsequent articles began making clear the previously unknown scope, depth, and character of the NSA’s prodigious abilities to scoop up unprecedented volumes of communications data all across the globe. I was shocked to learn that the US government had bugged the personal cellphones of Angela Merkel, Enrique Pena Nieto, Dilma Roussef, and dozens of other world leaders. My eyes bugged out when I discovered that the NSA was stealing all the data that coursed through the cables used by Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft, and other Internet companies. And I did a double-take when I learned that the NSA wasn’t alone in this global data-mining endeavor — that Britain’s GCHQ and their counterpart agencies in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand were all in business together under an agreement known as “Five Eyes.”

Now, having read Luke Harding’s terrific new book, The Snowden Files, I know how much worse the problem is.

As Harding writes, “[p]aradoxically, in its quest to make Americans more secure, the NSA has made American communications less secure; it has undermined the safety of the entire internet” by inserting a “back door” into the encryption software used to protect personal and corporate data such as health records and financial transactions.

Clearly, these developments aren’t simply isolated events in a tale of a bureaucracy exceeding its brief (as bureaucracies are wont to do). In a larger sense, what Edward Snowden brought to light is that the governments of two of the world’s leading democracies acted more like dictatorships. Rather than clamp down on the rogue agencies that lied to conceal their most outrageous missteps even from senior elected officials, their leaders instead rushed to defend them to the hilt. Simultaneously, the US government used all available resources to track down Snowden and put him on trial for treason. Senior officials in the British government accused the Guardian of treason, too, and even at one point forced its staff to smash to bits the computers that were holding the files transferred from Snowden.

Treason? Really?

One of the most revealing episodes in this sad drama was the claim by General Keith Alexander, Director of the National Security Agency, that the wholesale data-scooping had enabled the NSA to stop 54 terrorist plots. As Harding notes, “Alexander’s deputy Chris Inglis subsequently conceded that only about a dozen of these plots had any connection to the US homeland. Then he said that just one of them might have been disrupted as a result of mass surveillance of Americans. (He was also ambiguous as to whether the plots were real ‘plots;’ some of the citations he gave had more to do with financial transactions.)”

So, a four-star US general accountable for the actions of his 40,000-person agency publicly distorted the truth — almost certainly knowing what he was doing — and got off scot-free, while the person who brought to light his agency’s illegal and unconstitutional activities was charged with treason! How can this possibly make sense in a democracy?

Yet there are even broader implications to this story.

The surveillance state and the future of democracy
Assume, for the sake of argument, that Barack Obama spoke sincerely in his 2008 campaign for the presidency when he promised to ”strengthen privacy protections for the digital age and … harness the power of technology to hold government and business accountable for violations of personal privacy.”

Contrast that with the president’s remarks in January 2014 on the subject of government surveillance, when he responded in a major address to the publication of the Snowden documents detailing massive privacy abuses by the NSA. He heralded a series of largely cosmetic changes in procedure but insisted “the men and women of the intelligence community, including the NSA, consistently follow protocols designed to protect the privacy of ordinary people.”

In other words, candidate Obama pledged to turn back some of the egregious abuses of Americans’ civil liberties introduced by the Bush Administration — while president Obama unapologetically defended them, just as he had in 2010 by signing the renewal of the notorious Patriot Act.

To my mind, this blatant turnaround reflects two major aspects of the new reality that now characterizes American government: first, that the president is not an all-powerful chief executive but must routinely accept as fait accompli much that has become established practice in the federal government, no matter how he might feel about it; and, second, that the intelligence establishment, lavished with unlimited funds and highly permissive laws by decades of protective presidents and compliant congresses, has grown out of control.

What does that say about the future of democracy in America?

Think about it. Read The Snowden Files – if only because Luke Harding is an excellent writer. This book reads more like a thriller than a work of nonfiction, and it’s clearly based on extraordinary access to many of the principals in the story.

And if you want to delve more deeply into the present-day reality of the US intelligence establishment, read Top-Secret America by Dana Priest and William M. Arkin, and The Way of the Knife by Mark Mazzetti. Taken together, these three books paint a chilling picture of the intelligence establishment that has increasingly dominated America’s role in the world and, more recently, limited the scope of our freedom at home.

[Brett C(urrently overseas again) · Rating 4 out of 5]

Luke Harding wrote a great account of how Edward Snowden came to be the most famous person back in 2013. The was written well and not boring by any means. Snowden began as a patriotic youth with the desire of becoming a US Army Green Beret only to wash out of Advanced Infantry School with a broken leg. Then without a degree/higher education he became a regular IT tech working for the National Security Agency (NSA). As time went on he became disenfranchised with what he saw and what he learned while working in the intelligence and surveillance community....it's all history from there.

Read it for yourself and see if he was a traitor and espionage mastermind, or did he act out of what he thought was right. Following his own moral compass...

I thought this was a good book and revealing to the whole Edward Snowden debacle of 2013. A recommended read! Thanks!

[Bettie · Rating 3 out of 5]

Bettie's Books

[W]

Recently,I watched the 2014 movie based on this book.Director Oliver Stone has done a fine job with the movie,it kept my interest.

However,as another reviewer notes,it is a known fact that governments and particularly the US government are involved in a lot of digital surveillance,eavesdropping and snooping.

While he did highlight this issue by spilling the beans to the Guardian newspaper,Snowden ended up derailing his whole life and career.Wasn't that too high a price ?

The movie was interesting,I suppose the book will be,too.

[Trish · Rating 4 out of 5]

Radio and TV coverage of the Snowden leaks were spotty. This book helped to fill in the details, background, and what happened since Snowden showed up in Moscow. Snowden himself, and his girlfriend Lindsay Mills, are fleshed out a little more, and I learned why an American would go to British journalists, the Guardian, with the information he had purloined. It turns out the British, specifically their top-secret telecommunications monitoring arm, GCHQ, collaborated with the NSA: “We have the brains: they have the money. It’s a collaboration that’s worked very well.” [Sir David Omand, Former GCHQ Director] No shortage of egoism and despotism to go around, then.

Snowden was a right-wing libertarian in early writings on the web as a user he called ‘TheTrueHOOHA’. It was frankly unsettling for me to read/listen to his thinking as a teen, and see his progression to action. To use his words, he would like to be viewed as a patriot who believes in the right to privacy enshrined in the U.S. constitution. When I’d first learned of his leaks, I was startled. Listening to his first interview on TV, I was admiring. After reading this book, I am unsettled.

Luke Harding, a Guardian reporter, outlines the Snowden action for us with a minimum of sensationalism but with some incredulity at the scope of the revelations. And the news is pretty sensational. Harding gives a little background into Snowden’s early development, and his foray into working as a U.S. government contractor specializing in the protection of U.S. government communications. Snowden’s amazed and amazing reach into the lives of others via their private data transfers must vindicate the paranoid. While I have my doubts that any world leader or business executive thought their telecommunications were truly secret, Snowden’s revelations are startling in the scope of the data collection and in the holes in the system, e.g., a relatively low-level contractor had access to the material.

I should probably state from the get-go that I do not fear my government. I grew up in an age where inaction was much more to be expected than action; incompetence and bureaucratic bungling was much more common than overreach. I was not subject to the kind of totalitarian control experienced in Eastern Bloc countries, the Soviet Union, or China, but we have those examples to know it can happen. I believe the president and his minions who claim that the government is not listening to the communications of private citizens. They simply do not have the capacity, nor the interest, to do that. However, they now apparently have the means, and individuals within governments can have a deleterious effect upon the stated objectives of government. Snowden has shown us a place where an individual might have an outsized effect to his purported role.

Knowing just what I know now, if I had to make a judgment on Snowden’s fate, I might say he should go to court congruently with the leadership of the NSA and the GCHQ. I don’t think it would have been possible for him to “go up the chain of command” to protest this data collection. It is ridiculous to contemplate that anyone would have listened to him, given the reaction from our fearless leaders upon learning of his revelations. But I wish things had gone differently…for him and for us.

I listened to the Random House Audio version of this title, very ably read by Nicholas Guy Smith. I had a look at the paper copy as well, and found it concise enough that the momentum never lagged. Since Guardian reporters were the ones that initially broke this story, it is reasonable that they are the ones to write the details of what happened and the follow-up. I can’t imagine there is a person out there who wouldn’t be interested in this topic. Inform yourselves. This is going to be a political topic for some years to come.

[Elina · Rating 2 out of 5]

Εντάξει...μια καταγραφή των γεγονότων. Σημαντικό ιστορικό γεγονός, αλλά δεν έχω άποψη για το θέμα και δεν γνωρίζω αν τελικά άλλαξε κάτι από αυτό που περιγράφεται τόσο Οργουελικά, ότι όλοι παρακολουθούμαστε από τα social media κλπ. Ξέρουμε κατά βάθος και χωρίς αδιάσειστες αποδείξεις ότι ισχύει, αλλά σκέφτομαι ότι ίσως όλο αυτό με τον Σνοόυντεν, να έγινε για να μας κοιμίσουν ότι όλα λειτούργησαν καλά και δεν μας παρακολουθούν πια. Ποιός ξέρει όμως την αλήθεια;

[Arun Divakar · Rating 4 out of 5]

Life as we know it is now almost entirely on the internet. When we are not on the phone (which in itself is a rare thing), we are on the computer or the tablet swimming in the ocean of the internet. We live, play, work, love and trade on the internet and build our entire identities there. I will complete this review and post it on an online forum which is again an irony from the POV of the book. Imagine the kind of information that is available in the world of the internet, everything we have ever read and written, every financial transaction made, every phone call and video call is all out there for someone to grab and use if they have enough resources to do so.

The million dollar question is : is someone doing this snooping ? The world believed that this wasn’t until Edward Snowden came out of the woodwork and unveiled what the Germans called der shitstorm, the extensive reach of the American NSA in breaching online privacy. The kind of revelations that Snowden brought to the limelight has led to businesses, individuals and nations to rethink the extent of American penetration into their lives. This book is a chronicle of Snowden’s defection, his subsequent reveals with the help of The Guardian group and his subsequent exile.

The fact that Snowden who was a contractor with the NSA had such extensive access to the documents does itself question the access controls placed by the agency on its sensitive material. The book does not go into the details of how the documents were eventually smuggled out. Although in the trailer for Oliver Stone’s Snowden, Joseph-Gordon Levitt tosses something resembling a Rubik’s cube as he walks out of the security check. Snowden is introduced as a geeky young man who enlists in the army to be discharged for a broken leg and later with his formidable computer skills, he finds a job with the CIA. While initially he is a geek who is all gung-ho about his move into the cloak and dagger world of espionage, his move into NSA shakes him completely. According to The Guardian and Snowden, this was a period when he understood how much American intelligence had penetrated the world and all of it made him completely disillusioned. He moves to Hong Kong and with the help of the newspaper group begins to run a series of articles which expose the massive surveillance conducted by the US and UK on a post 9/11 world.

There followed a furore all over the world in which the world nations, the corporates and the common citizens angrily responded to the extent to which their privacy was violated. And yet if the book is to be believed, the Obama administration was strangely nonchalant and in denial mode all through this. There were a lot of hand wringing and impassioned pleas from the American side of the fence that all of this was done to counter another 9/11. It then came as a surprise to the law makers that even in the Congress, the opinion was divided on what good the increased amounts of spying into the lives of citizens was doing and also to whether the NSA really needed to be reined in. Not much has changed in the world and being the secretive organization it is, we don’t know what the NSA is up to now. The Snowden effect was more visible in terms of the steps that netizens adopted all over the world following the revelations. Technology companies and consumer electronics (read Apple) have made the encryptions stronger and hopefully made it difficult for the snoops to find their way into the maze of information. Research also points to the fact that terrorist outfits have made their digital security stronger too which sums up the fact that across the globe there is a heightened awareness of the need for systems which are tamper proof.

Snowden obviously became a global fugitive and is currently in Russia with another side effect being that to a section of the Americans, he is also a traitor. Post this book and my reading on this topic, I don’t find in Snowden a hero or a revolutionary. He is a symbol or more aptly a channel of communication which told the world to be on their guard. His morals or ethics are subjects to be debated about and since this book was published by The Guardian, they always treat their subject with a tenderness. But we need to step beyond him as an individual and come to terms with the extent to which the global intelligence network has spread. There is mention in the book of an operative who put his girlfriend on electronic surveillance after they had a spat and I fail to understand the threat to national security in such a case ! The term ‘abuse of power’ assumes gargantuan proportions when viewed at through such a prism. Also to note is the reaction meted out to the newspaper from the British authorities following the scoop which leads you to wonder about the freedom of the press.

A timely if not slightly dated book but still worth a read. Lesson learned is also that : Pretend it is the 1980’s and that there is no Wi-Fi, talk to another person instead of texting them !

[Jeanpierre · Rating 5 out of 5]

For those of my generation, you will recall reading 1984 and Brave New World. The debate was how society might evolve toward some form of totalitarian control. In fact today both forms, drugs and invasion of privacy are complimenting each other to reach such goal. Snowden's book written by The Guardian's journalist shows how far this pervasive spying on everyone is been carried out through the internet, phone and all digital tools.

The point that Bin Laden knew that and did not even have a phone line to his house take away any argument that it is helpful to catch terrorist.

This is a book that all should read to be aware that everything written is read potentially by NSA staff. Hi NSA handier, hope you gave a good day.

[Yanper · Rating 2 out of 5]

Δεν είναι λογοτεχνικό βιβλίο είναι όμως αρκετά ενδιαφέρον. Σου δίνει μία ελάχιστη εικόνα από τον θαυμαστό κόσμο των μυστικών υπηρεσιών και του κατεστημένου. Βλέπεις πόσο μακριά έβλεπε ο Οργουελ και ανατριχιάζεις. Διαβάζοντας το δεν μπόρεσα να μην ξεκαρδιστώ στα γέλια ενθυμούμενος τις γραφικές αναρτήσεις στο ΦΒ, " ενημερώνω το ΦΒ ότι δεν επιτρέπω την χρήση των προσωπικών μου δεδομένων, φωτογραφιών, μπλα μπλα μπλα."Δεν ξέρω αν είμαστε τόσο αθώοι ή τόσο αφελείς.

[Vasilis Kalandaridis · Rating 5 out of 5]

Εξαιρετικό.Η πρώτη μου φορά που διαβάζω τέτοιου είδους βιβλίο.Έχει στοιχεία,ημερομηνίες,μαρτυρίες,κρίσεις,ερωτήματα,όλα.Και επιτέλους κατάλαβα τι ακριβώς έγινε στην υπόθεση Σνόουντεν,η τηλεόραση μάλλον μπερδεύει αντί να πληροφορεί.

[Chris Steeden · Rating 4 out of 5]

‘‘I am a senior member of the intelligence community …’ No name, no job title, no details. The Guardian columnist Glenn Greenwald, who was based in Brazil, started to correspond with this mysterious source. Who was he?’

I think nearly everyone in the world now knows who Edward Snowden is. After listening to Snowden on the Joe Rogan podcast I did a cursory search for any decent books on Snowden out there. My luck was in for sure. Luke Harding had written one. He is a very good investigative journalist. I have read a couple of his books. ‘A Very Expensive Poison’ is highly recommended. I knew all about the Snowden affair back at the time but only through news reports and articles. The podcast piqued my interest once more.

Snowden had access to highly classified NSA files. ‘They suggested the White House wasn’t just spying on its enemies (bad guys, al-Qaida, terrorists, the Russians), or even on its supposed allies (Germany, France), but on the communications of millions of private US citizens… There had never before been a big leak out of the National Security Agency. Everybody knew that America’s foremost intelligence-gathering organisation, based at Fort Meade near Washington DC, was impregnable.’

I am one of those people that does not use Facebook, Twitter or Tik Tok. My only real social media is Goodreads. Then I started thinking about how much we do use the internet. In our household we are always buying stuff online and have accounts with many online stores and I do my tax return online. There are e-mail and texts and WhatsApp. Then there are phone calls. To be honest any spying agency would be bored to tears with our electronic history, but I do understand why people are concerned. It is a slippery slope when agency’s do this without consent. ‘Between 2009 and 2012 Snowden says he found out just how all-consuming the NSA’s surveillance activities are: ‘They are intent on making every conversation and every form of behaviour in the world known to them.’ Should we be bothered? Yes. What they were doing was illegal and ‘violated the US constitution’. On that basis alone reform was needed. You cannot argue with the need to stop terrorism and to do that the NSA is needed more than ever but they need to keep within their remit to do that. Their tentacles had spread and there was no stopping them. It wasn’t just us, the ordinary person, that the NSA were spying on. It was their allies like Germany, ‘For 10 years the agency even bugged the phone of German chancellor Angela Merkel, Europe’s most powerful politician.’ France did not get away with it either. I am not naive enough to think France and Germany were not doing their own bit of snooping, but it appears that their surprise was the actual scale of the NSA trawling and data collection.

Like the two other Luke Harding books I have read this skips along at a fast pace and keeps your attention throughout. He just has a style of telling a story that makes you want to keep reading. He also goes over how the British are implicated. GCHQ works closely with the NSA. Partners if you will. The NSA pay GCHQ for the work they do with data collection. For all the illegality and bad ethics around this reading about spies, spying and double dealings it is just so darn interesting. I liked one story where the British set-up fake internet cafes at ones of these G20 meetings in London. The computers were equipped with key-logging software so when the delegates entered passwords the spies had them. That’s it. I’m applying to be a spy. Beware my Goodreads friends. I read your reviews.

Farewell my Goodreads friends as I head off into the sunset to become a man of mystery (sounds much more fun than being the actual whistleblower).

[Jason · Rating 5 out of 5]

Whew! What a ride!

I don't know what to say about this other than, it ought to be required reading (if even just for the simple fun of it). As far as thrilling reads, this qualifies. It's odd that this happened only a short while ago, yet it feels so distant and like some distant past. It's something that seems like it should be on the top of society's priorities, but it just isn't. There are far more urgent things at the moment, like attempted democratic coups, the world burning down around us, the coasts flooding, the economy the economy the ECONOMY. We've become distracted and have forgotten just how pervasive the governments have become in our everyday lives. Probably an NSA person will read this later tonight before they go to bed, somewhere between tea and a nice hot steam. Hi NSA person!

Anyways, good book. Very informative. Very disturbing - I only had a rudimentary understanding of the Snowden leak, and of how deep the surveillance went. Now I feel obligated to educate myself a bit more on this. I think we all should.

Onward.

[Bria · Rating 1 out of 5]

Let's put aside the debate whether Snowden was right or wrong to release thousands of classified government documents and focus on what the outcome of this was. To me, the outcome (or reason for releasing the documents) is the real issue here.

Imagine you are in an airport, would you say the word "bomb"? Imagine you are on Google in your private home on your private internet, would you search "how to make a pipe bomb?" or "how to make a fertilizer bomb?". Probably not. And why? Because you are aware the government monitors you. You have learned this through friends, through TV and through the media. Did you know this before 2013 and Snowden? Of course.

Snowden's entire reasoning for whistleblowing was (1) The public needed to know what these documents contained and (2) That this would promote change across the globe. And I find that both of these reasons are unfounded and naïve.

Firstly, the American media (and media across the globe) had been reporting on this very same illegal spy activity since 2001. Harding gives many examples of articles and whistleblowers who all said the same things as Snowden and who came before him. Yes, Snowden brought more evidence and examples of this surveillance, but this wasn't really a new idea. I find it incredibly surprising that people, for example Snowden, thought the government didn't monitor the internet or phone lines. The minute the Patriot Act was signed and the government gave itself permission to spy and detain you whenever, this should have been a forgone conclusion. Companies spy on you before an interview, so do colleges before they give you an acceptance. We all spy on each other's Facebook pages. So why is this news? Answer, it isn't. What would be news if the 100 million phone calls the NSA gets from America and multiple other countries per day resulted in people being imprisoned, tortured and killed without reason. That would be scary. That would be a worthwhile reason to blow the whistle. Just telling people "Hey the government stores your emails along with literally millions of other emails that they can't sort through" is a pretty pathetic reason to become a whistleblower. Snowden didn't save any lives or uncover government labor camps or find mass graves or torture chambers. Those are what I would expect in a media story that is being compared to Big Brother, etc. Also, if you are concerned about the government reading your naughty emails to your mistress or lover, just get some low-grade encryption *according to Harding*. And to wrap this up, China, Russia, the Middle East, England, France, Italy, Germany, Brazil, etc. all have their own versions of this same spying network. Harding even mentions them in this book. This only difference here was, Snowden was tattling on the US not these other countries.

Secondly, Snowden's actions did not change anything. The NSA still exists, so does the Patriot Act (Obama re-signed it). If anything, the NSA is being offered more money. Harding talks about how the budget for the NSA has increased.

So if Snowden didn't promote change, didn't save anyone and didn't help the American public, why did he even blow this whistle? The answer, his own ideology. He believed that he should. That it was the right thing to do. So we can argue all day long on if this was 'right', but at the end of the day it wasn't to help people, it was to promote Snowden's libertarian and political goals.

I am giving this book this poor rating because the writing was just awful. It jumped around so much (sometimes in the same paragraph) that it was hard to follow. The blatant adoration of Snowden was also little to strong.

If you are interested in this topic, this really isn't an informational, unbiased read. But if you already know something about this topic and are interested in the pro-Snowden side, this is a good read.

[Sandro · Rating 3 out of 5]

This is an informative book that makes important arguments about the relationship between practices of mass-surveillance and the role of the free press by laying bare such state interventions through Edward Snowden's revelations. The nature of this book is that it is journalistic rather than research-based or scholarly. As a consequence, the book doesn't offer sources but relies on Harding's retellings and his experience of working as a journalist for the British newspaper The Guardian. Nevertheless, I have found some of the things Harding shares with the reader inspiring in regard to my own interpretation of the events surrounding Snowden. What this book does well is to convey the urgency of adjusting international whistleblowing and journalistic freedom legislation to prevent the institutional targeting of individuals who chose to share information that belongs to the public.

[James Roberts · Rating 5 out of 5]

First off, I'd like to apologize for not posting earlier. I finished the book a couple of months ago, and have only recently found the time to write a review. As to the book, I appreciated it because of its perspective. In my opinion, I feel that the message is simple, concise and unbiased. As opposed to what you will get from the American mass media, the UK media etc., we are given an inside view of the thoughts and reasoning behind the actions of a young man who felt compelled to out what he felt were the disingenuous actions of the US and UK government. I respect the actions taken, after the regular channels had been exhausetd, to no avail. I am of the opinion that the great machine that is the government is neither concerned for nor respectful toward any action that does not preserve or strengthen it's agenda - to amplify and solidify the need for governance. This book laid out the details in an understandably chronological way, and from multiple perspectives as to lead the reader to make their own assumptions about the validity and motive of Snowdens' series of actions. What I found refreshing, was that for the first time in a very long time, I was able to read the details, without constantly being reminded by the mass media and the government, about how I was supposed to feel. The book was well done, to the point, and an easy read - never boring or lagging.

[Shaun · Rating 3 out of 5]

Great . . . if you're a journalist and like the fast-paced action and efforts by the Guardian to protect freedom of the press and the First Amendment. Curious that a newspaper in the UK is seeking protection of the First Amendment when the UK does not even have either a Constitution or Bill of Rights like we enjoy here in the US. It begs the question: Where was the US Press -- or the Fourth Estate -- when all this was happening under our noses? To ask the question is to answer it: asleep at the wheel. Suddenly Mr. Snowden's choice in seeking assistance from reporters with the Guardian looks that much more inspired and brilliant to me.

Otherwise, the book is "average" to "good" if you are just a plain ol' reader like me. Seemed to be a lot of self-aggrandizement by Mr. Harding and the folks at the Guardian. Makes Snowden out to be a "patriot" and not the "traitor" he is alleged to be. Sure makes the NSA and our politicians -- especially the White House -- as well as the politicians in the UK, look absolutely terrible with all their obvious lying to Congress, lying to each other, lying to the American, UK and world citizens, double-dealing, back sliding, and whatever other invective you wish to direct toward them.

Not "All The President's Men" but not a stinker either.

[Liza Vourdaha · Rating 4 out of 5]

Άπειρες πληροφοριες.Πολλα ονοματα,πολλες ημερομηνιες.Ακρως διαφωτιστικο σχετικα με την υπόθεση Σνοουντεν...Τα ΜΜΕ τελικα πιο πολυ παραπληροφορούν και καθοδηγούν παρα ενημερώνουν.

[☆A.J.☆ · Rating 4 out of 5]

A truly enjoyable read. Personally, I would've given it a 5 stars rating, but it took on a more speculative tone and left me with a few questions (which I couldn't really decided whether the Author purposefully intended to or simply hadn't answers for) that probably got me all riled-up to want to get them answered.

[C. Janelle · Rating 4 out of 5]

When the Patriot Act first passed in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, I was part of a group that organized panel discussions and protests against the act. The kind of wholesale surveillance revealed by Edward Snowden was exactly the kind of thing, we feared, for which the Patriot Act paved the way. And although the consensus (as far as there is one) seems to be that the post-9/11 surveillance techniques of the NSA over-reach even the provisions of the Patriot Act, the law allowed for just a little hop-skip to the place where we are today. So, while my inclination is to say, "I told you so," no one really cares what I thought when the act was first passed so why bother saying it?

A commenter on the radio asserted that the U.S. is divided into two camps, those who think Edward Snowden is a hero and a patriot and those who think he's a traitor. I would argue there's a third camp of people who know his name but don't know anything else about him, but the division is the source of the point I'm trying to make. I've been inclined to think of Snowden as a hero from the beginning, and I'm even more inclined to think so after reading The Snowden Files. I'm also inclined to ask my many computer-savvy friends for advice on encryption software for my laptop. Not because I'm engaged in illegal activities, but that's the whole point: the NSA is hoovering up data from everyone, not just from suspected terrorists. If I pissed off someone in the government, I'm sure they could come up with enough evidence from my internet search history and my library records to cobble together a case against me, or against anyone.

The thing I don't quite understand is why more people---myself included---aren't totally up-in-arms (figuratively speaking) about Snowden's revelations. Why are so many of us just going about business as usual? Is it because we assume we have nothing to hide, and so we're leaving things be and letting it up to the journalists to be targeted as terrorists for reporting government actions that flout our rights under the Constitution? Or is it because we already assumed we had no privacy and so this new information doesn't really bother us? As one friend puts it, "I assume they already have all of my information anyway."

But about the book: I enjoyed this book. It was a pleasant (if disturbing) read. I admit, I skimmed the "Shoot the Messenger" chapter in which Harding goes into detail about the inner workings of British government. I'm still an American, after all, and hearing about what happens in other countries kind of makes me glaze over. I was astounded, however, at the grounding of the flight of the president of Bolivia when he was suspected of smuggling Snowden out of Russia (he didn't, btw). No wonder some other countries think of the U.S. as a big bully throwing its weight around.

So, my next action is to procure Greenwald's book about the contents of the Snowden leaks, and to maybe buy myself a typewriter and start visiting people in person more often rather than calling or e-mailing.

[Colibri · Rating 4 out of 5]

Ο Luke Harding, έκανε μια εκπληκτική ��ουλειά, συγκεντρώνοντας όλο το υλικό σε ένα ενιαίο κείμενο. Ένα συναρπαστικό αφήγημα, με γρήγορο ρυθμό, το οποίο διαβάζεται απνευστί. Συστήνεται ανεπιφύλακτα!

«Δεν θέλω να ζω σε έναν κόσμο όπου οτιδήποτε λέω, οτιδήποτε κάνω, σε οποιονδήποτε μιλάω, κάθε έκφραση δημιουργικότητας ή έρωτα ή φιλίας καταγράφεται...»

«Βλέπεις πράγματα που ίσως είναι ανησυχητικά. Όταν δεις τα πάντα συνειδητοποιείς ότι ορισμένα από αυτά τα πράγματα είναι καταχρηστικά. Η αίσθηση περί αδικίας ενισχύεται. Δεν υπήρξε κάποιο συγκεκριμένο πρωινό [που να σηκώθηκα αποφασισμένος ότι δεν πάει άλλο]. Ήταν μια φυσιολογική διαδικασία»

«...οι κατασκοπευτικές υπηρεσίες της Δύσης έδειχναν να μην αντιλαμβάνονται την ευρύτερη εικόνα: ότι το κράτος τώρα πια συνέλεγε αδιακρίτως τις επικοινωνίες εκατομμυρίων ανθρώπων, χωρίς τη γνώση ή τη συγκατάθεσή τους.»

«Τα ζόμπι ήταν όλοι εκείνοι που δεν γνώριζαν ότι το iPhone πρόσφερε στην υπηρεσία κατασκοπείας νέες δυνατότητες παρακολούθησης που δεν μπορούσε καν να φανταστεί ο αρχικός Μεγάλος Αδελφός. Οι "καταναλωτές" ήταν τα ανεγκέφαλα πειθήνια στρατιωτάκια του Όργουελ.»

«Στην αντιδικία για το ποιος ελέγχει το διαδίκτυο, οι άνθρωποι της NSA έδιναν μια δυσοίωνη απάντηση: "Εμείς".»

«Στην εποχή της κυριαρχίας των δεδομένων, η υπηρεσία μετατοπίστηκε από το ειδικό στο γενικό· από τη στοχοποίηση στο εξωτερικό σε εκείνο που ο Σνόουντεν χαρακτηρίζει ως "καθολική, αυτόματη, μαζική παρακολούθηση".»

«Οι Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες πραγματοποιούν ενέργειες αντικατασκοπίας χρησιμοποιώντας πληθώρα μέσων. Ένα από τα πλέον αποτελεσματικά είναι η συνεργασία με εμπορικούς φορείς για την απόκτηση πρόσβασης σε πληροφορίες μη διαθέσιμες με άλλον τρόπο»

«Το Facebook αποκάλυψε ότι το τελευταίο εξάμηνο του 2012 έδωσε τα προσωπικά δεδομένα 18 με 19.000 χρηστών σε διάφορες κρατικές υπηρεσίες των ΗΠΑ, όχι μόνο στην NSA αλλά και στο FBI, σε ομοσπονδιακές υπηρεσίες και σε τοπικές αστυνομικές αρχές.»

«Θεωρητικά είμαστε ανεξάρτητο κράτος. Πρακτικά όμως όχι».

«...τα προγράμματα των μαζικών παρακολουθήσεων της NSA που αποκάλυψε "δεν μας παρέχουν ασφάλεια". Σύμφωνα με τα λεγόμενά του: «Τραυματίζουν την οικονομία. Τραυματίζουν τη χώρα μας. Περιορίζουν τη δυνατότητά μας να μιλάμε και να σκεφτόμαστε και να ζούμε και να είμαστε δημιουργικοί, να έχουμε σχέσεις, να συναναστρεφόμαστε ελεύθερα... Υπάρχει τεράστια απόσταση ανάμεσα στα νόμιμα προγράμματα, στη θεμιτή κατασκοπεία, στη σύννομη επιβολή του νόμου όταν είναι στοχευμένη και βασίζεται σε θεμιτές εξατομικευμένες υποψίες και ενέργειες βάσει εντάλματος, και στην καθολική μαζική παρακολούθηση που θέτει ολόκληρους πληθυσμούς κάτω από κάποιο μάτι που βλέπει τα πάντα, ακόμα κι όταν δεν χρειάζεται».

[Casey · Rating 3 out of 5]

I harbor substantial feelings about Edward Snowden, but this review isn't about my personal feelings, it's about Luke Harding's work. So whether you view Snowden as a hero, or a traitor, I think this book is worth your time and attention.

The text is accessible, the information is intriguing, but the book is bias, and its subjective slant mars what would have been an enjoyable reading experience. And I feel this is a tragedy to some extent, as the subjective angle was unnecessary. This would have easily been a 4-star book if the narrative had retained an objective tone. As a reader, I do not appreciate when an author blatantly paws at me with their agenda. Clearly Harding is pro-Snowden. Okay, this is fine and dandy. But Harding's subjectivity is a constant source of readerly irritation. Mr. Harding, don't "tell" me how I should feel, allow the reader to come to this place independently.

Harding presents some Snowden background, insight as to whom and why Snowden contacted in the early stage of his information leak, and some airport scrambling. Harding also touches on what some of the Snowden files reveal, and the global reaction to these revelations.

Despite my dislike for rather one-sided narratives, I've no reservations recommending this book to anyone interested in learning a bit about Snowden and the subsequent reaction to his decision to leak NSA files.

Audiobook:
Nicholas Guy Smith gives a strong and intimate reading. He has an English accent, and while I found his pacing a touch slow, I quite enjoyed his narration.

[foteini_dl · Rating 4 out of 5]

Το ότι οι κυβερνήσεις των χωρών των χωρών-με πρόσχημα την πάταξη της τρομοκρατίας-παρακολουθούν απλούς πολίτες μέσω e-mail, τηλεφώνων κλπ δεν είναι αυτό που συντάραξε. Μάλλον θα πρέπει να είσαι αφελής για να πιστεύεις πως κάτι τέτοιο δε συμβαίνει. Το σπουδαίο που προέκυψε απ΄αυτήν την υπόθεση, ήταν ότι κάποιος έφερε αποδείξεις (φέρνοντας στην δημοσιότητα απόρρητα έγγραφα της NSA) γι' αυτήν την κατ' εξακολούθηση παρακο��ούθηση. Είναι τρομερό πως μπορούν να καταλάβουν όχι μόνο ποιος είσαι, τι κάνεις,πότε το κάνεις, αλλά και ποιοι αποτελούν τους ανθρώπους με τους οποίους συναναστρέφεσαι σε καθημερινή βάση. Και καταλαβαίνεις ότι δεν είσαι πουθενά ασφαλής, μιας και έχουν στις υπηρεσίες τους εταιρίες που όλοι χρησιμοποιούμε λίγο-πολύ καθημερινά (facecook, google, yahoo, apple μεταξύ άλλων). Ζούμε σε μια οργουελική κοινωνία (βλέπε 1984) και όχι ελεύθερης έκφρασης.
Εξαιρετικό βιβλίο, που διαφωτίζει μια υπόθεση που τότε συντάραξε πολλούς σε όλο τον κόσμο, αλλά τώρα μοιάζει να έχει ξεχαστεί (��ες και το πρόβλημα αυτό δεν υφίσταται πλέον). Το βιβλίο θυμίζει ένα καλογραμμένο πολιτικό θρίλερ, σαν αυτά του John Le Carre, που έχει ξεπηδήσει από το Β' ΠΠ.
Αν θέλετε να έρθετε παραπάνω σε επαφή με την υπόθεση αυτή, πέρα από το βιβλίο προτείνω το ντοκιμαντέρ Citizenfour της Laura Poitras και την περσινή συνέντευξη του Snowden στον κωμικό (που κάνει καλύτερα τη δουλεία των δημοσιογράφων από πολλούς δημοσιογράφους) John Oliver (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEVly...)

[Satya Ananthu · Rating 4 out of 5]

This dude has balls of steel. Being in the bad books of US government and not getting caught is no easy feat to pull off. That shows how smart he is.

He never went to college, but made it to the IT department of NSA. It was possible only because of the openness of this country in recognizing and encouraging talent. On the other hand, the same country silently spies on its citizens and almost everyone on the planet. It's like setting your teenage child free and tracking their movements secretly by phone. It's in no way freedom, it's pure hypocrisy.

Ed Snowden's story reminds me of a quote I read in another book:

“Most men take more out of life than they give to it. A few give more to life than they take out of it. The world runs because of such men.”

It's because of this man, the hypocrisy is exposed and government's bluff called.

Just like Indian embassy in London went back to typewriters because of this mass surveillance, there will be a day when we all go back to the basics -- grow our own organic food in our backyards, barter goods and services and become luddites, therefore more human. Wrong is the new right, and wrong and right will take turns, and be in a constant cycle.

[Timthast · Rating 4 out of 5]

The Story was fascinating and horrifying at the same time. I followed the Edward Snowden storey in the news but was not aware of the sheer enormity of the snooping done by the NSA and GCHQ (in the UK) that he uncovered.
Which is to say literally billions of phone calls and emails by pretty much all Americans and Brits and a large part of the planet, foreign leaders and close allies, US companies, Foreign companies that had nothing to terrorism. Building in back doors to encryption software, going to and getting upfront buy in from all the major tech companies - Google, Apple, Yahoo, Microsoft, AOL. . . to just hand over their data on us, and not just "when subpoenaed but just because".

All very unconstitutional (in the US). Supported by pretty much the entire government establishment from Bush, to Obama.

I came to it with an unclear idea of Snowden. Was he a good guy or a bad guy. I came away seeing him as a hero who sacrificed his personal liberty to blow the whistle on and hopefully change some of this horrendous behavior.

I would have given this a higher ranking but I found the narrative to be a bit disjointed. At times it would go off into side stories and provide WAY too much detail on certain things.

[Chaz Hitz · Rating 5 out of 5]

If you are like me. I barely noticed the Edward Snowden affair that spread throughout the media like a wild fire this past summer and fall. All I knew was that he leaked national secrets out of the NSA. The official U.S. spy agency known as the “National Security Agency” or “Not Secret Anymore” thanks to Mr. Snowden’s actions. I really didn't care at the time but I do now. I have just finished reading a book titled “The Snowden Files: The Inside Story of the World’s Most Wanted Man (Vintage)” by Luke Harding. The author describes in detail of how and why Mr. Snowden’s information got to the press. If this had not been a real-life situation, described by those close to the whole Snowden affair, it would have been a great fictional spy thriller. You can't make this stuff up and I could not put the book down. I almost read it through one sitting.

This was from by blog which can be read at http://goaskchaz.com/2014/03/13/edward-snowden-patriot-traitor-whistleblower-spy/

[Richard · Rating 4 out of 5]

Scary, more frightening than a horror movie. The uncovered truths, revelations, lies that the U.S. and British governments have weaved is beyond belief. EVERYONE is spied on, no one is immune by the machinations of the NSA and GCHQ. Spying on the President of Brazil, spying/listening to Angela Merkel's private phone messages, millions of American, Latin, European, Middle Eastern and Asian citizens - no problem. We have become entrapped in a survilence state where these agents are so paranoid ! Anyone who uses technology ( almost everyone of us to some degree ) i.e. - utilization of the internet, mobile phones, skyping, etc., etc. is NOT IMMUNE !

What horrible lives we must live in the 21st century for this to happen to us !

Edward Snowden is a hero that has revealed the underbelly, sophistication and all encompassing survelance (spelling?) that average citizens were not made aware .... until now.

[Lino Matteo · Rating 3 out of 5]

The Snowden Files
Luke Harding
2014


While this is a story that needed to be told…it is almost too Hollywood to believe. BIG BROTHER is here and most people accept that it is justified for our safety. But what is safety without freedom?
Who is afraid of the first amendment? Why those with and in power of course, for they do not want that power threatened.
There is a good magazine article in this book. Unfortunately the material is thin and repetitive for a 300+ page book.
So while it is a story that needed to be told, I would have liked more graphics and fewer words.
Thanks
3 stars.



Edward Snowden was a 29-year-old computer genius working for the National Security Agency when he shocked the world by exposing the near-universal mass surveillance programs of the United States government. His whistle blowing has shaken the leaders of nations worldwide, and generated a passionate public debate on the dangers of global monitoring and the threat to individual privacy.

In a tour de force of investigative journalism that reads like a spy novel, award-winning Guardian reporter Luke Harding tells Snowden’s astonishing story—from the day he left his glamorous girlfriend in Honolulu carrying a hard drive full of secrets, to the weeks of his secret-spilling in Hong Kong, to his battle for asylum and his exile in Moscow. For the first time, Harding brings together the many sources and strands of the story—touching on everything from concerns about domestic spying to the complicity of the tech sector—while also placing us in the room with Edward Snowden himself. The result is a gripping insider narrative—and a necessary and timely account of what is at stake for all of us in the new digital age.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00I1ZKA56/...

Notes:
12: Snowden used the word ‘panopticon.’ …Jeremy Bentham. It describes an ingenious circular jail….
EN: Time to reread 1984
13: Even President Obama conceded the debate was overdue and reform was required.
15: Nothing at last is scared but the integrity of one’s own mind ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson.
47: Snowden’s partner, Lindsay Mills….
52: …that inside the NSA there’s a lot of dissent…
56: Snowden chose the handle ‘Verax’, a classical Latin adjective meaning ‘truth-telling’
59: Snowden was one of around 1,000 NSA ‘sysadmins’ allowed to look at many parts of the system.
60: Five days later Mills removes her blog. She also wonders publicly about deleting her Twitter account….”To delete or not to delete?” she tweets.
63: Greenwald lives in Miranda’s Brazilian coastal home…
65: Some have called this digital ecosystem outside mainstream publishing the Fifth Estate…
67: PGP encryption software…
73: Presidential Policy Directive 20, a top secret 18 page document issued in October 2012….
76: He (Snowden) was very worried about his friends and family being implicated.
81: Ewen MacAskill, a 61 year old Scot and political reporter…
102: Island of Harris…
87: Five Eyes…the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and USA
102:
One cannot hope to bride or twist
Thank God! He British journalist
But, seeing what the man will do
Unbribed, there ‘s no occasion to. ~ Humbert Wolfe’s epigram
107: Of course it was an illegal operation. But that’s our job. We’re at war against terrorism.
111: America is fundamentally good country. We have good people with good values. But the structures of power that exist are working to their own ends, to extend their capability at the expense of the freedom of all publics. ~ Snowden
112: GCHQ is worse than the NSA
121: Nobody takes our calls anyway. So we have literally nothing to lose in terms of access ~ Guardian US
140: Obama added that it was impossible to have 1005 security and 100% privacy. We have stuck the right balance.
147: I have no intention of hiding who I am, because I know I have done nothing wrong. ~ Snowden
152: Then suddenly Snowden became a global phenomenon
Page 155: All of the Signals All of the time
157: So between them Britain and the US play host to most of the planet’s burgeoning data flows.
172: British journalists do not enjoy the constitutional free speech protection of their US counterparts.
174: The special US courts that dealt with intelligence matters met in secret.
195: Until they become conscious, they will never rebel ~ George Orwell 1984
196: “ON January 24th, Apple Computer will introduce Macintosh. And you’ll see why 1984 won’t be like 1984”
107: The zombies were the public, unaware that the iPhone offered the spy agency new snooping capabilities beyond the imagination of the original Big Brother.
108: Apple joined in October 2012 – exactly a year after Job’s death.
Leaked PRISM documents
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_(...
214:…Tor, the popular tool to protect online anonymity.
238: …simply corrupt the most basic notion of justice…that it must be seen to be done.
EN: #TheSnowdenFiles showed the world that FEAR had triumphed over reason in America and further eroded America’s claims to world leadership.
EN: Assume the NSA is going to read anything you write – including this memo – in Canada, USA, France or elsewhere. Govern yourself accordingly. Is this the new rules of the game?
279: You come here often. #NSApickuplines’. EN: It is only funny if you see the point and not the question mark. Period.
284: …Amash came from the libertarian wing of the (Republican) party.
300:…it would be a long time before Snowden saw home again.
329: ‘Even in Siberia there is happiness.” ~ Anton Chekhov, In Exile
331: …that the programs of NSA mass surveillance don’t make us safe. They hurt our economy. They hurt our country. They limit our ability to speak and think and to live and be creative, to have relationships, to associate freely…. ~ Snowden
333: He was a guest of the Russian Federation, whether he lived it or not. And in some sense its captive. No one knew how long his exile might last…
#TheSnowdenFiles Luke Harding