Logic and Computer Design Fundamentals

by M. Morris Mano, Charles R. Kime

Featuring a strong emphasis on the fundamentals underlying contemporary logic design using hardware description languages, synthesis, and verification, this book focuses on the ever-evolving applications of basic computer design concepts with strong connections to real-world technology. Treatment of logic design, digital system design, and computer design. Ideal for self-study by engineers and computer scientists.

Genres: Textbooks, Computer Science, Reference, Engineering, College, Nonfiction, Electrical Engineering

696 pages, Hardcover

First published April 1, 1900

Reviews

[Tinotenda Chemvura]

Very confusing and long explanations to very simple and basic concepts.

[Jukka Paulin]

Clear, concise, beautiful book on the topic of digital logic and how computer technology can be built.

[Zachary]

It was alright. My professor forgot to update his syllabus, and so I ordered this edition from 2008. Even considering that, this edition was all over the place and lacked a coherent order.

[Philip]

I'm using the 5th edition for my class, and I need to post this review somewhere because this piece of junk is one of the worst textbooks I've ever had. For visualizing and understanding difficult concepts, this author makes a pitiful attempt. Words take up about 90% of the textbook when there should be tons of diagrams. You end up wasting hours reading long and wordy blocks of paragraphs and not being able to visualize anything he's saying.

[Brian Cham]

I knew that hardware was my weakness, so I studied this entire textbook from cover to cover in the holiday period before the computer hardware course so that I would be prepared. How did that turn out? Somehow my grade for that course turned out to be my worst in my entire time at university! I appreciated the diagrams that show the flow of bits, but perhaps this installed some false confidence in me and not enough real understanding.

[Ashanan]

Very dense, but great diagrams.

[George Williams]

is a good book.

[Kaxhif Taj]

ok

[Mgt.Sarandia]

Poorly written, broken sentences, confusing qualitative descriptions.

Lacks diagrams, tables and examples.

No solution to exercise problems which are written in an overly obscure manner.