What do you think?
Rate this book
240 pages, Hardcover
First published October 14, 2014
Writing Style
Oh, YA! You are such a vast genre that sometimes I forget that not all books within you are written in glorious prose or verse. I'm in a slump lately, to be honest. Every single book I've read since The Tragic Age has fallen flat, because the prose simply doesn't compare. The book is written at a nice pace, no glaring factual errors exist, etc. but I'm just not getting that amazing voice from the characters or narrator.
C
Plot
The beginning of VBT is rather slow, but I really do love a good murder mystery, and once the exposition wrapped itself up, the book got a lot more interesting. McBride does a good job of pacing her story, and plot twists come up at the perfect moment, leaving me with the visual version of grabby-hands whenever I had to leave the story.
A
Characters
Mark: I was really hoping for a "more than meets the eye" with you. It was tragic that you were nothing more than a run of the mill nice (and rich!) guy waiting for your nice (and rich!) name to be cleared. When it all boils down, you were nothing more than a trope, and even your mommy issues didn't add depth.
Katie: For someone who dominates most of the story, you don't really have a voice. To be honest, I lost respect for you and thus shut you out when you were going over your plans to follow Mark to his university of choice and go to community college if necessary. Ladies, can I be real? It doesn't matter how great of a man he is, he is not worth jeopardizing your education over. No ifs, ands, or buts. (Sidenote: do the kids at Whitney go to class? I can't recall a single scene where the girls are in class and learning, aside from the AP Bio field trip to the freaking morgue, which is beyond unlikely irl. Girl, my school district has to get on their knees and beg for us to go to an art museum!)
Tessa: Tessa's voice was easily the most prominent in this book, and she is all kinds of fcked up, which is refreshing, after two bland characters narrating the entire book. However, how did McBride manage to narrate as Tessa without spilling anything for the entire book? It seems unnatural for a character to clam up about their ever-present burden, yet spew the rest of their stream of consciousness, just sayin'. Also, was Tessa's hatred for Mark ever explained? I chalk it up to Tessa possibly being queer for Katie, leading to extreme jealousy, but that would add more tragic!mogai characters, and I can't deal with that (see: The Unforgivables).
Minor characters: Steve Getty is a creep and I hate him, which is the intention of the author. It's a shame he got away with multiple counts of sexual assault/date rape, but I'll discuss that in the Unforgivables. Oh, Charlie! The lone queer character, who comes out in a tragic manner and is nothing more than the standard queer character trope! A moment of silence for all that you could have been. See the Unforgivables for more on this. Joelle is really cool. I enjoy her growth as a character through the course of the story, and she is the only character that grows in a positive way.
B*
*Note: this is only for Joelle and Tessa, who were really well-written.
Worldbuilding/Reasonability
Or honestly, the lack thereof. Did we learn anything about the town surrounding Whitney? Did we learn anything about the campus itself? A novel doesn't need fantastical elements for worldbuilding to occur. Even if this story is the most unmagical thing in the world, there still needs to be a "map" of sorts woven through the story. Weave in the character's favorite hang-out, where the police station, library, and church are at, etc. The phrase "leave something to the imagination" ≠ "leave the reader in the dark without a flashlight."
As for the reasonability aspect, many pieces of this story were far-fetched. Police search every possible area in which the crime could have occurred, and in a murder situation, the idea that they would confine the search to Whitney campus only is ridiculous. Either not enough research was done here, or the author was too lazy to flesh out the world and expand the search.
C
The Unforgivables
Perpetuating Rape Culture
Look, Joelle either got raped or assaulted, her boyfriend dumped her before hearing her out, and then she proceeds to keep quiet about it. When prodded to share her story, she's reluctant, but she finally comes around. All is looking well, and then bam! Steve Getty's picked up by his ambassador father and escapes the possibility of charges. What is this scenario supposed to do? There are enough rapists getting away with their crimes in real life! There is no need to add to the overall despair/uselessness rape victims feel. When writing topics as sensitive as these, it is necessary to show support for the group you're writing about. Just writing out their tragic story isn't enough. Give them justice within your story. That shows support, because you are taking a side. By letting Getty get away, no sides (or perhaps the wrong side) are being taken.
Tokenism
Honestly, is there any rest for queer characters in YA? Maybe it all comes from the hatred we face irl, but please! I need some escapism from daily discrimination! Reading about unhappy mogai kids breaks my heart! Let us LIVE! Also, fck outta here with the "character came out in a suicide note" trope. Do you have any idea how destructive that is? Media plays a huge role in our lives, and mogai kids already have enough people sending them subliminal/blatant "kill yourself" messages, okay? Again, let us LIVE! Give us a healthy relationship! A loving family! We aren't turning towards fiction for another dose of brutal reality, people!
Other than the inclusion of a token queer character that gets no rest, this book is the most mayo thing I've ever seen! Where are the POC? Are they mythical? Or does Whitney Prep just not recruit POC?
Does it really kill authors to flesh out a minor character and then add in a tiny detail like "they're not white/they're mogai"? Is it really that hard?
F
TL;DR
∙Inclusion alone, especially via tokenism, ≠ support of a minority group.
∙Bullshit does not a good story make--do your research!
∙Positive growth and messages in YA ≠ being a sappy, faux-deep book.