What do you think?
Rate this book
Take Your Best Shot: The Prime Ministership of Julia Gillard
The three years and three days of Australia's first prime minister: how do they really tally up.
No Australian prime minister has had to face such a difficult and challenging political environment as did Julia Gillard. Her impressive legislative record was overshadowed by pitched battles with jealous rivals and a remarkably hostile media, as well as her own struggles to communicate effectively with the public. Following her successful The Making of Julia Gillard, award-winning biographer Jacqueline Kent analyses our first woman prime minister's tumultuous term in office, drawing on a range of views and including an exclusive new interview with Gillard herself. Take your best shot is an insightful, revelatory and immensely readable account of Julia Gillard's leadership - and it's abrupt ending.
No Australian prime minister has had to face such a difficult and challenging political environment as did Julia Gillard. Her impressive legislative record was overshadowed by pitched battles with jealous rivals and a remarkably hostile media, as well as her own struggles to communicate effectively with the public. Following her successful The Making of Julia Gillard, award-winning biographer Jacqueline Kent analyses our first woman prime minister's tumultuous term in office, drawing on a range of views and including an exclusive new interview with Gillard herself. Take your best shot is an insightful, revelatory and immensely readable account of Julia Gillard's leadership - and it's abrupt ending.
127 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2013
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8 reviews
June 13, 2022
An interesting read, especially in light of the change in the political landscape all these years later. 3 stars.
May 5, 2023
A short but informative read. These little blue penguin classics are great!
January 27, 2014
What if Labour was in power…?
Ow come on, admit it. With all the recent problems besieging Indonesia-Australia relations, it is difficult not to be asking this question. Of course, as officials, we are not supposed to show any preference towards one government or another. That would be “intruding on domestic politics”, a taboo in diplomacy. Then again, for ages, western diplomats have officially indicated their preference for which South American, Middle Eastern or Southeast Asian leaders should be in power. And many times, they were even willing to go to war over this.
Book cover
I’m only human, and being human means having doubts, and of course, having preferences. I remember once writing in an essay on political theory: “contendo ergo sum”, I compare therefore I am. And when I look at how difficult relations have become between Indonesia and Australia, I can’t help but imagine how things would be if it wasn’t the Coalition government now in Canberra making the calls on Australian foreign policy towards Indonesia.
It was with these thoughts in my mind that I read Jacqueline Kent’s Take Your Best Shot: The Prime Ministership of Julia Gillard in three (or was it four) sittings.
Yes, Julia Gillard. I know most people would probably associate recent images of the ALP with Kevin Rudd. However, I’ve always felt a certain admiration for the smart, sharp-looking Ms. Gillard. Ok, Rudd speaks Chinese, and that certainly makes him cool. But somehow Gillard would be the person I’d chose as my boss (if I could ever choose bosses).
There’s a personal memory that will always remind me of Julia Gillard, Australia’s first female Prime Minister. On December 20, 2011, just as I watched Ms. Gillard meet President SBY (less than 10 meters away from me) for the first ever Indonesia-Australia Annual Leaders Meeting in Bali, my pregnant wife called me and told me that her water just broke. It was a moment in my life. And sure enough, 20 hours later, Gaia Veronika was born. I had thought of naming her Julia, but Gaia sounded close enough to Julia, I figured.
Anyways, back to the book, Kent has previously written a biography of Julia. And so, early in the book, she admitted the possibility of a certain bias, as she pictures Ms. Gillard as Cate Blanchett’s Queen Elizabeth in that 1998 Oscar winning movie. I didn’t mind this at all, because I think there has been just too much bias against Ms. Gillard throughout her leadership of the Australian government.
Kent writes that Ms. Gillard was frequently criticized for being a “nuts-and-bolts legislator, a fixer of problems, rather than a prime minister with large vision”. Many times, visionary leaders are well loved by the people. But there are also moments when the people do get tired of big words, and wish that leaders would just get down to work.
The book is not meticulously detailed, but provides an excellent overview of the challenges that Ms. Gillard faced throughout her three years and three days stay at the top of the Australian government. It talks about her battles with other legislators on issues such as climate change, finance and education. It highlights her success in a passing a sleuth of clean energy bills, achieving something that great politicians like John Howard, Malcolm Turnbull and even Kevin Rudd couldn’t do, especially not with a minority government.
The book also goes into an issue that often pits Australia against its northern neighbours: asylum seekers. Remaining conservative on this issue (unlike Mr. Rudd and his ideal of a “big Australia”), Ms. Gillard put forward the need for border management and a sustainable immigration policy. At the same time, she showed interest in the possibility of working towards a regional solution to the problem.
Of course, the book looks into two issues that seem to highlight Ms. Gillard’s term in office: her supposed inability to convey the successes of her government to the public, and her protracted battle with Kevin Rudd.
On her cold, Elizabethan public image, Kent argues that Julia is actually an eloquent speaker, who narrates in a logical and systematic way. However, her problem is that she prefers to make these speeches at the Parliament, and not in front of the media cameras. Her government had to explain complex policies to a generally resistant public, while at the same time faced the challenges of an Opposition leader who was skilled in crafting “slogans” and a media unskilled in reporting nuance. This kinda reminds me of Indonesia today.
And on dealing with Kevin Rudd, Kent describes the removal of Mr. Rudd was as swift as the Iraqi invasion. However, like that invasion, it was followed by a long period of unpredictability and instability. While Ms. Gillard is portrayed by Kent in a generously favourable manner, the undertone was obvious: the implosion of the ALP leadership. Like that really popular REM song, “Everybody hurts…”
As I finished the book, I felt my honest respect towards Ms. Gillard confirmed. Apparently, being a female Prime Minister is not easy, even in a country as democratic and egalitarian as Australia. And more so, because she didn’t feel the need to ensure a legacy by smiling pretty to the media. Because, like she said, “chasing popularity would be the death of purpose”.
Ow come on, admit it. With all the recent problems besieging Indonesia-Australia relations, it is difficult not to be asking this question. Of course, as officials, we are not supposed to show any preference towards one government or another. That would be “intruding on domestic politics”, a taboo in diplomacy. Then again, for ages, western diplomats have officially indicated their preference for which South American, Middle Eastern or Southeast Asian leaders should be in power. And many times, they were even willing to go to war over this.
Book cover
I’m only human, and being human means having doubts, and of course, having preferences. I remember once writing in an essay on political theory: “contendo ergo sum”, I compare therefore I am. And when I look at how difficult relations have become between Indonesia and Australia, I can’t help but imagine how things would be if it wasn’t the Coalition government now in Canberra making the calls on Australian foreign policy towards Indonesia.
It was with these thoughts in my mind that I read Jacqueline Kent’s Take Your Best Shot: The Prime Ministership of Julia Gillard in three (or was it four) sittings.
Yes, Julia Gillard. I know most people would probably associate recent images of the ALP with Kevin Rudd. However, I’ve always felt a certain admiration for the smart, sharp-looking Ms. Gillard. Ok, Rudd speaks Chinese, and that certainly makes him cool. But somehow Gillard would be the person I’d chose as my boss (if I could ever choose bosses).
There’s a personal memory that will always remind me of Julia Gillard, Australia’s first female Prime Minister. On December 20, 2011, just as I watched Ms. Gillard meet President SBY (less than 10 meters away from me) for the first ever Indonesia-Australia Annual Leaders Meeting in Bali, my pregnant wife called me and told me that her water just broke. It was a moment in my life. And sure enough, 20 hours later, Gaia Veronika was born. I had thought of naming her Julia, but Gaia sounded close enough to Julia, I figured.
Anyways, back to the book, Kent has previously written a biography of Julia. And so, early in the book, she admitted the possibility of a certain bias, as she pictures Ms. Gillard as Cate Blanchett’s Queen Elizabeth in that 1998 Oscar winning movie. I didn’t mind this at all, because I think there has been just too much bias against Ms. Gillard throughout her leadership of the Australian government.
Kent writes that Ms. Gillard was frequently criticized for being a “nuts-and-bolts legislator, a fixer of problems, rather than a prime minister with large vision”. Many times, visionary leaders are well loved by the people. But there are also moments when the people do get tired of big words, and wish that leaders would just get down to work.
The book is not meticulously detailed, but provides an excellent overview of the challenges that Ms. Gillard faced throughout her three years and three days stay at the top of the Australian government. It talks about her battles with other legislators on issues such as climate change, finance and education. It highlights her success in a passing a sleuth of clean energy bills, achieving something that great politicians like John Howard, Malcolm Turnbull and even Kevin Rudd couldn’t do, especially not with a minority government.
The book also goes into an issue that often pits Australia against its northern neighbours: asylum seekers. Remaining conservative on this issue (unlike Mr. Rudd and his ideal of a “big Australia”), Ms. Gillard put forward the need for border management and a sustainable immigration policy. At the same time, she showed interest in the possibility of working towards a regional solution to the problem.
Of course, the book looks into two issues that seem to highlight Ms. Gillard’s term in office: her supposed inability to convey the successes of her government to the public, and her protracted battle with Kevin Rudd.
On her cold, Elizabethan public image, Kent argues that Julia is actually an eloquent speaker, who narrates in a logical and systematic way. However, her problem is that she prefers to make these speeches at the Parliament, and not in front of the media cameras. Her government had to explain complex policies to a generally resistant public, while at the same time faced the challenges of an Opposition leader who was skilled in crafting “slogans” and a media unskilled in reporting nuance. This kinda reminds me of Indonesia today.
And on dealing with Kevin Rudd, Kent describes the removal of Mr. Rudd was as swift as the Iraqi invasion. However, like that invasion, it was followed by a long period of unpredictability and instability. While Ms. Gillard is portrayed by Kent in a generously favourable manner, the undertone was obvious: the implosion of the ALP leadership. Like that really popular REM song, “Everybody hurts…”
As I finished the book, I felt my honest respect towards Ms. Gillard confirmed. Apparently, being a female Prime Minister is not easy, even in a country as democratic and egalitarian as Australia. And more so, because she didn’t feel the need to ensure a legacy by smiling pretty to the media. Because, like she said, “chasing popularity would be the death of purpose”.
September 17, 2013
Fascinating and insightful but too brief. I wanted to delve more deeply into what makes Gillard tick. God knows, it must have been tough to be the first female PM, let alone governing with a hung parliament and with her predecessor and successor, Rudd, dividing and destabilising the party. She has my admiration. What struck me reading this book was how much she achieved despite the difficulties of her position and I wonder why leaders with her practical, productive approach are not admired as much as the glory boys who love to hog the headlines. She and Rudd were so different in styles that they could have been the dream team, instead both their political careers appear to be over. What does it say about democracy that we value sound bites and media splashes more than good honest, hard work and an ability to work with others to get things done?
September 28, 2013
Thought provoking. I did not agree with all of her observations, but thought it was a worthwhile analysis of Julia Gillard's time as our Prime Minister. The way she analyses Julia's abilities, and problems was interesting. The two oppositions are commented on, the one outside her party, and the worse one inside her party.It is a pity we have lost the MP that she was from parliament.
September 27, 2013
Definitely biased in favour of her subject but it makes for a change to read a sympathetic portrait of Gillard and her prime ministership. A good summary of her time in office and the policy she developed.
January 6, 2014
A good coverage, broad brush approach to the Gillard years. Lacks the biting analysis of "The Year My Politics Broke", in that JK takes a very traditional approach - it's a historical document not a critique. It's a quick and engaging read, it just doesn't ask very much of its broader subject.
October 2, 2014
A brief but insightful read. For a poltical biography, it has a nice blend of policy, the partisan, and the personal.
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8 reviews