Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Days of Fire: Bush and Cheney in the White House” as Want to Read:
Days of Fire: Bush and Cheney in the White House
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Days of Fire: Bush and Cheney in the White House

4.08  ·  Rating details ·  3,144 ratings  ·  302 reviews
In Days of Fire, Peter Baker, Chief White House Correspondent for The New York Times, takes us on a gripping and intimate journey through the eight years of the Bush and Cheney administration in a tour-de-force narrative of a dramatic and controversial presidency.

Theirs was the most captivating American political partnership since Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger: a bold
Kindle Edition, 1st, 816 pages
Published October 22nd 2013 by Doubleday (first published January 1st 2013)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Days of Fire, please sign up.
Popular Answered Questions
Jason Roland It discusses briefly GWB's and Cheney's early lives and careers. Their backgrounds and what led them into politics. It follows the campaign for the pr…moreIt discusses briefly GWB's and Cheney's early lives and careers. Their backgrounds and what led them into politics. It follows the campaign for the presidency as well. The bulk of the book is about their time in office though.

The post-presidency is discussed in an epilogue. Brief but interesting.(less)

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 4.08  · 
Rating details
 ·  3,144 ratings  ·  302 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of Days of Fire: Bush and Cheney in the White House
May 23, 2014 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: politics, 9-11, terrorism
I hesitated for a good long while before I finally picked up Peter Baker’s Days of Fire: Bush and Cheney in the White House.. My hesitation had nothing do to with quality, as the book has received overwhelmingly positive reviews. It had to do with subject-matter. Though it feels like a lifetime ago (or maybe several lifetimes ago), the Bush Administration resides in our recent past. I believe that it’s hard to write good history when the history is still fresh. Instead of dispassionate analysis ...more
The first presidential election for which I was eligible to vote was in 2004, and I voted against Bush as my foray into civic participation. Given Bush's purported disinclination towards the "East Coast, Ivy League establishment," I'm guessing he wouldn't have been a big fan of mine either. However, these were not really relevant factors in my enjoying the book. If you're looking for a hagiography or a smear job you'll be disappointed.

What Peter Baker has created is an impressively smooth narra
Oct 23, 2013 rated it really liked it
"I want to hang Saakashvili by the balls," Putin told Sarkozy.
"Hang him?" Sarkozy asked.
"Why not? The Americans hanged Saddam Hussein."
"But do you want to end up like Bush?"
"Ah," Putin replied, "there you have a point."

"The president," a senior [Bush] administration official said, "thinks cutting and running on his friends shows weakness. Change shows weakness. Doing what everyone knows has to be done shows weakness."

"You know there are all these conspiracy theories that Dick runs the country .
Jan 12, 2014 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I have to admit that, much like 70% of Americans, I was not a fan of Bush and one of the main reasons I started reading this book was to bolster the opinions I had already formed. This book did pretty much the exact opposite. By no means am I saying that I will now defend the W. Bush administration. I still think you can make a strong case that he was one of the worst presidents in American history. But I walked away from this book with the belief that you can make an equally strong case that fe ...more
May 25, 2013 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: favorites
As the actions and legacy of the Bush administration have been reduced to bumper-sticker slogans and treated like bad memories to be forgotten, Peter Baker does a great job telling us what actually happened. He gives us a vivid portrait of a presidency forged in crisis and virtually defined by controversy.

The book’s compelling and fast-paced narrative is driven more by the people and personalities that inhabited it rather than actual events. Still, Baker gives us a good sense of the daily grind
As the navy steward worked his way around the table taking orders, most of the officials stuck with a simple fruit bowl. Cheney, on the other hand, ordered bacon and eggs. Hill was struck that the vice president would order something so different when everyone was going light, especially since he had had four heart attacks. (p. 567)

Ah, this book has a lot of new moments, but for some reason this late one stuck with me. Baker's book is essentially the story of a failed presidency, and a big reaso
Mar 15, 2014 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: politix
While I found this absolutely absorbing, and as readable as a Stephen King novel, and pretty well-written (just like a Stephen King novel), in the end I was sort of grossed-out by this whitewashing of Bush and Cheney posing as a balanced and critical examination of their two terms in office. It was especially a Bush love-fest. Hey, he's a smart, sensitive, caring man after all! In everything he did, he only meant well!

Almost no words spent on the Iraqi dead, which he must take responsibility for
Dec 13, 2016 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction, history
I have moved on to the next stage of my grim fascination with the US presidency from the voyeuristic masochistic delight of an introvert following the pain of the campaign to now actually reading about the actual time spent in office. I have a big fat book about Lincoln leering at me as we speak.

Anyway I am not really sure why I read this book apart from the realization that books about campaign are the gateway drugs to reading about presidents. I did not particularly enjoy the time Bush was in
Dec 17, 2013 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
First, let me say that I never voted for Bush/Cheney and can be counted among those who think they were among the worst and most destructive administrations in US history. Certainly they were in my lifetime, thus far.

Their transgressions, for me, originated with the contested election in 2000. Thought I must also say that even then I was struck by Gore's inability to carry his home state of Tennessee. It's rare when a presidential candidate doesn't carry his home state, and in this case it was
Mar 22, 2014 rated it liked it
Shelves: set-aside
I read about a third of this lengthy book before it was due at the library. It was infuriating but relentlessly competent, drawing together some original interviews but also a lot of memoirs of Bush-administration figures that I will never read, forming a thorough and perhaps unnecessarily detailed account of the Bush years. ("Laura Bush had comfort food made for dinner that night, October 6: chicken-fried steak with mashed potatoes and banana pudding for dessert.")

It is well done as history bu
Jessica (booneybear)
Sometimes it is difficult to remember that political leaders are just normal human beings dealing with extraordinary situations. This book showed a very human side to George Bush. Unfortunately Dick Cheney did not come off as sympathetically. It was interesting to see how the relationship between Bush and Cheney evolved through the 8 years in the White House. I was always one of the few people who actually felt bad for all the negative and hostile attacks against President Bush while he was in o ...more
Jan 13, 2019 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: i-own-it
Bush was my POTUS. I grew up with him as my president, so his administration was what I knew about politics for what still feels like the majority of my life (I'm in denial that the turn of the century wasn't just yesterday). I of course remember where I was on September 11, 2001 and the enduring effects of that "day of fire." I recall watching President Bush's second inaugural address while high on laughing gas at the dentist's office. And I still can feel the emotions that came with looking on ...more
Rob Smith
This as good of a historical/narrative overview of the Bush administration as we're bound to get for awhile. In Days of Fire, author Peter Baker takes us through the story of the Bush years, centering on President Bush, and (unusual for a presidential biography) Vice President Cheney. The book is a narrative, storytelling history a la Doris Kearns Goodwin (as in Team of Rivals or The Bully Pulpit. It takes from the earliest days, through 9/11, midterms, Hurricane Katrina, all the way to the last ...more
Oct 24, 2013 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: adulthood
Loved this book. Baker strikes a great balance between the wonky stuff, the power struggles in the White House, and the characters involved. The book starts with plenty of background of the major players, which sets up the conflicts and subplots during the eight years. Considering the number of people involved and the length of the book, I never had to search the index to figure out who the Undersecretary of Labor was and why they were involved. Baker sticks to the important players that are ful ...more
Jan 31, 2014 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This will probably be the definitive book on the Bush-Cheney administration. Mr. Baker has clearly consulted every source he could find, interviewed everyone available, and has produced practically a day-by-day account of the two terms that seems about as fair and factual as one could hope. It may be more than you want to know at 653 packed pages, but if you're willing to stay the course there's a lot to learn.
Among other things, Mr. Baker lays to rest the recurring notion that Cheney actually
Jan 31, 2019 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition

“Days of Fire: Bush and Cheney in the White House” is Peter Baker’s 2013 review of the two-term Bush administration. Baker is Chief White House Correspondent for The New York Times and was a reporter for The Washington Post for two decades. He is the author of books on Bill Clinton’s impeachment, the rise of Vladimir Putin and a recent biography of Barack Obama.

Based on hundreds of interviews and thousands of pages of notes and internal documents, this boo
Dan R. Celhay
Sep 08, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Reading about Bush is interesting because he had a rough time with 9/11, Katrina, the financial meltdown among other issues that seem to spring one after another. The book centers on the impression that Cheney was the one pulling the strings behind most of Bush'actions and he did rely heavily on Cheney but much less on his second term. Cheney is always referred to as "taciturn" and he has probably become one of my favorite political figures so far. ...more
I received this book as part of a goodreads giveaway and generally enjoyed the comprehensiveness of Baker's reportage, but there are some significant weaknesses as well. The general writing style is as if Baker wrote a 650 page plus NY Times article. This is not a cheap shot. It is informative, well-resourced and generally balanced. However, this book will never be considered the definitive account of the Bush presidency because the characters of Bush and Cheney demand someone who has more magis ...more
Philip Girvan
Apr 05, 2015 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
George W. Bush did not agree to be interviewed by Baker, a reporter for the New York Times, believing that a NYT reporter could not tell the story of his presidency objectively. Bush's absence is unfortunate and while it can't help but weaken the book, Baker was able to secure interviews with every other key member of the Bush administration, including Vice-President Cheney, allowing Baker to share multiple perspectives on various key events during Bush's two terms. These perspectives are reveal ...more
Kim Miller-Davis
Although it took me a couple of months to get through, this is the best book that I have read about the Bush presidency (including Bush's own memoir.) Consisting of over 650 pages chock full of meticulously researched information about events, meetings, and the decision-making process of Bush & his cabinet, Baker's political narrative delivers a thorough, fair-minded evaluation of the Bush administration. Having said that, this book is not what I expected at all.

Because of the title, my concept
Not an easy read, in fact a painful read. The misjudgments on Iraq were devastating. Yet, this is an important read, important because it so seriously, systematically and deeply examines both terms of the George W. Bush Presidency. Moreover, the author does this in a remarkably objective manner. Peter Baker conducted over 400 interviews with some 275 people as diverse as Condi Rice, Dick Cheney, Colin Powell, Stephen Hadley, Michael Hayden, Rob Portman and even John Axelrod. In addition, Baker h ...more
Nov 01, 2014 rated it it was amazing
There are many good qualities to this book to put it in the strong recommendation category.

The writing is very balanced, well researched and unobtrusive. The events of the narrative take center stage and flow effortlessly. It always felt like there were sufficient details to convey the story without getting bogged down in unnecessary minutiae.

Here’s a sample:

“Liberation, however, proved to be messier than anyone had hoped. Cheney and Makiya were right when they said that Americans would be welco
Travis Kurtz
Dec 04, 2013 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Peter Baker takes you into the most polarizing presidency in modern time. President George W. Bush had the highest approval ratings of any president; yet, by the time he left his president saw the highest disapproval ratings since the Gallup poll began. In his book, “Days of Fire” you feel as if you’re inside the White House while the decisions are being played out. Baker leaves you with many sources and commentary; the story itself makes up 653 pages with well over 100 pages of endnotes. It is ...more
Oct 28, 2013 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: reviews
Days of Fire: Bush and Cheney in the White House by Peter Baker, Chief White House Correspondent for The New York Times, who has an eye and ear on the many goings-on during the Bush administration, is no child's play. A tome of over 800 pages, it is an arduous journey through the turbulent eight years of the Bush presidency, and it is a book which many readers may not read through to the end unless they are staunch supporters or strong critics.

However, this assumption is not based on content but
Jun 03, 2014 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
In historical accounts and biographies, something that is very important to me is that the author not try to either deify or vilify the subject of the book. Days of Fire fills this requirement well. It is not an indictment nor an attempt to justify the Bush Administration, but rather gives the perspectives of different actors as situations developed and leaves you to decide the degree to which you agree or disagree. I also enjoyed how the author in his narrative, knowing "the future" of the Admi ...more
Sachin N
Oct 01, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Just finished reading this book I received through Goodreads giveaways. Was promised a hardcover but received a softcover one - no complaints!

This book is a hefty one but is a very balanced comparison between Bush and Cheney's early lives and route to their respective positions. An excellent read, this book brings out the human behind the two powerful men who ushered the world into a post 9/11 world. Many actions that we know the president took during his 8yr term, we will now come to know why h
Oct 25, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Linda by: Charlie Rose 10-22-13
This was a very interesting and perhaps enlightening read. The author didn't rag on 43's time in office but presented a factual account of his administration. Parts of George Bush is obvious, other parts showing a man more sensitive than I expected. Of particular interest to me was the widening separation between Bush and Cheney especially during the second term of office.
I don't like Cheney any better (and perhaps a bit less). Despite my being a political junkie, I still shake my head at the ma
John Campbell
Feb 27, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Reliving the turbulent years of George W. Bush's presidency by reading this book was an affecting experience. Baker does a good job giving an objective account of those years as well as telling the story of the White House's chief figures, Bush and Cheney. I think more liberals (like me) should read this book. While it didn't change my mind on my disagreement with a wide variety of Bush policies, it did show me the humanity behind the policies. Empathy is severely lacking in political discourse ...more
David Corleto-Bales
Nov 14, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2013
A very thorough and comprehensive history of the two terms of Bush and Cheney that nearly wrecked America forever; Bush went from a sort of aimless president in 2001 to being a perpetual "war president" that presided over the disastrous invasion of Iraq. Much of the blame is placed, quite rightfully so, on Dick Cheney's doorstep. As difficult to read about as it was to live through. Only for masochists. Too soon. ...more
Barry Sierer
This book is basically a re-tread of the Bush administration with little if any new information. It does portray both Bush and Cheney in a more human and sympathetic light, but author also has an irritating habit of trying to narrate what each of them was “actually thinking”, which seems to be quite a stretch.

This may be a good choice if you haven’t already read a comprehensive book on the Bush administration but if you have already done so this one may be a waste of time.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
History, Politics...: Bush and Cheney: Still not Hitler or Stalin 2 9 Apr 13, 2014 11:41AM  

Readers also enjoyed

  • The Survivor: Bill Clinton in the White House
  • Destiny and Power: The American Odyssey of George Herbert Walker Bush
  • Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America
  • Richard Nixon: The Life
  • Double Down: Game Change 2012
  • To Start a War: How the Bush Administration Took America into Iraq
  • Reagan: An American Journey
  • JFK: Coming of Age in the American Century, 1917-1956
  • Eisenhower in War and Peace
  • Coolidge
  • The Bridge: The Life and Rise of Barack Obama
  • Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War
  • Decision Points
  • Wilson
  • First in His Class: A Biography of Bill Clinton
  • The Final Days
  • An Unfinished Life: John F. Kennedy, 1917-1963
  • His Very Best: Jimmy Carter, a Life
See similar books…
There is more than one author with this name in the database.

Peter Baker has been a journalist for the Washington Post and the New York Times. He covered President Bill Clinton's impeachment trial, resulting in the book The Breach. As the Post's Moscow bureau chief, he wrote the book Kremlin Rising. He is married to the journalist Susan Glasser.

News & Interviews

  Jordan Morris is a comedy writer and podcaster whose credits include @Midnight, Unikitty! and Earth to Ned.  The sci-fi comedy Bubble is his...
30 likes · 9 comments
“to” 0 likes
“Bush felt fortified in his resolve when he stopped by Rice’s office one day that week while she was meeting with Elie Wiesel, the famed Holocaust survivor. Bush had just read Michael Beschloss’s book The Conquerors, about how Franklin Roosevelt and other leaders failed to act to stop the Holocaust. “I’m against silence,” Wiesel told him. “I’m against neutrality because it doesn’t ever help the victim. It helps the aggressor.” 0 likes
More quotes…